ForeThinker:
City go win this match hands down !!

Maxcollins042:
How did Sterling miss that sitter? E pass Yakubu Aiyegbeni own.

uncastableodd:
Wow in DJ khaled voice it is another one ..

#367,000 in the bag ..

And funniest thing na my school fee a take play this game ..If you can't risk it in life ,you will never make it in life ..

I hope the idiots credit me very early on Monday morning

TheGoodJoe:
However, both Ferdinand and Hart believe there was clear contact on Laporte, albeit unintentional, and the goal shouldn't have stood.

"I think it's a foul," Ferdinand told BT Sport.

"If I'm on that pitch, it's got to be. He's connected and he's the one who went on to score. City were dominating at that time.

"There is 100 per cent contact. I don't understand how they can't call that? People will be saying conspiracy theories now if you're a City fan.

"I believe that's a foul and it's the man who goes on to score the goal."


"It's not intentional, that's clear but there is a clash of legs," Hart added.

"Does it then go with the referee's decision because he's seen it?"

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/man-city-var-ferdinand-hart-18776960.amp

---

Funny if anyone still thinks there is no gang up against Manchester City.

Corrupt folks.

Righteousness89:
Man city Fans Stay Calm..

We will Send a High Powered Delegation to UEFA..

There Must be a Second Leg...

Dembele Cannot Go Scot Free..

Sleekfingers:
Another isi ewu and stouts loading for me tomorrow....i bet on lyon straight win....na so bayern gimme sara money yesterday

Slynation:

Oga let us hear word.... At least City did not score any goal and VAR cancelled him

They should channel their blame instead to Sterling for missing what my grand mom would have scored comfortably

foleskay:
Thank you lyon. I just won 270k. A whole 14 odds enter just like that. Today is my cash out day after 6yrs of betting. . Thamk you jesus

boujeeassnigga:
Baba u try oh, abeg help a bro wit 1k na, 2088702513UBA, MAY GOD BLESS U

TheGoodJoe:


Sterling missing a clear goal does not give the right to the referee to allow an illegitimate goal. What kind of logic is that?

EbukaHades10:
L that I've forgotten that it ever happened??
Abeg

TheGoodJoe:
Sterling missing a clear goal does not give the right to the referee to allow an illegitimate goal. What kind of logic is that?

Pickieox:
All these clubs and American Wrestling continue fooling the gullibles...

TheGoodJoe:
However, both Ferdinand and Hart believe there was clear contact on Laporte, albeit unintentional, and the goal shouldn't have stood.

"I think it's a foul," Ferdinand told BT Sport.

"If I'm on that pitch, it's got to be. He's connected and he's the one who went on to score. City were dominating at that time.

"There is 100 per cent contact. I don't understand how they can't call that? People will be saying conspiracy theories now if you're a City fan.

"I believe that's a foul and it's the man who goes on to score the goal."


"It's not intentional, that's clear but there is a clash of legs," Hart added.

"Does it then go with the referee's decision because he's seen it?"

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/man-city-var-ferdinand-hart-18776960.amp

---

Funny if anyone still thinks there is no gang up against Manchester City.

Corrupt folks.

ReeLoaDead:
WWE is fixed. Soccer is not. Or which sport do you recommend instead?

ReeLoaDead:
Why do you think Lyon's second goal was illegitimate?

Pickieox:
Make your findings. Life is a journey bro...

Slynation:

Just maybe if City had converted most of their chances, the scoreline would have definitely be in their favour.... To think it was a team most people branded the "farmers" baffles me a lot...Now they crying VAR this, VAR that, they should all shut da phuck up....!!

I think the UEFA BODY needs to look into this and adopt this one legged tie on a neutral ground just to carry the underdog teams along, It has exposed the weaknesses of the so-called Top_dogs with the mentality of home/away fixtures.... Imagine RB_Leipzig and Lyon in a champions league Semi finals, who would have ever thought things would happen this way...."It is what it is"

ReeLoaDead:
You make the claim, the onus is on you. If you cannot do so then it is obvious you are just make unsubstantiated claims.

Pickieox:

I'll give you a tip, then you fix the puzzle yourself. Why do you think FIFA and UEFA are at times embroiled in corruption saga. Who are the brains behind sport betting all over the world? Be a seeker brother, find the truth yourself...

TheGoodJoe:


The guy who stepped over the ball was in an offside position. That is interference. Secondly, Dembele fouled Laporte to gain advantage to score. That is a foul.

No way the goal should stand.

---

However, both Ferdinand and Hart believe there was clear contact on Laporte, albeit unintentional, and the goal shouldn't have stood.

"I think it's a foul," Ferdinand told BT Sport.

"If I'm on that pitch, it's got to be. He's connected and he's the one who went on to score. City were dominating at that time.

"There is 100 per cent contact. I don't understand how they can't call that? People will be saying conspiracy theories now if you're a City fan.

"I believe that's a foul and it's the man who goes on to score the goal."


"It's not intentional, that's clear but there is a clash of legs," Hart added.

"Does it then go with the referee's decision because he's seen it?"

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/man-city-var-ferdinand-hart-18776960.amp

ReeLoaDead:
The corruption issues has nothing to do with match fixing ... don't you have the intellectual curiosity to dig further and find out what those charges were for?

TheGoodJoe:


I like the one leg format and neutral ground. However, it does not change the facts. This is not about Lyon but the corrupt reoccurrence against City.

ReeLoaDead:

But bro - VAR cleared that goal!