jiz:
Impressive performance from Mancity our noisy neighbor

diplomat058:


Look at this man. I provided veritable facts up there yet you want to continue basking in palm wine joint rumors to feel good. Where is the 4b? Except you don't understand the concept of cost analysis, net spending in transfer market means inflow minus outflow. If Arsenal's net is -372m in the last five years and Man City's net is -470m, it means Man City only spent 100m or less in transfer costs more than Arsenal. So what are you saying? If man city have spent 4b, then Arsenal have spent 3.9 billion, and Liverpool and Chelsea are hovering around 3.8 billion. It even means Man U have spent above 4 billion. Can you see the ridicule in your reasoning. You haven't provided any facts until now. I have you screen shorts and links to PL verified Transfer Market website and you called it balance sheet C'mon, let's be reasonable here. Dispute that transfer market stats for the last five years. Mind you, Guardiola is just in his fifth year. I am waiting

You really call ATM a dumpsite? ATM that have produced the world with world class superstar footballers? It's either you said that ignorantly or you don't know the value of respect in sportsmanship. Even EPL that regard ATM as a valuable player factory will deny your uninformed naivety.

Guardiola is far more successful than Ferguson, domestically. It's a fact. In some days, it will be his 4th EPL in five years with lots of league Cups. Respect to Sit Alex, but his best records was an average of a PL trophy in 2 years (50%). Guardiola's record will be mad with an average of 4/5 i.e 80%. No one comes close in the history of PL.

I am still waiting for you to dispute the transfer market stats, and show me how Guardiola spent 4 billion and Liverpool did not spend 3.8 billion as records show a difference of -200 million in net spending between the two

sogodihno:


Madrid can't dominate Man city, they don't have the materials, I am not saying they can't win o, but possession, forget it. The only team in the world that can dominate this Man city in possession, is Guardiola Barca of 2010/2011 season.

BoomBucks:


You guys just write things to gather likes or popular opinions.

There's nothing like away goals here. This game is nothing but a 1:0 victory to City.

How's a team losing 1:0 an advantage? Can you walk me through your thought process on this?

I mean the only advantage for Madrid here is that their league title is wrapped up so they can rest players and focus on next week. But City are fighting it real hard in the EPL title race with Liverpool. You didn't point that out.

The game is anyone's but a 4:3 is equivalent to 1:0. There's no way Madrid is advantage here. If anything, Madrid need to come out and play, because they need to score. It will make the game even more open for City. For me it's advantage City.

I don't know but next week is not too far.

aminusodiq:
so you mean if the ball hits my body and I use my hand unintentionally use my hand to stop a potential goal, its not a foul?

He wasnt protecting his hand from touching the ball, the hand was too free for someone inside the box!

Karleb:


They were both sacked! Rejected.

Guardiola wasn't sacked at Barca. Mou was sacked at the greatest club in La Liga, the greatest club in UCL history and went to Chelsea, till today Chelsea only has 2 UCL and 6 league titles.

Name one world class player in Sevilla or Valencia. The only team breaking RMD and Barca duopoly is ATM, even at that, some of their players are still Barcelona rejects.

You are just proving my points. Have you ever seen a young EPL talent that wish to play for ATM or Sevilla or Valencia. La Liga is so bad, talents that can't it to RMD, Barca or at worst ATM runs to EPL.

Greezman and Suarez are at ATM because Barcelona rejected them. They are not playing there because they love the club.

As per Guardiola, tell me one single coach that has spent 4b in transfer except the bald one.

His dominance is temporary, Leeds, Arsenal and Chelsea have done so in the past.

Liverpool and SAF probably didn't need 4b to dominate the league.

diplomat058:


Look at this man. I provided veritable facts up there yet you want to continue basking in palm wine joint rumors to feel good. Where is the 4b? Except you don't understand the concept of cost analysis, net spending in transfer market means inflow minus outflow. If Arsenal's net is -372m in the last five years and Man City's net is -470m, it means Man City only spent 100m or less in transfer costs more than Arsenal. So what are you saying? If man city have spent 4b, then Arsenal have spent 3.9 billion, and Liverpool and Chelsea are hovering around 3.8 billion. It even means Man U have spent above 4 billion. Can you see the ridicule in your reasoning. You haven't provided any facts until now. I have you screen shorts and links to PL verified Transfer Market website and you called it balance sheet C'mon, let's be reasonable here. Dispute that transfer market stats for the last five years. Mind you, Guardiola is just in his fifth year. I am waiting

You really call ATM a dumpsite? ATM that have produced the world with world class superstar footballers? It's either you said that ignorantly or you don't know the value of respect in sportsmanship. Even EPL that regard ATM as a valuable player factory will deny your uninformed naivety.

Guardiola is far more successful than Ferguson, domestically. It's a fact. In some days, it will be his 4th EPL in five years with lots of league Cups. Respect to Sit Alex, but his best records was an average of a PL trophy in 2 years (50%). Guardiola's record will be mad with an average of 4/5 i.e 80%. No one comes close in the history of PL.

I am still waiting for you to dispute the transfer market stats, and show me how Guardiola spent 4 billion and Liverpool did not spend 3.8 billion as records show a difference of -200 million in net spending between the two

post=112299788:
GOOOAAAALLLL.

MANCHESTER City scored the second goal.

2. 0.

Yipeeeeeeee.

2 goals in 10 minutes.

What an interesting game of Football.

An absolute dream start for Man City.

Let's gooooooo

post=112300021:
See how Man Cuty dey play Madrid half field like one 3rd division Club.

Their luck no follow dem come today like the last match against the CHAMPIONS OF EUROPE AND THE CHAMPIONS OF THE WORLD.

Who dey breathe?!

post=112300058:
This club must come to ENGLAND again.

post=112300081:

No be small spending for dem boys be dat o.
We will support you with more.
Let's make dem boys smile tonight.
Congratulations in advance.

osazsky:
my bro just rest..dont waste ur time..I have gone tru al links here none works go to futbol24 for update

Sheuns:
Pep’s game plan was to score as many goals as possible and kill off this tie in the first leg, sadly that didn’t happen. They now have to work twice as hard in Spain. It’s still anyone’s game but Madrid have the advantage.

franugo:


How exactly does Madrid have the advantage here?? Away goals rule no longer applies, Madrid have to beat city by a 2 goal margin and honestly I don't even see them beating city in the first place, talk less of beating them by 2....mtchewww, Madrid are out

flexyrule:
Na your transfer I first do.
Check payment from quickteller.

franugo:


How exactly does Madrid have the advantage here?? Away goals rule no longer applies, Madrid have to beat city by a 2 goal margin and honestly I don't even see them beating city in the first place, talk less of beating them by 2....mtchewww, Madrid are out

Ximenez:

What's the significance of being the first to produce two teams in the final?
I already knew where you're headed, that's why i gave you that response.
Spanish teams have played each other thrice, same with English teams, no need to waste time.

reallest:

diplomat058:


I guess you now have to resort to lies since you can't find facts to support your imaginations. Records from PL website for transfer market shows that Man U, with a net transfer of -500m+ spend more than Man City in net transfer spendings in the last five years. Funnily, Man City has a net transfer of only -470m, barely 100 million pounds than what Arsenal have spent in the last five years in net spending (Arsenal net spending in the transfer market is -372m). Even Liverpool and Chelsea in closing up to City, yet you guys go around pacifying the fact of Guardiola's historic domination, emasculation and totalization of the EPL with a fake consolation that "He is spending billions." Lols. Check out the real facts. Forget, EPL na polished, rich farmers union.

https://www.transfermarkt.com/premier-league/fuenfjahresvergleich/wettbewerb/GB1

On you saying that Grizemann is at ATM cos he was rejected by Barca, I will pretend not to see that abortion of logic. Perhaps you weren't a football fan yet when Grizzmann was balling in ATM before he was lured by Barcelona in the first place.

Anything again?

Fatbam003:
How many times city won against lfc this season with the inclusion of both players

Ximenez:

Lol
Big club with goal difference of 2 after 34 games.

franugo:


How exactly does Madrid have the advantage here?? Away goals rule no longer applies, Madrid have to beat city by a 2 goal margin and honestly I don't even see them beating city in the first place, talk less of beating them by 2....mtchewww, Madrid are out

Owopariola01:



Liverpool and SAF spend heavily as well. The value of money was just different.

jiz:
Impressive performance from Mancity our noisy neighbor

vickydevoka:

Ask Chelsea what de did Madrid at home and vise versa. Home no get advantage again. Na where u see ball u play