ifunanyababe:
The controversy over Saudi Crown Prince MbS's alleged orchestration of the murder of Saudi dissident Jamal Khashoggi has largely subsided since the government insider-turned-critic walked into the kingdom's consulate in Istanbul in early October and never walked out. But a new controversy is brewing over one of the kingdom's most controversial practices: Its mass-beheadings of men convicted of 'terrorism' charges, typically members of the Shiite minority living in the eastern part of the kingdom. Saudi Arabia has long practiced execution by beheading. But this year, the mass extermination of 37 of mostly Shiite men this week provoked condemnation from the UN and other human rights organizations, as several teenage boys were executed for crimes as seemingly petty as sending Whatsapp messages about government demonstrations.

Read the full story/news here:



The complete news made me cry... What's UN doing sef?
https://ebeanonews..com/2019/06/saudi-kingdom-beheads-16-year-old-for.html

AlBaqir:
This is insane. "Crime" commited at 10 years old. That age is not even baaligh بالغ - grown up - as far as Sharia is concerned. How barbaric it is to now come (8 years later) to crucify him for the "crime" he committed when he was a baby?

In Islam, there is no sin and no punishment for a crime committed by non-baaligh (unmatured), an insane person and somebody asleep. Obviously Saudi does not practice Islam. Saudi only uses Islam as a tool to shield her crimes and atrocities.

aadoiza:

Those bloody mumu salafi won't speak out against this barbarity, trust me, I know this. As long as it is Saudi sullying the image of Islam, we cannot or no allowed to talk about it. Even a mad man could see Saudi has gone astray
This is age of information, so they cannot hide their devilry as they used to.

Empiree:
they are busy talking about how Muslims hate Saudi because of recent moonsighting. You never see these people bring up ahadith that criticized this evil kingdom.

If those brothers truly follow sunnah why are they silent on this so called "Sunnah country"?. Why they never ever quoted the ahadith?.

They were busy few days ago just talking about how Muslims and some Arab countries came up with Wednesday end of Ramadan and not Tuesday as saudi alleged. Our only respect for Saudi Arabia is because of Mecca and Medina. There is nothing there after these two major cities

How the heck in the world Saudi Arabia killed a boy because of protest?. This is very nasty. See how major media outlets silent (i really don't need their broadcast/propaganda anyways). If it is Pakistan or other Muslim countries they are not pleased with they would be everywhere and they would have crucified Islam for it.

This is very shameful. I'm not against loving a scholar or country. But if loving them blindly regardless of their evil activities doesn't shake your heart, what sort of blind love is that. They are relatively silent as if it is nothing to write about. This further throws suspicions the guys are getting stipends from Saudi authority. Wrong is wrong regardless whenever they did it to Shia or fellow sunni

Empiree:
This Is The Hadith They Don't Quote. They Dare not quote it in Saudi Arabia. They will be locked up or beheaded. Sayyidina Muhammad Ibn Andullah(saw) reported to have said:





** “There shall be Prophethood (nubûwwah) among you for as long as Allâh wishes it to be among you. Then it shall be lifted up when Allâh wishes to lift it up.


** Then there shall be successorship (khilâfa) on the pattern (minhâj) of Prophetship for as long as Allâh wishes it to be. Then it shall be lifted up when Allâh wishes to lift it up.


** Then there shall be a trying kingship (mulkan `addan) for as long as Allâh wishes it to be. Then it shall be lifted up when Allâh wishes to lift it up.


** Then there shall be a tyrannical kingship (mulkan jabrîyyatan) for as long as Allâh wishes it to be. Then it shall be lifted up when Allâh wishes to lift it up.


** Then there shall be successorship on the pattern of Prophetship.”



SOURCES

Narrated from Hudhayfa by Ahmad with a sound chain as stated by al-Zayn in the Musnad (14:163 #18319) and as indicated by al-Haythamî (5:188-189): “Narrated by Ahmad, al-Bazzâr with a more complete wording, and al-Tabarânî partly, in al-Awsat. The narrators in its chain are trustworthy.” Also narrated from Abû `Ubaydah by al-Tabarânî in al-Kabîr (1:157) with the wording “Then there shall be kingship and tyranny” after the mention of successorship.



I believe that we have reached the pinnacle of these kingships before disagreement ensued within house of Saudi with regards to succession. The last successionship mentioned in the Hadith is emergence of Imam Mahdi (as).

From this Hadith we can infer that the current kingdom of Saudi Arabia is not proper guidance of Islam. Any wonder this Hadith is not mentioned in Sahih Bukhari and Muslim they so much love to quote?. That's very suspicious because they can easily tell us that this Hadith is not Sahih. Who is fooling who?

panafrican:
The British should take over that Kingdom and make it an oversea British territory .

QueenSekxy:

They have infiltrated Britain. Infact, britain has been conquered 70% by these terrorists.

Empiree:
This Is The Hadith They Don't Quote. They Dare not quote it in Saudi Arabia. They be locked up or beheaded. Sayyidina Muhammad Ibn Andullah(saw) reported to have said:





** “There shall be Prophethood (nubûwwah) among you for as long as Allâh wishes it to be among you. Then it shall be lifted up when Allâh wishes to lift it up.


** Then there shall be successorship (khilâfa) on the pattern (minhâj) of Prophetship for as long as Allâh wishes it to be. Then it shall be lifted up when Allâh wishes to lift it up.


** Then there shall be a trying kingship (mulkan `addan) for as long as Allâh wishes it to be. Then it shall be lifted up when Allâh wishes to lift it up.


** Then there shall be a tyrannical kingship (mulkan jabrîyyatan) for as long as Allâh wishes it to be. Then it shall be lifted up when Allâh wishes to lift it up.


** Then there shall be successorship on the pattern of Prophetship.”



SOURCES

Narrated from Hudhayfa by Ahmad with a sound chain as stated by al-Zayn in the Musnad (14:163 #18319) and as indicated by al-Haythamî (5:188-189): “Narrated by Ahmad, al-Bazzâr with a more complete wording, and al-Tabarânî partly, in al-Awsat. The narrators in its chain are trustworthy.” Also narrated from Abû `Ubaydah by al-Tabarânî in al-Kabîr (1:157) with the wording “Then there shall be kingship and tyranny” after the mention of successorship.



I believe that we have reached the pinnacle of these kingships before disagreement ensued within house of Saudi with regards to succession. The last successionship mentioned in the Hadith is emergence of Imam Mahdi (as).

From this Hadith we can infer that the current kingdom of Saudi Arabia is not upon proper guidance of Islam. Any wonder this Hadith is not mentioned in Sahih Bukhari and Muslim they so much love to quote?. That's very suspicious because they can easily tell us that this Hadith is not Sahih. Who is fooling who?

mizmia:
Funny you. Pakistan is a Shia country.

post=79202775:

This Shiite issue is an international problem.
They are upcoming terrorists.
Our government should not take it with kids gloves.
And you see so animals supporting this same group, clamoring that their leader should be released from detention,
all because of the hatred they have for their country and president.
Infidels. I heard you grill vultures for those patronizing you. All the terrorists we know in Islam are sunnis, from boko haram to Isis.



This is the only thing we won't support.
And we believe this is what the UN are kicking against.

post=79202775:

This Shiite issue is an international problem.
They are upcoming terrorists.
Our government should not take it with kids gloves.
And you see so animals supporting this same group, clamoring that their leader should be released from detention,
all because of the hatred they have for their country and president.
Infidels.



This is the only thing we won't support.
And we believe this is what the UN are kicking against.