Tinubu’s Church rat and communion point is echoing in COP27. They say rich nations should pay us for climate change. That's evidence of a visionary.

https://twitter.com/samomatseye/status/1589608202295218177?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

Lol.

Since that statement was made. I spent lot of my time trying to explain, expantiate, elucidate and bring it down to the level our dull zombidients could understand.

It was all a futile effort. More like trying to fill a basket with water.

The thing is Tinubu's is not to be held responsible for their inability to comprehend things outside the normal 'i have only one watch, Nassrawa is a big country, and quoting irrelevant china figures'.

Tinubu can not be held responsible for their inability to think deep to comprehend simple logic when using it to lay down an explanation.


I dont envy the intellectual capacity of any zombidients. They are too dull to be humans.

Evidence of an antichrist

You can't expect anything less from Tinubu's chief propagandist, Sam Omatsaye whose head is stocked in Tinubu's dripping ass

Disgusting

What Tinubu said ia not the same. Don't mislead people. Church rat ....who uses such example? Only ...

Lol... what's the correlation?

Grasping at straws..

No mata how right he is,he is still wrong.how can u use poisoned holy communion as example?do u want to tell us dat d body of our lord jesus christ is poisoned?even rat in church.who will b praying to see rat in mosque?rat is a symbol 4 poverty.are you calling christians poor?i don tire sef.

Mumu journalist

lhordspy:
Lol.

Since that statement was made. I spent lot of my time trying to explain, expantiate, elucidate and bring it down to the level our dull zombidients could understand.

It was all a futile effort. More like trying to fill a basket with water.

The thing is Tinubu's is not to be held responsible for their inability to comprehend things outside the normal 'i have only one watch, Nassrawa is a big country, and quoting irrelevant china figures'.

Tinubu can not be held responsible for their inability to think deep to comprehend simple logic when using it to lay down an explanation.


I dont envy the intellectual capacity of any zombidients. They are too dull to be humans.

Explain it to Bill gates, Klaus Schwaab and George Soros. All three men have a big influence in Nigerian elections. Come 2023, they will show Tinubu the reason why the church rat has no choice besides drinking from the poison communion, which is life itself.

Only in Nigeria will you see vibrant youths supporting APC and PDP that have failed the country, the citizens and their unborn generations. APC has hacked Nigerian economy into a perpetual debt. Dollar vs Naira is almost 1000:1. Cost of living is worst day in day out. Sometimes I feel some Nigerian Youths don't have conscience. The old men you are campaigning for have lived their lives and enjoyed Nigeria to fullness. Had free educations but refused to give youths free educations nor pay ASUU. Now, they messed the country up after enjoying their youthful age. Also, they want to cripple yours and your children future, but out of ignorance you still praise their names in the detriment of your children future.

ganisucks:


Explain it to Bill gates, Klaus Schwaab and George Soros. All three men have a big influence in Nigerian elections. They will show Tinubu the reason why the church rat has no choice besides drinking from the poison communion, which is life itself.

Ehn
So Bill gates and the other clowns you mentioned, your slave masters, have big influence in nigeria elections? Do they have PVC(s)?

You Zombidients never seems to amaze me less. Are they planning on sending hackers to hack our INEC system or Peter Obi struck a deal with them to imports 40millions of white foreigners with PVC to come vote for Labour party?

Dumb head.

Buhariiswicked:
Tinubu’s Church rat and communion point is echoing in COP27. They say rich nations should pay us for climate change. That's evidence of a visionary.

https://twitter.com/samomatseye/status/1589608202295218177?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

This has quickly become the key issue at COP27 – and the most difficult to resolve.

By Rachel Ramirez, CNN
Updated 8:59 AM EST, Mon November 7, 2022
People displaced from their homes by flooding in Pakistan in Dadu, Sindh province, on Oct. 27, 2022.
People displaced from their homes by flooding in Pakistan in Dadu, Sindh province, on Oct. 27, 2022.

CNN
—
Aftab Khan felt helpless when torrential floodwaters submerged a third of Pakistan, his home country.

Khan’s hometown was completely underwater. His friend rescued a woman who had walked barefoot, carrying her sick child, through stagnant floodwaters for 15 miles. And Khan’s own mother, who now lives with him in Islamabad, was unable to travel home on washed-out roads to check if her daughter was safe.

“These are heart-wrenching stories, real stories,” Khan, an international climate change consultant, told CNN. “I was heartbroken.”

Al-Sahaba mosque
As countries convene at climate summit in Egypt, reports show the world is wildly off track. Here's what to watch at COP27
Pakistan became the clearest example this year of why some countries are fighting for a so-called “loss and damage” fund. The concept is that countries which have contributed the most to climate change with their planet-warming emissions should pay poorer countries to recover from the resulting disasters.

Earlier this year, Pakistan cooked under a deadly heat wave that climate change made 30 times more likely, according to the World Meteorological Organization. Now it is reeling from the aftermath of the worst floods in living memory.

The South Asian country is responsible for less than 1% of the world’s planet-warming emissions, but it is paying a heavy price. And there are many other countries like it around the world.

Loss and damage will be center stage at COP27 in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, this year, as low-emitting countries inundated with floods or watching their islands sink into the ocean are demanding that developed, high-emissions countries pay up for this damage.

But it’s been a contentious issue for years, as rich countries like the United States fear that agreeing to a loss and damage fund could open them up to legal liability, and potential future lawsuits.

Climate activists in developing nations and a former top US climate official told CNN time is running out, pointing to Pakistan’s cascading disasters as the clearest evidence why a dedicated loss and damage fund is needed.

The developing world is “not prepared to protect themselves and adapt and be resilient” to climate disasters, former White House Climate Adviser Gina McCarthy told CNN. “It’s the responsibility of the developed world to support that effort. Commitments have been made but they’re not being delivered.”

What is loss and damage?
As a concept, loss and damage is the idea that rich countries, having emitted the most planet-warming gases, should pay poorer countries who are now suffering from climate disasters they did not create.

Loss and damage is not a new ask. Developing countries and small island states have been pressing for these kinds of funds since 1991, when the Pacific island Vanuatu first proposed a plan for high-emitting countries to funnel money toward those impacted by sea level rise.

The morning's first rays of sunlight hit the island community of Serua Village, Fiji, in July.
The morning's first rays of sunlight hit the island community of Serua Village, Fiji, in July.
Loren Elliott/Reuters
It took more than a decade for the proposal to gain momentum, even as much of Vanuatu and other small island Pacific nations are slowly disappearing.

In Fiji, climate activist Lavetanalagi Seru’s home island, it has cost an average of $1 million to relocate communities because of sea level rise. Moving away from ancestral lands is not an easy decision, but climate change is having irreversible impacts on the islands, said Seru, the regional policy coordinator with the Pacific Islands Climate Action Network.

“Climate change is threatening the very social fabrics of our Pacific communities,” Seru said. “This is why these funds are required. This is a matter of justice for many of the small island developing states and countries such as those in the Pacific.”

Why is loss and damage controversial?
A major reason this type of fund is contentious is that wealthy nations are concerned that paying for such a fund could be seen as admission of liability, which may trigger legal battles. Developed nations like the US have pushed back on it in the past and are still tiptoeing around the issue.

Khan said he understands why rich developed nations are “dragging their feet.” But he added that it’s “very important for them to empathize and take responsibility.”

There has also been confusion about its definition – whether loss and damage is a form of liability, compensation or even reparations.

“‘Reparations’ is not a word or a term that has been used in this context,” US Climate Envoy John Kerry said on a recent call with reporters. He added: “We have always said that it is imperative for the developed world to help the developing world to deal with the impacts of climate.”

Huts made of branches and cloth provide shelter to Somalis displaced by drought on the outskirts of Dollow, Somalia, in September.
Huts made of branches and cloth provide shelter to Somalis displaced by drought on the outskirts of Dollow, Somalia, in September.
Jerome Delay/AP
Kerry has committed to having a conversation on a fund this year ahead of a 2024 deadline to decide on what such a fund would look like. And US officials still have questions – whether it would come through an existing financial source like the Green Climate Fund, or an entirely new source.

The Marechaussee arrest a protester as Milieudefensie, Extinction Rebellion, Greenpeace and other organisations members sit in front of an aircraft during a protest 'SOS for the climate' at Schiphol Airport, near Amsterdam on November 5, 2022. - Netherlands OUT (Photo by Remko de Waal / ANP / AFP) / Netherlands OUT (Photo by REMKO DE WAAL/ANP/AFP via Getty Images)
Climate activists block private jet runway at Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam
Kerry also sparked some controversy on the topic at a recent New York Times event, when in response to a question on loss and damage, Kerry seemed to suggest that no country has enough money to help places like Pakistan recover from devastating climate disasters.

“You tell me the government in the world that has trillions of dollars, cause that’s what it costs,” Kerry said at the event.

But others say the money is there. It’s more a matter of priorities.

“Look at the annual defense budget of the developed countries. We can mobilize the money,” Alden Meyer, senior associate at E3G, told CNN. “It’s not a question of money being there. It’s a question of political will.”

What do experts think can actually get done?
At COP27, the biggest debate will be over whether to create a dedicated financial mechanism for loss and damage – in addition to existing climate finance meant to help countries adapt to climate change and transition to clean energy.

After climate-ravaged nations called for a new loss and damage finance facility at COP26 in Glasgow last year, it’s likely it will be an official COP27 agenda this year. But even as wealthier countries like the US and EU nations have committed to talk about it, there’s not a lot of hope countries will emerge from Sharm in agreement about a fund.

An overhead view shows the photovoltaic (PV) solar panels making up Manston Solar Farm, in south-east England on November 4, 2022.
What are 'emissions?' What is 'net zero?' Here are the climate change terms you should know
“Do we expect that we’ll have a fund by the end of the two weeks? I hope, I would love to – but we’ll see how parties deliver on that,” Egypt ambassador Mohamed Nasr, that country’s main climate negotiator, told reporters recently.

But Nasr also tamped down expectations, saying that if countries are still haggling over whether to even put loss and damage on the agenda, they’re unlikely to have a breakthrough on a financing mechanism.

He said it’s more likely that the loss and damage conversation will continue over the two weeks of Sharm, perhaps ending a framework established for a financing mechanism – or clarity on whether funds might come from new or existing sources.

Some officials from climate-vulnerable nations warned that if countries fail to come to an agreement now, the problem will be much worse later.

“For countries not on the front line, they think it’s sort of a distraction and that people should focus on mitigation,” Avinash Persaud, special envoy to Barbados Prime Minister Mia Mottley, told CNN. “If we had done mitigation early enough, we wouldn’t have to adapt and if we’d adapted early enough, we wouldn’t have the loss of damage. But we haven’t done those things.”

Correction: An earlier version of this story misstated how much money has been spent to relocate communities in Fiji because of sea level rise. It's an average of $1 million per community, according to Lavetanalagi Seru.

CNN’s Ella Nilsen and Eve Brennan contributed to this report.

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/11/07/world/loss-and-damage-explained-cop27-climate/index.html

.

They should pay to who? To your corrupt leaders?

Only thief'nubu supporters are church rats looking for holy communion to steal...



But God has intervened and will put them to shame, you don't ridicule God and get away with it.

Vote wisely

lhordspy:



Ehn
So Bill gates and the other clowns you mentioned, your slave masters, have big influence in nigeria elections? Do they have PVC(s)?

You Zombidients never seems to amaze me less. Are they planning on sending hackers to hack our INEC system or Peter Obi struck a deal with them to imports 40millions of white foreigners with PVC to come vote for Labour party?

Dumb head.

On election day, you will realize that Trump wasn't crazy when he said they rigged the US elections. Let your Baba be going around promising every Tom, Dick and Harry, the oil wells which belong to The Fathers. They don't waste time talking, they just do; ask Goodluck Jonathan.

ganisucks:


On election day, you will realize that Trump wasn't crazy when he said they rigged the US elections. Let your Baba be going around promising every Tom, Dick and Harry, the oil wells which belong to The Fathers. They don't waste time talking, they just do; ask Goodluck Jonathan.

Explain yourself.

FreeStuffsNG:


This has quickly become the key issue at COP27 – and the most difficult to resolve.

By Rachel Ramirez, CNN
Updated 8:59 AM EST, Mon November 7, 2022
People displaced from their homes by flooding in Pakistan in Dadu, Sindh province, on Oct. 27, 2022.
People displaced from their homes by flooding in Pakistan in Dadu, Sindh province, on Oct. 27, 2022.

CNN
—
Aftab Khan felt helpless when torrential floodwaters submerged a third of Pakistan, his home country.

Khan’s hometown was completely underwater. His friend rescued a woman who had walked barefoot, carrying her sick child, through stagnant floodwaters for 15 miles. And Khan’s own mother, who now lives with him in Islamabad, was unable to travel home on washed-out roads to check if her daughter was safe.

“These are heart-wrenching stories, real stories,” Khan, an international climate change consultant, told CNN. “I was heartbroken.”

Al-Sahaba mosque
As countries convene at climate summit in Egypt, reports show the world is wildly off track. Here's what to watch at COP27
Pakistan became the clearest example this year of why some countries are fighting for a so-called “loss and damage” fund. The concept is that countries which have contributed the most to climate change with their planet-warming emissions should pay poorer countries to recover from the resulting disasters.

Earlier this year, Pakistan cooked under a deadly heat wave that climate change made 30 times more likely, according to the World Meteorological Organization. Now it is reeling from the aftermath of the worst floods in living memory.

The South Asian country is responsible for less than 1% of the world’s planet-warming emissions, but it is paying a heavy price. And there are many other countries like it around the world.

Loss and damage will be center stage at COP27 in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, this year, as low-emitting countries inundated with floods or watching their islands sink into the ocean are demanding that developed, high-emissions countries pay up for this damage.

But it’s been a contentious issue for years, as rich countries like the United States fear that agreeing to a loss and damage fund could open them up to legal liability, and potential future lawsuits.

Climate activists in developing nations and a former top US climate official told CNN time is running out, pointing to Pakistan’s cascading disasters as the clearest evidence why a dedicated loss and damage fund is needed.

The developing world is “not prepared to protect themselves and adapt and be resilient” to climate disasters, former White House Climate Adviser Gina McCarthy told CNN. “It’s the responsibility of the developed world to support that effort. Commitments have been made but they’re not being delivered.”

What is loss and damage?
As a concept, loss and damage is the idea that rich countries, having emitted the most planet-warming gases, should pay poorer countries who are now suffering from climate disasters they did not create.

Loss and damage is not a new ask. Developing countries and small island states have been pressing for these kinds of funds since 1991, when the Pacific island Vanuatu first proposed a plan for high-emitting countries to funnel money toward those impacted by sea level rise.

The morning's first rays of sunlight hit the island community of Serua Village, Fiji, in July.
The morning's first rays of sunlight hit the island community of Serua Village, Fiji, in July.
Loren Elliott/Reuters
It took more than a decade for the proposal to gain momentum, even as much of Vanuatu and other small island Pacific nations are slowly disappearing.

In Fiji, climate activist Lavetanalagi Seru’s home island, it has cost an average of $1 million to relocate communities because of sea level rise. Moving away from ancestral lands is not an easy decision, but climate change is having irreversible impacts on the islands, said Seru, the regional policy coordinator with the Pacific Islands Climate Action Network.

“Climate change is threatening the very social fabrics of our Pacific communities,” Seru said. “This is why these funds are required. This is a matter of justice for many of the small island developing states and countries such as those in the Pacific.”

Why is loss and damage controversial?
A major reason this type of fund is contentious is that wealthy nations are concerned that paying for such a fund could be seen as admission of liability, which may trigger legal battles. Developed nations like the US have pushed back on it in the past and are still tiptoeing around the issue.

Khan said he understands why rich developed nations are “dragging their feet.” But he added that it’s “very important for them to empathize and take responsibility.”

There has also been confusion about its definition – whether loss and damage is a form of liability, compensation or even reparations.

“‘Reparations’ is not a word or a term that has been used in this context,” US Climate Envoy John Kerry said on a recent call with reporters. He added: “We have always said that it is imperative for the developed world to help the developing world to deal with the impacts of climate.”

Huts made of branches and cloth provide shelter to Somalis displaced by drought on the outskirts of Dollow, Somalia, in September.
Huts made of branches and cloth provide shelter to Somalis displaced by drought on the outskirts of Dollow, Somalia, in September.
Jerome Delay/AP
Kerry has committed to having a conversation on a fund this year ahead of a 2024 deadline to decide on what such a fund would look like. And US officials still have questions – whether it would come through an existing financial source like the Green Climate Fund, or an entirely new source.

The Marechaussee arrest a protester as Milieudefensie, Extinction Rebellion, Greenpeace and other organisations members sit in front of an aircraft during a protest 'SOS for the climate' at Schiphol Airport, near Amsterdam on November 5, 2022. - Netherlands OUT (Photo by Remko de Waal / ANP / AFP) / Netherlands OUT (Photo by REMKO DE WAAL/ANP/AFP via Getty Images)
Climate activists block private jet runway at Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam
Kerry also sparked some controversy on the topic at a recent New York Times event, when in response to a question on loss and damage, Kerry seemed to suggest that no country has enough money to help places like Pakistan recover from devastating climate disasters.

“You tell me the government in the world that has trillions of dollars, cause that’s what it costs,” Kerry said at the event.

But others say the money is there. It’s more a matter of priorities.

“Look at the annual defense budget of the developed countries. We can mobilize the money,” Alden Meyer, senior associate at E3G, told CNN. “It’s not a question of money being there. It’s a question of political will.”

What do experts think can actually get done?
At COP27, the biggest debate will be over whether to create a dedicated financial mechanism for loss and damage – in addition to existing climate finance meant to help countries adapt to climate change and transition to clean energy.

After climate-ravaged nations called for a new loss and damage finance facility at COP26 in Glasgow last year, it’s likely it will be an official COP27 agenda this year. But even as wealthier countries like the US and EU nations have committed to talk about it, there’s not a lot of hope countries will emerge from Sharm in agreement about a fund.

An overhead view shows the photovoltaic (PV) solar panels making up Manston Solar Farm, in south-east England on November 4, 2022.
What are 'emissions?' What is 'net zero?' Here are the climate change terms you should know
“Do we expect that we’ll have a fund by the end of the two weeks? I hope, I would love to – but we’ll see how parties deliver on that,” Egypt ambassador Mohamed Nasr, that country’s main climate negotiator, told reporters recently.

But Nasr also tamped down expectations, saying that if countries are still haggling over whether to even put loss and damage on the agenda, they’re unlikely to have a breakthrough on a financing mechanism.

He said it’s more likely that the loss and damage conversation will continue over the two weeks of Sharm, perhaps ending a framework established for a financing mechanism – or clarity on whether funds might come from new or existing sources.

Some officials from climate-vulnerable nations warned that if countries fail to come to an agreement now, the problem will be much worse later.

“For countries not on the front line, they think it’s sort of a distraction and that people should focus on mitigation,” Avinash Persaud, special envoy to Barbados Prime Minister Mia Mottley, told CNN. “If we had done mitigation early enough, we wouldn’t have to adapt and if we’d adapted early enough, we wouldn’t have the loss of damage. But we haven’t done those things.”

Correction: An earlier version of this story misstated how much money has been spent to relocate communities in Fiji because of sea level rise. It's an average of $1 million per community, according to Lavetanalagi Seru.

CNN’s Ella Nilsen and Eve Brennan contributed to this report.

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/11/07/world/loss-and-damage-explained-cop27-climate/index.html

.

You think my blowing grammar tinubu's IQ will increase from - oooooooooooooooo. 1 to 000000000000000.2

Tinubu is perpetually daft.

Someone will open his mouth with confidence and talk absolute nonsense that has no bearing with the discourse and you the so-called intellectual Will be busy explaining the nonsense. The both of you need mental evaluation.
That's exactly how they brought in the current failure in Aso Rock.

lhordspy:
Lol.

Since that statement was made. I spent lot of my time trying to explain, expantiate, elucidate and bring it down to the level our dull zombidients could understand.

It was all a futile effort. More like trying to fill a basket with water.

The thing is Tinubu's is not to be held responsible for their inability to comprehend things outside the normal 'i have only one watch, Nassrawa is a big country, and quoting irrelevant china figures'.

Tinubu can not be held responsible for their inability to think deep to comprehend simple logic when using it to lay down an explanation.


I dont envy the intellectual capacity of any zombidients. They are too dull to be humans.

What do you think you know with all these irrelevancies you type here twisting narratives to suit your support for your paymaster.
How do you explain what Sam omatseye said? Did he make any sense to you? You people sef can sure go any length