Ihedinobi3:

It's my privilege to serve you, my friend. And thank you kindly for the reassurance and clarification.

As you said, they all really happened, and our Lord used them all to teach:

34All these things Jesus spoke to the crowds in parables, and He did not speak to them without a parable.
Matthew 13:34 NASB

Grace be with you, my friend.

Amen

solite3:
thank you very much for your wonderful thought and advise.
I know not to overstep scripture limits when conversing with people concerning the truth. I wasnt inferring that the parables where false

I dont think anyone has advanced that parables were false.

I am on record to have proposed that parables usually have a plethora of lessons, moral truth in them and that they actually are a faithful representation of reality.

solite3:
because whatever parables the Lord made where things that really happened and the people could relate with, for example, the parable of the sower however in the case of Lazarus and the rich man

Which is why I asked you the below keeping resurfaced questions, hmm? lol
1/ Do you know what happened, as in meaning what Jesus did, a few weeks after He narrated the parable of the Rich Man and Beggar Poor Man named Lazarus to the crowd?
2/ Most of the verisimilitude characters in Jesus' parables, hardly have names, but the name of the beggar poor man was given.
Do you know why Jesus, on purpose, gave Lazarus, as the name of the beggar poor man, in that Luke 16:19-31 parable narrative, hmmm?

solite3:
although Jesus might have used it for teaching, it something that really happened

The conversation between the unnamed rich man and beggar poor man named Lazarus never happened. Nothing really happened in parables solite3. A parable is a faithful representation of reality, it in itself, is not reality, biko, joor now.