Rig Veda says God is ‘ONE’ and God is Atman, then why believe and worship any other God in place of real God.+*****



The Vedas do not talk about idol worship; the followers of Vedic Religion or Santana Dharma never worshiped idols. Thus all the Puranic Gods which are of the form and attributes are not Vedic Gods.


Hinduism is not Vedic religion or Santana Dharma.  Hindus do idol-worship, while Vedas bars idol worship.


 Yajur Veda – chapter- 32:~God Supreme or Supreme Spirit has no ‘Pratima’ (idol) or material shape. He cannot be seen directly by anyone. He pervades all beings and all directions. Thus,   Idolatry does not find any support from the Vedas.


Rig Veda 1/164/46: ~ “They call him Indra, Mitra, Varuna, Agni or the heavenly sunbird Garutmat. The seers call in many ways that which is One; they speak of Agni, Yama, Matarishvan.



Rig Veda 8/58/2:~ Only One is the Fire, enkindled in numerous ways; only One is the Sun, pervading this whole universe; only One is the Dawn, illuminating all things. In very truth, the One has become the whole world.


Vedas do not permit idol worship. All the idols are of the Puranic Gods priests are referring to the Puranic Brahma as God they are ignorant of the God in Vedas even though they speak of Vedas.


The Vedas do not talk about idol worship. In fact, till about 2000 years ago followers of Vedism never worshiped idols. Idol worship was started by the followers of Buddhism and Jains. 


There is logic to idol worship. Vedas speak of one God that is the supreme ‘Self’ in i.e. Atman or Soul but Hinduism indulges in worshiping 60 million Gods. All these 60 million Gods are non-Vedic Gods based on the beliefs.


The Vedas confirms God is Atman (Spirit), the innermost ‘Self’.


Rig Veda: ~ The Atman (Soul or Spirit) is the cause; Atman is the support of all that exists in this universe. May ye never turn away from the Atman the innermost ‘Self’. May ye never accept another God in place of the Atman nor worship other than the Atman?"(10:48, 5)


Rig-Veda 1-164-46 and Y.V 32-1 clearly mention that God is “One”.


Rig Veda says God is ‘ONE’ and God is Atman, then why believe and worship any other God in place of real God.


Brihad Upanishad: ~ “If you think there is another entity, whether man or God there is no truth."


When Upanishad itself declares: ~  Sarvam khalvidam brahma ~ all this (universe) is verily Brahman. By following back all of the relative appearances in the world, we eventually return to that from which it is all manifest – the non-dual reality(Chandogya Upanishad). 

One must remember that for all periods the Vedas are the final goal and authority, and if the Puranas differ in any respect from the Vedas, the Puranas are to be rejected without mercy.

If you feel Puranas says something and the Vedas say something else, reject the Puranas and believe in the Vedas.  The Puranas are just a myth.


Even Sage Sri, Sankara declares: ~Supreme Brahman (God) is impersonal, Nirguna (without Gunas or attributes), Nirakara (formless), Nirvisesha (without special characteristics), immutable, eternal and Akarta (non-agent). It is above all needs and desires. It is always the Witnessing Subject. It can never become an object as it is beyond the reach of the senses. Brahman is non-dual, one without a second. It has no other beside it. It is destitute of difference, either external or internal. Brahman cannot be described because the description implies a distinction. Brahman cannot be distinguished from any other than It. In Brahman, there is not a distinction between substance and attribute. Sat-Chit-Ananda constitutes the very essence or Svarupa of Brahman, and not just Its attributes. The Nirguna Brahman of Sage Sri, Sankara is impersonal.


God is formless, timeless, and spaceless existence. Thus according to the Vedas God neither has any image nor God resides in any particular idol or statue. God cannot be seen directly by anyone. God pervades all beings and all directions.      

                            

On the Vedic perspective, Lord Krishna has been just a Mahan yogi and not God himself’. Because in the Bhagavad Gita itself says: ~


The Bhagavad Gita: ~ brahmano hi pratisthaham ~ Brahman (God) is considered the all-pervading consciousness which is the basis of all the animate and inanimate entities and material. (14.27)


Lord Krishna Says Ch ~V: ~ “Those who know me in truth." The last two words (tattvataha) are usually ignored by pundits, but they make all the difference between the ordinary concept of God and the truth about God.


So, on Vedic perspective, Lord Krishna is not Vedic God because Rig Veda says:   May ye never accept another God in place of the Atman nor worship other than the Atman?"


That is why Lord Krishna Says Ch ~V: ~“Those who know me in truth.". The last two words (tattvataha) are usually ignored by pundits, but they make all the difference between the ordinary concept of God and the truth about God.


The Bhagavad Gita: ~ brahmano hi pratisthaham ~ Brahman (God) is considered the all-pervading consciousness which is the basis of all the animate and inanimate entities and material. (14.27)


All Hindus indulge in non-Vedic practice barred by the Vedas introduced by the different founders of the different sects of Hinduism at a different time, whereas the Vedic religion or Santana Dharma is ancient and has no founder.


Hinduism is not Vedic religion or Santana Dharma.  Hindus do idol-worship, while Vedas bars idol worship.


Sage Sri, Sankara: ~"That which permeates all, which nothing transcends and which, like the universal space around us, fills everything completely from within and without, that Supreme non-dual Brahman  (God)."


Brihadaranyaka Upanishad: ~ Brahman (God) is in the form of the Athma, and it is indeed Athma itself’.


Thus it refers to formless and attributeless God, which is the Atman (Soul), the innermost ‘Self’ within the false experience. Thus it indicates clearly all the Gods with form and attributes are mere imagination based on the false self’.  Thus Atman or Soul, the  ‘Self’ is God.


Sage Sri, Sankara’s Supreme Brahman is impersonal, Nirguna (without Gunas or attributes), Nirakara (formless), Nirvisesha (without special characteristics), immutable, eternal, and Akarta (non-agent). It is above all needs and desires. It is always the Witnessing Subject. It can never become an object as it is beyond the reach of the senses. Brahman is non-dual, one without a second. It has no other beside it. It is destitute of difference, either external or internal. Brahman cannot be described because the description implies a distinction. Brahman cannot be distinguished from any other than It. In Brahman, there is not a distinction between substance and attribute. Sat-Chit-Ananda constitutes the very essence or Svarupa of Brahman, and not just Its attributes. The Nirguna Brahman of Sage Sri, Sankara is impersonal


The God you see and meet and in your vision is not God in truth but a hallucination.


How can you see and meet God without knowing what God is in actuality? By praying and meditating on God without knowing what God really is, leads to hallucination.    The world in which you exist hides God. Thus, Self-realization is necessary to realize ‘what God is in actuality. 

Bhagavad Gita: 7: 19:~ ‘Everything is Atman, there exists nothing except Atman.”


All is consciousness. The whole universe is consciousness. From consciousness, the universe comes. When the universe disappears, the consciousness still remains without form, time, and space.

The one who awakened to the knowledge of the 'Self' becomes Brahma Gnani. A Gnani by realizing the ultimate truth or Brahman knows that all three states are merely an illusion created out of consciousness. Whoever realizes the ultimate truth or Brahman knows that the three states and the formless witness of the three states are one in essence. If a man worships God as a separate entity is ignorant.  If one is thinking God is one and the ‘Self’ another, he has not the true knowledge. :~ Santthosh Kumaar




There is only one God and despite Egypt being the most technological advanced society in world history that concept didn't originate with them. Egyptians were polytheists and worshppied many gods including the Pharaoh was seen as God. Akhenaten came after Noah whose ship that survived the flood was reported in Asia. and Abraham come from Chaldea which is Asia. I don't desire to debate it. The original Asians are Negroes. Shem is called the sons of God in Job because actually he only had one God. Both his brothers Ham and Japeth had multiple gods.

My thoughts are

Shem is the Asiatic Blackman

Ham is the African Blackman

Japeth is the New World & Pacific Island Blackman


Those are the 3 races of the original man or sons of Noah

Akhenaten was a pharaoh of Egypt who reigned over the country for about 17 years between roughly 1353 B.C. and 1335 B.C.Aug 30, 2013

The A.D calendar is not real and alot of dates do not match known facts and characters. Egypt was never monotheistic. They did however understood there was a creator God yet they worshipped Him through other gods. And this concept of Orisha or Angel worship can be found among Yorubas Ifa who are one of the most advanced peoples on Earth. It can be found among other groups as well where they have intermediaries to the Supreme Being. Hebrew, Islam and Vedic religion worship God Almighty directly without go betweens.

So 3 races of Blacks exist with their own unique parternal DNA.

FAMILYPEDIA


Grandson of NoahProgenitor of Assyrian Peoples

Biography

Ashur (אַשּׁוּר) was the second son of Shem, the son of Noah. Ashur's brothers were Elam, Arphaxad, Lud, and Aram.

Prior to the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls, there was contention in academic circles regarding whether Ashur or Nimrod built the Assyrian cities of Nineveh, Resen, Rehoboth-Ir and Calah, since the name Ashur can refer to both the person and the country (compare Genesis 10:8–12 AV and Genesis 10:8–12 ESV). Sir Walter Raleigh devoted several pages in his History of the World (c. 1616) to reciting past scholarship regarding the question of whether it had been Nimrod or Ashur who built the cities in Assyria.

Historical MapDead Seas Scrolls

The Ge'ez version of the Book of Jubilees, affirmed by the 15 Jubilees scrolls found amongst the Dead Sea Scrolls, affirms that the contested lands in Genesis 10:8-12 were apportioned to Ashur. Jubilees 9:3 states, "And for Ashur came forth the second Portion, all the land of Ashur and Nineveh and Shinar and to the border of India, and it ascends and skirts the river." 




Ashur son of Shem as you can see they lived closed to India which is Southeast Asia. So not only does the people of one God worship come from Asia yet the religion as well.

[A foreign general explains:] This people [the Jews] is descended from the
Chaldeans. At one time they lived in Mesopotamia, because they would not
follow the gods of their fathers who were in Chaldea. For they had left the
ways of their ancestors, and they worshiped the God of heaven, the God
they had come to know; hence they [the Chaldeans] drove them out from
the presence oftheir gods and they fled to Mesopotamia, and lived there for
a long time. Then their God commanded them to leave the place where they
were living and go to the land of Canaan.


Chaldea is in Asia


Abraham forced to live around idol worshippers so Abraham was forced out.




Chaldeans were

Considered the little sister to Assyria and Babylonia, the Chaldeans, a Semitic-speaking tribe that lasted for around 230 years, known for astrology and witchcraft, were latecomers to Mesopotamia who were never strong enough to take on Babylonia or Assyria at full strength.

Abraham, a Brahmin

“And in Chaldea, Brahm was known. A pious Brahm named Terah lived in Ur; his son was so devoted to the Brahmic faith that he was called A-Brahm; and he was set apart to be the father of the Hebrew race. Now, Terah took his wife and sons and all his flocks and herds to Haran in the West; here Terah died. And Abram took the flocks and herds, and with his kindred journeyed farther west; and when he reached the Oaks of Morah in the land of Canaan, he pitched his tents and there abode. A famine swept the land and Abram took his kindred and his flocks and herds and came to Egypt, and in these fertile plains of Zoan pitched his tent, and here abode. And men still mark the place where Abram lived–across the plain.

“You ask why Abram came to Egypt land? This is the cradle-land of the initiate; all secret things belong to Egypt land; and this is why the masters come. In Zoan Abram taught his science of the stars, and in that sacred temple over there he learned the wisdom of the wise. And when his lessons all were learned, he took his kindred and his flocks and herds and journeyed back to Canaan, and in the plains of Mamre pitched his tent, and there he lived, and there he died. And records of his life and works and of his sons, and of the tribes of Israel, are well preserved in Jewish sacred books.” (Aquarian Gospel 10:6-15).





As you can see the Indians have stories of Shem coming from Asia or India into the land of Chaldea. I didnt make this up nor did any Indian deceive me, I came to this conclusion on my own that Shemite bloodline is the Asiatic Blackman. This is not an Indian like you see today yet rather a Negro because Shem married into Ham. This occurs when Abraham chooses Hagar an Egyptian woman as Sarah's handmaid or concubine. There are many more times where Hebrew males marry Egyptian women producing the Negro look that's quite different from a pure Hamite. Shem may have looked somewhat different being he was from Asia. Yet this story does validate other conclusions that Egypt was more technologically advanced than other places.

.

In his book Moisés y los Extraterrestres, Mexican author Tomás Doreste states,

Voltaire was of the opinion that Abraham descended from some of the numerous Brahman priests who left India to spread their teachings throughout the world; and in support of his thesis he presented the following elements: the similarity of names and the fact that the city of Ur, land of the patriarchs, was near the border of Persia, the road to India, where that Brahman had been born.

The name of Brahma was highly respected in India, and his influence spread throughout Persia as far as the lands bathed by the rivers Euphrates and Tigris. The Persians adopted Brahma and made him their own. Later they would say that the God arrived from Bactria, a mountainous region situated midway on the road to India. (pp. 46-47.)

Bactria (a region of ancient Afghanistan) was the locality of a prototypical Jewish nation called Juhuda or Jaguda, also called Ur-Jaguda. Ur meant "place or town." Therefore, the bible was correct in stating that Abraham came from "Ur of the Chaldeans." "Chaldean," more correctly Kaul-Deva (Holy Kauls), was not the name of a specific ethnicity but the title of an ancient Hindu Brahmanical priestly caste who lived in what are now Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the Indian state of Kashmir.

"The tribe of Ioud or the Brahmin Abraham, was expelled from or left the Maturea of the kingdom of Oude in India and, settling in Goshen, or the house of the Sun or Heliopolis in Egypt, gave it the name of the place which they had left in India, Maturea." (Anacalypsis; Vol. I, p. 405.)

"He was of the religion or sect of Persia, and of Melchizedek."(Vol. I, p. 364.)

"The Persians also claim Ibrahim, i.e. Abraham, for their founder, as well as the Jews. Thus we see that according to all ancient history the Persians, the Jews, and the Arabians are descendants of Abraham.(p.85) ...We are told that Terah, the father of Abraham, originally came from an Eastern country called Ur, of the Chaldees or Culdees, to dwell in a district called Mesopotamia. Some time after he had dwelt there, Abraham, or Abram, or Brahma, and his wife Sara or Sarai, or Sara-iswati, left their father's family and came into Canaan. The identity of Abraham and Sara with Brahma and Saraiswati was first pointed out by the Jesuit missionaries."(Vol. I; p. 387.)




More links

Son of man

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMcnET5gW4A

TheBedWench:
Son of man

Interesing...
Most would call these conspiracy theories, but conspiracy theories are mostly hidden truths the cattle must never know about.

I think you should move your threads to the Religion section. They will get more views, more contributions, and definitely more criticisms and insults, but many more would learn from them.

AutoTechDoyz:

Interesing...
Most would call these conspiracy theories, but conspiracy theories are mostly hidden truths the cattle must never know about.

I think you should move your threads to the Religion section. They will get more views, more contributions, and definitely more criticisms and insults, but many more would learn from them.

I put them in the celebrities section for one reason to let them know God is the only one worth celebrating. I found it weird when hungry poor people would root for a big man showing off his gigantic mansion and custom furniture. Religion practiced by our fathers does permeate with us more than so called karma. I understand bloodline is one of the greatest mysteries concealed by the persecutors.

TheBedWench:



I put them in the celebrities section for one reason to let them know God is the only one worth celebrating. I found it weird when hungry poor people would root for a big man showing off his gigantic mansion and custom furniture. Religion practiced by our fathers does permeate with us more than so called karma. I understand bloodline is one of the greatest mysteries concealed by the persecutors.

I doubt dodos who worship celebrities would see value in your threads. But if you insist on putting them here then it is.

AutoTechDoyz:

I doubt dodos who worship celebrities would see value in your threads. But if you insist on putting them here then it is.

I might follow what you suggest maybe I'm being lazy. That happens sometimes on the mission. A mission is until Allah comes you home.

The sons of the one God

So it might sound weird yet this is backed up by scripture. That is the people of God have a bloodline and Satan has a bloodline. This is even the same wisdom in the Vedas. Skin color has nothing to do with bloodline. Melanin theory was created by Jews to hide their seed they implanted among Hebrews.





Who are the descendants of Lord Krishna?

It is believed that Vrishni was son of Satvata, a descendant of Yadu, the son of Yayati. He had two wives, Gandhari and Madri. He has a sonnamed Devamidhusha by his wife Madri. Vasudeva, the father of Krishna was the grandson of Devamidhusha.




Who are the descendants of the Messiah
The Messiah's bloodline includes King Solomon and King David. The Messiah experienced marriage and produced offspring with Mary Magdalene


The Royal Bloodline of Messiah and Mary Magdalene -


What is the Merovingian bloodline?
The Merovingian dynasty was the ruling family of the Franks from the middle of the 5th century until 751. They first appear as "Kings of the Franks" in the Roman army of northern Gaul. By 509 they had united all the Franks and northern Gaulish Romans under their rule.


French is a semantic language created by Yudeans who fled the war between Rome and Yudea.

As you can see Yudea is the royal tribe whose lineage goes back to Krishna who was Black yet a blue black.

Paganism is a term first used in the 4th century, by the early Christian community, for populations of the Roman world who worshipped many gods. 

Amongst the many pagan gods worshipped across the world were seven: Osiris, Apis, Zeus, Dionysus, Helios, Hades and Asclepius.

More than one God is polytheisticism. Egyptians and Greeks are the same people who warred with each other and sometimes held alliances.

THE KNOWING

Ptolemy I Soter & the creation story of Serapis Christus, Zeus & Jesus

theageoftheknowing2017

3 years ago

Advertisements

Ad



Ptolemy I of Egypt as a means to unify the Greeks and Egyptians in his realm. The deity was depicted as Greco-Roman (Ju-Zeus, Je-Zeus, Jesus) in appearance, but with Egyptian trappings, and combined iconography from a great many cults, signifying both abundance and resurrection. His cults was spread as a matter of deliberate policy by the Ptolemaic kings, who also built a splendid Serapeum in Alexandria. Serapis continued to increase in popularity during the Roman period, often replacing Asaru (Osiris) as the consort of Isis in non-Egyptian temples (Note: Serapis is aform of Asar[u]). Zeus,  aka “Zeus Pateras,” takes his name from the Indian version, “Dyaus Pitar.” Dyaus Pitar, which in turn is derived from the Ta Meri (Egyptian) name “Iusa Ptah-Re,” or “The Father of the GODS”. Thus, the origin of the English transliteration word ‘Fath-Er (Father).’ In Kemet (Egyptian) mythology, Ptah, the Father, is the unseen Creative-force, and the Sun was viewed as Ptah’s visible proxy who brings everlasting life to the Earth; hence, the title “Son of God,” which is really the “Sun of God.” Thus,“Jesus is the Light of the World” that everyone sees. “Zeus” equals “Dyaus,” which became the Greco-Roman words ‘Deos,’ ‘Deus’ and ‘Dios’ – ‘God.’ “Zeus Pateras,” like Dyaus Pitar, means, “God the Father”. Dyaus Pitar becomes “Jupiter” in Roman mythology. According to Professor Hilton Hotema, the very name “Christ” comes from the Vedic word ‘Kris,’ as in ‘Krishna,’ (the Black One) which is also another name for the Sun (Consciousness). According to Gerald Massey in his phenomenal book “GERALD MASSEY’S LECTURES,” he states that Christ and Krishna is derived from the Ta Merrian (Kemetian / Egyptian) word KRST,  meaning ‘Burial,’ the mummified body of Asar (Osiris), symbolized as the “Soul embedded (buried) within the Pineal Gland (flesh). ‘Lazarus,’ the mummy raised from the dead by Jesus, the Christian copyists did not change his name much, “El-Azar-us” (Azar-EL, “the AngEL of Death” or Asar-Re, “Lord of the Underworld”) being the Ta Merrian (Kemetian / Egyptian) mummy raised from the dead by Heru (Horus) at least a 1,000 years before the Judeo-Christianity version. This story is allegory for the Sun reviving its old, dying self, or father, as in “El-Asaru (Osiris).” Moreover, Christ comes from the Greek word ‘Christos’, which means “The Anointed One”. Again, the word ‘Krishna’ in Greek is the same as ‘Christos’. A colloquial Bengali rendering of Krishna is ‘Kristo’, which is the same as the Spanish for Christ — ‘Cristo’. Furthermore, since Heru (Horus) was called ‘Iusa / Iao / Iesu’ (later the Tamil word Issa, and Arabic / Quranic word Isa), the ‘KRST,’ (Iusa Karast) and Krishna / Christna was called ‘Jezeus.’ Thus, we get the Indus-Kushite name “Jezeus Christna,” which later becomes the New Testament Biblical name “Jesus Christ.” Hotema states that the name “Iesous Christos” (Jesus Christ) was not formally adopted in its present form until after the first Council of Nicea, i.e., in 325 A.D. Interestingly, in Bengali, Krishna is reputedly “Christos,” which is the same as the Greek for “Christ” and which the soldiers of Alexander the Great called Krishna and when a Tamil (Pre-Dravidian) person calls on Krishna, he often says, ‘Krsta.’ ‘Krsta’ is a Sanskrit word meaning ‘attraction.’ So when we address God as KRST, Christ, or Krishna we indicate the same all-attractive Supreme Personality of Godhead. When Jesus said, “Our Father who art in heaven hallowed be Thy name”, the name of God was Krsta or Krishna. Prabhupada further says: ‘Christ’ is another way of saying ‘Krsta’ and ‘Krsta’ is another way of pronouncing ‘Krishna,’ the name of God…the general name of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, whose specific name is ‘Krishna.’ Therefore whether you call God ‘Christ’, ‘Krsta’, or ‘Krishna’, ultimately you are addressing the same Supreme Personality of Godhead…(read “THE ORIGINS OF CHRISTIANITY AND THE QUEST FOR THE HISTORICAL JESUS CHRIST” by Acharya S and “JESUS NEVER EXISTED” by Kenneth Humphreys).
According to author and theologian Tom Harpur: “states, “Gerald Massey discovered nearly two hundred instances of immediate correspondence between the mythical Egyptian material and the allegedly historical Christian writings about Jesus. Horus (Heru) indeed was the archetypal Pagan Christ (Note: Gerald Massey had access to the basement of the British Museum where 80% more items, pieces and etc…are located at…only 20% is above ground in the museum portion).”




Christianity started in Egypt and is a pagan religion like Egyptians were pagans. Hamites observe pagan culture which includes cannibalism of their deceased kings similar to South Pacific Fiji Island Blacks cannibalize their deceased relatives. I know of at least several West African tradition were eating deceased kings is an observed practice. This Last Supper ritual of Christ offering bread as his flesh and wine as his blood is a pagan ritual observed by Egyptians. This was believed to be a resurrection of the king as he would become apart of his descendants who consumed him. The people of Abraham never did such for headman and kings were buried in caves like a tomb. Christianity has no relation to Abraham or the God of Abraham and is of Hamite pagan origins.

IN THE ALEXANDRIAN CULT OF SERAPIS

Ahmed Osman

CHRISTIAN ROOTS IN THE ALEXANDRIAN CULT OF SERAPIS


The basis of Egyptian salvation beliefs was the divine nature that Egyptians attributed to their king, who was looked upon as the human son of Ra, the cosmic god. This special relationship between god and the king was manifested in the three special events in the ruler's life—his holy birth, his anointing at coronation, and his resurrection after death. It was an essence of Egyptian belief that, while the spiritual element left the body at death, it would return at some point in the future if the body could be kept safe and protected, which is why Egyptians devoted such care to mummification and secure tombs. Osiris was regarded as an ancient king, slain by his brother Seth, who dismembered his body. However, his wife/sister Isis was able to collect his remains and, using a magic ritual, assemble his body again and restore him to life, not on earth but in the underworld, where he became the god and judge of the dead.


Following the suppression of the Amarna monotheistic religious revolution—of Akhenaten and Tutankhamun in the mid 14th century BC—new theology developed within the cult of Osiris. Initially, the promise of eternal life was confined to kings and nobles who could afford the expensive burial rite. After the death of Tutankhamun, however, a long process of change in the Osiris theology began, which resulted in the emergence of the cult of Serapis, whose followers could obtain the right to eternal life without the need for mummification if they confessed in the deity and went through an initiation ritual.


It was Ptolemy I Soter (304-284 BC), who introduced Serapis. The Apis bull was sacred at Memphis, where the deceased APIs was known as Osiris-Apis, or "Oserapis," from which he derived the name of his new deity, "Serapis." Ptolemy built a temple for Serapis in Alexandria, where he placed a statue for the god: a man with curly hair, benign expression, and a long beard, in the same style used later for the representations of Christ in Coptic churches. Other than his temple at Alexandria, Serapis had another centre in Memphis, where, on the necropolis of Sakkara, the Serapeum became one of the most famous sites in the country.


Isis became the companion of Serapis, who also inherited many of the attributes of Osiris, including mastery over the underworld. The mystic rites of Isis, to which women as well as men were admitted after an ini




Jesus Christ never existed it was a combining of Hamite gods worshipped in Egypt and Greece. I'm saying Hamites colonized other Hamites same as the Arab/Berber Almoravids and Morocco used the British, Belgiums, French and other European White nations to colonize other Hamites in West Africa. It is Hamites who believe their ancestors were gods and they have divine right to rule. Black Hebrews are different genetically and ancestrally and had no beliefs they were gods.

Alot of the slaves brought to America were Igbos or Hebrews. We are cousins don't you know?



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWMnIlg02gs