Fahdiga1:
You already have your answer. IPOB is loved by sane countries

heniford2:
Trash

BigBashiru:
For anyone that closely studies African politics, it is clear that the former colonial powers (UK, France and Germany) have never really left Africa alone since they physically left. In Chad, CAR, Mali, France is always looking to install proxy Governments that will do its bidding and meet its interests. Francophone african countries are also required by colonial law to deposit 50% of their reserves into the French treasury and to award public sector contracts to French companies.

Nnamdi Kanu is a British citizen in UK. This is pure speculation but UK could be looking to:
1. Install a Government to do its bidding.
2. Cause war in Nigeria to maintain white supremacy - which is to say - "look at Africa, all their countries are at war"
3. Cause destabilisation in order to sell arms and make money.
4. Cause destabilisation in order to win mining contracts.

The British Government, if it does not have ulteror motives should either take Nnamdi Kanu to court for instigating session/ war but should also send him to Nigeria so he can be on the forefront of the war he is instigating.

BigBashiru:


Ipob is a rebel group used by the West to destabilize Nigeria just the same way they use other rebel groups to destabilize Mali, Chad, Burkina Faso and CAR. They now want to use the same strategy in Nigeria.

BigBashiru:
For anyone that closely studies African politics, it is clear that the former colonial powers (UK, France and Germany) have never really left Africa alone since they physically left. In Chad, CAR, Mali, France is always looking to install proxy Governments that will do its bidding and meet its interests. Francophone african countries are also required by colonial law to deposit 50% of their reserves into the French treasury and to award public sector contracts to French companies.

Nnamdi Kanu is a British citizen in UK. This is pure speculation but UK could be looking to:
1. Install a Government to do its bidding.
2. Cause war in Nigeria to maintain white supremacy - which is to say - "look at Africa, all their countries are at war"
3. Cause destabilisation in order to sell arms and make money.
4. Cause destabilisation in order to win mining contracts.

The British Government, if it does not have ulteror motives should either take Nnamdi Kanu to court for instigating session/ war but should also send him to Nigeria so he can be on the forefront of the war he is instigating.

BigBashiru:


Ipob is a rebel group used by the West to destabilize Nigeria just the same way they use other rebel groups to destabilize Mali, Chad, Burkina Faso and CAR. They now want to use the same strategy in Nigeria.

Fahdiga1:
Very soon it will be heniford3 cos they will soon ban this one until you get sense

heniford2:
ban what stop posting trash here enough of ESN and IPOB dude go and hustle

BigBashiru:
For anyone that closely studies African politics, it is clear that the former colonial powers (UK, France and Germany) have never really left Africa alone since they physically left. In Chad, CAR, Mali, France is always looking to install proxy Governments that will do its bidding and meet its interests. Francophone african countries are also required by colonials law to deposit 50% of their reserves into the French treasury and to award public sector contracts to French companies.

Nnamdi Kanu is a British citizen in UK. This is pure speculation but UK could be looking to:
1. Install a Government to do its bidding.
2. Cause war in Nigeria to maintain white supremacy - which is to say - "look at Africa, all their countries are at war"
3. Cause destabilisation in order to sell arms and make money.
4. Cause destabilisation in order to win mining contracts.

The British Government, if it does not have ulteror motives should either take Nnamdi Kanu to court for instigating session/ war but should also send him to Nigeria so he can be on the forefront of the war he is instigating.

BigBashiru:
For anyone that closely studies African politics, it is clear that the former colonial powers (UK, France and Germany) have never really left Africa alone since they physically left. In Chad, CAR, Mali, France is always looking to install proxy Governments that will do its bidding and meet its interests. Francophone african countries are also required by colonial law to deposit 50% of their reserves into the French treasury and to award public sector contracts to French companies

Nnamdi Kanu is a British citizen in UK. This is pure speculation but UK could be looking to:
1. Install a Government to do its bidding.

2. Cause war in Nigeria to maintain white supremacy - which is to say - "look at Africa, all their countries are at war"

3. Cause destabilisation in order to sell arms and make money

4. Cause destabilisation in order to win mining contracts.

The British Government, if it does not have ulterior motives should either take Nnamdi Kanu to court for instigating session/ war but should also send him to Nigeria so he can be on the forefront of the war he is instigating.

Henrydonland:
It makes sense but I don't think so because during the civil war Britain, USA and the likes were on the side of Nigeria while France,Isreal were supporters of Biafra.

The British would not want to look like fools if Nigeria ends up dividing.

360degreess:
..you are wrong.the OP is right.white people are evil.

BigBashiru:
For anyone that closely studies African politics, it is clear that the former colonial powers (UK, France and Germany) have never really left Africa alone since they physically left. In Chad, CAR, Mali, France is always looking to install proxy Governments that will do its bidding and meet its interests. Francophone african countries are also required by colonial law to deposit 50% of their reserves into the French treasury and to award public sector contracts to French companies.

Nnamdi Kanu is a British citizen in UK. This is pure speculation but UK could be looking to:
1. Install a Government to do its bidding.
2. Cause war in Nigeria to maintain white supremacy - which is to say - "look at Africa, all their countries are at war"
3. Cause destabilisation in order to sell arms and make money.
4. Cause destabilisation in order to win mining contracts.

The British Government, if it does not have ulteror motives should either take Nnamdi Kanu to court for instigating session/ war but should also send him to Nigeria so he can be on the forefront of the war he is instigating.

BigBashiru:


Notice that boko haram, iswap and Isis do not operate in uk, France or Germany. These organisations only operate in countries that are either former colonies or where they have strategic interests

I once read somewhere online that speculated France could be "sponsoring jihadists" in Mali and CAR

Beancounter93:
.

The problems those countries have are internal, not the cause of external factors.
Chad for example has had tribal tensions, and these have not been handled well, as has CAR and Mali.
All in all, the problem with most African countries is that they run 'sharing cake' economies, not productive economies. If African countries were ready to be productive, most of this conflict would have ended.

By sharing cake...I mean most African countries sell raw materials and use the money to import. When group A feels left out of the sharing, they complain and insome event take up arms. If group B feels left out of the government postions, they cry marginalisaiton, and eventually may take up arms.

That's Nigeria and many other African countries, even the peaceful ones.(Tanzania is an exception because none of the tribes there have an absolute majority)

If anything...France has been a stabilising force, not a destabilising one...and I say this at the risk of being called an imperalist. France has prevented the situation in Mali and Ivory Coast from degenerating into worse.

(Funnily enough the major power in CAR now is Russia. plus some UN troops.).



Nigeria has always run a British-friendly foreign policy regardless of the government.



White supremacy is not dependent on there being chronic war in Africa. If anything, white governments won't mind peaceful and prosperous Africa...it suits them better, provides a market for their goods, and helps them get raw materials sans stress

A peaceful Africa benefits the whites more...supremacist or otherwise



Most arms used in African wars prolly come from Russia and china. The UK is not the leading manufacturer of arms it once was.



Again a peaceful Africa is better for mining companies...they don't have to pay protection money to all sorts of warlords, and gangsters along the way.(Many telcom/it component manufacturing companies would love it if the Eastern Congo was peaceful...no more payment to local warlords X and f for protection to transport tanzanite!) They can just simply pay taxes, transport their goods, and make a huge profit...



I don't like NK or Biafra agitation...but accusing him of instigating secession..is one thing. Actually proving it...that's another thing. COURTS rely on evidence, not on allegations. This does not mean MNK is innocent...it just means that you need a lot more than just 'he is instigating violence'.(And there is evidence some of the violence is being provoked by other factors too).

BigBashiru:


A peaceful Africa isn't better for mining because labor cost will go up and the locals will realise the minerals belong to them and fight for their share. It's divide and conquer.

BigBashiru:


Ipob is a rebel group used by the West to destabilize Nigeria just the same way they use other rebel groups to destabilize Mali, Chad, Burkina Faso and CAR. They now want to use the same strategy in Nigeria.

BigBashiru:


Ipob is a rebel group used by the West to destabilize Nigeria just the same way they use other rebel groups to destabilize Mali, Chad, Burkina Faso and CAR. They now want to use the same strategy in Nigeria.

Naijabad:


I am surprised at your stupidity. I thought you're intelligent.

99% of Igbos are in support of Biafra. The remaining 1% are the political class.

Now let me shock you, conduct a referendum in old eastern region, if we don't have 99% in support of Biafra, I will denounce it.

BigBashiru:
For anyone that closely studies African politics, it is clear that the former colonial powers (UK, France and Germany) have never really left Africa alone since they physically left. In Chad, CAR, Mali, France is always looking to install proxy Governments that will do its bidding and meet its interests. Francophone african countries are also required by colonial law to deposit 50% of their reserves into the French treasury and to award public sector contracts to French companies.

Nnamdi Kanu is a British citizen in UK. This is pure speculation but UK could be looking to:
1. Install a Government to do its bidding.
2. Cause war in Nigeria to maintain white supremacy - which is to say - "look at Africa, all their countries are at war"
3. Cause destabilisation in order to sell arms and make money.
4. Cause destabilisation in order to win mining contracts.

The British Government, if it does not have ulteror motives should either take Nnamdi Kanu to court for instigating session/ war but should also send him to Nigeria so he can be on the forefront of the war he is instigating.

BigBashiru:
For anyone that closely studies African politics, it is clear that the former colonial powers (UK, France and Germany) have never really left Africa alone since they physically left. In Chad, CAR, Mali, France is always looking to install proxy Governments that will do its bidding and meet its interests. Francophone african countries are also required by colonial law to deposit 50% of their reserves into the French treasury and to award public sector contracts to French companies.

Nnamdi Kanu is a British citizen in UK. This is pure speculation but UK could be looking to:
1. Install a Government to do its bidding.
2. Cause war in Nigeria to maintain white supremacy - which is to say - "look at Africa, all their countries are at war"
3. Cause destabilisation in order to sell arms and make money.
4. Cause destabilisation in order to win mining contracts.

The British Government, if it does not have ulteror motives should either take Nnamdi Kanu to court for instigating session/ war but should also send him to Nigeria so he can be on the forefront of the war he is instigating.

melodyogonna:

Why would they take someone to court for instigating secession? I mean, Scotland was granted a referendum, UK themselves was granted referendum to decide about staying in the EU. Lmao this guy, you think social unrest is something new? UK have had them, they know the way to stop it is not to make the civilians angrier. Otherwise you're at risk of having your government overrun by angry civilians who are not afraid to die lol. Every sensible government now will give you the only sensible advice - dialogue

Beancounter93:


One thing you need to know about the two referendums you mentioned

1.Scotland referendum: The Scottish secessionists did not start burning things up and down before they got a referendum. What they did is that they first formed parties to advocate for secession, then they won local elections and showed their people that they could run their local areas well...then they allied with the Labour party, then they got some concessions (like the Scottish assembly) then they eventually...after over 70 years of agitation got the UK government...then held by their allies the Labour party...to sign a law allowing for the referendum in 2010...WHICH Ttook place in 2014.

2.The brexit referendum was already written into the EU's founding rules. A member can leave if the majority vote to do so. A member may join if there is a majority vote in favour. That's how the UK joined the EU in 1975...there was a vote...and it went Yes. And that is how they left...again another vote, they left.