Despite Moderna’s cheery press release this morning, the clinical trial results for its groundbreaking COVID vaccine could not be much worse.

The vaccine, developed and championed by Anthony Fauci and financed by Bill Gates, used an experimental MRNA technology that the two men hoped would allow rapid deployment to meet President Trump’s ambitions “warp speed” time line.

Dr. Fauci was so confident of his shot’s safety that he waved ferret and primate studies ( Moderna suspiciously reported no health data from its mouse studies). That appears to have been a mistake.

Three of the 15 human guinea pigs in the high dose cohort (250 mcg) suffered a “serious adverse event” within 43 days of receiving Moderna’s jab.

Moderna did not release its clinical trial study or raw data, but its press release, which was freighted with inconsistencies acknowledged that three volunteers developed Grade 3 systemic events defined by the FDA as “Preventing daily activity and requiring medical intervention. “

Moderna allowed only exceptionally healthy volunteers to participate in the study. A vaccine with those reaction rates could cause grave injuries in 1.5 billion humans if administered to “every person on earth”.

That is the threshold that Gates has established for ending the global lockdown.

Moderna did not explain why it reported positive antibody tests for only eight participants. These outcomes are particularly disappointing because the most hazardous hurdle for the inoculation is still ahead; challenging participants with wild COVID infection.

Past attempts at developing COVID vaccines have always faltered at this stage as both humans and animals achieved robust antibody response then sickened and died when exposed to the wild virus.

Moderna’s press announcement heralded “Positive Interim Phase 1 findings”. I have forwarded that claim to my colleagues in securities law; FTC rules restrict the amount of lipstick public companies may slather on bad donkeys.

YouTube silences prominent epidemiologist for opposing coronavirus lockdowns

In its fight to stamp out “misinformation” about the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), Google-owned YouTube has silenced a prominent epidemiologist whose opinions and ideas about the pandemic contradict certain facets of the official narrative.

Dr. Knut M. Wittkowski, the former head of biostatistics, epidemiology and research design at Rockefeller University, was featured in a video about the virus that was recently posted to YouTube before being quickly removed from YouTube for violating the tech giant’s “community standards.”

The 65-year-old expert in viruses is a vocal critic of so-called “social distancing” and other government-imposed measures that supposedly aim to fight the pandemic. He has repeatedly warned that such measures are not helping but rather prolonging the crisis – and for this he is no longer welcome on YouTube.

About the time that a video of Dr. Wittkowski explaining all of this reached about 1.3 million views, YouTube pulled it down and banned it, just like it has done to many other videos and channels over the years.

In Dr. Wittkowski’s view – and keep in mind that the guy holds two doctorates, one in computer science and the other in medical biometry – the best response to the Wuhan coronavirus is to basically let it do its thing. Most people will not even develop symptoms, and thus will never even know they have it. The small percentage of people who do get sick will also largely recover, while those with the highest risk can simply stay at home until the worst of it has ended, if they so choose.

“With all respiratory diseases, the only thing that stops the disease is herd immunity,” he stated in the now-deleted video. “About 80 percent of the people need to have had contact with the virus, and the majority of them won’t even have recognized that they were infected.”

You will not encounter this type of censorship at Brighteon.com, by the way, which is hosting the Plandemic film that has also been deleted and banned by YouTube.

As usual, YouTube provided no explanation as to why Dr. Wittkowski’s video was removed
In speaking to the New York Post about his video’s removal, Dr. Wittkowski was perplexed, to say the least. He said that all he did was share with viewers his understanding as to how viruses work while presenting an alternative approach to dealing with this current pandemic, which apparently is not allowed.

“I was just explaining what we had,” he stated. “They don’t tell you why. They just say it violates our community standards. There’s no explanation for what those standards are or what standards it violated.”

Another possible reason that Dr. Wittkowski got the axe from YouTube is because he has likened the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) to a “bad flu,” an opinion that YouTube and other tech giants have stated in the past “is problematic.” Everyone is apparently expected to believe that this crisis is the worst thing to strike the world since the Holocaust, and all must respond with cowering trepidation to the government’s demands.

“Anything that goes against [World Health Organization] recommendations would be a violation of our policy and so removal is another really important part of our policy,” admitted YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki during a recent interview with CNN.

While Dr. Wittkowski’s viewpoints may not be in the majority, they do align with what has been implemented in Sweden, where “social distancing” and societal shutdowns were never implemented.

Facebook is also going after people and groups that it deems as spreading “dangerous” information. The company has reportedly been working with state governments in California, Nebraska and New Jersey to remove event pages for anti-lockdown gatherings.

More of the latest news about the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) is available at Pandemic.news.

The Jewish Reuben Brothers Who Pillaged Russia In The 1990s Top List Of U.K.’s Richest

Born in Mumbai, they grew up in north London and attended state schools. They made savvy business choices, eventually joining forces to control 5 per cent of the world’s aluminium output through their company Trans-World Metals.

They have also invested in prime London property such as Millbank Tower, Connaught House in Berkeley Square and the former Naval and Military Club in Piccadilly.

Sir Leonard Blavatnik, the Ukrainian-born Jewish mogul who made his multi-billion-dollar fortune in the aluminium industry in the former Soviet Union, has held on to fourth place with a net worth of £15.78bn.

His other investments include a property empire including hotels in Hollywood, Miami Beach and Cap-Ferra and has a stake in Russian oil company TNK-BP. Blavatnik is based in London, and lives in a £41m home in Kensington Palace Gardens with his American wife Emily.

Born in Uzbekistan Alisher Usmanov built his fortune from steel and mining. His largest investment is in Russian metals giant Metalloinvest and he has also funded MegaFon, the country’s second-biggest mobile phone operator. His wife, Irina Viner-Usmanova is Jewish, and he crept up to seventh place with a net worth of £11.68bn.

After the so-called fall of communism, “Russian” organized crime figures, who just happened to be largely Jewish, ransacked the country with the help of Jewish economic “experts” from Harvard, buying up its industrial infrastructure for pennies on the pound.

Over 25 years later, these organized crime figures have now worked their way into “legitimate” business, social, and “philanthropic” circles in the West.

And some of them, like “Sir” Leonard Blavatnik, have even been knighted — now that’s a funny-sounding name for English aristocracy.

Of course, the Reuben brothers are literal paupers compared to the Rothschild dynasty, the defacto rulers of the U.K., but somehow they never make this celebrated “Rich List”, which should be renamed “Jewish Nouveau Riche List”.

The English aristocracy is no longer English — it has been replaced by this literal mob in three piece suits.

Kamala Harris introduces Senate resolution saying phrase ‘Wuhan virus’ is ‘anti-Asian’

Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., introduced a resolution condemning “anti-Asian sentiment as related to COVID-19,” including use of the phrase “Wuhan Virus.”

The former presidential candidate introduced the bill on behalf of a number of Democrats to condemn “all manifestations or expressions of racism, xenophobia, discrimination, anti-Asian sentiment, scapegoating, and ethnic or religious intolerance” and “to expeditiously investigate and document all credible reports of hate crimes, incidents, and threats against the Asian American and Pacific Islander community in the United States.”

The resolution claims a study found over 400 cases of anti-Asian discrimination related to COVID-19 between February 7 and March 9.

The resolution takes particular aim at phrases such as “Wuhan virus,” “Chinese virus” and “Kung Flu” for perpetrating “anti-Asian stigma.”

It calls on the U.S. to “recommit” to building an inclusive society by “prioritizing language access and inclusivity in communication practices.”

Trump began calling COVID-19 “Chinese Virus” soon after rumors began circulating among Chinese officials that coronavirus found its origin in the U.S. Army, and he rejected objections from the media that the term might be “racist.” However, he said in late March that if China continued to protest the name he’d stop using it.

WHO DATABASE ON HEALTH CARE ATTACKS OMITS CHINESE DOCTOR SUPPRESSION

“If you look at Ebola, right, if you look at Lyme in Connecticut, you look at all these different horrible diseases, they seem to come with a name with a location,” he said. “I don’t have to say it if they feel so strongly about it, we’ll see.”

Harris, along with Sens. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., and Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, last month announced their intention to bring forward the resolution. Duckworth accused Trump of “inappropriate and racist efforts” to “rebrand” the disease.

POMPEO CALLS NEWEST AID PLEDGE 'PALTRY' GIVEN THE NUMBER OF LIVES LOST WORLDWIDE

“Inflammatory and racist rhetoric from officials at the highest level of our government has contributed to a disturbing rise in hate-crimes targeting Asian Americans,” said Hirono.

Meanwhile, Republicans have sought to hold China accountable for withholding information in the early days of coronavirus. On Tuesday, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., introduced a bill that would allow Americans to sue the Chinese government over its coronavirus handing.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

"They suppressed the evidence. They suppressed the doctors. They jailed the doctors even. And now we're dealing with this terrible disease," the senator said. "So the victims of this disease in our country ought to be able to go to our courts and sue the Chinese government to hold them accountable and to get damages for it."