tuniski:

We shall know when Prof Yakubu shows up at the tribunal with the required documents which include the election results.

The petitioner is driving at something and it is interesting.

guy honestly do you believe atiku won buhari in katsina ? Katsina !!. You know that's not true , but choose to be political . It's just like saying buhari won in rivers state

callmeVIBRANT:
Your witness testify against you.. chai!!

Na own goal be dat na!

frankmoney:
guy honestly do you believe atiku won buhari in katsina ? Katsina !!. You know that's not true , but choose to be political . It's just like saying buhari won in rivers state

I believe Atiku could defeat buhari in any state except Yobe and Borno. So, it won't be surprising if he won there. The Buhari mojo had really gone down long before the election. I had hoped for a free and fair election that truly reflect the wish of the people irrespective of the winner.

tuniski:

Quite unfortunate submission.

Wetin dey unfortunate inside my comments.
Person die? Or you break for leg ?

lielbree:

The poster forgot to add that the testimony of the witness testified in favour of Atiku.

Yes but its a waste in the absence of proof

tuniski:

I believe Atiku could defeat buhari in any state except Yobe and Borno. So, it won't be surprising if he won there. The Buhari mojo had really gone down long before the election. I had hoped for a free and fair election that truly reflect the wish of the people irrespective of the winner.

you still choose to lie to yourself ... Atiku cannot win buhari in katsina , same way buhari can't win in any SS or SE states ... Go and check the records only a fellow katsina candidate yaradua

Rebelutionary:
that's not the point...the point is, your witness shouldn't contradict your evidence. It shows lack of coordination between Atikus counsel and their litany of confused witnesses.

He is under oat. He has the right to say what he believes in. At least it shows PDP did not coach him on what to say. The judges will decide finally.

garfield1:

Yes but its a waste in the absence of proof

Did the witness say he has no proof to support his claim?

frankmoney:
you still choose to lie to yourself ... Atiku cannot win buhari in katsina , same way buhari can't win in any SS or SE states ... Go and check the records only a fellow katsina candidate yaradua

Atiku/PDP can win Buhari in katina just like it happened in 2007. Katsina has always been a PdP state.

But you believe Buhari/apc can defeat Atiku/pdp in Adamawa, right? Only free and fair election can genuinely reflect the people's preference at any given time.

Who ever thought Donald Trump would win In 2016? Election are fluid.

Gforce2019:


Wetin dey unfortunate inside my comments.
Person die? Or you break for leg ?

It was just drivel .

Ruggedniggaone:
let court cancel results of those states rigged by buhari and APC and declare atiku winner sikena

And those rigged by pdp be accepted abi?

tuniski:

Atiku/PDP can win Buhari in katina just like it happened in 2007. Katsina has always been a PdP state.

But you believe Buhari/apc can defeat Atiku/pdp in Adamawa, right? Only free and fair election can genuinely reflect the people's preference at any given time.

Who ever thought Donald Trump would win In 2016? Election are fluid.

oga I said yaradua not atiku .... Stop being political , yaradua and buhari are both from katsina , even yaradua admitted that his election was filled with irregularities ... And yes I doubt if buhari can win atiku in adamawa in an election. And for your last question , a whole lot of people did

Ruggedniggaone:
let court cancel results of those states rigged by buhari and APC and declare atiku winner sikena

Even when Atiku witness is contracting what Atiku early presented to the tribunal?

tuniski:

Atiku/PDP can win Buhari in katina just like it happened in 2007. Katsina has always been a PdP state.

But you believe Buhari/apc can defeat Atiku/pdp in Adamawa, right? Only free and fair election can genuinely reflect the people's preference at any given time.

Who ever thought Donald Trump would win In 2016? Election are fluid.

Did you read where Atiku himself submitted to the tribunal that PMB won in Katsina? You are really doing more harm than good to yourself

tuniski:

That was a good testimony . He simply insist that PDP ain't defeated in Katsina. Like the state PDP agent earlier posited.

And isn't that contradicting to you?

Afamed:

And isn't that contradicting to you?

It was consistent with Katsina state PDP's position.

The essence of the petition is to prove that INEC's results are fraud before anything else.

Afamed:

Did you read where Atiku himself submitted to the tribunal that PMB won in Katsina? You are really doing more harm than good to yourself

Yes, Atiku's position is based on transmitted results while the katsina PDP's based on their own situation room.
What this does is to raise real doubt about inec's result. The essence is to invalidate inec's entire charade.
If you have 3 results emanating from same election what would you do?

frankmoney:
oga I said yaradua not atiku .... Stop being political , yaradua and buhari are both from katsina , even yaradua admitted that his election was filled with irregularities ... And yes I doubt if buhari can win atiku in adamawa in an election. And for your last question , a whole lot of people did

I deliberately brought PDP into it so that perhaps you see the connection. Everything mustn't be explained like we are in elementary class.

Ruggedniggaone:
let court cancel results of those states rigged by buhari and APC and declare atiku winner sikena

guy you don't need court to do that.. Cancel the results by yourself

ultimateGreen:


it shows u don't read the post... Atiku witness did not testify again him...

Atiku and PDP conceded that APC won them in Zamfara but there witness disagreed that PDP won the presidential election in Zamfara....


so read the body of any post before u comment not just heading!!!

Oga, it still the same contradiction. Atiku presented a petition based on the alleged results gotten from a certain INEC server, therefore, all his witnesses are expected to align with the evidence of the petition which is the INEC server results. the witness could have just said APC won there but it was heavily rigged.

Nemesis909:


Your own witness's testimony going well against your claims.

Atiku, the maga that continues to pay.

Out of 40 just 1 that miss road and dose not know where he belongs.

tuniski:

I believe Atiku could defeat buhari in any state except Yobe and Borno. So, it won't be surprising if he won there. The Buhari mojo had really gone down long before the election. I had hoped for a free and fair election that truly reflect the wish of the people irrespective of the winner.

You practically don't know what you are saying.

tuniski:

It was consistent with Katsina state PDP's position.

The essence of the petition is to prove that INEC's results are fraud before anything else.

Atiku said he didn't win in Katsina state with his submission to the tribunal his agent thought otherwise and you said there was consistency in their statements. Definitely you are full of contradiction

Afamed:

Atiku said he didn't win in Katsina state with his submission to the tribunal his agent thought otherwise and you said there was consistency in their statements. Definitely you are full of contradiction

The problem is your comprehension in context. The entire petition is challenging the INEC results. While Atiku said apc won relying on the result transmitted, the PDP katsina consistently insist PDP won.

Now 3 results are being claimed. That has introduced further contention. The legal team knew exactly their strategy. They presented witnesses whom they knew would dispute the entire claim of both atiku and inec/apc on purpose.

Let me ask you again where 3 results are being claimed, what would do as a member of the panel?

Afamed:

You practically don't know what you are saying.

You surely dont or better still, you didn't comprehend my submission.

tuniski:


The problem is your comprehension in context. The entire petition is challenging the INEC results. While Atiku said apc won relying on the result transmitted, the PDP katsina consistently insist PDP won.

Now 3 results are being claimed. That has introduced further contention. The legal team knew exactly their strategy. They presented witnesses whom they knew would dispute the entire claim of both atiku and inec/apc on purpose.

Let me ask you again where 3 results are being claimed, what would do as a member of the panel?

They will do nothing sir without proof.only one person or body is empowered to declare results and results must be in a format as prescribed by the electoral act.until the pink copies of results of pdp agents contradicts that of the ctc,it is a waste..

Ayasayas:
Out of 40 just 1 that miss road and dose not know where he belongs.

Which ones know where they belong

tuniski:

You surely dont or better still, you didn't comprehend my submission.

You dont actually.everybody cannot be wrong.didn't you once say that 1.3 million is 27% of 8.5 million?
Didn't you also claim that kwara will go to atiku?
Didnt you claim that vote percentages are calculated only between apc and pdp? Guy,respect yourself.you are lucky that this is a faceless forum allowing you to get away with your trash

garfield1:

You dont actually.everybody cannot be wrong.didn't you once say that 1.3 million is 27% of 8.5 million?
Didn't you also claim that kwara will go to atiku?
Didnt you claim that vote percentages are calculated only between apc and pdp? Guy,respect yourself.you are lucky that this is a faceless forum allowing you to get away with your trash

Are you everybody? Even that your reference equally shows your narrowness in statistical mapping. I dont know your field but, you surely didn't get it me.

Everybody can even be wrong like it was with most scientific discovery where traditional views were challenged.

tuniski:


Are you everybody? Even that your reference equally shows your narrowness in statistical mapping. I dont know your field but, you surely didn't get it me.

Everybody can even be wrong like it was with most scientific discovery where traditional views were challenged.

I still maintain that you are empty politically and legally.maybe you are well versed in other fields but certainly not here.you are becoming a nuisance

tuniski:

You surely dont or better still, you didn't comprehend my submission.

Keep quiet,you are always full of contradiction in every thread on Nairaland. You are fast becoming a nuisance here

garfield1:

I still maintain that you are empty politically and legally.maybe you are well versed in other fields but certainly not here.you are becoming a nuisance

The guy is really becoming a nuisance on social media