Xisnin:



Stick to what you know!

Fashola is a medical illiterate.

Sanitizers are not only antibacterial.
As general advice for your health, just because something is written on the body(that is not how drugs are prescribed)
it doesn't mean it is good for you.

The information on packages are for ignorant laymen and not for experts and
many sanitizers do not mention bacteria on their body(since that is what you are fixated on).
Most that do mention germs which is a non-technical term encompassing virus, bacteria, fungi and
other disease-causing agents.


Do you even know what a virus is?


When your basics are wrong all your listed points are wrong. This isn't politics where opinion reins.
This is science.

BTW, did they write on the body of the soap and water you use that it kills virus?
Why would you use soap and water when it is not written on the body?

NGpatriot:
[s][/s]


The only illiterate I see here is you.

They are antibacterial regardless of whatever else they use them for. PERIOD.

Can you show us a bottle of sanitizer that says antiVirus?

This is why olodo people fail WAEC, they ask them if it's antibacterial or not and they answer back that you can also use it for this and that?

Where is the sense in acting as if you know more than the manufacturers that put antibacterial on the bottle instead of antivirus?

Your issue just moved from illiteracy to rettardation.

Xisnin:


What a stark illiterate
He uploaded a photo of hand sanitizer killing "germs" but he is still arguing blindly.
You are a danger to yourself and those around you.


Copy and paste more text that you don't understand.

You will soon win the Darwin award
Just ask Kyari how far.

mikezuruki:


You didn’t understand the source you quoted. Fashola said rubbish.

mikezuruki:


What of China and other advanced countries that advised we use sanitizers?

Xisnin:
Fashola is 100% wrong.
He is a lawyer.
Don't listen to medical illiterates, listen to real experts or read medical and research literature.

Virus are far more fragile than bacteria.
Any solution(sanitizer or not) with 70% alcohol will destroy any kind of virus.
Lower concentration sanitizers will also destroy viruses if used in sufficient quantities.

Xisnin:
Fashola is 100% wrong.
He is a lawyer.
Don't listen to medical illiterates, listen to real experts or read medical and research literature.

Virus are far more fragile than bacteria.
Any solution(sanitizer or not) with 70% alcohol will destroy any kind of virus.
Lower concentration sanitizers will also destroy viruses if used in sufficient quantities.

NGpatriot:



The only illiterate I see here is you.

They are antibacterial regardless of whatever else they use them for. PERIOD.

Can you show us a bottle of sanitizer that says antiVirus?

This is why olodo people fail WAEC, they ask them if it's antibacterial or not and they answer back that you can also use it for this and that?

Where is the sense in acting as if you know more than the manufacturers that put antibacterial on the bottle instead of antivirus?

Your issue just moved from illiteracy to rettardation.

mikezuruki:
I saw a clip where Fashola said we are trying to prevent the spread of a Virus and not bacteria hence we don’t need hand sanitizers because it is used for bacteria.

This I not only find unintelligent but a high level ignorance was displayed. He did think about ways one can contract it before making such shameful statement.

But if I’m wrong and he’s right, I stand to be corrected.

Cheers

NGpatriot:


1. Sanitizers are antibacterial, not an antivirus, Fashola was 100% CORRECT and there's not a single sanitizer out here that says antivirus sanitizer because they are antibacterial regardless of what other things you use it for.

2. Regardless of access to soap and water or not, it doesn't change the fact that hand washing is far superior and more effective than hand sanitizers..

3. Yes, hand sanitizers are provided as alternatives, but they are not effective, they give you nothing but a false sense of protection, this is why the CDC put out advisories to highlight the superior effect and effectiveness of handwashing over sanitizers.

4. Again, Fashola was 100% correct and the CDC agreed with him.


5. Fashola never said you should not use sanitizers, he only highlighted the fact that it's antibacterial, rightfully so, a perfect and correct statement. He also emphasized the importance and better effect of handwashing.

6. This is why my first post in this thread referenced poor comprehension on other people's part, they either did not watch the video or did but didn't comprehend.

I use sanitizers, but with the understanding that I'm not 100% protected and still must be careful and vigilant until I'm able to do proper handwashing with soap and water.

Instead of losing sleep over this issue, stick to what you believe in, stick to sanitizers and let other people stick to handwashing, it's your choice.

Btw, I'm not a lawyer or a doctor, but I know a lot about this virus, about how to protect myself and what I need to do either per handwashing or sanitizer, this is common sense and you don't have to be a lawyer or doctor to know all that.

NGpatriot:



Hand sanitizers are antibacterial regardless of whatever else they use them for.

Is there not a reason why you can not show us any sanitizer that says anti-virus?

Illiterate, your elementary and basement mentality is getting more and more embarrassing and totally boring.

Whats kyari got to do with the topic?

Now I see you are just another illiterate ipob shallow and empty head comedian.

NGpatriot:


1. Sanitizers are antibacterial, not an antivirus, Fashola was 100% CORRECT and there's not a single sanitizer out here that says antivirus sanitizer because they are antibacterial regardless of what other things you use it for.

2. Regardless of access to soap and water or not, it doesn't change the fact that hand washing is far superior and more effective than hand sanitizers..

3. Yes, hand sanitizers are provided as alternatives, but they are not effective, they give you nothing but a false sense of protection, this is why the CDC put out advisories to highlight the superior effect and effectiveness of handwashing over sanitizers.

4. Again, Fashola was 100% correct and the CDC agreed with him.


5. Fashola never said you should not use sanitizers, he only highlighted the fact that it's antibacterial, rightfully so, a perfect and correct statement. He also emphasized the importance and better effect of handwashing.

6. This is why my first post in this thread referenced poor comprehension on other people's part, they either did not watch the video or did but didn't comprehend.

I use sanitizers, but with the understanding that I'm not 100% protected and still must be careful and vigilant until I'm able to do proper handwashing with soap and water.

Instead of losing sleep over this issue, stick to what you believe in, stick to sanitizers and let other people stick to handwashing, it's your choice.

Btw, I'm not a lawyer or a doctor, but I know a lot about this virus, about how to protect myself and what I need to do either per handwashing or sanitizer, this is common sense and you don't have to be a lawyer or doctor to know all that.

mikezuruki:


What of China and other advanced countries that advised we use sanitizers?

Aphrygian:
viruses are more fragile than bacteria,is this a joke? Something that exists at the submolecular lever, do you no some can exist as particles for years?https://www.oie.int/doc/ged/d8191.pdf

Xisnin:

Yes, they are more fragile.

You didn't even read the link you posted as it deals exclusively with the fragile virus
and nothing on bacteria. No part of the summary supports your position.


You are obviously a layman, virus doesn't exist in submolecular level.
In fact, it is made up of many molecules.

Even your irrelevant argument is mute, an atom is more stable than an electron(a subatomic particle)
and a molecule more than an atom.

Check the meaning of molecules first before you use the word.

We have bacteria that can survive a nuclear winter and thrive in extreme conditions.

An average bacteria leave a virus in the dust for stability.

NGpatriot:


1. Sanitizers are antibacterial, not an antivirus, Fashola was 100% CORRECT and there's not a single sanitizer out here that says antivirus sanitizer because they are antibacterial regardless of what other things you use it for.

2. Regardless of access to soap and water or not, it doesn't change the fact that hand washing is far superior and more effective than hand sanitizers..

3. Yes, hand sanitizers are provided as alternatives, but they are not effective, they give you nothing but a false sense of protection, this is why the CDC put out advisories to highlight the superior effect and effectiveness of handwashing over sanitizers.

4. [s]Again, Fashola was 100% correct and the CDC agreed with him.
[/s]

5. Fashola never said you should not use sanitizers, he only highlighted the fact that it's antibacterial, rightfully so, a perfect and correct statement. He also emphasized the importance and better effect of handwashing.

6. This is why my first post in this thread referenced poor comprehension on other people's part, they either did not watch the video or did but didn't comprehend.

I use sanitizers, but with the understanding that I'm not 100% protected and still must be careful and vigilant until I'm able to do proper handwashing with soap and water.

Instead of losing sleep over this issue, stick to what you believe in, stick to sanitizers and let other people stick to handwashing, it's your choice.

Btw, I'm not a lawyer or a doctor, but I know a lot about this virus, about how to protect myself and what I need to do either per handwashing or sanitizer, this is common sense and you don't have to be a lawyer or doctor to know all that.

mikezuruki:
I saw a clip where Fashola said we are trying to prevent the spread of a Virus and not bacteria hence we don’t need hand sanitizers because it is used for bacteria.

This I not only find unintelligent but a high level ignorance was displayed. He did think about ways one can contract it before making such shameful statement.

But if I’m wrong and he’s right, I stand to be corrected.

Cheers

6digitscomrade:
obviously u passed through school school never went through you.. don’t ever deceive yourself in solitude that u weren’t a science student I’m vast because I gave education and knowledge a chance..

mikezuruki:


Truth be told, you didn’t say anything.

989900:
Fashola is passing on a poor understanding of how stuffs work here.

1. Hand washing with soap (especially a microbial one) is still number 1.

2. All hand sanitizers are not mates.

3. 60% and above alcohol based 'antimicrobial' hand sanitizers is almost as good hand washing with soap.

4. Washing with Dettol is bae!

P.S. 95% Alcohol Methylated Spirit would rip apart most germs/microbes, novel Corona virus inclusive.

sweetsell:
[s]Even your own submission exposed that you are being foolish. I bet you are Igbo ?

Watch the Fashola clip n note what he said about the emboldened. [/s]

6digitscomrade:
yes because I’m an old English man and we have a saying say nothing and keep saying it.. I didn’t expect an infant to understand me it wasn’t meant for feeble and cradle minds.. u can now go look for legos and build ur marvel characters.. let adults discuss..run along kiddo

mikezuruki:


Lol
You should run along old man. I created the thread.
Mumu. I’m sure you know what it means

6digitscomrade:
that u are the young landlord of the thread and like everything u can mess on it .. no yawa I understand u

NGpatriot:




Nigerians and poor comprehension skills, he was right because sanitizers are not all that effective, hence his views that hand washing is far more effective than sanitizers, that was the context and the point he was trying to make, wash your hands instead of depending on sanitizers as if it's the magic bullet.


Wash your dirty hands.

mikezuruki:


I no Dey beef you Bro.
But next time, try correct someone instead of cheap insults.
No body Dey above making mistakes

NGpatriot:
[s][/s]


The only illiterate I see here is you.

They are antibacterial regardless of whatever else they use them for. PERIOD.

Can you show us a bottle of sanitizer that says antiVirus?

This is why olodo people fail WAEC, they ask them if it's antibacterial or not and they answer back that you can also use it for this and that?

Where is the sense in acting as if you know more than the manufacturers that put antibacterial on the bottle instead of antivirus?

Your issue just moved from illiteracy to rettardation.