AlexBells:
Nobody said Moscow won't defend, the question is, defend with what? Conventional weapons no problem, nuke then welcome to a big world problem cause no country would agree to stay without nuke if Russia nukes Ukraine being that Ukraine is not a nuclear power country however without the nukes for now it will be very hard for Russia to win, the morale is low in the Russian side

Bro you would be making a big mistake to misrepresent the gentle walk of a tiger as a sign of weakness.

If you know how fierce the Russians fought against the Germans during operation babarosa, you won't be sounding like this.

mysticwarrior:
Bro you would be making a big mistake to misrepresent the gentle walk of a tiger as a sign of weakness.

If you know how fierce the Russians fought against the Germans during operation babarosa, you won't be sounding like this.

There's issue about justice and war of attrition, Germany invaded Russia, remember I spoke about morale, Russian fought Germany with everything in them, this is a very different scene Russia invaded Ukraine, the morale is higher on the Ukraine side, most Russians of fighting age don't see the justification for the invasion.

Ukraine also used to be part of then USSR so when you say Russia fougt Germany just also note that millions of Ukraine people was part of that defence. The motivations for the war is matters a lot, there are bigger reasons for Ukraine to fight than for Russia to fight, it is about self preservation for both sides however Ukraine have done better work at winning the confidence of their citizens.

Russia has the military might(which is why unlike Libya, Iraq and other weak countries, NATO has been unable to invade Russia).
China has the economic might.
Politics is war without bloodshed and war is politics with bloodshed.
The decline of the West led by the US has been rapid.
China remains the most developed country in the world and continues to advance in all areas of development (human, infrastructure, technology) etc.
The West led by the US is a faded empire which fell like the Roman empire.
Thanks to Russia, China and India (the current champions/super powers).
This is the birth of a multipolar world.

Russian Hypersonic Missiles Superior To Anything Nato’s Got, French Media Says - Politics
https://www.nairaland.com/7364082/russian-hypersonic-missiles-superior-anything

NATOPresident:
Russia has the military might(which is why unlike Libya, Iraq and other weak countries, NATO has been unable to invade Russia).
China has the economic might.
Politics is war without bloodshed and war is politics with bloodshed.
The decline of the West led by the US has been rapid.
China remains the most developed country in the world and continues to advance in all areas of development (human, infrastructure, technology) etc.
The West led by the US is a faded empire which fell like the Roman empire.
Thanks to Russia, China and India (the current champions/super powers).
This is the birth of a multipolar world.

very impressive.

Putin Introduces Bills On Accession Of New Russian Regions To Parliament - Politics
https://www.nairaland.com/7364130/putin-introduces-bills-accession-new#117228351

AlexBells:

There's issue about justice and war of attrition, Germany invaded Russia, remember I spoke about morale, Russian fought Germany with everything in them, this is a very different scene Russia invaded Ukraine, the morale is higher on the Ukraine side, most Russians of fighting age don't see the justification for the invasion.

Ukraine also used to be part of then USSR so when you say Russia fougt Germany just also note that millions of Ukraine people was part of that defence. The motivations for the war is matters a lot, there are bigger reasons for Ukraine to fight than for Russia to fight, it is about self preservation for both sides however Ukraine have done better work at winning the confidence of their citizens.

by loosing it's territories to the Russians who have successfully annexed dombass and Ukrainian region? And its like you still don't know that the Russians control 30% of Ukrainian territories, after using just 5% of their military might.

Oct3
Truss has ‘worst’ approval of UK PM since 2010 – poll
A survey shows that she is less popular than Boris Johnson before his resignation
British Prime Minister Liz Truss’ personal approval rating is lower than her predecessor Boris Johnson’s was right before he was forced to resign this year, a recent Opinium/Observer poll has shown.

According to the survey of 2,000 people, which was conducted between September 28 and 30 and released on Saturday, only 18% of Britons approve of the job Truss is doing, and 55% disapprove.
This places her net approval at -37, down from -9 a week ago, which is worse than the -28 that Johnson had in the final Opinium poll before he stepped down as Tory leader in July.

“This is the worst poll result we have shown for a Conservative prime minister since the 2010 general election,” James Crouch, the head of policy and public affairs at Opinium, told The Guardian.
Liz Truss has managed to reach the depths of the poor personal ratings of both Theresa May and Boris Johnson at the end of their tenure, within weeks of taking office and within days of her government’s first major action.
The poll came out as the government is looking for ways to tackle inflation and soaring energy prices. It has responded to the crisis by increasing the caps on energy prices.

Truss argued that the measure will stop average annual household bills from rising next year to as high as £6,500, a figure estimated by experts.

Protests against the increasing cost of living, during which people publicly burned their utility bills, were held across the UK on Saturday.
A former foreign secretary, Truss took over from Johnson in September after winning the Tory leadership race. Johnson stepped down after officials in his cabinet resigned en masse due to disagreements over economic recovery policies and several controversies, such as the flouting of Covid-19 quarantine rules by senior government members, including Johnson himself.

mysticwarrior:
by loosing it's territories to the Russians who have successfully annexed dombass and Ukrainian region? And its like you still don't know that the Russians control 30% of Ukrainian territories, after using just 5% of their military might.

That's the issue of morale, that more than halve of Russia don't justify the annexation nor the war, and Ukraine has higher obligations to fight, no one is judging the morality of a war it is about the motivations, currently Ukraine is more motivated, Russia has been dubbed the aggressor

Russian Parliamentary Committee Okays Ratification of Accession Agreements of New Regions
The committee on constitutional legislation of the upper house of the Russian parliament on Monday gave a nod to the ratification of international treaties with the Donetsk and Lugansk people’s republics, as well as the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions, and recommended that the upper house approve the accession laws.

The Federation Council will consider the laws at a meeting on October 4.

State Duma Unanimously Ratifies Treaties On New Regions’ Accession To Russia.
https://www.nairaland.com/7364403/state-duma-unanimously-ratifies-treaties

RZArecta:
The United States wants nuclear war at all costs, they know what they're doing and it's deliberate

.
Definitely you don't knw what you're saying. USA will want her country destroyed for Ukraine sake. Or you think there's a winner in a nuclear war. They'll all sink themselves. USA and the entire Europe will sink.

babyboy4every1:
.
Definitely you don't knw what you're saying. USA will want her country destroyed for Ukraine sake. Or you think there's a winner in a nuclear war. They'll all sink themselves. USA and the entire Europe will sink.

there are some things you're only looking at from the top and I understand but I honestly don't have time to explain and defend my points about the whole endgame just know that these people are very sick and everything happening now everywhere is deliberate