sholarr12:
Having watched the first kegs of the Champions League semi finals, some lessons have been learned. Below are 5 things we learned from the Champions League:

1 Messi Is Everything: From telling Barcelona fans at the Camp Nou to stop whistling Coutinho to putting the referee under control and from scoring magical goals to creating play, Messi is everything as he is a magician, scorer, creator, and leader.

2 Liverpool Are Overhyped: Liverpool are a good team but they are not great. To be a great team, you must win trophies yet Liverpool have no trophies in decades. They constantly get close but they lose all. Their players are overhyped as well. If you have not faced Messi the way Pique and Co have faced Ronaldo, you should be humble.

3 Premiership Is Behind La Liga: There were four Premiership teams in the quarter finals but none will be in the final as Barcelona are poised to eliminate Liverpool and Ajax are to do the same to Tottenham. From Barcelona serving up a masterclass against Manchester United to winning Liverpool by 3 goals to nil, La Liga proves better than the Premiership.

4 Messi To Win Ballon d'Or: It is Messi turn to win the Ballon d'Or this season. And even if he doesn't win the Champions League, he has done enough this season to win it.
[b]
5 Barcelona Are Effective: [/b]Barcelona are without a loss this season in the Champions League and this proves their effectiveness.

Oga, you've to come back and rewrite this to 10 things we learned in the champions league

osazsky:
everyone denying Liverpool cuz they are going trophy less this season after spending more than 200m,give wolves 200 m to spend and see if they wouldn't lift d EPL,spits on kloop,floppy,spits on losserpool,ynwa fans should just hide their faces in shame and be compelled to take an oath,like the Muslim thread before been allowed to comment on any football thread,nonsence,op kudos

huuuuuuuuu.... eat ur words

Anndrew:
mumu..we are talking of individual award overall achievement both club and country...all d same Lionel messi s d GOAT

Goat wey no fit chop grass for anfield

highcollide:
Foolish opinion. It is actually Barcelona that is overhyped without messi. Take away messi what you have is alaves.


Liverpool have lost just one league match this season, they have more points in their league than Barcelona have at la liga. They haven't lost at home in 2 years....


Yesterday, the match was 50:50...Liverpool had more possession, more shots more than Barcelona...Messi was the difference. If messi was injured or salah and mane buried their chances, would you be typing this nonsense today?

Seun should do something so that nairalanders can be able to delete foolish threads by themselves.

I remember when I made this comment. I forgot to ask the barkadogs if they had what it takes to play at anfield.

Oluwaseyi00:


Arguing with you will be insulting to my repute..

Kids..

Elder sir.

Do you have more comments

maybachmusic:



yea, even when they almost raped liverpool till the final whistle


yea nothing special

na dembele give una the small mouth wey una get

cause a 4 or 5-0 win wonder what u all would be singing

How far

ImaIma1:


The special thing there was that Barcelona scored 3 and Liverpool didn't score. Isn't that special enough?

Just see how ordinary ur team was

maxwell530:
let me resolve this issue with you all that has been shouting sneidjer and Iniesta names ever since. Bro I'm firmly telling you right now that Lionel Messi truly deserves the 2010 award. This award is individual award for God sake and no player performed better than Lionel Messi that year, he was the highest goalscorer in La Liga (34) the highest in champions league 8,Copa Del Rey (1) club world cup (2) super Copa(1).he scored total of 47 goals that season. So you want to overlook all this individual stats because sneidjer win ucl/trebles?
If you think Messi didn't deserve 2010 award, that means Ronaldo didn't deserve 2013 too cuz he didn't win La liga nor ucl but he won ucl highest goalscorer with 12 goals,he didn't even score more than Messi in the league. Arjen Robben and Frank Ribery won trebles but none performed individually than Ronaldo.

I normally don't do this comparison btw this 2 legends but you guys won't just stop comparing and downgrade one just because you love another. I have said it in my early post, only when you watch this 2 greats with open mind can you appreciate what football is all about.

Even in the wc he had how many goals that year?
I will argue this matter pa,
He doesn't deserve it customers he Neva ucl or champions League that year, you were just saying goals, what or cr7, last year in ucl, he didn't even win the player of ucl, messi was always favoured, I tell you.
Messi is a better player than cr7 anytime any day , but that 2010 was a No, did he even score in that world cup at all, Bros leave shit, sneidjer really tried that year I beg

maxwell530:
let me resolve this issue with you all that has been shouting sneidjer and Iniesta names ever since. Bro I'm firmly telling you right now that Lionel Messi truly deserves the 2010 award. This award is individual award for God sake and no player performed better than Lionel Messi that year, he was the highest goalscorer in La Liga (34) the highest in champions league 8,Copa Del Rey (1) club world cup (2) super Copa(1).he scored total of 47 goals that season. So you want to overlook all this individual stats because sneidjer win ucl/trebles?
If you think Messi didn't deserve 2010 award, that means Ronaldo didn't deserve 2013 too cuz he didn't win La liga nor ucl but he won ucl highest goalscorer with 12 goals,he didn't even score more than Messi in the league. Arjen Robben and Frank Ribery won trebles but none performed individually than Ronaldo.

I normally don't do this comparison btw this 2 legends but you guys won't just stop comparing and downgrade one just because you love another. I have said it in my early post, only when you watch this 2 greats with open mind can you appreciate what football is all about.

Zidane , Figo and Co how many goals them score before given the award, r9 only came to play in the wc 2002 , and won it , what are we saying here ,
He Neva deserved it

mixta140:

Even in the wc he had how many goals that year?
I will argue this matter pa,
He doesn't deserve it customers he Neva ucl or champions League that year, you were just saying goals, what or cr7, last year in ucl, he didn't even win the player of ucl, messi was always favoured, I tell you.
Messi is a better player than cr7 anytime any day , but that 2010 was a No, did he even score in that world cup at all, Bros leave shit, sneidjer really tried that year I beg

what about 2013 then? Who deserves it in 2013?

mixta140:

Zidane , Figo and Co how many goals them score before given the award, r9 only came to play in the wc 2002 , and won it , what are we saying here ,
He Neva deserved it

even a goalkeeper has won it the past. But how many midfielders has won it in recent years ? I mean in the era of Ronaldo/messi. You think Iniesta wouldn't have won Atleast one in the era of zidane, figo and the likes? Ronaldo changed the structure and criterion for the award in 2008 and I believe he's changed it forever.
The award is more like a golden boot award now. Why do you think the Final 3 nominees in the last decade has always been attackers except Neur in 2014? Today you hear alot of people saying Hazard don't stand a chance because he doesn't score much. Why do you think Mbappe is being tipped ahead of Hazard already? Most Messi and Ronaldo fans frowned at modric award and believes he doesn't deserve it more than Ronaldo,what exactly is their reason if not Goals?
If you believe Messi didn't deserve it 2010,how did Ronaldo deserve it in 2013 ahead of Ribery, Robben?

maxwell530:
even a goalkeeper has won it the past. But how many midfielders has won it in recent years ? I mean in the era of Ronaldo/messi. You think Iniesta wouldn't have won Atleast one in the era of zidane, figo and the likes? Ronaldo changed the structure and criterion for the award in 2008 and I believe he's changed it forever.
The award is more like a golden boot award now. Why do you think the Final 3 nominees in the last decade has always been attackers except Neur in 2014? Today you hear alot of people saying Hazard don't stand a chance because he doesn't score much. Why do you think Mbappe is being tipped ahead of Hazard already? Most Messi and Ronaldo fans frowned at modric award and believes he doesn't deserve it more than Ronaldo,what exactly is their reason if not Goals?
If you believe Messi didn't deserve it 2010,how did Ronaldo deserve it in 2013 ahead of Ribery, Robben?

How come modric did the last

maxwell530:
what about 2013 then? Who deserves it in 2013?

What happened

mixta140:

Just see how ordinary ur team was

None of them is my team. It was just a fact and observation

ImaIma1:


None of them is my team. It was just a fact and observation

Thathe ain't fact

mixta140:

How come modric did the last

if you can't comprehend what I'm saying, don't quote me again.
Bye

mixta140:

Thathe ain't fact

Did Liverpool score? No

How many did Barca score? 3

They both created chances and one team converted the chances to goals.

Do the math. Barcelona was a better team for that match.

mixta140:

What happened

Robben won the trebles with Bayern with style (abi you have forgotten how they beat Barça 7:0 on agg in semi final?)

Barça won La Liga
Messi won Golden Shoe


But Ronaldo won Balon d'Or because he won Copa Del Rey


if you still don't know what happened in 2013. Don't Quote me again.


Bye.

maxwell530:
Robben won the trebles with Bayern with style (abi you have forgotten how they beat Barça 7:0 on agg in semi final?)

Barça won La Liga
Messi won Golden Shoe


But Ronaldo won Balon d'Or because he won Copa Del Rey


if you still don't know what happened in 2013. Don't Quote me again.


Bye.

Same to him too, then he doesn't deserve it too.

ImaIma1:


Did Liverpool score? No

How many did Barca score? 3

They both created chances and one team converted the chances to goals.

Do the math. Barcelona was a better team for that match.

I disagree,

ImaIma1:


Did Liverpool score? No

How many did Barca score? 3

They both created chances and one team converted the chances to goals.

Do the math. Barcelona was a better team for that match.

When barca played Chelsea then in the Champions league, barca played better Chelsea won,,,

maxwell530:
if you can't comprehend what I'm saying, don't quote me again.
Bye

You Don vex, if una Wan dabaru something the next thing is you can't comprehend, what's there to comprehend.

mixta140:

When barca played Chelsea then in the Champions league, barca played better Chelsea won,,,

We are talking about the Barca and Liverpool 1st leg match. Besides, a team supposedly playing better is inconsequential when they lose the game, especially when they concede three goals and score none.

Even if they played better, their mistakes or inability to make use of their chances already made them lesser team.

mixta140:

I disagree,

It is allowed

ImaIma1:


We are talking about the Barca and Liverpool 1st leg match. Besides, a team supposedly playing better is inconsequential when they lose the game, especially when they concede three goals and score none.

Even if they played better, their mistakes or inability to make use of their chances already made the lesser team.

I get

ImaIma1:


It is allowed

Smiles