BabaO2:
This referee is always biased against Chelsea.

OgaTheTop2:
Omo, see chilled Odeku! Uncle, una get electricity for Naija like this? Abi na Ghana you dey?

fujirice:

There’s no way in hell Chelsea wouldn’t have won this match if it remained 11 vs 11.
No way!

Jazzman01:


Yeah. I wonder why the coach didn't substitute him. He could have brought on Chamberlain who has a fast pace and likes running at defenders.

Lamasta:

Na Mozambique I dey o na 24/7 light we dey get here

Jazzman01:


What's so stunning about it that we have not seen before? Was Mourinho's own not on par or even better than this? Defending has become Chelsea's trademark right from the days of Mourinho so it's not a big deal. That's what they are good at. They defend and play fast counter that's their style.

Jazzman01:


Don't say that because the game would have been very open and there will be pockets of space to exploit unlike when they were 10men and all of them turned into defenders.

oluplus:

Wrong.

Before Chelsea scored, it was balanced. Liverpool was dominating because they needed to equliaze, which is normal. Chelsea would have done the same if Liverpool scored first.
The unjust red card just scattered the whole thing., but God no shame us.
We are the blues.

kokomilala:
The match ended one apiece. Why is one nil still being displayed by Nairaland? The moderator in charge should do what's necessary.

Jazzman01:


It wasn't balanced. Go and check the stats again. Before Chelsea scored, Liverpool were dominating. That dude was right. Chelsea's plan was to defend and counter as they always do.

Jazzman01:


Don't say that because the game would have been very open and there will be pockets of space to exploit unlike when they were 10men and all of them turned into defenders.

Abi, even na Chelsea box 18 Lukaku dey for the entire 90 minutes, even na inside Chelsea box 18 Kovacic dey with his on target against Becker, even na Box 18 Lukaku dey when the Liverpool defenders blocked his shot.....

Some people sha no be the same match we watched together

crazygod:

Apart from that Van dyke shot, other shots just dey vex me. Especially that Salah own.

OgaTheTop2:
Oh my God! I will like to holiday for that place bruh. Good babes dey there?

CSTRR:

Our attacking is even better than our defending.

That red card killed off any attacking instinct we had.

blinking001:
YNWA, we are liverpool, we never walk alone, today is the day we are going decimate Chelshit football club. We'll obliterate their defenses today....
If Liverpool doesn't win this match, I'll deactivate my Nairaland account.

Tonytonex:
you don't know what you are saying

You dey mind him, person wey no sabi football at all

Chelsea played and still playing one of the best footballs and people wey sabi football acknowledge it, some pundits recognized it, but to some people wey no no anything about football, its defending or counter attack when the Liverpool be the baba for counter attacking football....

If not for the wasteful Werner last season, Man city would have chop minimum of 3 goals in each of the 3 Matches but because of their hatred for Chelsea they won't see it...

Pacesetter123:
But Suarez scenario you screened shot is totally different from James's own.
Don't you see how Suarez is diving with his two hands to punch the ball out like a goal keeper?
In James own,he tried clearing the ball with his knees,but the ball slip off and touched the hand.
That shows you that he did not originally go for the ball with his hands like Suarez did.He went for the ball with his leg (thigh) and the ball brushes tro his hand unintentionally.
So,was it a penalty? Yes,it was.
Was it a red card offense? No,it wasn't.

Jazzman01:


You mean your counter attacking?

thundafire:
shut up

Lamasta:
See you no go marry dey find babes up and down you better repent

Jazzman01:


Don't say that because the game would have been very open and there will be pockets of space to exploit unlike when they were 10men and all of them turned into defenders.

Great100000:
Oga go sit down if you don't know what to say about Chelsea, did you even watch football at all or Chelsea matches, wetin be Defending has become Chelsea Trademark, is it ChelseaFC of England are you talking about Berekum Chelsea F.C.

You hate Chelsea and we agree, so why are you bias with your analysis, you keep saying Saying Chelsea defend is their trademark and counter attack is their style of play, well don't let me talk much jare.

Maybe go and watch Chelsea of Hiddink, Chelsea of Acceloti, Chelsea of Villa Boas, Chelsea of Di Matteo, Chelsea of Sarri (Sarriball) and Chelsea of this same Tuchel and come back with your analysis again, Chelsea sitting back is getting stales jor, even if Chelsea get 90% ball possession, to you they are still defending and counter attack to you.

Tonytonex:
The moderator is a JJC. He has gone to bed.

fujirice:

Just go and watch the highlights on YouTube, it’s out now. I don taya to argue

oliverano:


He may end up winning today but that's a terrible strategy of betting.

Someone played City win or draw against spurs @1.14 or so with other games.

Lost 60k plus coz city lost!!!

Mangekyo:
But I legit dey pity Ronaldo Sha
EPL ball na high intensity. I doubt if the old man would be able to keep up. With the likes of Rudiger, Virgil Van Dijk, Mario, dias etc... If to say him be join city now, things for better.. But man u

Im Looking forward to seeing him get exposed like a fraud that he is

Angelfrost:


Boss, I no want draw soup abeg!... I need a winner today!

Let's settle this Chelsea/Liverpool quarrel once and for all!