Pataricatering:
so basically your criteria for superiority of the male gender is based on the amount of hard labour they can accomplish ? The number of sacks of onions they (can) carry? this quantification of labour totally ignores the labour of women -not only that - are you also saying that if capacity for manual labour is the criteria for superiority- does that then make the labourer in mile 12 superior to the manager of your Bank branch?.
You have also concluded by yourself proffesors in Oxford and cambridge are uneducated , lol

You see how you casually dispose the onion thing as nothing. That's were the base truth is.
Society has not always been this civilize. So heavy lifting and crude manual work We're needed. It was crude very. Crude.
.if you strip the western world off its technology what is left is Africa. In other for you to understand you must first see.

You can explain pain all you want y but until I punch you in the jaw. You dont Know what pain is. Many high pitch knowers don't know what they are teaching. It's just intellectual. No real experience. That's why anthropologist like malinoski urge scientist expercially the social one not to sit in library all day but venture into the field and see practical for themselves. Books don't tell a whole story. And talking to you I can tell 85 % of your knowledge comes from book. It's not accurate. Lot are always lost in translations.

LordReed:


Na so una be, even lizard na demon.

Lizard can be food!

AntiChristian:


Lizard can be food!

Myer:


Na only you and me get sense for NL.

which kind mumu sense be that.