Say otilooor

cosmatika:
Then they should subtract 2points from Chelsea and give Westham their share.
EPL refs have always been a case of ojoro.
Arsenal have suffered it the most

Any one could make mistakes, including the so called body. What is the yardsticks used to decide the goal was wrong? Where was this body when Tottenham cheated Chelsea by drawing the hair of a player in the box? There have been worst VAR decision than this. I smell anti-Chelsea movement. Man go and rest, even FIFA makes errors.

fergie001:

Referees body after review, said the decision was wrong, you are now countering the referees body?

Will he have amputated his legs?

Ex-players who have played the game for decades said the decision was incorrect.... With VAR, it was clearly an INCORRECT DECISION.

ppogba:


The analogy makes sense as long as you ignore the fact that it is the driver that is responsible for the slow pace of the Bently and not necessarily the Bently itself.

Humans are behind VAR and the English should be bold enough to acknowledge their ineptitude aggravated by corruption.

Noted.

PRECIOUS14482:
They know what they're doing
First was manager challenging manager and the incident hit media with full force
Now is accepting bias approach on goals but nobody is mention Everton goal against Liverpool.

They know what they're doing, once the fixe their fans compensation match, nothing will change it.

All these are strategies of keeping EPL very relevant in the society.

it is all mental bruv. Controversies keep people talking more about the league hence occupying mainstream media..

Masterito:
Any one could make mistakes, including the so called body. What is the yardsticks used to decide the goal was wrong? Where was this body when Tottenham cheated Chelsea by drawing the hair of a player in the box? There have been worst VAR decision than this. I smell anti-Chelsea movement. Man go and rest, even FIFA makes errors.

That is the problem... Everything must not be anti-anything?

Against Spurs, they also said the same thing that they were wrong and should have chalked off the goal. That is the same thing they are saying here, what's the difference?

Errors are allowed, and they simply said it was an incorrect decision .... Give it up!

At least you admitted @ the bolded, that's a first.

phemmyfour:
If it's the other way round, it would have been a penalty. The body of ref association can be wrong you know.

Another body of ref can give you another interpretation.

There is no technology to determine what is soft or hard contact

Leave the sentiments, that was no foul. Even Arsenal's cancelled goal yesterday was a soft one.

It is football and controversies are allowed... That Goal was a clean one.

lymelyte:
it is all mental bruv. Controversies keep people talking more about the league hence occupying mainstream media..

Exactly.
You're informed

The EPL use the referees to give the betting companies favourable results. The betting companies in return pay more taxes.

fergie001:

Leave the sentiments, that was no foul. Even Arsenal's cancelled goal yesterday was a soft one.

It is football and controversies are allowed... That Goal was a clean one.

Sentiment?
It has nothing to do with sentiment
Was there a contact: yes

Was the contact enough to prevent Mendy from continue with the next phase of play: Debatable

2tpick:
Therr is certainly a bias against chelsea in England. Where was pgmol after match day 2 even with mike dean admitting his mistakes days later. No mention of arsenal's disallowed goal despite the fact it took the on-pitch referee about 5 minutes before he could come to a decision to disallow the goal.

Jose Mourinho said it, there's a conspiracy against Chelsea. Before the blame was Roman Abrahimovic injecting oil money. Now that the club is owned by their darling Americans it's still same ol BS.

Hespee93:
What about Aston Vila's offside call, what do.you have to say about that?

Don't mind them, those are the kind of incidents they should be talking about.

cosmatika:
Then they should subtract 2points from Chelsea and give Westham their share.
EPL refs have always been a case of ojoro.
Arsenal have suffered it the most

against which team pls

So nothing would be said about the Arsenal match. Odegaard barely had any contact with Eriksen, even Hasselbank and Darren Bent condemned this wholeheartedly, they aren't Arsenal fans.
That goal should have stood. Eriksen held his hand up too, wanted to shield the ball, Odegaard did the same and Eriksen fell down, play continued while the referee didn't see a reason to stop it. The ball lashed on to Saka who gave beautiful pass to Martinelli who buried the ball into the net.
The thing is, that wasn't a goal check, it was an incident that happen seconds before the goal was scored. The same scenario happened with Leicester on the same day and the goal stood..
How about Maguire's foul on Saka? He abruptly held Saka with his two hands and pulled him to the ground in the box and VAR was not even checked.
There's an agenda in the EPL and people are losing their love for the league gradually.

Now that the referee board admitted their mistake, what's gonna be done? Nothing, and if it happens again it will be the same process and on and on like that.

phemmyfour:
Sentiment?
It has nothing to do with sentiment
Was there a contact: yes

Was the contact enough to prevent Mendy from continue with the next phase of play: Debatable

Debatable?

Ok.... This is better.

fergie001:

Debatable?

Ok.... This is better.

yea, it's 50-50. The decision isn't ABSOLUTE wrong.

The body should focus on ABSOLUTE wrong ref decision like the wrong offside call in villa game and Cucurella hair pulled

phemmyfour:
yea, it's 50-50. The decision isn't ABSOLUTE wrong.

The body should focus on ABSOLUTE wrong ref decision like the wrong offside call in villa game and Cucurella hair pulled

They have.
And they issued a statement after the Spurs game, that the goal should have been chalked off. They have said nothing about the Villa & Utd games but 50-50, No.

It's 3/4 a goal but these are errors that football can't get away from sometimes.

This won't change anything at all
medicine after death

Maybe in a week from now, they will apologize for denying arsenal a goal against man u. Stupid var, as if it's not humans operating the system. Nansense.

paulolee:

I swear
So many controversial calls
Can’t believe Dey chalked off dt Brighton Mac allister sweet goal of the season contender bcoz of one mumu marginal offside

Classic goal.
But that was a right call though

paulolee:
I have said it countless times, if u watch la liga n serie a games, u would notice dt both leagues use var differently from the way epl use theirs
Italy n Spain allows the referee takes his own decision, var comes in to assist n the ref walks down to watch the screen to check wat the var is saying
But epl makes it looks like the var officials av upper hands, atimes the goal or calls get chalked off even without the reff checking d screen

you are wrong

It's only in clear situations that the ref doesn't check - In italy , spain and england same protocol how ref wan go confirm Offside

you fumy sha

Arsenal fans, your food has landed

chelseamann:
English Refs Are terrible.. what about Chelsea vs Spurs? After the game they said same thing that the var decision was against Chelsea but nothing was done..
VAR don spoil football

this is exactly what I wanted to pointed it out, when it come to Chelsea's it will become a case a study, an issue everyone would like look into EPL una too bias no more pre-intimacy again.

Angelfrost:


VAR rescued Chelsea!

Let me ever hear their fans make phim again!

phim

27Pushing30:


you are wrong

It's only in clear situations that the ref doesn't check - In italy , spain and england same protocol how ref wan go confirm Offside

you fumy sha

I mean chopping off a goal because of foul dt happened in d build up leading to d goal
Epl ref jus go with wat the var said n it’s game on
Am not talking about offside bro

motionarena:

Classic goal.
But that was a right call though

With dier edited line dt de would tag “marginal offside “

Ok...........


So, Should we all listen to slawomirr who says that English Premier League is all arrangee.



As funny as it sounds, with what has happened this past league games, he might be right to an extent.

Wotoporiously speaking

Make everybody lick their wounds in peace

Everybody go collect, na EPL and what goes around comes around.

paulolee:

I mean chopping off a goal because of foul dt happened in d build up leading to d goal
Epl ref jus go with wat the var said n it’s game on
Am not talking about offside bro

Granted sha even that Arsenal v man United was embarassing

How can that really be called a foul

ALFADOS:
this is exactly what I wanted to pointed it out, when it come to Chelsea's it will become a case a study, an issue everyone would like look into EPL una too bias no more pre-intimacy again.

they should just scrap that rubbish called VAR.. it has taken away the excitement in the game.. now u have to score a goal and wait for var before celebration

Awon werey
They no watch Chelsea vs Tottenham abi

paulolee:

I swear
So many controversial calls
Can’t believe Dey chalked off dt Brighton Mac allister sweet goal of the season contender bcoz of one mumu marginal offside

I'm sorry but that goal is just like any long range goal scored in any match
I had to look twice to see why the goal was being hailed but yep still nothing

cosmatika:
Then they should subtract 2points from Chelsea and give Westham their share.
EPL refs have always been a case of ojoro.
Arsenal have suffered it the most

Then they should give chelsea the 3 point against Tottenham.