@ eldee,

it'd be wrong, based on dis clip, to assume dat any govt would direct its military to attack harmless, innocent civillians --- & i also want to believe dat it is possible dat most of such people (like these 1s in d clip) might have been caught & suitably punished.

but something else should come to bear --- why is there need for some of such damaging materials not to be released to the larger public!? thats in the direction we outta be thinking cuz right now i don't see any good that dis leaks have brought but more chaos!

RuuDie:

@ eldee,

it'd be wrong, based on dis clip, to assume dat any govt would direct its military to attack harmless, innocent civillians --- & i also want to believe dat it is possible dat most of such people (like these 1s in d clip) might have been caught & suitably punished.

but something else should come to bear --- why is there need for some of such damaging materials not to be released to the larger public!? thats in the direction we outta be thinking cuz right now i don't see any good that dis leaks have brought but more chaos!

They are voices, they have a right to be heard . . . if those people in the video were British, they'll be on the Guardian's front page/
The system set up to give them a chance has not shown us the fact that 120,000 people died for nothing.

What Wikileaks has done is given you and I a right to see for ourselves and make our own judgements what the people we voted into power have done with the powers we gave em.
The military court marshals have become a joke . . . how can a general that just gave an order to blow up an Iraqi town be the one to judge a junior officer that shot 10 people??

RuuDie:

GB (Glenbeck) on FOX TV has a pretty interesting conspiracy theory that ties in the Wikileaks saga to the riots in London and some other events. . . . pretty interesting how he put it all together, sound logical reasoning backed with pictorial & video evidence too --- wish i could get the video and play it all over again.

WOW

WOW