-According to Websters dictionary, the word negro is a race of humankind native to Africa. But looking further down, you find some more interesting clues.

-The Word Negro is of Spanish and Portugese origin: From negro black, from Latin nigr-, niger

The word was first used in 1555. At this same time in history a major event was taking place in Spain and Portugal- It was the expulsion of black Portuguese Jews (negro Portugese Jews) to Potugese settlements on the West caosts of Africa where they were sold as slaves. Many thousands of these Jews were shipped to these Portuguese settlements on the West coast of Africa to worked on the plantations.

In less than a decade after these Jews were settled on the continent of Africa, the transatlantic slave trade began. And these same Jews were captured and transported to the Americas where they were again sold as slaves. The Portugese slave traders knew who exactly they were taking fro slaves because they put them there.

The majority of the slaves that were put on slave ships had the DNA haplogroup E1B1A; the same DNA haplogroup of the remains of black Jews found buried in mass graves in Portugal with hands and feet tied, and with broken skulls


...Most of whom were known to be of the Royal house of David. The same DNA haploagpoup of the Bantus and majority of the inhabitants of subsaharan (West, East, central and Southern) Africa.

Negroland and the coasts of Guinea where real biblical Jews were expelled to.

You are seeing only what u want to see

King John the third sold all those Jews for slaves who refused to embrace the Roman religion and they settled in Guinea, Sao-Tome, Angola, and other potugesee settlements on the continent of Africa, working on sugar plantations.

They took their children from them, baptized them and raised them to be Chrsitians (slaves of course) in Portugal.

illicit:
You are seeing what u want to see

You are totally blind.

An amazing painting depicting the inquisition. (Portugal 1570)
So much in this one picture. Tell me, what can you see?

donnie:

You are totally blind.

I see....

We wuz Kangz. Das rite.

1Sharon:
We wuz Kangz. Das rite.

HalleluYAH

Why do you want to be middle eastern, Israelite?

Just be a proud black African of your particular tribe. You don't need to justify your existence or prove you're special by the book of your colonisers and slave masters.

IMAliyu:
Why do you want to be middle eastern, Israelite?

Just be a proud black African of your particular tribe. You don't need to justify your existence or prove you're special by the book of your colonisers and slave masters.

What kind of stupid question is that?

ISRAEL (Jacob/YAKUBI) is a man, NOT a land. The children of Israel are not known by what land they live in but by who their father is. And by the way, there is nothing like Middle-East, that's a recent connotation used by your slavemasters to deceive you. That is Northeast Africa. It was all Africa before Europeans built the Suez canal seperating that region from the rest of the continent.

And the bible is not a white man's book. My black ancestors wrote the book. The people of the book are black. Christianity existed in Africa long before Rome adopted it and used it to conquer the world.

You better repent and keep the commandments or you will be destroyed with the rest of the world.

Shabbat Shalom

Ancient painting depicting YAKUBI (Jacob/ISRAEL) my ancestor.

IMAliyu:
Why do you want to be Middle Eastern, Israelite?

Just be a proud black African of your particular tribe. You don't need to justify your existence or prove you're special by the book of your colonisers and slave masters.

donnie:
What kind of stupid question is that?

ISRAEL (Jacob/YAKUBI) is a man, NOT a land. The children of Israel are not known by what land they live in but by who their father is. And by the way, there is nothing like Middle-East, that's a recent connotation used by your slavemasters to deceive you. That is Northeast Africa. It was all Africa before Europeans built the Suez canal seperating that region from the rest of the continent.

And the bible is not a white man's book. My black ancestors wrote the book. The people of the book are black. Christianity existed in Africa long before Rome adopted it and used it to conquer the world.

You better repent and keep the commandments or you will be destroyed with the rest of the world.

Shabbat Shalom

[img]https://s7/images/70468484_610193756186298_4814938182373236298_n.jpg_nc_htscontent-yyz1-1.cdninstagram.jpg[/img]

The Bible is not a white man's book and neither is it a black man's book. It is a world book. it is a big fat lie to claim that the bible was written by some fantasy black ancestors. Some people in the Bible were black, certainly the likes of the Ethiopian eunuch, who was the first Gentile the Gospel was explained to was black. ApostleSimeon was nicknamed Niger, was a black man.

Jesus is Semtic, from the Mediterranean Sea region, adjacent to alkebulan, where civilisation started and so is of a skin colour that is the middle of black and white, which comes to in a range of light reddish brown or light olive skinned colour to dark reddish brown or dark olive skinned colour.

Now, let me clear you up of the whole matter of Africa.

Herodotus, the father of History, wrote that the Garamantes, a North African people, used to live in caves. The Garamantes, mentioned by Herodotus, are a civilisation and tribe, thought to correspond to Iron Age Berber tribes in the southwest of ancient Libya.

To the Ancient Greeks, Libya was one of the three known continents along with Asia and Europe. In this sense, Libya was known as the African continent to the west of the Nile Valley and extended south of Egypt. Herodotus described the inhabitants of Libya as two peoples: The Libyans in northern Africa and the Ethiopians in the south. According to Herodotus, Libya began where Ancient Egypt ended, and extended to Cape Spartel, south of Tangier on the Atlantic coast (i.e. in present day Morocco)

So in effect, meaning that, the Romans, actually referred to the "whole" of Africa, as "Libya," rather than the area of Libya, we know today and not as the word "Africa"

Now, here is where it gets very interesting, as if you dig further down, it becomes apparent that Egypt back in the day then, was considered part of Asia by the ancients, and only first got assigned to Africa, by the geographer Ptolemy 85 - 165 AD, who accepted Alexandria as Prime Meridian and made the isthmus of Suez and the Red Sea the boundary between Asia and Africa.

In fact, according to history, Africa is not Africa’s real name. The name "Africa" is mentioned to have been first used by the Romans to refer to the Carthaginian Empire which was in present-day Tunisia. After the Romans conquered the Carthaginian Empire, they acquired administrative control over North Africa, and this led to the division of North Africa (by the Romans) into two; namely Africa Pronconsularis, which was in present-day Northern Tunisia, and Africa Nova, which consisted of Algeria, so the word, Africa, the current misnomer adopted by almost everyone today, was given to this continent by the ancient Greeks and Romans. Africa, from the onset had none of the sub-Saharan African region countries in it then, because in classical antiquity, Africa really, then, was just "Ancient Libya"

The fact is, the oldest, the ancient name of Africa, and the only one of indigenous origin was Alkebulan, and the many other names, it previously had were: Ethiopia, Corphye, Ortegia, Libya and of course, Africa - the latest of all. Alkebulan, by the way of interest, incidentally means "mother of mankind" or "garden of Eden"

Alkebulan is the oldest and the only one of indigenous origin. It was used by the Moors, Nubians, Numidians (i.e. Berber tribe), Khart-Haddans (Carthaginians), and Ethiopians. As I earlier made known, Africa, the current misnomer adopted by almost everyone today, was given to this continent by the ancient Greeks and Romans and in them Roman days, Africa, really was referred to only Tunisia and parts of Algeria.

In fact, Africa was what the Romans called, the region which roughly lies where Tunisia is today, and that definition later expanded out to designate the whole landmass south of the Mediterranean Sea region, Asia, just as similar, originally was what the Greeks called the region east of the Aegean sea region.

[img]https://s7/images/5CSPP5ZGUQ7HTMUFMJU5NXSYMQ.jpg[/img]
Now let's talk of the Middle East and the Suez Canal and demystify them both.

The British used to think of the region that roughly corresponds to today's Middle East as two entities: namely the Near East (the Balkans and the eastern Mediterranean) and the Middle East (the region around Iran and the Persian Gulf. By Nick Danforth, based on A. Keith Johnston's 1852 "Chart of the World Showing the Forms and Directions of the Ocean Currents.'')

Baba, here, has took it upon himself, to come in and scatter the place up, with saying there is no such thing/place as Middle East, that it's a SCAM, suggesting that its a recent connotation used by "your slavemasters" to deceive you.

Now the thing is, the Suez Canal was built in between 1859 and 1869, and got officially opened on the 17th of November 1869, and even more, the Suez Canal, basically is a man-made waterway connecting the Mediterranean Sea to the Indian Ocean via the Red Sea. The Mediterranean Sea region in fact, has been called Middle East, as early as 1852 and years before the Suez Canal saw the light of day.

The Suez Canal, as earlier pointed out, wasn't even separating any region from Africa, like donnie would like the readership to believe. Also, naming the Mediterranean Sea region as the Middle-East, had nothing to do with Jesus or any particular people group, this was something just conveniently done for naval interests and commerce purposes.

Also, the Canal of the Pharaohs, also called the Ancient Suez Canal or Necho's Canal, is the forerunner of the Suez Canal, constructed in ancient times. Even a precursor to the Necho's Canal, is a smaller canal believed to have been constructed under the auspices of Senusret II or Ramesses II, which was built to facilitate travel from the Nile River to the Red Sea

Christianity never existed in Africa long before Rome adopted it and used it to conquer the world. In fact, the word, Christianity, is not in the Bible, it is a Constantine Roman invention, whilst the word, Christian, is a people of Antioch invention, an epithet, they used as a term of abuse and to profane the name of the Lord with

IMAliyu:
Why do you want to be Middle Eastern, Israelite?

Just be a proud black African of your particular tribe. You don't need to justify your existence or prove you're special by the book of your colonisers and slave masters.

Baba is senile, thats is why a black skinned African of Delta region extract/tribe would be coveting to be a Mediterranean Sea region person, Israelite

The Bible, a special book, is a universal/world citizen book, it isn't a book of any particular colonisers or slave masters, whether Portuguese, British, Spanish, Dutch, Americans et cetera, but a Manufacturer Manual, providing varied information about the Manufacturer and the Manufacturer's product(s).

When will Donnie be brave enough to discuss on the DNA test results of corpses buried in ancient Israel nau?

Too scary for your black Hebrew fantasy?

illicit:
You are seeing only what u want to see

OkCornel:
When will Donnie be brave enough to discuss on the DNA test results of corpses buried in ancient Israel nau?

Too scary for your black Hebrew fantasy?

Not really, your Lord and savior Satan, and his children whom you love and worship have made thier seat in that place (if that's even the actual land of Cannan). That place is controlled by the Roman Catholic Jesuits. They have power now, but their time (the time of the gentiles) is almost up.

Revelation 2:9
I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.

Luke 21:24
And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.

That whole land is full of false locations and deception for Tourists. The real Mt. Sainai is in Saudi Arabia not Israel. The real Mt Zion is Mt. KENYA. Those false sites are there for foolish Christians to spend their money to go and see.

When MESSIAH returns, they will confess everything even without being told.

MuttleyLaff:

The Bible, a special book, is a universal/world citizen book, it isn't a book of any particular colonisers or slave masters, whether Portuguese, British, Spanish, Dutch, Americans et cetera, but a Manufacturer Manual, providing varied information about the Manufacturer and the Manufacturer's product(s).

Universal world citizen book?
NONSENSE... that's the language of the BEAST system.
A book containing the prophesies from YAH's prophets, directed to YAH's people will never be reduced to a so-called Universal book or stupid motivational nonsense. It is the story of ISRAEL's Salvation.

donnie:


Not really, your Lord and savior Satan, and his children whom you love and worship have made thier seat in that place (if that's even the actual land of Cannan). That place is controlled by the Roman Catholic Jesuits. They have power now, but their time (the time of the gentiles) is almost up.

Revelation 2:9
I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.

Luke 21:24
And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.

That whole land is full of false locations and deception for Tourists. The real Mt. Sainai is in Saudi Arabia not Israel. The real Mt Zion is Mt. KENYA. Those false sites are there for foolish Christians to spend their money to go and see.

When MESSIAH returns, they will confess everything even without being told.

Plenty needless stories which does not in anyway address my query.

Just happy to see you exposing your double standards on this platform. You were more than happy to accept the DNA test results of Ramses, but now dodging that of ancient Israelites buried in the land of Israel abi?

Wake up from your black Hebrew delusion. Deep down you know it’s a lie.

Lmao, Mt.Zion is in Kenya? Your case is more critical than I thought

OkCornel:

Plenty needless stories which does not in anyway address my query.

Just happy to see you exposing your double standards on this platform. You were more than happy to accept the DNA test results of Ramses, but now dodging that of ancient Israelites buried in the land of Israel abi?

Wake up from your black Hebrew delusion. Deep down you know it’s a lie.

Lmao, Mt.Zion is in Kenya? Your case is more critical than I thought

Is that all you've got? Where are the ancient Israelites buried in the land? Such idiotic nonsense. You think they'd want to expose themselves in such manner?

You didn't read MESSIAH's prophecies about Jerusalem's destruction and that the people should flee? Millions fled further into Africa and many others were enlsaved and taken captive to Europe?

You have made no point and nothing you will ever say here can counter the solid proofs I have put down on this platform.
Delusion? Then why chase a deluded fellow around like your life depends on it?

Why didn't you also mock Mt. Sainai in Saudi Arabia? Becasue you believe they are white ba? Youre just a coon.

donnie:


Is that all you've got? Where are the ancient Israelites buried in the land? Such idiotic nonsense. You think they'd want to expose themselves in such manner?

You didn't read MESSIAH's prophecies about Jerusalem's destruction and that the people should flee? Millions fled into Africa and many others were enlsaved and taken captive to Europe?

You have made no point and nothing you will ever say here can counter the solid proofs I have put down on this platform.
Delusion? Then why chase a deluded fellow around like your life depends on it? Youre just a coon.

Lmao, so at no point in ancient Israel’s history were Israelites buried on their own land?

Chai, this black Hebrew delusion has really done a number on you.

David’s generation, Solomon’s generation and all the generations up to the first exile to Babylon where buried where? Subsaharan Africa?

Ezra and Nehemiah’s generation that returned from exile were buried in Kenya and Congo ba? Lmao


Deny it all you want, but ancient corpses buried in the land of Israel bursts your black Hebrew bubble of lies.

MuttleyLaff, come and see Donnie’s next line of argument that there were no ancient Israelites buried in the land of Israel. This black Hebrew joke has gotten even more ridiculous.

OkCornel:


Lmao, so at no point in ancient Israel’s history were Israelites buried on their own land?

where did I make that statement?

donnie:


Is that all you've got? Where are the ancient Israelites buried in the land?Such idiotic nonsense. You think they'd want to expose themselves in such manner?

You didn't read MESSIAH's prophecies about Jerusalem's destruction and that the people should flee? Millions fled further into Africa and many others were enlsaved and taken captive to Europe?

You have made no point and nothing you will ever say here can counter the solid proofs I have put down on this platform.
Delusion? Then why chase a deluded fellow around like your life depends on it?

Why didn't you also mock Mt. Sainai in Saudi Arabia? Becasue you believe they are white ba? Youre just a coon.

Biko Donnie, after typing out the bolded, are you now making a u-turn that ancient Israelites were not buried in Israel?


These are your words o, not mine.


Oh, and by the way...did you just call Saudi Arabians “whites”? Your case is really critical

OkCornel:



Biko Donnie, after typing out the bolded, are you now making a u-turn that ancient Israelites were not buried in Israel?


These are your words o, not mine.


Oh, and by the way...did you just call Saudi Arabians “whites”? Your case is really critical

Its a question... where are the corpses or remains like the Pharoah you mentioned earlier? Show us the DNA test results they provided pointing to a single father YAKUBI (Jacob)? Those guys you worship have no biblical connection to the Patriachs so the real truth remains hidden. ROME plundered that land and has all the truth hidden till this day.

You expect those devils who just arrived in that land in 1948 to show you ancient artifacts of thousands of years ago without much fraud?

And ancient arabians are not white but dark skinned, sorry. That's a well known fact, you whiteman worshipper.
Na me make mistake to answer you sef... I thought you even had some sensible argument. I don't engage in these type of senseless discussions... mtcheew.

donnie:


Its a question... where are the corpses or remains like the Pharoah you mentioned earlier? Show us the DNA test results they provided pointing to a single father YAKUBI (Jacob)? Those guys you worship have no biblical connection to the Patriachs so the real truth remains hidden. ROME plundered that land and has all the truth hidden till this day.

You expect those devils who just arrived in that land in 1948 to show you ancient artifacts of thousands of years ago without much fraud?

And ancient arabians are not white but dark skinned, sorry. That's a well known fact, you whiteman worshipper.
Na me make mistake to answer you sef... I thought you even had some sensible argument. I don't engage in these type of senseless discussions... mtcheew.

So I’m discussing with someone who is ignorant of the fact that there are catacombs (ancient tombs) in Jerusalem?


Dude, all this denial just to deflect from dna test results on corpses of ancient Israelites so you keep wallowing in your black Hebrew delusion?

No matter how hard you want to run, you can never outrun the truth


And as for the Saudi Arabians, be they ancient or modern, absolutely no one in their right senses would classify them as whites. Not even the present generation inhabitants there are seen as white.


Back to the matter on ground Donnie. Are you ready to talk about the DNA test results on the corpses of ancient Israelis?

Solomon had locks on his head. Certainly wasn't some stupid white man.

Song of Solomon 5:11-13
His head is as fine gold, his locks curled, and black as a raven.

DNA test results on ancient corpses buried in Israel will treat this black Hebrew delusion once and for all.


But guess what, that’s not palatable for one who’s invested much into believing and propagating lies.

SOOO, THE PERSIANS /IRANIANS/BABYLONIANS ARE "BLACK"... OF COURSE THEY ARE.

Relax, research is still going on, when he's through you will get the result.

How you dey?

OkCornel:
DNA test results on ancient corpses buried in Israel will treat this black Hebrew delusion once and for all.


But guess what, that’s not palatable for one who’s invested much into believing and propagating lies.

A recent archaeological discovery in Turkey promises to shed more light on reconstructing one of the most pivotal events in the history of Christianity as an organized religion ― the Council of Nicaea.

Seventh ecumenical council, Icon -17th century painting... Novodevichy Convent, Moscow.


Painting of “The Council of Nicea” in Sumela monastery, Macka, Trabzon, Turkey. Event though the picture is a bit faded, we can see they're cleary niggas!



O sifia pains

O yes