Nickshrapnel:
I know one can also calculate in terms of volume but I find calculating in terms of diameter more straightforward since both of them have a shape that roughly resembles that of a sphere

It's OK but diameter is not size.

atheistandproud:
@sourcerer

I prefer the capture theory. The moon may have been a dwarf planet captured by our gravity as it was passing by. The moon may have also been made by Aliens, or at least Zechariah Sitchin implied that the Anunaki may have put it there as an observation post.

If you have noticed, the moon only shows us one side of it's face? Why does it do that? What's on the far side of the moon?

Bros no vex o, how exactly did the Anunaki make a dwarf planet?

RingRoadMafia:


Bros no vex o, how exactly did the Anunaki make a dwarf planet?

They didn't make it. It was "captured" and put into orbit

atheistandproud:


They didn't make it. It was "captured" and put into orbit

How was it captured?

RingRoadMafia:


How was it captured?

jjjjjjgggghhh

atheistandproud:


I dunno, it wasn't specified in the book.

So you prefer a theory that can't be substantiated? A theory which neither you nor the author of the book which you speak of know absolutely nothing about.

RingRoadMafia:


So you prefer a theory that can't be substantiated? A theory which neither you nor the author of the book which you speak of know absolutely nothing about.

If you don't understand how science works then I'm sorry that I cannot engage you. There are many theories and patents which we do not have the scientific tools to confirm/disprove yet.

I'm very sure if you lived during the time of Copernicus and Galileo, you would have said the same thing. Good day.

unanonso:


Believe it!

belive what?

atheistandproud:


They didn't make it. It was "captured" and put into orbit

dude free that ideology I've been there . #hugs

RingRoadMafia:


So you prefer a theory that can't be substantiated? A theory which neither you nor the author of the book which you speak of know absolutely nothing about.

you drink buddy? Beers on me , cheers!

jjjjjkkkklll

Na me carry myself come una thread.

I'm off.

Never expect to see me here.

atheistandproud:


Na wa.

If NASA wants to attempt to capture an asteroid, what's the probability that a more advanced civilization cannot capture a dwarf planet?

I'm not saying it is truth. The possibilities are endless, if one actually chooses to consider them.

I respect that fully

TheSourcerer:
what if there is no utimate truth . Everything is random ,We are random .

That's like a plate of rice with dodo and assorted meat and vegetables and a chilled bottle of odeku randomly appearing on the table before one.

How can everything be random if it depends on what led to it?

Do note that scientists never claim to know how it all began. The fact is however that a bang that is big can not just randomly happen since something has to exist to go bang. And before you assume I'm saying God said, "let there be a big bang", even God would have had to evolve from something and evolve something big to make go bang.

Spy360:

The only theory that satisfies every is that God created the universe and chose to keep life here on earth alone for His special purpose.

'The only theory that satisfies you', you mean.

Not everyone is so easily satisfied or too lazy as to not go about knocking and asking and seeking in order to learn more especially since Christ taught you to do science as in use your senses to ask and knock and seek.

TheSourcerer:
I believe debris and dirt of the atmosphere/Clouds gives off the red colouring of the moon

You bloody believer!

atheistandproud:


If you don't understand how science works then I'm sorry that I cannot engage you. There are many theories and patents which we do not have the scientific tools to confirm/disprove yet.

I'm very sure if you lived during the time of Copernicus and Galileo, you would have said the same thing. Good day.

Okay, so you're saying that since Unicorns are in theory; a "thing" , then people are free to believe them?? There's proof of how the moon was formed, bro. Real proof backed with evidence of it's happenstance in other parts of the galaxy and you're here believing in alien theories that suits your fantasy. You my friend, are the one who doesn't understand how science works.

TheSourcerer:
you drink buddy? Beers on me , cheers!

Yes sir! I, infact, am a red wine connoisseur

Spy360:

The sun is over 10,000 times the size of the moon.

Ok , the sun is 10,000 times bigger than the moon but an observer from Earth basically sees then as the same size due to the distance of the moon from the earth, the positioning is so accurate that it feels like more than just a coincidence.... Such phenomenon doesn't appear in any other planet in our solar system.

Spy360:

The moon was empty and boring. Mars too is empty and now becoming boring. We need to get to Jupiter.

That's probably what they want you to believe, do you honestly think that if NASA or any other space agency makes any remarkable discovery that they will share it with the public?

TheSourcerer:
I really doubt life exists outside the milky way , at least we are sure nothing is in the Solar System , we are one spontaneous freak accident , Maybe.

I am willing to believe that there's a possibility that no life exists on our solar system apart from Earth but what I'll never believe is that the can't be any form of life outside our solar system.... It's basically impossible, even NASA has not denied nor accepted that fact.

budaatum:


You bloody believer!

I'm glad you belive too

budaatum:


That's like a plate of rice with dodo and assorted meat and vegetables and a chilled bottle of odeku randomly appearing on the table before one.

How can everything be random if it depends on what led to it?

Do note that scientists never claim to know how it all began. The fact is however that a bang that is big can not just randomly happen since something has to exist to go bang. And before you assume I'm saying God said, "let there be a big bang", even God would have had to evolve from something and evolve something big to make go bang.

bangs happen every time

Spy360:

If it does not satisfy you then what?

Hmm
It's obvious no God cares about my family.
Case closed

TheSourcerer:
bangs happen every time

The universe began when something changed.
In other words, the universe was something else before.
But there's no "before or after" in the absence of an observer.
Time shows that a limited observer gets exposed to limited objects.

Anyway, there's no limit to the limited objects that exist.
A limited object is either a collection of ageless indivisible objects or an ageless indivisible object with a specific form.
The form of an ageless indivisible object never changes.
But the form of a collection of ageless indivisible objects changes as these objects induce whatever pattern while moving randomly or anyhow.

TheSourcerer:
belive what?

The Scripture

unanonso:


The Scripture

I do not belive in the Scriptures I believe the bible or Quran,? So no

I enjoy such threads nice one Op.

HellVictorinho:



Hmm
It's obvious no God cares about my family.
Case closed

I am sorry about whatever it is with your family, but are just being bitter. That makes your opinion less rational.

That said, whether God cares or not is a different issue. My point is, only the existence of an intelligent creator can explain the origin of the universe.

I don't swallow all what religion says but I take the logical points or beliefs and mix them with science.

Religion- hypothesis
Science- proofs

Vulcanheph:

I am willing to believe that there's a possibility that no life exists on our solar system apart from Earth but what I'll never believe is that the can't be any form of life outside our solar system.... It's basically impossible, even NASA has not denied nor accepted that fact.

Don't call it impossible, when you can't prove it. There were over 100million sperm cells released by your father, but only one (you) fertilised your mother's egg. If religion have told you this (how special you are), you wouldn't have believed.

Rejoice in the fact that we are special in the entire universe. No life, except here.

Spy360:

I am sorry about whatever it is with your family, but are just being bitter. That makes your opinion less rational.

That said, whether God cares or not is a different issue. My point is, only the existence of an intelligent creator can explain the origin of the universe.

I don't swallow all what religion says but I take the logical points or beliefs and mix them with science.

Religion- hypothesis
Science- proofs

There's nothing rational about your post.



How did my post show bitterness


You shouldn't mix up religion with science and philosophy.



There's nothing amazing about the universe.
Life is absurd.



You are just another collection of ageless indivisible objects.



Note: what you think can't change what I think here

HellVictorinho:


There's nothing rational about your post.



How did my post show bitterness


You shouldn't mix up religion with science and philosophy.



There's nothing amazing about the universe.
Life is absurd.



You are just another collection of ageless indivisible objects.



Note: what you think can't change what I think here

How is it that you post something you cannot prove and claim mine is irrational?


You're embittered because God did care about your family. How can you say so if you feel he does not exist?

Secondly you say there's nothing amazing about the universe. You must be a really hates bored fellow. The universe is AMAZING!

Life is absurd if you can't find meaning and purpose to yours. My life is beaming with meaningful purpose.

Finally, that trash about ageless indivisible bla bla bla... keep those to yourself.

The problem with your lot is self induced confusion. By the way I am not trying to impress or convince you. I am only expressing myself and thoughts.