TeeGentle:
Social shosho media

casualobserver:


The law says within 24 hrs of reporting. If it isn’t reported there is no action to take. Sahara reporters should show evidence than porn was reported and by who but wasn’t removed.

SmartyPants:


not even any porn but non-consensual porn

Slynation:
Msteeeeew....As if the last twitter ban has any effects!! It only affects corporate business who couldn't tweet with their official handles

VPN dey for all...if they like, they should ban it

Chijeep:
just asking ooo

Is it the same Twitter and Instagram all of us are doing or do they have pro max of it?
Because me I never see any porn something there ooo.

TIWA DO I NO SEE
OXLADE DO I NO SEE
16YR OLD GIRL DO I NO SEE
13YR OLD GIRL DO I NO SEE


MAYBE GOD DON MAKE ME ALLERGIC TO PORN

SmartyPants:


There are two issues here:

1. The journalist that doesn't know what he is reporting on, first talking about non consensual content, and then saying porn in general can still be accessed;

2. The fact that non-consensual porn is not allowed on these platforms already. So creating a new directive around this issue seems not to be genuine.

casualobserver:


I don’t see the relevance of what you posted. The law says they must remove any indecent image that is reported. It has to be reported first.

dat9jaguy:


Yeah it is not allowed in these platforms but they still happen and government is doing their own bit by reinforcing and reminding them of this obligation.

Rayjnr:


VPN this and that, how many people dey use am, even you fit brag say u use VPN,
Haha Nigerians wey no even know wetin banks dey debit them for dey talk about VPN

SmartyPants:


That's because you are misguided on what the law says.

The law, as reported here, says the platforms should remove non-consensual porn or revenge porn.


Note: I am adding to your point, not contradicting it.

Flamethehussler:
<sup>clueless bunch of People

Na so one Pakistan sent me $100 gift card for porn video call</sup>

SmartyPants:


Or looking to capitalise on the difficulty of monitoring everything that is posted in real-time, in order to create room for banning?

casualobserver:


You are the one who is misguided, possibly suffering the malaise of many Nigerians, the ability to read in English but not fully understand what they just read. Again I repeat, the law says they must remove indecent content within 24 hrs of reporting. You don’t need to have anything more than an average reasoning faculty to know the law does not require them to remove any porn or images that haven’t been reported.

blingxx:


Where you dey see Pakistan client ?

SmartyPants:


Trading words is not a substitute for having basic comprehension. Oh, you were offended because I said you were misguided? Sorry o. But you are misguided, no offense intended.

The order was contained in the recently released Code of Practice for Interactive Computer Service Platforms/Internet Intermediaries (online platforms).
According to the document, these online platforms have to “act expeditiously to remove, disable, or block access to non-consensual content that exposes a person’s private areas, full or partial nudity, sexual act, or revenge porn, where such content is targeted to harass, disrepute, or intimidate an individual.

“A platform must acknowledge the receipt of the complaint and take down the content within 24 hours.”


Besides that, I just told you I am agreeing with your point, but adding something to it and you still came back swinging instead of realising that you just don't understand where I'm coming from.

So which of us really suffers said malaise?

Sorry o.

dat9jaguy:



While this might be valid reason, let's not speculate on their motivation for this but the important thing is the government has a responsibility to protect its citizens and by reminding the social media platforms of their duty to prevent harassment and intimidation on their platforms.
By this now, those social media platforms should really be vetting Nigerian contents to prevent these illegal acts so as not to run against the law.
The government is showing responsibility here.

casualobserver:


Of what relevance is all this nonsense you just posted? The article was about failing to delete proscribed media when reported. And I said they can only remove what has been reported. You really have a problem with English! Seriously!!!!’

Multiplier7:
They're looking for means to ban twitter again. Simple

SmartyPants:


Maybe come back to this a couple of hours from now when your head is clear. This is absurd now.

I said: I AM AGREEING WITH YOU and then adding something to what you said.

The law says non-consensual content must be removed.

sahara reporters, said they found porn (general porn).

What Sahara reporters found was not the proscribed content.

Anyway its not deep so done here.

SmartyPants:


Sorry but no this won't cut it. If the government feels that social media sites have the capacity to monitor all of these things, then logically, the government should apply the same standard to itself.

There are cyber laws in nigeria so why doesn't the government prosecute violators?

casualobserver:


You really a displaying the traits of someone with a very low IQ. The law says it must be removed. When reported!!! Don’t you understand the basic difference? Jesus!!!!!


How daft are you

dat9jaguy:


I bet if the government monitors(can't say if they are doing it already) all our internet activities, we would all be shouting freedom of speech. The logical thing is for them to compel these organizations to do the monitoring themselves.
Government is saying take priority on my country and protect our citizens or we take action ourselves.
Again, is that so bad?

SmartyPants:


I have agreed with you, and simply added an additional point to make the case that sahara reporters are DOUBLY WRONG!

That is to say, they are wrong for the reason you posted, and additionally wrong for the reason I've added.

which part of this is confusing you

Mate it's fine if you can't get it.

casualobserver:
. You really are retarded. Let me explain this to you in a language even a retard can understand. Under this law, Social media companies are not obligated to remove any offensive post that hasn’t been reported. If a post has been reported they must take it down within 24 hrs….but the post must first be reported.