While the focus of your research is on the study's findings, it's equally important to discuss the study's background. The tone of your study will be defined by the opening paragraph, which will persuade readers to continue reading.
For most writers, however, describing the study's context is problematic.

Another issue that authors have is distinguishing between the background and the literature review, both of which are important parts of any research project topics and guide. The two phrases have different functions, despite the fact that they are commonly used interchangeably. As a result, I'll go through the fundamentals of writing a background and how to distinguish it different from a review in this post.
The background of the study establishes the study's environment. This section describes why the research subject is important for understanding the study's primary points. The background portion of a researcher article/thesis is usually the first piece, and it covers why the investigation is needed as well as the research aims.

As a consequence, the background section should provide a high-level summary of your research issue while highlighting the study's major objectives. Please limit your remarks to the most important and relevant components of the study that led to your objectives. Don't go into too much detail about them; it should be left for the literature study. The background part should explain your results in chronological order to show the field's development and the gaps that need to be filled. A overview of your interpretation of past research, as well as the investigation's aims, should be included in the background section.

Because of the number of information in the background, it may become repetitious, causing readers to lose interest. Develop a story around the central subject of your study to make your background more interesting. Make sure the piece stays on course and doesn't devolve into a lengthy literary debate. Each concept should build on the previous one, allowing readers to follow along with the tale and see where your research will fill in the gaps.

Many writers are unable to distinguish between a literature review and a research background. Following the background part, the literature review should be the second portion of your manuscript/thesis. This section mostly supports the notion presented in the preceding section. This section should be longer and more detailed, with all taxation research topics indicated in the background section included. This section should summarize all of the research that went into the new study as well as any current trends. You'll need to do a comprehensive literature evaluation of various papers linked to the overall topic of your study to write this part. This gives visitors a short overview of your study topic.

After that, you should conduct a more in-depth examination of the specific studies that are relevant to the stated purpose of your study. It would be beneficial to categorize them both chronologically and topically so that readers can see how the discipline has progressed. To put it another way, a number of topics should be covered in order to show how research in those areas has developed through time. This will highlight both what has already been accomplished and what remains to be done in the future.