Agbegbaorogboye:

Goals come as a result of errors no doubt. But I'm sure you've heard of unforced errors and schoolboy errors before if you're familiar with sports.
PSG came into the second half looking to do same thing they did against Bayern that worked. Play on the counter. Like I said and it's obvious you can't argue it, man city had 1 shots on target before their goal! This is indicative of a toothless attack. PSG by then had 9 shots with 4 on target.

Compare PSG's goal which came from a corner with Marquinhos charging at the ball which was put into an unmarked space picked by Maria. The job still needed to be done by Marquinhos for the ball to go beyond the keeper.
Man city's goal on the other hand, no Man City player was attacking the ball towards the post. All Navas had to do was follow the trajectory of the ball and pick it up. But I guess he got too used to Marquinhos clearing the aerial ball, he forgot he has a keeper is the last line for clearing the ball. That's a schoolboy goalkeeper error and an unforced error from PSG as a team, just same way they did with Man utd's second goal that year.
I hope you can see the difference.

garfield1:


PSg this season are far better away.man u,barca,bayern

mazimee:


That PSG wouldn't have happened if Gundogan marked his man well. That's an error too. About the City goals, you have to be dominant and to force goals. City dominated PSG the whole of 2nd half.

Agbegbaorogboye:

So you agree that it was a physical battle between Gundogan and Marquinhos in which Marquinhos came up tops. It can then be said the goal is well deserved. Can you give the battles involved in the KDB goal at least?

jikins:


Whats point of all these honestly? Weda you score earth breaking goal or cheap goal. The rule of the game doesn't change. The team with the most goals win. I personally would prefer 2 cheap goals against 1 breath taking goal any day any time. Man City don win. And they won away. They did their job. Only time will tell if they will do it again next week.

All these talks of error this error that will not change the scoreboard and the reality of the loss PSG suffered. So I don't see the point. Its up to PSG to be better next match in both defence and attack and hope Man City don't up their game too much and also hope for a little bit of luck.

TruthinAction:
Man city was just lucky. First goal was keeper error. Second goal was defensive blunder. How could they have allowed the free kick to go in between the defensive walls? PSG should play their life out in the second game. I see them winning by 2-1. The winner will be decided by penalty kicks.

Komu1048:



And may I know the competition?

If it’s not cl,El or Supercup. Then keep ur peace

tenzofall:
Run along

Diffdeef:
and west brom butchered Chelsea 5- 2,have some shame g.

bashuayi:



sense far from you ooo

Chelsea concede those goals after red card

jikins:


Whats point of all these honestly? Weda you score earth breaking goal or cheap goal. The rule of the game doesn't change. The team with the most goals win. I personally would prefer 2 cheap goals against 1 breath taking goal any day any time. Man City don win. And they won away. They did their job. Only time will tell if they will do it again next week.

All these talks of error this error that will not change the scoreboard and the reality of the loss PSG suffered. So I don't see the point. Its up to PSG to be better next match in both defence and attack and hope Man City don't up their game too much and also hope for a little bit of luck.

garfield1:


Yes,run along with the bald headed Spaniard out of ucl

Agbegbaorogboye:

Is anyone disputing the fact that City won? City won fair and square. Just like Man Utd did the other time. But there's no doubt PSG were the architects of their own misfortune in both cases/

blackjack21:


yes, it is.
PSG fall hand. I just hope something else happen, I don't want English Vs English final.

osazsky:
ur consign should be chelsea not city.pep has nerver thrown a 2 goal lead in a knockout stage too experience for that.for psg man u baca yes not city

bashuayi:



sense far from you ooo

Chelsea concede those goals after red card

osazsky:
nothing is fair my bro .chealsea winning the ucl was not fair.buhari winning the elections was not fair..the fact that man u and asenal now play in a division B competition is not fair

GeneralPula:


Something wey Mourinho don do well well..

Him even destroyed Barca and won the champions league with such wild style..

Agbegbaorogboye:

So you agree that it was a physical battle between Gundogan and Marquinhos in which Marquinhos came up tops. It can then be said the goal is well deserved. Can you give the battles involved in the KDB goal at least?

emae009:


Actually read what you just wrote. His premise would have been wrong if he said "any team that beats Barca gets to the finals and win....."
He said any team that beats Barca wins the UCL except Madrid are in the finals then Madrid wins. This is true.
'10 - Inter Milan won (first statement is valid)
'12 - Chelsea won (first statement is valid)
'13 - Bayern won (first statement is valid)
'14 - Madrid won (exception is valid)
'16 - Madrid won (exception is valid)
'17 - Madrid won (exception is valid)
'18 - Madrid won (exception is valid)
'19 - Liverpool won (first statement is valid)
'20 - Bayern won (first statement is valid).

Your base your argument on the fact that any team that beats Barca gets to the final which is mostly true but that's not what he said. Problem is you didn't understand fully what his statement meant before you started trying so hard to prove him wrong

Soso990240:
Roma won Barca, but couldnt get to the finals. your analysis is wrong bro. If they couldnt face Madrid, then your analysis lacks meaning

oyatainer:



Cry me a river you idiot. Since Man City has been playing teams hands down and eventually lost deu to errors, who have come out to praise them.


Deal with it, guy. They had their plan and utilised it well. If you don't like it go and hug a transformer.

mazimee:


There wasn't even a battle as Gundogan wasn't positionaly aware

Diffdeef:
and west brom butchered Chelsea 5- 2,have some shame g.

TruthinAction:
Man city was just lucky. First goal was keeper error. Second goal was defensive blunder. How could they have allowed the free kick to go in between the defensive walls? PSG should play their life out in the second game. I see them winning by 2-1. The winner will be decided by penalty kicks.

fergie001:

My most hated clubside is Barcelona. Guardiola represents that so....On The Blues I Stand

emae009:


based on the premise "Any team that beats Barca wins the UCL except Real Madrid are in the finals, then Madrid Wins" .....
can you point out how that analysis is wrong
I really did hope that dumbing it down would be self explanatory. But I'd love to hear your own argument

Lamasta:


Forgive yourself amd move on bro Guardiola is still firing on all cylinder...