‌Barbados to remove Queen Elizabeth II as head of state


‌

Barbados has announced its intention to remove Queen Elizabeth II as head of state and become a republic by November next year, as the Caribbean island nation seeks to move fully beyond its colonial past.

The decision was formalized in the so-called Throne Speech, delivered on behalf of Prime Minister Mia Mottley by the island’s Governor-General Sandra Mason to mark the state opening of parliament on Tuesday.

More than half a century after attaining independence from Britain, “the time has come to fully leave our colonial past behind,” Mason said.

“Barbadians want a Barbadian Head of State,” she said. “This is the ultimate statement of confidence in who we are and what we are capable of achieving.”



Mason said “Barbados will take the next logical step toward full sovereignty and become a Republic by the time we celebrate our 55th Anniversary of Independence” — which will be marked on November 30, 2021.

When asked about the speech, a Buckingham Palace spokesman said: “This is a matter for the government and people of Barbados.”

Queen Elizabeth is head of state of the United Kingdom and 15 other formerly-British ruled countries, where she is represented by the governor-general.

They are Antigua and Barbuda, Australia, The Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Canada, Grenada, Jamaica, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Solomon Islands, and Tuvalu.

Many Barbadians have called in the past for removing the queen’s status — due to its lingering imperialist associations — and several of the island’s leaders have advocated becoming a republic.

A government-appointed commission concluded in 1998 that Barbados should become a republic with a non-executive president as head of state to replace the queen — but the recommendation was not acted upon.



Mason cited a warning by the country’s first prime minister, Errol Walton Barrow, who had cautioned against “loitering on colonial premises” — saying: “That warning is as relevant today as it was in 1966.”

“Having attained Independence over half a century ago, our country can be in no doubt about its capacity for self-governance,” she said.

A number of nations have removed the queen’s status as head of state since achieving independence, while remaining part of the 54-member Commonwealth, with Mauritius the last to become a republic, in 1992.

During Queen Elizabeth’s reign, eight referendums have been held on becoming a republic, of which three passed: Ghana (1960), South Africa (1960), and The Gambia (1970).

Barbados is sometimes called “Little England” for its loyalty to British customs.

The move by Barbados comes as the historic role of the British Empire comes under renewed scrutiny, as part of a global reckoning on race relations and the colonial past fuelled by mass anti-racism protests in the United States.



https://punchng.com/barbados-to-remove-queen-elizabeth-ii-as-head-of-state/

Their day don break.

They have seen the light.

Okay

coolcharm:
Their day don break.

They have seen the light.

My brother, that is not even the problem. Take a closer look at what the write-up said in the third paragraph before the last. It says :

'During Queen Elizabeth’s reign, eight referendums have been held on becoming a republic, of which three passed: Ghana (1960), South Africa (1960), and The Gambia (1970).'

Does it mean that Nigeria is not a republic?

they should also allow Biafra to go, hoha

Canada should also follow suit.

How can independent nations still have Queen Eliza as their Head of state in this current year?

UK too should do same

Hushpuppies:




My brother, that is not even the problem. Take a closer look at what the write-up said in the third paragraph before the last. It says :

'During Queen Elizabeth’s reign, eight referendums have been held on becoming a republic, of which three passed: Ghana (1960), South Africa (1960), and The Gambia (1970).'

Does it mean that Nigeria is not a republic?

Nigeria is an experiment, that's what we all aren't seeing. I don't see any reason why you should bring almost 250+ ethnic groups together to form a state, when you know ethnocentrism won't allow for peace even within two ethnic groups.

Hushpuppies:




My brother, that is not even the problem. Take a closer look at what the write-up said in the third paragraph before the last. It says :

'During Queen Elizabeth’s reign, eight referendums have been held on becoming a republic, of which three passed: Ghana (1960), South Africa (1960), and The Gambia (1970).'

Does it mean that Nigeria is not a republic?

This seems to be a huge revelation

Righteousnesss8:

no bro it's the Genesis

I really think you're right

Canada Nko

Yoruba & Hausa / Fulani would decide that. Maybe year 7070.

Asari too laid claim as their Masters so maybe they also need to get independence from Ijaws too.

Dikegodspower:
they should also allow Biafra to go, hoha

The beginning of the end of the book of kings.

Nigeria needs to be recolonized or we all go our separate ways to avoid further blood shed.