People, you took your eye off the ball. You had the information to tell you what was going on, but you let the #corporatemedia distract you.

[A] It was a bioweapon, and
[B] we have the antidote.

THREAD....
Let's go back to that original paper in J Virol 2005.
From the CDC. Fauci's people.

archive.is/ZYNzz

What was the reason that they were looking at #chloroquine for SARS coronaviruses?

Because they were developing them as bioweapons.

And #hydroxychloroquine was known to be an antidote.

https://archive.fo/FaTXB

The US government realised in 2014 that there needed to be a ban on "gain of function" studies with these viruses.

So, they just outsourced it to #Wuhan

https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/04/23/why-us-outsourced-bat-virus-research-wuhan/

What's "gain of function" research?

Put simply, for a virus it's where you add in a genetic sequence to make it more deadly (virulent).

We've been able to do this effectively since the advent of mass sequencing and the human genome project in 2003.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Genome_Project

The centre of this research was the Sanger centre.
It's impressive.
Named after Fred Sanger, a Quaker.
Most of the genomics research in the world is centred on this building.
But I digress.

The advent of sequencing and the human genome project meant that we were able to take the DNA (or RNA) of any organism and modify it. Additions, deletions etc.

Zengli Shi was doing this with SARS viruses in 2008, using inserts (spliced genetic material) from HIV-1


Why would anyone take SARS, one of the most deadly respiratory viruses, and add inserts from HIV-1, the hardest-to-treat virus known to man?

THAT is "gain of function" research.

It's unethical and highly dangerous

Zengli Shi did it.

So what happened after 2014 when the US cancelled their gain of function program?

Well, the Wuhan Institute of virology opened in 2015 and Zengli Shi was installed.

But she isn't working alone. She needs help. From the US and - guess where - the @CSIRO in #melbourne

(Yes, I know, it's all too predictable isn't it?)

Gary Crameri

Guess what Gary told you on the @abcnews?

That the virus came from bats.

But we know that is absolutely false.

Gary lied. The ABC lied. People died.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-10-31/scientists-confirm-chinese-bats-responsible-for-sars-outbreak/5059404

How do we know the virus was manufactured? We've known since Prashant Pradhan published this paper in Biorxiv in 2nd Feb 2020.

Note that it says "withdrawn"....
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v2

"Withdrawn" doesn't mean "invalid". On this occasion it means "censored".

Those that were there will remember that it was forced off the internet, @zerohedge were forced off with it.

Why? Was there anything wrong with it?

Since about June there have been more news reports confirming that this virus was manufactured.

But it took 4 months. That is the power of the #corporatemedia and "scientists" like @trvrb who promoted the censorship of Pradhan

https://www.neweurope.eu/article/norwegian-scientist-says-covid-19-was-manufactured-claim-backed-by-ex-british-intel-head/

For those that want to check independently the original paper, a copy is here: https://files.catbox.moe/r5nimq.pdf

By the way, feel free to challenge me on this. On any of it.
But the important thing is that this was probably not important.

It was a manufactured virus designed as a bioweapon.

It escaped in Wuhan, probably by accident and almost certainly too early (hence the difficulties keeping the fear going beyond the 90 days curve)...

.... but there was an antidote. #hydroxychloroquine was always the antidote.

It's a super safe drug. Safer than paracetamol (tylenol).

It works when given early after a diagnosis or as prevention.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/hydroxychloroquine-works-in-high-risk-patients-and-saying-otherwise-is-dangerous

So who benefits by promoting the #fakenews story that it doesn't?

The #corporatemedia.
The people that control the corporate media, the #CFR.
Big government.
#CCP.
#Bigpharma.

And, I'm saddened to say it, but the medical faculty of the world has shown their true colours.

Despite a small band of doctors and scientists standing up for the truth, most of us are censored and threatened.

Those that tow the line are allowed to speak.

Those that are allowed to speak have vested interests (political or financial) that are more important than the desire to save lives.

Because they did not offer any alternatives to a demonstrably effective treatment.
They are either corrupt or naive. They are showing themselves and will have to answer when the public finally realise the truth and the #classactionlawsuit(s) follow, which they will.

There will be nowhere to hide.
Governments and Chief Medical Officers have told you that there was no treatment for #covid19 and it was a lie.

Others told you that the treatment was dangerous and it was proven to be a lie.

People died unnecessarily. Thousands of them.

Never forget.

Oh, if you're one of the #corrupt medical faculty that are trying to promote the "dangerous drug" #fakenews you are lying to yourself and lying to the public.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893920302179

FYI given the interest in this thread It has been archived here:
https://archive.fo/uWOzh

They can silence us but they can't silence the message.
Just to clarify this one, this was in 2013. Talking about SARS and MERS but the principle is the same.

He fails to mention his involvement in manipulating the viruses.

And we know that MERS outbreaks are not "natural"
https://sphcm.med.unsw.edu.au/news/could-mers-coronavirus-be-bioterrorism-new-study-shows-why-could-be-one-explanations-paradoxes