garetz:
This has nothing to do with Bolton's sack, Trump has always said he is willing to meet with Rouhani to negotiate a new deal

shaggy007:


And Bolton was against it.

So, yes, it has everything to do with Boltons sack

shaggy007:


And Bolton was against it.

So, yes, it has everything to do with Boltons sack

garetz:

It has nothing to do with his sack

dermmy:


Do you listen to news at all? Even Trump confirmed that they had disagreement over some issues and he doesn't like Bolton's policies.

Check this https://www.nairaland.com/5413375/trump-discussed-easing-iran-sanctions

garetz:

Yeah he said they disagreed over some issues but he never mentioned it was over Iran, instead he mentioned Venezuela and Cuba.

dermmy:


Lol. And you think Trump would tell the whole world he disagreed with Bolton over Iran and NK. He wouldn't want the world to see that US is losing the fight against Iran and NK in its pressure campaign against the two countries but we are not fooled they actually disagreed over Iran and North Korea.

The pressure campaign against Iran is even pushing Iran towards getting nukes and the talks and meeting with NK has not yeilded any fruitful result, Kim has said he wants a mutual concession and i think Trump has seen the truth. The Iranians are stubborn and keep demanding US lift sanction, Kim wants concessions from US too. You can see that the Iran and NK issue looks similar Iran wants sanctions to be lifted while NK also wants some sanctions to be lifted too.

US has proved to be an untrusted power over the decades, look at what they did to Ghaddaffi they made him gave up Libya's nuclear ambition and promised him they won't embark on regime change which they later did.

From what i have seen so far Trump wants to negotiate but Bolton had been hindering that. Infact Mike Pompeo should tread carefully else what befell Bolton would befall him.

garetz:

All these things you are saying is just assumptions and conjecture. Until there is any evidence that it had anything to do with Iran, that's what it will remain. The facts available from everybody involved in the matter is that it had nothing to do with Iran

garetz:

It has nothing to do with his sack

michlins:
[s][/s]Obama gave Trump the best political platform to perform but he choose people like Bolton who're puppets of NRA and defense contractors to advise him. With American debt exceeding $22trn and cost of energy increasing, America can't afford any more wars. That's why he had to sack Bolton, bring Iran to negotiating table so that they can flood the international market with crude. Without that, crude is bound to go back to $80 per barrel or even more.
Cheap energy is what American companies need now to combat the onslaught from their Chinese counterparts whose government is purposely devaluing the yuan to ensure companies don't leave in the wake of the new tariffs[s][/s]