Oza200:
Na wa for Naija justice system o! You only flex your muscles on individuals or people you can "beat". Tell me, what did you do to the crew members, the porn star girl, the camera man, the film producer and director of the Award Winning Chrisland College School student sex tape movie? May heavy Thunder fall on all of you pretenders in this country. Mtweeeew!

EdemIboro:
https://pmnewsnigeria.com/2022/05/09/uche-igwe-docked-for-sharing-chrisland-students-sex-video-on-twitter/Uche Igwe docked for sharing Chrisland students' sex video on Twitter

9jaRealist:


Even a “great” lawyer cannot exonerate you from the publication and/or distribution of child pornography (although confused that does not appear to be what he is charged with). Meanwhile, quit sounding like a paedophile and a misogynist!
>

izzy4shizzy:
Broadcaster don cast lol

delpee:


The problem is that most people commenting know little or nothing about the Child Rights Act, privacy and cybercrime laws.

Many people will learn great lessons if the case is prosecuted diligently.

Blablamalala:


If the case is prosecuted diligently what will happen to Twitters? Do you have any idea? What most of you don't understand when it comes to court cases is that it is probably analysed base on the context and not just content. IGNORANCE IS BLISS
SmartyPants

SmartyPants:


You're definitely the ignorant one here. It doesnt matter if everyone else did it too. The Court is concerned with the particular case before it. It may then only be within the discretion of the judge to temper justice with mercy by considering extenuating factors. If the case is prosecuted dilligently that man will go to prison for a very long time.

9jaRealist:


EXCELLENT NEWS!

But I don’t really understand the reported charges…
He should be charged with publication and distribution of CHILD PORNOGRAPHY!
>

Blablamalala:


IGNORANCE IS BLISS ONCE AGAIN ... cheers.

Blablamalala:


If the case is prosecuted diligently what will happen to Twitters? Do you have any idea? What most of you don't understand when it comes to court cases is that it is probably analysed base on the context and not just content. IGNORANCE IS BLISS
SmartyPants

Smartypants modified: how is it child pornography to even start with. Do you know what pornography means? Does the scenario surrounding the distribution of that sextape have any motivation of it being labelled as a porn? What was the motive and intended Ty ion of those little kids when filming to make pornography?

SmartyPants:


Lol.

S 23(4) Cybercrime Act

4) For the purpose of subsection (1) above, the term “child pornography” shall include pornographic material that visually depicts- (a) a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct; (b) a person appearing to be a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct; and (c) realistic images representing a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct.

I don't know why i bother with some of you.

SmartyPants:


Given the fact that he was only one of several thousand who committed the offence, prosecutorial discretion has been applied in choosing a lesser charge.

Its just a warning.

Blablamalala:


It wasn't a warning. The already know that they will loose woefully if the thread such a path in the court of law as long as the CONTEXT of the charge is an area of emphasis.

For example, you think as long as a person dies in your hands it automatically translate to a murder case in the court of law? Laugh Wan kill me ..

SmartyPants:


What rubbish is this? Who would ever believe such and why would you bring up such an asinine example and then turn around to laugh at yourself?

Are you even okay?

Mr. Bye.

Blablamalala:


You are still parading your IGNORANCE my dear brother. The court doesn't work like that lol. What you quoted up there with respect to the subject matter is very particular of a layman's point of view which you are?

Did it define what is PORNOGRAPHY? Are all sex related cases a pornography all because some people chose to film themselves?

What then will the kids be charged for? Acting child pornography? Or the same insinuation of rape by the girl's mum which she chose to make public so as to get public sympathy?

Infact the guy doesn't even need a lawyer if he is smart and elequent.

Is Twitter unaware of the act you quoted above and that was why the allowed the video and have themselves not press charges?

Is an accusation of rape a child's play. If this case is to be followed very diligently, yawa go gas no be small. Abeg rest you no sabi anything.

SmartyPants:


You are doing your best to sound legally-inclined and it's irritating. Each post is full of more rubbish than the last.

1. The kids are minors. Do you know what the legal implication of that is with respect to being charged?

2. Can you find any place on twitter where that video is still up? Can Twitter possibly press charges for al the offences committed on the platform all over the world?

3. The meaning of pornography is not in dispute. It is an ordinary English word. If you know even the rudiments of law, you should know what the relevant canons of interpetation are with respect to such. What is relevant is what is child pornorpahy in the eyes of the law since child pornography is a technical term.

You seem to be one of those mentally unstable persons that will argue till eternity so I leave you to it.

ShaqFu:
Oh really. So one need the consent of another parents to share their sex tape or what did I just read.

Those charges won't hold water if the guy can get a really good lawyer who knows his onions.

pocohantas:

Go and get him a good lawyer na.
Chuchuchu

ShaqFu:
I don't need to the same way you need to mind your business. Tssk.

pocohantas:

You need to, because obviously you know good lawyers that can easily win a case of circulating child pornography. Maybe you are the lawyer. Put that your HEAD into good use.

ShaqFu:
And you should put that subjective head of yours in the realm of objectivity, that's why you don't and will never know nothing is ever itched in stone permanently. Isn't that why they say "innocent until proven guilty".

pocohantas:

Who said he isn’t innocent until proven guilty? Seems you have a problem keeping your thoughts in place. Maybe I should refreshen your memory. Where is this lawyer that would easily swing a case of child pornography circulation?

Just open mouth waaaaaa!

ShaqFu:
You're the one having problems with keeping your useless emotions in place. Your should refreshen your subjective mind before you even muster the thought of refreshing others...

The lawyer you seek is located in that good for nothing void of narrow mindedness you call a mind. Now get lost, pest.

Omodua:
Why bringing ethnic joke on this.
The MODs should look out for posters like this who thrive on ethnic bigotry. We can't continue to sell ourselves to outside on tribal lines.

drlateef:



If you are caught in that your US base, na 20 years of cooling off plus child sex offender register you got get.

EdemIboro:
https://pmnewsnigeria.com/2022/05/09/uche-igwe-docked-for-sharing-chrisland-students-sex-video-on-twitter/Uche Igwe docked for sharing Chrisland students' sex video on Twitter

pocohantas:


This one you keep singing SUBJECTIVE, is that the new English word you learnt?

I ask you again, where is this lawyer that would easily swing this case in his favour? Every single time one of your penis-wielding-gender is charged with an offense, you and your kind would immediately remember there are lawyers that can EASILY win the case. Have you guys EASILY won the case Baba Ijesha is facing? See wide mouth. Wear that your bongo trouser with canvas and go win the case EASILY. As naso e easy.

Bodmum:
that's virtual number and no technology can trace it, for now.

Blablamalala:


Her mum too could win her allegation of her daughter being raped if she gets a good lawyer It's the court of law where blue is turned to black with total conviction.