ivandragon:


A liliputan with an over inflated ego, that is the 'thing' you are.

I'd you were not so blinded by your misdirected frustration, you would know that NYSC already allows the use of hijab which already makes your deluded rants irrelevant.

Since you are against such, you might as well go to NYSC camps & chase out all hijab wearing corpers.

Alexgeneration:
Exactly why a fart like you should exempt religious people from service and get a separate uniform.


Oh, they should add gown and palazzo to the hijab. Our lawyers are already dressing like native doctors to the court because cvnts like you exist to rationalize folly with your dumb rhetorics of "it's my opinion ".

emorse:

Imagine your favourite footballer made a suit out of the jersey material. After all it's the same uniform.

Penguin2:
Imagine this rubbish!

Trust me, outrage is what will follow next.

MURIC will soon issue statement.

Just as “Professors” from the north will issue statements to condemn the sending out of the lady.

The next thing that will happen is for Islamic Lawyers to sue NYSC to court to allow Muslim women wear even face veil to camp. And I won’t be surprised to see Ariwoola sign off on it.

Then Hausa youths will be next to start going on rampage in Ogun to protest the act.

This is the stupid level that Buhari his fellow intolerant vultures have reduced this country.

Must she wear that nonsense to NYSC camp is it a mosque?

I’m so enraged.

Righteousness2:
There is nothing absolutely wrong with her wearing a skirt. It's the same material, it's the same uniform.

Even in the military, you have women who put on their skirts.

Trouser is not for women! It's for men.
Even if the whole women Worldwide put on trousers, it doesn't make it right.
She is not man! And so her putting on skirt is not a crime.

Infact she is a worthy example for the ladies.

emorse:

Imagine your favourite footballer made a suit out of the jersey material. After all it's the same uniform.

Righteousness2:
There is nothing absolutely wrong with her wearing a skirt. It's the same material, it's the same uniform.

Even in the military, you have women who put on their skirts.

Trouser is not for women! It's for men.
Even if the whole women Worldwide put on trousers, it doesn't make it right.
She is not man! And so her putting on skirt is not a crime.

Infact she is a worthy example for the ladies.

Righteousness2:
[font=Lucida Sans Unicode][/font]

No Matter the kind of uniform or whatever you do, I cannot as a man, put on a skirt. It is abomination.
So likewise it is for a woman.
We Live in a world where abnormality and abominations has become normal.

I rather Please GOD than please man under any guise.

Carlylepneuma:
Well I guess u got a very poor imagination I suggest u should do better than that because the look like this...

SAMBARRY:
she should follow the law.muslims are not above the law.its just a 3 weeks thing not a 3 year thing

Righteousness2:
There is nothing absolutely wrong with her wearing a skirt. It's the same material, it's the same uniform.

Even in the military, you have women who put on their skirts.

Trouser is not for women! It's for men.
Even if the whole women Worldwide put on trousers, it doesn't make it right.
She is not man! And so her putting on skirt is not a crime.

Infact she is a worthy example for the ladies.

ivandragon:
Though the NYSC scheme gradually loses its relevance yearly, the fact remains that it is a semi-paramilitary service (if I can use that classing) & is very regimented which is why Camps have a lot of military personnel & the DG of NYSC is always a top military officer.

Given the above, it is almost impossible to see a female soldier or female security officer wearing clothing outside the norm or approved wears, hence, same is applicable to Corpers...

However, the NYSC may consider looking into this aspect & come up with an acceptable standard for those who have strong religious beliefs on clothing or alternatively, make the Camp optional for those set of people (females only).

Haykinx98:

It is okay to not serve
It is okay to collect exemption letter from camp

Righteousness2:
[font=Lucida Sans Unicode][/font]

No Matter the kind of uniform or whatever you do, I cannot as a man, put on a skirt. It is abomination.
So likewise it is for a woman.
We Live in a world where abnormality and abominations has become normal.

I rather Please GOD than please man under any guise.

Softmirror:


THOSE TROUSERS ARE A NEW MODEL DESIGNED TO COMFORM WITH A CERTAIN PEOPLE'S CULTURE. THAT IS THE POINT. AND IT TOOK YEARS OF SOLICITATION. IT WILL ONLY BE A MATTER OF TIME IN THE NEAREST FUTURE LADIES WILL BE ALLOWED TO CHOOSE BETWEEN SKIRTS AND TROUSERS FOR NYSC INORDER TO CONFORM WITH A PEOPLE'S WAY OF LIFE. MY POINT IS, LAWS ARE MADE BY HUMANS AND CHANGED BY HUMANS AT WILL. EVEN WITH YOUR ANALOGY CHANGE IS PERMANENT. TAKE A LOOK AT LAWN TENNIS.

najib632:
Can he play in the suit? If yes then your point is illogical. Christians are truly disbelievers. You can't ask yourself a which form of dressing will Jesus Christ be more pleased with. If you lie to yourself you're nothing but an assistant to the devil. I hope I am not even wasting my time with an atheist.

Carlylepneuma:
Well I guess u got a very poor imagination I suggest u should do better than that because the look like this...

emorse:

Solicitation. I agree totally with you on that. Anyone who seeks to change a law that binds a group must be willing and ready to solicit and not impose nor act with the intention of impunity. I doubt if anyone on earth can find a way to describe the lady's action as a solicitation. If she had been given the go ahead to dress that way, the NYSC official's reaction would have been wrong and probably punishable.

If that lady and like minded people find a way to change the laws through solicitation, topics like this won't find their ways into the news.

Righteousness2:
There is nothing absolutely wrong with her wearing a skirt. It's the same material, it's the same uniform.

Even in the military, you have women who put on their skirts.

Trouser is not for women! It's for men.
Even if the whole women Worldwide put on trousers, it doesn't make it right.
She is not man! And so her putting on skirt is not a crime.

Infact she is a worthy example for the ladies.

PHYTECH:


Should human beings to the law or law bend to shoot sanity of human choice ?

SAMBARRY:
the law is not a threat to the sanity of any human being except you want to ferment trouble because we know that is usually your end game.uma dey averse to a peaceful and lawful environment

PHYTECH:


These things are done in UAE, Saudi Arabia, Oman, kuwait, Qatar, Egypt, jordan. They're islamic countries and enjoy peace of individual choice.

Righteousness2:
Because the truth favors you today it is right.
When it does not favor you, it is wrong!

I am not here to make anyone happy. All I am after is to make GOD ALMIGHTY Happy.

Realhommie:
I was expecting you to engage the others who mentioned you asking you questions, atleast most where sane in their approach..

You know, sometimes all you have to do is just sit down and observe, even Christ did same. How can you say putting on trousers is a sin against God. What part of the Bible mentioned trousers? Again what was the mode of dressing in biblical times?

You're being elusive since you have refused to engage anyone rightly with proof to back up your claim. Stop misleading people please, someone earlier likened you to the pharisees of old and i agree. You're more religious, in fact overly religious than you're spiritual.

Learn to take correction when you're wrong because only a fool is set in his ways... Again, be open to new knowledge or better yet seek knowledge to broaden your horizon.

Righteousness2:
If you like you heed to what we put out,
If you like , refuse it and continue in your ways, continue to be wise in your own eyes.
When you cross over, you will know how far.
When you cross over, you will value what we do here.