ezegold4we:
What he's asking for is a review of the fundamental errors committed by Supreme Court where the total number of votes cast is higher than the total number of registered voters in IMO state,

Supreme Court or supreme scam scored an own goal in that hatchet judgement,

It must be correct becos 1+1 must be 2 and not 4,hope u guys making noise will understand

Have you not heard that whatever the Supreme Court said the Law is, is what it is?

Even where Supreme Court gave judgement in error, that's what the Law is. It cannot reverse itself because it's the Supreme Court and not a court of Appeal or cry cry Court. The principle of collective responsibility binds them.

.

[s]

CanadaOrBust:


So why did PDP win the rerun recently held in the same Hope’s “stronghold” where he got 99.99% of the votes with 100+% voter turnouts! At least u concede that Ihedioha will win Mbaise any day

Look, in all elections there are errors and shenanigans and most people try to “rig” to some extent. That’s why a premium is placed on whatever is declared as the result after all that. And that’s why the bar for removing an incumbent is high.
[b]After all the games and maneuverings, Ihedioha was declared the winner, and Hope finished FOURTH. [/b]That’s the baseline and u don’t lightly change that, u don’t change that through some highly questionable childish documents!

The SC did not examine Hope’s documents neither did they do any tabulation AT ALL. They accepted his figures and tabulations without examination or interrogation.

U don’t remove an incumbent based on such, no matter how he was elected.

Consider the Uzodinma documents they relied on to replace an 8-month incumbent governor with a FOURTH place finisher: not only were they full of ridiculous numbers, they were also incomplete, smudgy, full of alterations, signed only by APC, and showed results for only APC and PDP out of 70 parties!

YOU DON’T REPLACE AN INCUMBENT BY ACCEPTING CLEARLY FRAUDULENT DOCUMENTS AND REFUSING TO TABULATE CLEARLY RIDICULOUS NUMBERS!!

Never in Nigerian judicial history (or any authentic democracy for that matter) has the SC ruled against ALL lower courts AND the election authority itself in order to immediately replace a sitting governor with a 4th-place finisher - all based on clearly questionable, uncollaborated, and unauthenticated documents supplied solely by the 4th-place finisher himself!!

Supreme Court cases set precedents that lawyers will cite ad infinitum.
Here’s the precedent set here:

A person that comes 10th can easily be declared winner and immediately replace the incumbent. All they’d have to do is present result sheets which the Supreme Court MUST accept no matter how outrageous and defective they may be, as long as no one can produce the originals!
That’s what u r supporting!
———————————

Vanguard. Tuesday, January 28, 2020
Imo Guber: How Supreme court erred in computation of results

*Declared more votes than accredited voters
*Failed to interrogate petitioners’ evidence
*Avoided mentioning figures in a written judgment

[/s]

Onojanson:
The most they will do is to order a rerun in those units. With APC in control of everything in this country, they will win by fire by force.

I concur

maestroferddi:
You speaking ignorantly...

There were only seven justices in the panel that adjudicated that case.

We all know the antecedents of the largely handpicked justices....

They either fell in line or their files would be dusted up by EFCC...

The judiciary here are blindingly being teleguided by Buhari so quit trying to build something on nothing...

Is That what transpired in zamfara and rivers?

ezegold4we:
What he's asking for is a review of the fundamental errors committed by Supreme Court where the total number of votes cast is higher than the total number of registered voters in IMO state,

Supreme Court or supreme scam scored an own goal in that hatchet judgement,

It must be correct becos 1+1 must be 2 and not 4,hope u guys making noise will understand

This is supposed to be the responsibility of the so-called Nigerian bar association as a professional and regulatory body, to uphold the sanctity and sanity of the country's ailing laws and precedents.uphold.

Just hope the lawyers are not doing this just to collect more money from ihedioha. Politicians seems to be their cash cows nowadays

Centcanada:
when you don't know what to sat it write, kindly read peoples comment and enjoy it. Don't just comment because you re too gullible or just because you want some gullible like you to laugh on what you comment. The world need those that contribute sensibly and I urge you to be one.

Mr I know it all, can you please take your knowledge and wisdom somewhere else ... I think to respect others opinion is the basis of wisdom...
If you want to debate or contribute to national issues, you can create your own site and bring your likes with you ... or better still contest for an election .
This is Nairaland own by seun Osewa .

garfield1:

Is That what transpired in zamfara and rivers?

No point wasting time on you.

Zamfara and Rivers cases were obvious legal issues...

TOPCRUISE:
This man is still in pain. His Lawyers are continuing to mislead him. Ihedioha's lawyers are the worst when it comes to election petition. They did a very bad infact a worstest job at the supreme Court. Since there is no return leg for supreme Court hearing, Ihedioha and co will continue to lick their wounds.

They are so bad they won at tribunal and appeal

recievesense:
If Uzodinma can be favoured, keep trying. You never know.

Keep dreaming

kynbasil01:
That's what the illiterate terrorist cjn should do

Pls don't deny: you're also a terrorist for recognizing another terrorist.

maestroferddi:
No point wasting time on you.

Zamfara and Rivers cases were obvious legal issues...

So Imo state was obvious illegal issue abi?

maestroferddi:
No point wasting time on you.

Zamfara and Rivers cases were obvious legal issues...

But that of imo was not obvious legal issues? You cant even shift goal posts properly

Kuginzi:

So Imo state was obvious illegal issue abi?

Don't mind the loser,right from the declaration of igedioha which didnt meet the spread,it became an issue of legality

the battle has not been lose or won

different matters

Shaaaaaaa !! speak no more my child.oya go to children's section..

majamajic:
APC govt magic , from 4th to 1st


Even when the numbers didn't add up

The fact remains that Hope will do far better than Emeka


That's how Anambra got their break through , Ngige did his best to convince Anambra people , which is almost the same position Hope is now.

Emeka might got his mandate back later when Hope might have pushed to state to a better direction , cos Emeka was clueless, he started poorly !!!

penukz2015:
Shaaaaaaa !! speak no more my child.oya go to children's section..

If seen dey give us rank for here, u for go wash public toilet this morning for this your

garfield1:

Yes,areas with overvoting are just 6 polling units.hope will still be winner after the cancellation

That is not the only problem. The votes recorded exceeds number of accredited voters from card readers by more than a hundred thousand and plus.

The PDP is of the opinion that the whole 388 or say 364 was forgery and the formula the supreme court used to arrive at Hopes number doesn't exist and must only be inequalities.

LadyExcellency:


That is not the only problem. The votes recorded exceeds number of accredited voters from card readers by more than a hundred thousand and plus.

The PDP is of the opinion that the whole 388 or say 364 was forgery and the formula the supreme court used to arrive at Hopes number doesn't exist and must only be inequalities.

Inec should add the accrediration figure from the 388 units.thats not even an issue.
If the 388 unit result was forged,they never proved so in court and cannot now do so.the formula used in arriving at hopes number is embedded in our electoral act and in several decided cases.please see kakih vs pdp 2002 per jsc uwais.
See uduma vs arunsi 2010

garfield1:

Inec should add the accrediration figure from the 388 units.thats not even an issue.
If the 388 unit result was forged,they never proved so in court and cannot now do so.the formula used in arriving at hopes number is embedded in our electoral act and in several decided cases.please see kakih vs pdp 2002 per jsc uwais.
See uduma vs arunsi 2010

The accredited voters registered on the card readers from the polling units are constants.

The acclaimed 388 polling units were not all missing rather Hope claimed his counts were omitted in most.

Moreover, where are the card readers to confirm the accredited voters from missing booths? The INEC rejected the APC/ Hope presentations because of what I stated already.

The INEC specifically ordered no card reader, no elections hence the sum total of aggregate votes from the machines in Imo State is less one hundred thousand plus votes and vote can neither be created nor destroyed making the supreme court verdict an illegality

LadyExcellency:


The accredited voters registered on the card readers from the polling units are constants.

The acclaimed 388 polling units were not all missing rather Hope claimed his counts were omitted in most.

Moreover, where are the card readers to confirm the accredited voters from missing booths? The INEC rejected the APC/ Hope presentations because of what I stated already.

The INEC specifically ordered no card reader, no elections hence the sum total of aggregate votes from the machines in Imo State is less one hundred thousand plus votes and vote can neither be created nor destroyed making the supreme court verdict an illegality

Stop being stubborn.our laws does not recognize the card reader as a means of certifying or nullifying elections.the constitution states that to prove over voting,you must use the manual voters register not card reader and the supreme court has rrluled this severally.
See otti vs ikpeazu supra 2020

Blackeuropean:
Are you sure the will even review the case?

. That is your fear and the fear of APC and Hope Uzodinma supporters, they did know that the supreme Court will accept to review the case, and what they don't know is more than half of the judges of the supreme Court are in support of the review and are insisting on the review to mess up Tanko Muhammad who desolved the panel for that case three times

garfield1:

Stop being stubborn.our laws does not recognize the card reader as a means of certifying or nullifying elections.the constitution states that to prove over voting,you must use the manual voters register not card reader and the supreme court has rrluled this severally.
See otti vs ikpeazu supra 2020

What you are suggesting INEC to do now is go manufacturer non existing register?

There are no register to support Hope's fake results according to INEC hence INEC has refused to their Imo State guber records online

LadyExcellency:


What you are suggesting INEC to do now is go manufacturer no existing register?

There are no register to support Hope fake results

Inec should do nothing.uzodinma remains governor and thats final.if they are bothered,they should look for the 388 polling unit manual registers,am sure it was ticked.if you also looked at the results presented by hope,accredited voters figure was stated there

durangokid:
. That is your fear and the fear of APC and Hope Uzodinma supporters, they did know that the supreme Court will accept to review the case, and what they don't know is more than half of the judges of the supreme Court are in support of the review and are insisting on the review to mess up Tanko Muhammad who desolved the panel for that case three times

You are very funny.the supreme court cannot reject any application before it.they will always accept and then throw it back at your face.the panel was not reconstituted three times,only one member was replaced in that panel who was ill.the supreme court is always united in anything.i can bet with you if your ready

maestroferddi:
You are not making sense....

I am sure that you are not privy to the submissions canvassed by Ihedioha's legal team.

You can hire one million Gani Fawehinmis but if the judge is biased or has a vested interest, he would legal technicalities to vapourize your case/argument.

I would rather you stick to what you have a clue about...

The bolded is the elephant in the room they’re pretending not to notice!

durangokid:
. That is your fear and the fear of APC and Hope Uzodinma supporters, they did know that the supreme Court will accept to review the case, and what they don't know is more than half of the judges of the supreme Court are in support of the review and are insisting on the review to mess up Tanko Muhammad who desolved the panel for that case three times

I fear nothing, I want justice and nothing more, I asked this question because I know how corrupted Nigeria System is.

Blackeuropean:


I fear nothing, I want justice and nothing more, I asked this question because I know how corrupted Nigeria System is.

ok I understand you now, that is my dear too

I nearly thought this Ihedioha is smart sef .Shaaaaai shame on him

Uzodinma knows that an average Imolite hates him...he should better step aside before the unimaginable happens to him ..