If it is not permanency that the Government is going to move the Nteach beneficiaries to, what kind of job, then, will it be?

If the Nteach beneficiaries are not moved from the Npower programme to permanency, what else is suitable for them?

Is it really beneficial to remove the Nteach beneficiaries from the classrooms, where they have worked tirelessly for the past two to three years, only to replace them with others?

Where, exactly, are they going to apply the additional knowledge they have acquired over the stated period?


I know Mr President is a listening President and will do exactly what he believes is right for the beneficiaries.

So he must make them permanent beneficiaries or they won't find any other thing to do?
Many Nteach I know have stopped going to school long ago.

doggedfighter:
So he must make them permanent beneficiaries or they won't find any other thing to do?
Many Nteach I know have stopped going to school long ago.

You can neither put words into my mouth nor make my post say what it did not say. I never used "must" in that post. Why will I use must? Am I ordering or commanding Mr President? You people should be careful with all your cunning.

What other things do you want them to find and do? Are they not doing something already? We are talking about able and capable young men and women who are willing and ready to work and contribute their own quota to nation building and you're saying what exactly?

Our public schools need teachers. The Nteach beneficiaries are already in the system and are doing very well. Is it not best to retain them and make them permanent employees so that they can continue to give their best to the nation?

Who are the Nteach beneficiaries you know stopped going to school long ago? Speak the truth.

Just face the truth, they have to be replaced. Imagine every Nysc corper since the creation of the program remain a corper, even America will go bankrupt with such.

Highorbit7O16:
Just face the truth, they have to be replaced. Imagine every Nysc corper since the creation of the program remain a corper, even America will go bankrupt with such.

I really should ignore you because I have a feeling you don't know what you are talking about. However, let me educate you a little.

Are Npower and NYSC the same? Were they set up to accomplish the same aim? How could you even compare the two? It shows most of you do not grasp the realities on ground.

What you posted made no sense. Are not the Nteach beneficiaries adding value to the system?

elated177:




I really should ignore you because I have a feeling you don't know what you are talking about. However, let me educate you a little.

Are Npower and NYSC the same? Were they set up to accomplish the same aim? How could you even compare the two? It shows most of you do not grasp the realities on ground.

What you posted made no sense. Are not the Nteach beneficiaries adding value to the system?

Are Nysc corp members not adding value to the system too?
You expect too much from little things and it is very unhealthy.

Highorbit7O16:
Are Nysc corp members not adding value to the system too?
You expect too much from little things and it is very unhealthy.

Of course they are. Did I say otherwise? I brought up the issue of value because of the bankruptcy thing you raised.

Corpers and Npower(Nteach) beneficiaries are not the same.

You did not answer the questions. Are NYSC and Npower programme the same? Were they set up to accomplish the same aim?

How do I expect too much from little thing? What is this little you are talking about?