Lewisjohnson:
Chelsea is de only Big Team that Won in Champions league matches 2nite

That is a Message

Rival fans are just unsettled because we beat AC home and away..back to back
Very strong message

UCL is a culture

Really

Wizywiz:
so Leipzig no be big team ...maccabi Haifa no be big team

All dis Man U fans
Dis tin no be Conference league oo

Angelfrost:


You might want to research the rules sir... I didn't make them!

Besides, if the referee had made the wrong call, VAR would have corrected him, as was done in Trippier's case in Newcastle.

Some people don't know the rules but just want to argue.
Denying a clear goal scoring opportunity anywhere on the field is a red card offence.

Broveens42:



Rival fans are just unsettled because we beat AC home and away..back to back
Very strong message

UCL is a culture

AC Milan is not in form

I'm not taking anything away from Chelsea though, they beat AC Milan like say dem b small team. Them beat Milan Woto Woto

Lewisjohnson:

All dis Man U fans
Dis tin no be Conference league oo

abeg I no be man u fan oooo ... congrats to the blues

Highly disappointed in Ac Milan, a whole Italian champion being treated like this by 3rd place team from one farmer league dominated by man city. Funny thing is when Ac Milan play against Italian team counterparts, you see them flex muscle. See the way they demolished Juventus during the week end.

Parachoko:
AC Milan is not in form

I'm not taking anything away from Chelsea though, they beat AC Milan like say dem b small team. Them beat Milan Woto Woto

Chelsea lost first game, drew second game.... Haters said it's over ...... Fast forward they top the group right now...

Realguyman1:
That's u nor dey see well bdat o. because if u dey see well, then u for see say Milan nor fit draw Chelsea talkless of winning Chelsea.

Nah your generation no dey see well.

Broveens42:



That's why he was sold.. he is bang average. I don't know why people were hyping him.
The only person I regretted Chelsea sold was de bruyne...and it's no one's fault because he can't bench the likes of lampard, ballak then...never!

Most of u will just be analyzing what u don't know. Where Kelvin Debruyne and Michael Ballack take see for Chelsea?

Broveens42:



I believe you got the message even if I made a mistake

Bros leave matter jor. The simple truth then was that he was very young and still coming up with his games, and not because there were too much good midfielders in Chelsea again at that time. Even Frank Lampard nor dey himself again those period that Debruyne was at Chelsea.

Graham potter na og for this game oh chelsea haters go dey shake now

mightyleks:
Chelsea lost first game, drew second game.... Haters said it's over ...... Fast forward they top the group right now...

BABA FORGET THose haters we aint backing down

Realguyman1:
Most of u will just be analyzing what u don't know. Where Kelvin Debruyne and Michael Ballack take see for Chelsea?

I said I made a mistake... Do you have personal problems or issues around you?

Angelfrost:


Rafael is an awesome player... Giroud should have scored that header!

Chelsea is not there yet! So much work to be done there.

Bros leave matter jor. That's was how most guys were saying Chelsea wasn't there yet when they won the champions league.

Realguyman1:
Bros leave matter jor. The simple truth then was that he was very young and still coming up with his games, and not because there were too much good midfielders in Chelsea again at that time. Even Frank Lampard nor dey himself again those period that Debruyne was at Chelsea.

Be realistic... That era wasn't what you have now; where you get to give young players that chance... Cfc then was like for the big boys...be realistic

Broveens42:



I said I made a mistake... Do you have personal problems or issues around you?

Later saw the mistake part after my quote. Which one is do you have personnel issues around u? Na u know wether u get personal issue around u o.

Edoblakky:
Penalty but is that a red?

if you award a foul for that, then its a red card.....the rule says if u interfere with a goal scoring opportunity, or u bring down a man that is through on goal(ahead of the last man), it is a fould and a red card.......Mount didnt even make the most of that situation, another ref would let it slide and not even award a foul, as a chelsea fan, i was surprised he awarded a foul

Broveens42:



Be realistic... That era wasn't what you have now; where you get to give young players that chance... Cfc then was like for the big boys...be realistic

Apart from Ramirez then, which other midfielders dey serious for Chelsea again that time? The simple truth was that the coaches that coach Chelsea then didn't like him.

EngrHumble:



Oga that foul nor be red card joor...

if its a foul in that situation, then its a red card, thats what the rule says

Realguyman1:
Apart from Ramirez then, which other midfielders dey serious for Chelsea again that time?

Let me take you back to history... Cfc then was like for the big boys...it doesn't matter who's on form or not...
Infact it became so obvious that they would play almost all big boys in all competition.... that's how that era was.... But as the game evolved, they started introducing more young players at least for Carling cup, now carabao

Congratulations Chelsea

When you’re out living your life, you want comfortable and quality earphones, whether you’re on a work call or exercising. With oraimo Shark 3, you can have everything you desire.

Broveens42:



Let me take you back to history... Cfc then was like for the big boys...it doesn't matter who's on form or not...
Infact it became so obvious that they would play almost all big boys in all competition.... that's how that era was.... But as the game evolved, they started introducing more young players at least for Carling cup, now carabao

But Morinho played Debruyne against man united and the guy played very well as a big boy, but the Morinho still decided to let him go, why?

And wasn't Oscar and Hazard young players too then?

Ahh my chest�

Lewisjohnson:

All dis Man U fans
Dis tin no be Conference league oo

Realguyman1:
But Morinho played Debruyne against man united and the guy played very well as a big boy, but the Morinho still decided to let him go, why?

And wasn't Oscar and Hazard young players too then?

De bruyne was impatient and left... Stop blaming managers who already have their first choice midfielders

Broveens42:



De bruyne was impatient and left... Stop blaming managers who already have their first choice midfielders

Bros na Morinho throwaway Debruyne go buy Fabregas and not because he was impatient. Same thing he did to Salah after he bought William

Realguyman1:
Bros na Morinho throwaway Debruyne go buy Fabregas and not because he was impatient.

You mean he threw de bruyne in a trash bin ?

Broveens42:



You mean he threw de bruyne in a trash bin ?

He let him go because he wasn't in his plan. So don't regret Chelsea allowing Debruyne to leave, but blame Morinho for him over sabi then.

Realguyman1:
He let him go because he wasn't in his plan. So don't regret Chelsea allowing Debruyne to leave, but blame Morinho for him over sabi then.

So what was the mou supposed to do.?...tie de bruyne's legs to the bench while he plays his preferred midfielders?

When you carefully read my earlier statement, it suggests that no one was actually to be blamed...I just expressed a regret I can't repair...
I didn't kill anyone

Broveens42:



So what was the mou supposed to do.?...tie de bruyne's legs to the bench while he plays his preferred midfielders?

When you carefully read my earlier statement, it suggests that no one was actually to be blamed...I just expressed a regret I can't repair...
I didn't kill anyone

He let him go because he over sabi too much then, and not because his prefer midfielders was better than Debruyne.
When Morinho played Debruyne against United, the guy showed that he was good and was ready to burst into the Chelsea first team.
But Morinho over sabi nor let am see road

Morinho is to be blamed