Tunjibalogun:

Cc Nlfpmod Mynd44 OAM4J rule 2, this guy is inciting tribal divisions baselesly

Sweet salty tears of a pained obituarists.

Tunjibalogun:

Cc Nlfpmod Mynd44 OAM4J rule 2, this guy is inciting tribal divisions baselesly

Because he called the Judge's name?

seunmsg:


You can be rest assured that the Supreme Court won’t affirm the judgement given by Emeka Nwite.

Nigeria is bigger than you guys so we won’t watch by the side and allow emotional and sentimental folks ruin our democracy for us. Election will take place in 2023 and APC candidates across all positions would be on the ballot. If you are pained, sniper should be of help.

Can tribalism ever end in this una country?

I'm just pitying those still clamoring for one Nigeria

We will can just separate and practice our own democracy in our own different ways...

I come in peace

seunmsg:


Sweet salty tears of a pained obituarists.

Cc Nlfpmod Mynd44 OAM4J rule 2

(1)Best news of century.

nnachukz:

It could, but for the sake of democracy, we wish it doesn't get to that.
The process that elected the current chairman was headed by Buni and may be invalidated by this judgement and everything therefrom. If the judgement stands, someone can institute another court case to invalidate the current leadership and everything they have done in that capacity, which we now affect candidates that emerged from the primaries they headed.

But my chief, I want you to look at it this way sir, Buni was a product of the NWC, the highest decision body of the party. The court didn't fault the capacity of the NWC to choose a caretaker chairman, the only grouse the court had was the choice of the chairman (serving governor). Now, it should also be noted this same NWC (sacked Buni/asked him to go/asked him to resign) before a new convention was organized where the present crop of excos were chosen. So in my humble opinion these flagbearers are safe. Except the ones signed by Buni himself

seunmsg:


It’s obvious that is what you guys want but you’ve all failed. We won’t experience genocide in Nigeria and Peter Obi Pandora won’t be president.

Democracy has come to stay and the plan by a certain Emeka Nwite to stop candidates of the ruling party from participating in the election has failed. The Onitsha overhead bridge judgment will be upturned by the appeal court whether you guys like it or not. Period!

Omo the evil and bile resident in your heart no gree you hide your devilish self again oooh.

Lol I'm happy to see you unsettled, may this forever be your state of mind my dear. Continue vomitting the rubbish till e choke you dear.

seunH:
But my chief, I want you to look at it this way sir, Buni was a product of the NWC, the highest decision body of the party. The court didn't fault the capacity of the NWC to choose a caretaker chairman, the only grouse the court had was the choice of the chairman (serving governor). Now, it should also be noted this same NWC (sacked Buni/asked him to go/asked him to resign) before a new convention was organized where the present crop of excos were chosen. So in my humble opinion these flagbearers are safe. Except the ones signed by Buni himself

You have a strong point here.

garfield1:


It will not be.the supreme court already settled this issue.why not face atiku campaign

I say it again that it will be sustained in the court of Appeal.

I call it the last straw that broke the camel's back. Please read!

OYETOLA'S DOUBLE JEOPARDY: IMPLICATION FOR OSUN GUBER TRIBUNAL

By Wale Abdulahi

The ruling against Governor Gboyega Oyetola came to many as a surprise. It constitutes major setback for the defeated Governor and also indicated more negative fallouts for the Iragbiji politician.

Yes, the Governor has the grace to appeal the judgement up to Supreme Court. Irrespective of that window of opportunity, he is as at today, not a contender in the July 16 election in the face of the law. Hence, his involvement in whatever capacity lacks any legal foundation. As his candidacy is null and void, so was his participation at the poll an extended illegality. By extension therefore, his petition at the Tribunal is simply a nullity.

The Governor's predicament is compounded by myriads of challenges. His surrogate case through Dotun Babayemi failed miserably on his birthday, 29th of September. The Insurance man had calculated that an invalidation of primaries that produced Ademola Adeleke will imply PDP having no candidate at the election and therefore Oyetola as the runner up automatically the actual winner. It was an evil genius of a mind on both sides of the bargain as Babayemi had wilfully acted as a tool to destroy his own party. Oyetola also hoped to benefit from the unwholesome enterprise, casting himself in a garb of inordinate power seeker with no tinge of morality.

It is then somehow not strange that the Governor was repaid in his own coin. The table turned less than 24 hours and the hunter becomes the hunted. Today, APC had no candidate in the July election. INEC's declaration of Adeleke as winner remains.

When Oyetola eventually appeal the judgement, he would then have extra wahala on his head. While his push to deny Adeleke of his victory has become unsustainable and impossible, his focus will now be both Tribunal and the disqualification case. An usurper after somebody’s asset is hunted on all fronts. Increasingly, his capacity to push a hopeless case at the Tribunal is irreparably degraded and destroyed.

Having offended the judiciary by media trial of his petition, he has become a marked figure before the lord justices. Having failed to apologise for derisive treatment of the Tribunal, he has become a fatally injured animal easily tracked by the strong arm of the law. Oyetola is therefore not only a failed project, his options are also growing less and dim by the day.

So the impact of the ruling on the Tribunal matter is multi-dimensional. A politician who is not a candidate at an election has no locus standi to file an election petition. This Iragbiji man lacks actus reus, a fortiori, amicus curiae, a posteriori, a priori, audi alteram partem, autrefois acquit. He does not exist before the law; his petition is not known; and ceases to be a contestant at July 16th poll.

Critical implication is the legal cloud and storm this has put the "unknown" petitioner. On October 4th, when the Tribunal resumes, it is safe to assume there is no petition before the lord justices. Whatever is before the panel is a baby of illegality that cannot stand before the hallowed chamber of legality.

Yes, Oyetola will appeal the judgement. But as long as the judgement subsists, he is an interloper, a man suffering from double jeopardy, having received two blows and two gifts on his birthday.

Put more directly, Oyetola's originally weak case at the Tribunal has irredeemably collapsed. Adeleke's victory is getting consolidated.

●Wale writes from Olode's family, Iwo.

garfield1:


It will not be.the supreme court already settled this issue.why not face atiku campaign

Akeredolu verdict: Danger ahead, Keyamo warns APC

By The Nation On Jul 29, 2021

By Bunmi Ogunmodede, News Editor

Wednesday’s Supreme Court judgment, which ratified the victory of Ondo State Governor Rotimi Akeredolu, has thrown up a major controversy over the legitimacy of Governor Mai Mala Buni as the All Progressives Congress (APC) national caretaker chairman.

Yellow Page mobile
The Yobe governor was appointed after the removal of elected Chairman Adams Oshiomhole on June 16, last year for an initial six month period, which has been renewed indefinitely.

Three justices of the Supreme Court – Justice Mary Peter-Odili, Justice Ejembi Eko and Justice Muhammed Saulawa, endorsed a minority judgment.

The dissenting judgment was read by Justice Peter-Odili: “I do not agree with the majority judgment,”she said, noting that the APC, by Article 17(4) of its constitution has provided for how its affairs should be managed and what offices its memebrs could occupy at a time.

Justice Peter-Odili added: “This Article draws strength from Section 183 of the 1999 Constitution. Therefore, when the second respondent (APC) put up a person not qualified to author its nomination by virtue of the provision of Article 1z(4) of its constitution and Section183 of the 1999 Constitution to do so, that document has no validity, and thereby void.

Minister of State for Labour and Employment Festus Keyamo (SAN) in a statement last night on the minority judgment, said it had grave implication for the ruling party.

He said the party risked being destroyed “from top to bottom” by the judiciary, if it ignored what the Justices said.

“We cannot gamble with this delicate issue. The time to act is now,” he added.

The senior advocate, who said he was offering his “professional bit to the party,” explained that: “The little technical point that saved Governor Akeredolu was that Jegede failed to join Mai Mala Buni in the suit.”

He added: “Jegede was challenging the competence of Buni as a sitting governor to run the affairs of the APC as chairman of the caretaker committee. He contends that this is against Section 183 of the 1999 Constitution, which states that a sitting governor shall not, during the period when he holds office, hold any other executive office or paid employment in any capacity whatsoever. In other words, had Buni been joined in the suit, the story may have been different today as we would have lost Ondo State to the PDP.”

He then warned: “Any other person affected by the actions of the Buni-led Committee will henceforth, not fail to join him in any subsequent case in court. These include any subsequent election matter in any part of this country and all the APC congresses that are about to hold. The Supreme Court has just weaponised all those that would be aggrieved by the APC Congresses to proceed to court to challenge the competence of the Buni-led CECPC to organise the Congresses and national convention.”

Keyamo said the APC should terminate the plans to hold its ward congresses on Saturday.

In recommending what to do, he advocated the National Executive Committee (NEC) of the APC should meet urgently and reconstitute the caretaker committee to exclude those holding executive positions.

He said since “we cannot vouch for the legality of any NEC meeting called by Buni now,” the safest is to get two-thirds of NEC members to sign an invitation to summon a NEC meeting”.

The alternative, according to him, is for the Board of Trustees, which includes the President, to be activated to organize a national convention in line with Article 13 of the APC Constitution.”

A former national secretary of the Labour Party (LP), Mr. Kayode Ajulo, said: “The provision of Section 183 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) is unambiguous to the effect that “The Governor shall not, during the period when he holds office, hold any other executive office or paid employment in any capacity whatsoever.”

“As a former National Secretary of Labour Party, I am quite aware and it is unassailable that the national chairman and the national secretary are the alter egos of a political party chartered with the day-to-day running of the party.

“It is, therefore, incontrovertible that the continuous stay of the governor as Chief Executive Officer of the All Progressives Congress runs contrary to the provision of the Constitution and as such may be an albatross on the party, as all he had done before would be null and void, including the nomination of candidates within the period of his so-called leadership of the party.

“It is apposite to assuage and hint the leadership of the party by reminding same of the decision of Lord Denning of over five decades in the case MACFOY v. UAC LIMITED (1961) 3 ALL E.R where the learned jurist held that: “If an act is void, then it is in law a nullity. It is not only bad, but incurably bad. There is no need for an order of the court to set it aside.”

“Whichever way this issue is being tilted, permitting a governor of a State to hold another executive office may create cravings in some governors to become the state chairman of their political parties as being recently tinkered by some of them.”

The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) described the split decision of the Supreme Court as a verdict that Buni cannot continue to lead the APC as Caretaker Committee Chairman.

The PDP spokesman, Kola Ologbondiyan, said it is an aberration for Buni to serve as Yobe State governor and chairman of the APC at the same time.

Ologbondiyan said: “That is totally an aberration of the doctrine and dictates as established in the APC Constitution as well as the 1999 Constitution as amended.

“We insist that the process that led to the emergence of Governor Akeredolu was, and remains a violation of the APC Constitution as well as the 1999 Constitution.

“Section 183 of the 1999 Constitution states that no governor should hold any other position in any capacity, apart from the office of the governor. As you know, this was the major ground upon which we went to the Supreme Court”.

9jahotblog:


Akeredolu verdict: Danger ahead, Keyamo warns APC

By The Nation On Jul 29, 2021

By Bunmi Ogunmodede, News Editor

Wednesday’s Supreme Court judgment, which ratified the victory of Ondo State Governor Rotimi Akeredolu, has thrown up a major controversy over the legitimacy of Governor Mai Mala Buni as the All Progressives Congress (APC) national caretaker chairman.

Yellow Page mobile
The Yobe governor was appointed after the removal of elected Chairman Adams Oshiomhole on June 16, last year for an initial six month period, which has been renewed indefinitely.

Three justices of the Supreme Court – Justice Mary Peter-Odili, Justice Ejembi Eko and Justice Muhammed Saulawa, endorsed a minority judgment.

The dissenting judgment was read by Justice Peter-Odili: “I do not agree with the majority judgment,”she said, noting that the APC, by Article 17(4) of its constitution has provided for how its affairs should be managed and what offices its memebrs could occupy at a time.

Justice Peter-Odili added: “This Article draws strength from Section 183 of the 1999 Constitution. Therefore, when the second respondent (APC) put up a person not qualified to author its nomination by virtue of the provision of Article 1z(4) of its constitution and Section183 of the 1999 Constitution to do so, that document has no validity, and thereby void.

Minister of State for Labour and Employment Festus Keyamo (SAN) in a statement last night on the minority judgment, said it had grave implication for the ruling party.

He said the party risked being destroyed “from top to bottom” by the judiciary, if it ignored what the Justices said.

“We cannot gamble with this delicate issue. The time to act is now,” he added.

The senior advocate, who said he was offering his “professional bit to the party,” explained that: “The little technical point that saved Governor Akeredolu was that Jegede failed to join Mai Mala Buni in the suit.”

He added: “Jegede was challenging the competence of Buni as a sitting governor to run the affairs of the APC as chairman of the caretaker committee. He contends that this is against Section 183 of the 1999 Constitution, which states that a sitting governor shall not, during the period when he holds office, hold any other executive office or paid employment in any capacity whatsoever. In other words, had Buni been joined in the suit, the story may have been different today as we would have lost Ondo State to the PDP.”

He then warned: “Any other person affected by the actions of the Buni-led Committee will henceforth, not fail to join him in any subsequent case in court. These include any subsequent election matter in any part of this country and all the APC congresses that are about to hold. The Supreme Court has just weaponised all those that would be aggrieved by the APC Congresses to proceed to court to challenge the competence of the Buni-led CECPC to organise the Congresses and national convention.”

Keyamo said the APC should terminate the plans to hold its ward congresses on Saturday.

In recommending what to do, he advocated the National Executive Committee (NEC) of the APC should meet urgently and reconstitute the caretaker committee to exclude those holding executive positions.

He said since “we cannot vouch for the legality of any NEC meeting called by Buni now,” the safest is to get two-thirds of NEC members to sign an invitation to summon a NEC meeting”.

The alternative, according to him, is for the Board of Trustees, which includes the President, to be activated to organize a national convention in line with Article 13 of the APC Constitution.”

A former national secretary of the Labour Party (LP), Mr. Kayode Ajulo, said: “The provision of Section 183 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) is unambiguous to the effect that “The Governor shall not, during the period when he holds office, hold any other executive office or paid employment in any capacity whatsoever.”

“As a former National Secretary of Labour Party, I am quite aware and it is unassailable that the national chairman and the national secretary are the alter egos of a political party chartered with the day-to-day running of the party.

“It is, therefore, incontrovertible that the continuous stay of the governor as Chief Executive Officer of the All Progressives Congress runs contrary to the provision of the Constitution and as such may be an albatross on the party, as all he had done before would be null and void, including the nomination of candidates within the period of his so-called leadership of the party.

“It is apposite to assuage and hint the leadership of the party by reminding same of the decision of Lord Denning of over five decades in the case MACFOY v. UAC LIMITED (1961) 3 ALL E.R where the learned jurist held that: “If an act is void, then it is in law a nullity. It is not only bad, but incurably bad. There is no need for an order of the court to set it aside.”

“Whichever way this issue is being tilted, permitting a governor of a State to hold another executive office may create cravings in some governors to become the state chairman of their political parties as being recently tinkered by some of them.”

The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) described the split decision of the Supreme Court as a verdict that Buni cannot continue to lead the APC as Caretaker Committee Chairman.

The PDP spokesman, Kola Ologbondiyan, said it is an aberration for Buni to serve as Yobe State governor and chairman of the APC at the same time.

Ologbondiyan said: “That is totally an aberration of the doctrine and dictates as established in the APC Constitution as well as the 1999 Constitution as amended.

“We insist that the process that led to the emergence of Governor Akeredolu was, and remains a violation of the APC Constitution as well as the 1999 Constitution.

“Section 183 of the 1999 Constitution states that no governor should hold any other position in any capacity, apart from the office of the governor. As you know, this was the major ground upon which we went to the Supreme Court”.

This boy atiku needs you

garfield1:


This boy atiku needs you

Festus Keyamo warned. Appeal court of justice will sustained the judgement of the federal high court.

9jahotblog:
Festus Keyamo warned. Appeal court of justice will sustained the judgement of the federal high court.

What was the judgment of the supreme court in aketi vs jegede

nnachukz:

It could, but for the sake of democracy, we wish it doesn't get to that.
The process that elected the current chairman was headed by Buni and may be invalidated by this judgement and everything therefrom. If the judgement stands, someone can institute another court case to invalidate the current leadership and everything they have done in that capacity, which we now affect candidates that emerged from the primaries they headed.

No one can go to court again,time has elapsed

garfield1:


What was the judgment of the supreme court in aketi vs jegede

go and read keyamo response on the judgement. You are core APC strategist but you are very weak to know the people’s views on any political matter posts on nairaland. I can’t be replying anyone here without doing my assignment here. How could Buni be holding the governorship seat and also precise on the party affairs in the National hq. Oyetola and others will surely become the scapegoat.

Huncle, more than half of people mostly Christian voted apc in those two states will vote Peter Obi,



uote author=seunmsg post=117193180]

Lol, APC won Ekiti massively and lost Osun narrowly. In the two states APC got a combined vote of over 500k while Labour Party got a combined vote of less than 3k. Guy, rest and stop talking nonsense. [/quote]

9jahotblog:
go and read keyamo response on the judgement. You are core APC strategist but you are very weak to know the people’s views on any political matter posts on nairaland. I can’t be replying anyone here without doing my assignment here. How could Buni be holding the governorship seat and also precise on the party affairs in the National hq. Oyetola and others will surely become the scapegoat.

Boy,what did the supreme court say

garfield1:


Boy,what did the supreme court say

Ask google on it.

9jahotblog:
Ask google on it.

So keyamo opinion matters more than supreme court

garfield1:


So keyamo opinion matters more than supreme court

lol Keyamo warned

9jahotblog:
lol Keyamo warned

And the warning is bigger than the court abi? Are you ok?

SIONKPO1:

Its not about Obi but make your points and don't be hating unnecessarily cause its healthy

He nothing reasonable to say beyond ethnic bigotry

Evil Broom Party

seunmsg:


lol, stop being a pained loser. Is that why LP got less than 3k votes in the two states?

KADOSO MUTAIRU! The son of Bàbá Emile O'Corn is back! Did you go to Burkina Faso to audit their coup D'etat?

seunmsg:


Sweet salty tears of a pained obituarists.

Hmmmn. Old habits............