purples25:
A friend, Eyeness, made a topic on something similar and i believe it was misunderstood. She was referring to what a woman should do based off the experience of dealing with men that REFUSE TO MAKE ANY EFFORT in their relationships. What i wonder, is why anytime a woman mentions 'comfort' men go crazy calling her a gold digger and all sorts.

It is not wrong for a woman to have standards. This DOES NOT MEAN THAT SHE WILL NOT WORK, or that SHE WILL DEPEND SOLEY ON HIS MONEY. In such cases she just wants someone she can truly depend on.

In my opinion, even if you wish to pick a poor man, pick one that, if he has the opportunity, he will treat you as you deserve. Even if, in a year, he comes across 5000, out of it, he will do something for you, with 1000. Someone that is ready to DO SOMETHING, to be A MAN. Not some dude that just wants to be sleeping with you forever, and he neglects you emotionally, not calling and all. Then also, when he has little money, cannot even appreciate you. This very behavior is what drives the woman to the rich man. The poor man can be nasty and neglectful. At least, even if the one thing gained from a rich man is being cared for to some extent, it is better than the poor man, who schemes to trap a woman with claims that if she does not stay, she is a gold digger: yet these poor men neglect their women like rags.

purples25:


I think you didn't bother to read my post. If this is your only reaction, then probably you think that even mentioning standards is bad for a woman to do. That's terrible and one sided, because as a man, you surely go for what benefits you.

TheCork:



Please can u take 500 naira cash for kiss, hug & romance wit u please? I pay cash please. Was your nomba please?

purples25:

TheCork:


Ok I will pays u 1000 naira cash for sex... Deal?

purples25:


Go and find a brothel na

purples25:
A friend, Eyeness, made a topic on something similar and i believe it was misunderstood. She was referring to what a woman should do based off the experience of dealing with men that REFUSE TO MAKE ANY EFFORT in their relationships. What i wonder, is why anytime a woman mentions 'comfort' men go crazy calling her a gold digger and all sorts.

It is not wrong for a woman to have standards. This DOES NOT MEAN THAT SHE WILL NOT WORK, or that SHE WILL DEPEND SOLEY ON HIS MONEY. In such cases she just wants someone she can truly depend on.

In my opinion, even if you wish to pick a poor man, pick one that, if he has the opportunity, he will treat you as you deserve. Even if, in a year, he comes across 5000, out of it, he will do something for you, with 1000. Someone that is ready to DO SOMETHING, to be A MAN. Not some dude that just wants to be sleeping with you forever, and he neglects you emotionally, not calling and all. Then also, when he has little money, cannot even appreciate you. This very behavior is what drives the woman to the rich man. The poor man can be nasty and neglectful. At least, even if the one thing gained from a rich man is being cared for to some extent, it is better than the poor man, who schemes to trap a woman with claims that if she does not stay, she is a gold digger: yet these poor men neglect their women like rags.

purples25:
A friend, Eyeness, made a topic on something similar and i believe it was misunderstood. She was referring to what a woman should do based off the experience of dealing with men that REFUSE TO MAKE ANY EFFORT in their relationships. What i wonder, is why anytime a woman mentions 'comfort' men go crazy calling her a gold digger and all sorts.

It is not wrong for a woman to have standards. This DOES NOT MEAN THAT SHE WILL NOT WORK, or that SHE WILL DEPEND SOLEY ON HIS MONEY. In such cases she just wants someone she can truly depend on.

In my opinion, even if you wish to pick a poor man, pick one that, if he has the opportunity, he will treat you as you deserve. Even if, in a year, he comes across 5000, out of it, he will do something for you, with 1000. Someone that is ready to DO SOMETHING, to be A MAN. Not some dude that just wants to be sleeping with you forever, and he neglects you emotionally, not calling and all. Then also, when he has little money, cannot even appreciate you. This very behavior is what drives the woman to the rich man. The poor man can be nasty and neglectful. At least, even if the one thing gained from a rich man is being cared for to some extent, it is better than the poor man, who schemes to trap a woman with claims that if she does not stay, she is a gold digger: yet these poor men neglect their women like rags.

zexy2030:

Men are suppose to be providers while women are meant to be home keepers. Homes are generated by women. Unfortunately in today's society we don't have women, we have girls who are still learning on how to keep a home. Feminism is the headline topic of most women today. I love industrious women, very independent but when her independence makes it look like she is the man of the house with every rude and nauseating characters, the home becomes a battleground.

foolbuster:


Its hard to find a woman that plays a role in providing (the man's role) and still entirely submissive to the husband. Men have to stop whining, step up to the challenge and fulfill their natural role of providers. And Not expecting some woman to help them.

foolbuster:


I just tire for the men of this generation. Personally for me i consider it degrading to my self if my woman is not comfortable and taken well care of. For me its totally unacceptable, that is completely the man's job. Unless the woman feels like helping. A woman is supposed to be taken care of by the man. she's not even supposed to work unless she insists. But today the men are shifting the goal posts blaming society's high cost of living and still expecting total submission and respect from the woman.

zexy2030:

Men are suppose to be providers while women are meant to be home keepers. Homes are generated by women. Unfortunately in today's society we don't have women, we have girls who are still learning on how to keep a home. Feminism is the headline topic of most women today. I love industrious women, very independent but when her independence makes it look like she is the man of the house with every rude and nauseating characters, the home becomes a battleground.

foolbuster:


Its hard to find a woman that plays a role in providing (the man's role) and still entirely submissive to the husband. Men have to stop whining, step up to the challenge and fulfill their natural role of providers. And Not expecting some woman to help them.

purples25:


To be honest, the teachings i am following currently ground a woman on the importance of knowing how to take care of a home. Hypergamy is marrying above one's status and if a woman wants that, she is advised to take good care of the home as her way of balancing the scale. It's very important.

I also learnt that yes, so many women who pay almost all the bills become so hard and unpleasant. Though, the teaching says this is why it is important to remain in the womanly role, because such a woman that pays for a large amount of the things becomes stressed and loses her feminine allure. She becomes like a fellow man to her partner, and then he will look for that feminine touch outside.

purples25:


Yes, why do they claim to be redpill and manly men, but they cannot care for the kind of woman they would keep as their partner?

zexy2030:

very true point. I must recommend this for women to watch. Are u in a relationship already. Can we have a round table talk? Yea, after lockdown.

TheCork:



Darling please please please I beg u. Can u help a handsome brother. My prick is had n I will pay u 700 naira cash, please. Can I toast u please?

purples25:
A friend, Eyeness, made a topic on something similar and i believe it was misunderstood. She was referring to what a woman should do based off the experience of dealing with men that REFUSE TO MAKE ANY EFFORT in their relationships. What i wonder, is why anytime a woman mentions 'comfort' men go crazy calling her a gold digger and all sorts.

It is not wrong for a woman to have standards. This DOES NOT MEAN THAT SHE WILL NOT WORK, or that SHE WILL DEPEND SOLEY ON HIS MONEY. In such cases she just wants someone she can truly depend on.

In my opinion, even if you wish to pick a poor man, pick one that, if he has the opportunity, he will treat you as you deserve. Even if, in a year, he comes across 5000, out of it, he will do something for you, with 1000. Someone that is ready to DO SOMETHING, to be A MAN. Not some dude that just wants to be sleeping with you forever, and he neglects you emotionally, not calling and all. Then also, when he has little money, cannot even appreciate you. This very behavior is what drives the woman to the rich man. The poor man can be nasty and neglectful. At least, even if the one thing gained from a rich man is being cared for to some extent, it is better than the poor man, who schemes to trap a woman with claims that if she does not stay, she is a gold digger: yet these poor men neglect their women like rags.

purples25:


I'm glad you at least understand where I'm coming from. Sometimes I feel that the only thing that can make a man responsible may be religion. Because religion demands for a man to be the head. How can one mention that a woman should have standards and they are going haywire. Perhaps, the world has gone mad. How would a woman work and also keep herself in sync with you and just be supporting you in sensible ways whilst you do nothing towards her own wellbeing. I mean nothing, he is so selfish that he is unable to even call to ask how you're doing, but his main care is sex. How are they so selfish?

They said a woman that sets a standard is being bought. I disagree. This is because when you do things for the one you love, it is not considered as buying them over. Rather, you are caring for that person. If I have a boyfriend and I spend on him, it is a gesture of love, I am not buying him. The same for someone that has a fiancee. Thanks for sharing your angle.

Eyeness:
I hope khia sees this

Eyeness:
thanks for the mention. the issue is even if you pick a poor man, what assurance will you have that he will still be faithful when he becomes rich? wealth has a way of amplifying people's truth character, then there's also the fact that he might never be rich. you become poor by association and you have to pick up his slack. this will naturally create resentment which will threaten the relationship. Its too risky a gamble. the best thing is to work with results, not potential. being strategic about your future is nothing to be ashamed of. This makes me a proud golddiger.

Eyeness:
thanks for the mention. the issue is even if you pick a poor man, what assurance will you have that he will still be faithful when he becomes rich? wealth has a way of amplifying people's truth character, then there's also the fact that he might never be rich. you become poor by association and you have to pick up his slack. this will naturally create resentment which will threaten the relationship. Its too risky a gamble. the best thing is to work with results, not potential. being strategic about your future is nothing to be ashamed of. This makes me a proud golddiger.

Eyeness:
thanks for the mention. the issue is even if you pick a poor man, what assurance will you have that he will still be faithful when he becomes rich? wealth has a way of amplifying people's truth character, then there's also the fact that he might never be rich. you become poor by association and you have to pick up his slack. this will naturally create resentment which will threaten the relationship. Its too risky a gamble. the best thing is to work with results, not potential. being strategic about your future is nothing to be ashamed of. This makes me a proud golddiger.

khia:

Why can't you make your own wealth? Why don't you hustle for riches then marry a broke man and do all of these things for him that you expect a man to do for your broke behind while he does nothing for you other than sexx you. Would you consider this broke man a gold digger? You wouldn't give such a man a second glance yet you think a rich man should except you.

purples25:


Hi. I actually stated that a woman will contribute. I can't fathom how you've missed this point in all our posts.

khia:


Why can't you hustle and accumulate your own wealth?

purples25:


To contribute means that wealth will be accumulated, of course. To contribute to a relationship you have to have something which you accumulated, or you still don't understand the words in English?

purples25:


Go and find a brothel na

Not some dude that just wants to be sleeping with you forever, and he neglects you emotionally, not calling and all