A literature review examines textbooks, academic papers, and other sources relating to a specific issue, field of study, or theory, and provides a description, summary, and critical review of the sources in relation to the research question at hand. Literature reviews are intended to provide readers with an overview of the sources you used while researching a particular topic and to demonstrate how your findings fit into a larger field of study.

A literature review can simply be a list of relevant sources, but in the social sciences, it is more likely to follow an organizational framework and include both summary and synthesis, generally within defined conceptual categories. A synopsis is a reorganization, or reshuffling, of that material in a way that indicates how you intend to investigate a research issue, whereas a synthesis is a reorganization, or reshuffling, of that information that indicates how you propose to handle the research challenge.

A literature review might: Reinterpret old information in new ways, or combine new and old perspectives. Follow the field's cognitive development, including major arguments. Depending on the circumstances, evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most current or relevant research, or Find gaps in how a subject has been explored to date, most likely towards the conclusion of a literature study.
A literature review's objective is to: Assess each piece of work in terms of how it adds to a deeper knowledge of the study topic at hand.

Describe how each work links to the others being discussed.

Determine new methods for understanding prior research.

Any research gaps should be identified.

Distinguish between previously published findings that appear to be in conflict.

Take the lead in addressing the need for more research.

Place your research in the context of past research.

Reviews Of Literature In Different Formats

Argumentative Review: This strategy involves reading literature with the intent of supporting or refuting a pre-existing argument, firmly held conviction, or philosophical issue. The idea is to build a body of work that takes an unconventional perspective. Given the value-laden character of some social scientific research for final year project topics, argumentative strategies for reviewing the literature can be a valid and productive type of discourse. They can, however, cause bias when used to make summary claims like those seen in systematic reviews.

Review of History: Few things exist without a connection to the past. Historical literature reviews look at studies across time, sometimes starting with the first mention of a topic, concept, theory, or phenomena in the literature and following it through the history of scholarship within a subject. The purpose is to put research into historical context in order to show how knowledge has progressed and to point to future research prospects.

Integrated Review: Integrative Review is a sort of study that involves reviewing, analyzing, and synthesizing representative literature on a topic in an integrative manner in order to generate new ideas of getting education final year project topics. The volume of literature includes all works that address similar or identical ideas or research challenges. A well-written integrative review meets the same requirements as fundamental research in terms of clarity, rigor, and repeatability. This is the most common sort of review among social scientists.