Maynmann:
Glossolalia: speaking in a “spiritual language” that does not correspond with any known human language.
It’s not based on linguistics or any facts. It is purely a belief.

While we have Xenolalia: speaking in a human language other than your native one.

NNTR:
Please how do you mean glossolalia: speaking in a “spiritual language”'?

Give biblical verse(s) to support your response with. Thanks in advance

cc Acehart

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

Maynmann:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaking_in_tongues

NNTR:
I need you to articulate in your own words, and not sign-post me to a second party account

This is a mano a mano, aka poster to poster interaction, and not poster piggybacking and riding on hyperlink(s), that is showing someone's else intellectual property (i.e. someone's credit and creativity)

Try to be original. Dont be dependent on hyperlinks like h t t ps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaking_in_tongues

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

Maynmann:
Is the Christian bible called New Testament not a Catholic intellectual property?

NNTR:
The Bible itself is not a Catholic intellectual property and the Catholic aka RCC have no copyrights to the bible, meaning, it doesnt claim copyrights to it

So please I reiterate that, I need you to articulate in your own words, and not sign-post me to a second party account

This is a mano a mano, aka poster to poster interaction, and not poster piggybacking and riding on hyperlink(s), that is showing someone's else intellectual property (i.e. someone's credit and creativity)

Try to be original. Dont be dependent on hyperlinks like h t t ps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaking_in_tongues

Now beloved, lease how do you mean glossolalia: speaking in a “spiritual language”'?

Give biblical verse(s) to support your response with.
Thanks in advance

cc Acehart
PS: Must give this caveat. If you come up short, then you'll have the thread to yourself (i.e. will just ignore you)

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

NNTR:
The Bible itself is not a Catholic intellectual property and the Catholic aka RCC have no copyrights to the bible, meaning, it doesnt claim copyrights to it

So please I reiterate that, I need you to articulate in your own words, and not sign-post me to a second party account

This is a mano a mano, aka poster to poster interaction, and not poster piggybacking and riding on hyperlink(s), that is showing someone's else intellectual property (i.e. someone's credit and creativity)

Try to be original. Dont be dependent on hyperlinks like h t t ps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaking_in_tongues

Now beloved, lease how do you mean glossolalia: speaking in a “spiritual language”'?

Give biblical verse(s) to support your response with.
Thanks in advance

cc Acehart
PS: Must give this caveat. If you come up short, then you'll have the thread to yourself (i.e. will just ignore you)

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

Maynmann:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaking_in_tongues

Maynmann:


Bible means books. The Christian bible called New Testament is a Catholic intellectual property.
Riding on random books written by UNKNOWN AUTHORS.

Try to be original. Dont be dependent on Catholic epistles that has been forged, redacted, edited and corrected.

Which Bible VERSION are you using?

Acehart:


Bible verses. Do you get the impression that when you speak to “Christians” or “Church goers”, hyperlinks don’t drive home your point? Have you ever gone to the market and showed the meat seller the size of meat you want by showing him a picture on your phone that describes the size of meat you want to buy?

Acehart:


Sir, what does the word “Catholic” mean?

Maynmann:


Bible means books.
Do you think quoting random books that has been edited and doctored and written by UNKNOWN AUTHORS drive any reasonable points to intellectuals?

Maynmann:


^{Do you think quoting random books that has been edited and doctored and written by UNKNOWN AUTHORS drive any reasonable points to intellectuals?}

Acehart:


I like how you appraise yourself, intellectual? What’s your highest level of education?

Maynmann:


General.
Sir, What does the word “bible” mean?

Maynmann:


Theist, What do you understand by “intellectual”?

Acehart:


If you say it’s means “General”, who then takes credit for an intellectual property for the “General”?

If you are in intellectual, you should know what the word “Bible” means. You should know of the works of Paidoussis, Giffis, Mayhew etc. and you would know the right word to describe their works.

Acehart:


Please, whisper to me what your highest education level is?

Maynmann:


And who are you?
How can you “whisper” through text. That’s dumb.
Are you educated atall?

Acehart:


You called yourself an intellectual. How many works have you published and who were your publishers?

Maynmann:


What has intellectual got to do with publishing?
What do you understand by “intellectual”?

Maynmann:


^{What has intellectual got to do with publishing?
What do you understand by “intellectual”?}

Acehart:


What’s your highest level of education? What did you major in and from what school?

Acehart:


What’s your highest level of education? What did you major in and from what school?

Maynmann:


How can you “whisper” through text. That’s dumb.
Are you educated atall?

Acehart:


You appraised yourself to be an intellectual yet you don’t know the meaning of the word “whisper”, entirely. If you don’t know the meaning of a known word in its entirely, how can you know an “unknowable” God?

Let me help you: look at one of its meaning (second definition) in the picture. I drop my mic �, intellectual.

Maynmann:
Glossolalia: speaking in a “spiritual language” that does not correspond with any known human language.
It’s not based on linguistics or any facts. It is purely a belief.

Glossolalia is pseudo-speech; it is not real language, and it has no grammatical structure or associated meaning. It is gibberish intended to simulate and demonstrate a “divine” gift.

Professional linguists have studied glossolalia and have proved that it has none of the structure of a true language: the sounds used are taken from real languages that the speaker knows; grammar is lacking, or is a parody of the grammar of a language known to the speaker. Meaning is whatever the speaker says that it is.

Glossolalia is not peculiar to Christianity; shamans also do it to in their ceremonies. Something similar is also done by comedians imitating a foreign language for comic effect, e.g. speaking ‘Swedish’ or ‘French’ or ‘Japanese’ when in reality they are using nonsense syllables arranged, pronounced, and intoned as in the language they are imitating. Some people are much better at producing pseudo-speech than others: some so good that naïve people are fooled into believing that they are really speaking a language.


While we have Xenolalia: speaking in a human language other than your native one.