JusticeSeeker:
NOT even INEC has the power cancel a polling unit result after been declared by a presiding officer.

Dansuqi:


Agboriotejoye read this

Agboriotejoye:

It was an error of judgement. Even in the judgement, she made mention of the inec official who testified and the incidence forms he brought filled by the presiding officers for each polling unit, then went forward to claim that they never contested that elections held. So what were the incidence forms for? The duplicates were not certified. The act she quoted said a duplicate can replace the original not that it needs not be certified. The judgement was an error.

Agboriotejoye:

INEC did file a cross petition. Same with ihedioha at trial. You're not conversant with the case. Go and read about it. Besides, if INEC is empowered to conduct elections and declare results, they are also empowered to cancel elections which is what they did. Incidence forms are part of electoral guidelines which are recognised by law. INEC said there were no elections to begin with. Not to talk of results.

Agboriotejoye:

I keep saying you're not conversant with the case. If the results were signed by inec officials why were they now described as not certified?

What high court affirmed hope's candidacy? Did the high court vacate the order given by the federal high court to nwosu that APC should not submit any other name apart from his own? That's the only subsisting court order on the matter. You can show us the one affirming hope's candidacy if you indeed have it.

Here's a copy of the SC judgement affirming that only APC polling agents signed the results sheets

Agboriotejoye:

I have read it and responded appropriately.

Dansuqi:

Keep quiet and learn.incidence forms are inferior to result sheets.the cross appeal pdp filed were at the appeal and supreme court and it was not in connection with the 388 results.since you cannot obey or recognize simple laws,it is a waste of time.you can see how others that tried arguing ended up insulting you.you are impossible and cannot be reason with

Dansuqi:

The error is from you not her.she s a seasoned judge in election matters unlike you that is starting this year.a duplicate given to parties and the original held by inec are the same thing and accorded the same benefits.challenging results in an election result sheet is a difficult task and pdp failed to discharge it and time has elapse

Dansuqi:


AN Abuja High Court on Wednesday recognized Senator Hope Uzodinma as the candidate of the party for the 2019 Imo governorship election.
The court, which was presided over by Justice O.A Musa said that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) must also recognize only Uzodinma as the governorship candidate in the 2019 election.
Justice O. A. Musa who gave the restraining order on Tuesday, also restrained INEC (2nd Respondent) in the case from processing or publishing the “name of any other person other than Senator Hope Uzodimma from the All Progressives Congress (APC) as the gubernatorial candidate for Imo State Governorship election for 2019” pending the determination of the substantive suit on the matter.
Uzodimma through his lawyer, Joe Agi (SAN) had approached the court seeking an order to restrain the All Progressives Congress (APC) from conducting a fresh or re-conducting another primary for the Imo State Gubernatorial primaries and INEC from monitoring or purporting to monitor any fresh primaries or re-conducted primaries by the APC in Imo State Gubernatorial Election pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice before the Court.
Other reliefs sought by Senator Hope Uzodimma include:
An order directing the APC to forward his name (Uzodimma) to INEC as the Gubernatorial Candidate for Imo State Governorship Election for 2019.
An order restraining INEC from continuing to process or publish any other person’s name except the name Senator Hope Uzodimma; and an order for accelerated hearing on the matter.
In his affidavit in support of the motion exparte, the claimant (Uzodimma) averred that he was declared the winner of the Imo State APC gubernatorial primaries which were conducted on October 1, 2018, but shortly after he was declared the winner, “the National Chairman of the APC issued a press statement on the 3rd October 2018 purporting to cancel the primaries and re-conducting a fresh one.”
He added that none of the contestants in the election protested the result as declared by the returning officer “but rather six out of the nine contestants (Aspirants) confirmed that the primaries held and were free and fair.”
The Plaintiff noted in its affidavit that noted that the electoral guidelines do not give the National Chairman of the APC or the National Working Committee (NWC) to interfere with the electoral process; and that “out of the nine contestants (Aspirants) six agreed that there was an election and I (Uzodimma) won.”
He further averred that in the absence of an appeal, no organ of the party can cancel the result of primaries. He said failure of the Court to grant the order, “irreparable damage will be done to me.”
The Court has fixed October 16, 2018, for definite hearing of the matter.
It would be recalled that five of the governorship aspirants declared support for Senator Hope Uzodinma as winner of the Imo State governorship primaries conducted on Oct. 1 by the Ahmed Gulak Election Committee.
https://www.tribuneonlineng.com/168395/

That is for hope uzodinma.

.the supreme court did not affirm thst only apc agents signed the results.you did not read the piece well.it said learned senior counsel that is lawyer to pdp averred that result sheets were not signed.it is what we called pre judgment summary or reading,it is not her judgment.it is not everything contained in a judgment that is actually the judgment,always read carefully.before judges give their judgment,they read out all the prayers and claims of the two lawyers and then decide.
It was a mere allegation from pdp that remained unproven.scroll down and you will see her actual judgment.again,I've defeated you

Agboriotejoye:

You can also go to hell. You're partisan and that is your undoing. Incidence forms are filled when irregularities occur in an election. The question of superiority or otherwise do not arise. They are not a supplement for each other so what's the meaning of inferior in this matter. Where elections are cancelled, there will be no results and incidence forms will be filled detailing why the elections were cancelled. So, what does inferiority have to do in the matter. The 388 results can only exist if elections were free and fair and not cancelled. Well... They were cancelled.
If you want to talk about superiority, you'll talk about the original and duplicates not two separate forms serving different purposes

Agboriotejoye:

Well, it's obvious that there are conflicting judgements now. So, it still shows that hope's candidacy is not fully recognised. Besides, even the supreme court recognised nwosu as validity nominated APC candidate hence why he was disqualified.

The results were not signed. Even the judgement recognised that. That's why she held that since it's a duplicate, it need not be certified though she was wrong. She quoted that evidence act wrongly.

Agboriotejoye:

It's obvious that the body that's suppose to have the original and give out duplicates say such does not exist. The duplicates are also not signed by anybody but APC agents. They cannot replace inec presiding officers. She relied on a law that says duplicate can replace original. But that's under the assumption that the duplicate was issued along with the original but here, INEC says there's no original.

Dansuqi:

Once results are entered in result sheets,it means that elections held.incidence forms came alongside the card readers.both are not recognized by the electoral act.the electoral act has provided ways in which to prove none holding of elections and incidence forms is not part of it.
By the way you are even more partisan than me.you cant even hide it

Agboriotejoye:

Results were entered by who? INEC who are given the power to enter result said they didn't write result and that elections were cancelled. They are the only body approved by law to write results. If they say they didn't write it and their agents did not sign it, then it's not from them simple. Result is not a poem to be written by whoever feels like. Incidence forms are recognised by inec guidelines. Inec got those guidelines from the electoral act. As long as it's not in conflict with the electoral act, it's valid.

Dansuqi:

The judgment did not recognize that form ec8as were not signed,the judge was only re-echoing what apc and pdp presented in their briefs.stop embarrassing yourself,people are taking note.accept the truth and move on.

There is no conflicting judgment on hope's candidacy.i have posted a judgment recognising him,you have failed to tender yours.this is how pdp lawyers fumble at the court.
Even if there is another conflicting judgment confirming nwosu,it is from a high court which is of coordinate jurisdiction.both judgments have nullified each other meaning that the status quo as of when there was no judgment remains.the status quo was apc recognizing uzodinma and there was no appeal and by the time the supreme court ruled,it was statute barred.
Your case and that of pdp is bound to fail and it has failed

Dansuqi:


You have contradicted yourself.for there to be duplicate,there must be originals.inec failed to convince the courts about the non existence of the original.two copies exist which are that of apc and police and the courts will go with that.
No proof exist that the results were not duke signed,you have copies of the result,why not post it here?
The judge followed a law that treats both original and duplicate as one.no other law was quoted by pdp or inec to counter that law.even if we are assuming,the purpose of duplicate copies is a safeguard against the original.once the original is missing,we simply use the duplicate.it simply fulfilled its duties

Dansuqi:

What did the supreme court say about card readers and inec manual guidelines?

Agboriotejoye:

[b]Supreme court said card readers are not recognised by the electoral act and cannot replace the manual register. [/b]The incidence form were never under contention.
You can tell me what SC said about inec manual

Dansuqi:

The bolded extends to incidence forms which came out alongside card readers.

Agboriotejoye:

That is so not true. The judgement was given against card readers because election in Nigeria is a manual process. That's what the constitution says. Incidence form is not electronic so how does that judgment affect it?

Agboriotejoye:

Go and read the judgement. The judge agreed they weren't signed by INEC. That in itself makes it a forgery. A forged document can have no original. We have such cases with oluwole waec certificates. They have no original. They are fake. You can also tell us who declared the originals missing. Except you want to accuse INEC of conniving with Ihedioha and throwing away the original, to all intents and purposes, we have to believe what iNEC said that the results did not emanate from them.

Even in the case of buhari were the original is missing, it was waec who came and certified the copy not buhari. What supreme court is claiming is buhari could have also just went to a printer and print a duplicate since the original is missing.
The law she quoted never said the duplicate need not be certified. She decided that one by herself to reach a predetermined end.

Go and get the copies from uzodinma. He's your friend. He has everything.

Agboriotejoye:

That is so not true. The judgement was given against card readers because election in Nigeria is a manual process. That's what the constitution says. Incidence form is not electronic so how does that judgment affect it?

Dansuqi:

Stop deceiving yourself man.no judge agreed that copies were not signed.post the parts of the judgment were the judges admitted that results were not duly signed firstly.
Secondly,inec are alleging forgery by uzodinma therefore they must be proven beyond doubt like in the bayelsa case.ofvourse we are accusing inec of colluding with ihefioha since most adhoc stuffs were from mbaise.inec can only be believed if they 0rove themselves beyond doubt.
The case of atiku and buhari cannot apply here because atiku never said buhari forged his certificates.his prayers were that buhari did not submit copies of his results to inec and that buhari does not possess the qualifications he claimed to have in form cf001.

Since you claimed that she misinterpreted the evidence law,please post it here let us carefully scrutinize it.until then,you lose

Dansuqi:

It affects it because it works with card readers,it is an extension of it,a corollary.it is used when card readers fail.it cannot stand.it is tied to the card reader.give up before you become a laughing stock

Agboriotejoye:


It is not an extension of card reader. It serves a different purpose of recording events that occur during election not just for card reader failure. It's like a report sheet. Card reader is for accreditation. Incidence form plays no role in accreditation. You're confused.

Dansuqi:

Stop deceiving yourself man.no judge agreed that copies were not signed.post the parts of the judgment were the judges admitted that results were not duly signed firstly.
Secondly,inec are alleging forgery by uzodinma therefore they must be proven beyond doubt like in the bayelsa case.ofvourse we are accusing inec of colluding with ihefioha since most adhoc stuffs were from mbaise.inec can only be believed if they 0rove themselves beyond doubt.
The case of atiku and buhari cannot apply here because atiku never said buhari forged his certificates.his prayers were that buhari did not submit copies of his results to inec and that buhari does not possess the qualifications he claimed to have in form cf001.

Since you claimed that she misinterpreted the evidence law,please post it here let us carefully scrutinize it.until then,you lose

Dansuqi:

Was there incidence forms before 2015 polls or not?

kahal29:


Seriously I tire for the guy.

Agboriotejoye:

If you have a problem with English I can't help you further. I don't know maybe you can't read the parts I posted before, I really can't help you. After I showed you in the judgement that PDP raised that they were not certified, you said it's PDP's argument and not a position accepted by the judge. I then showed you were the judge agreed they were not certified but quoted evidence act to show they don't need to be certified. So what else do you want? It's obvious you're being willingly blind and unfortunately, I don't do miracles. Even from media reports the said result sheets contain only results for PDP and APC to the exclusion of the remaining 68 parties. But i'm sure you're not aware of that as well.
I like the fact you are now accusing inec of colluding with an opposition party. It brings everything down for you unfortunately. If INEC can collude with PDP, how can it not be that our very corrupt police can't collude with APC to present fake results given their antecedents and the fact that the subpoena did not even follow the right process? Even the result sheets presented by the police were 366 instead of 388.

In the case of Buhari, I hope you are aware Buhari submitted a waec certificate carrying his picture and a name of "Mohammed" instead of "Muhammadu" is that not a clear case of forgery in dis matter?

I'm not pasting anything for you again bros. You can paste them yourself since you're so sure.

kahal29:


Seriously I tire for the guy.

Agboriotejoye:

Tire for yourself and your zombeism. Go and read pg40-41 of the judgement you pasted and see where the judge agreed that the duplicates were not certified but relied on evidence act to claim they need not be certified. Don't be like your brother.