Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,152,864 members, 7,817,560 topics. Date: Saturday, 04 May 2024 at 02:22 PM

Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission - Politics (7) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission (30236 Views)

Court Rules That INEC Can Determine How Election Results Are Transmitted / E-Results Transmission: Why Senate Can’t Subject INEC Power To NCC - Tambuwal / Ekiti Election: PDP Nwc Gets Hard Facts, Reconfirms That INEC Doctored Results (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by Jokay07(m): 9:37am On Mar 11, 2023
BluntCrazeMan:



Instead of you to answer my simple question inside the other uncrowded harmless thread,, you're here mentioning my moniker on another thread.

Nevertheless,, I will still respond to you..

Now..
Let me still drag you back to that same Electoral-Act-2022: Section-64; Sub-Section-(4);.(a-&-b)..

The words there are very clear.

We can all agree that the “Directly-Transmitted Results From The Various Polling-units”, as described inside the Electoral Act, could be done using any method on this earth, (be it “Optical-Fibre Transmission”, “Solar-Waves Transmission”, “Radio Transmission”, “Sonar Transmission”, and even “Seismic Transmission” too),, but definitely NOT “Manual Transmission”, because it wouldn't satisfy the expected requirements of the Electoral Act.


Section-64(4) of the Electoral Act simply maintains that, no matter the Method or Mode which INEC employed for the Transmission of the results (“Directly from the Polling-units”),, it MUST be completely done-and-dusted with before the Collations that are supposed to use the results from those polling-units would start.
This is because,, those directly transmitted results are the results which the Collation Officers at the various “WARDS COLLATION CENTERS” must use to satisfy the requirements of the Section-64(4) of the Electoral-Act-2022.




Therefore,, this particular Court-Ruling still didn't deflate my arguments..


Please read the Section-64; Sub-Section-(4):.(a-&-b) of the Electoral-Act-2022 again,, and explain it well to me,, just in case I am not understanding it very well..
Sorry I have been very busy lately, though it shouldn't be an excuse.

However, I dont think that there's much to argue here since we have agreed the electronic transmission of results is not enshrined in the electoral act.

This means that it's under inec guidelines and Inec as an independent body can choose whatever method that seems ok for them to collate results.
So, to save each other's time, let's focus on what the electoral act says rather than committing "legal sacrilage" by rewriting and misinterpreting the inec electoral act intentionally so as to suit our narrative. grin

Secondly, going through the electoral act and the constitution, I have noticed some words there and I would like to draw your attention to them.

1. Transmit

2. Directly.
Let get to know the meaning of these two words before I proceed with my defence further.
grin grin
My lord, I rest my case.
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by YorubaRonuuu(m): 9:40am On Mar 11, 2023
benheaven:

You are doing yourself harm
because I'm telling you the bitter fact right so you've started crying
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by wildkat: 9:53am On Mar 11, 2023
YorubaRonuuu:
Gbam.... This news won't be nice in the ears of the ipob and the obi followers because they will start crying that the judge has been bribed.

Yoruba Lokan

Tinubu's 8 years is certain!

U just open your rotten mouth and shout gbam! Whether the news is genuine or not... So far as it massages your stupid fancy
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by bentenny(m): 9:57am On Mar 11, 2023
emerged01:


Yes,INEC has its own guidelines and regulations but they have the power to act against them when the situation calls for it. But not carrying the parties along on the need to take such step is where the mistake came in.
The choice was contained in their guidelines and regulations!
Inec had enough time to change their stance!
Any last minute alteration should have been communicated publicly before February 25 which may have possibly led to a postponement of the elections citing their inability to adequately conduct an e-transmission of results!
Mistakes or last minute disobedience of the own guidelines and regulations have grave consequences as contained in the electoral acts!
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by YorubaRonuuu(m): 10:03am On Mar 11, 2023
wildkat:


U just open your rotten mouth and shout gbam! Whether the news is genuine or not... So far as it massages your stupid fancy
you're very stupid for that statement, so the news isn't genuine now because it's apparently wasn't what you want to hear... Dumbed ass idiot
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by wildkat: 10:07am On Mar 11, 2023
YorubaRonuuu:
you're very stupid for that statement, so the news isn't genuine now because it's apparently wasn't what you want to hear... Dumbed ass idiot

Yes that's how APC touts and urchins talk. Very foolish set of bastards
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by IgOga(m): 10:18am On Mar 11, 2023
Party that came 3rd in everything too dey worry abeg grin grin grin

Empty barrel makes the loudest noise grin
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by YorubaRonuuu(m): 10:19am On Mar 11, 2023
wildkat:


Yes that's how APC touts and urchins talk. Very foolish set of bastards
it's obvious that you're the real bastard expecting everyone to start acting like a sheep following your candidate deceiving them not to a tribal biggot... I'm not even into politics so get that into your skull
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by cocoduck: 10:31am On Mar 11, 2023
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by wildkat: 11:01am On Mar 11, 2023
YorubaRonuuu:
it's obvious that you're the real bastard expecting everyone to start acting like a sheep following your candidate deceiving them not to a tribal biggot... I'm not even into politics so get that into your skull

Calm down.. stop foaming from the mouth
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by YorubaRonuuu(m): 11:32am On Mar 11, 2023
wildkat:


Calm down.. stop foaming from the mouth
asshole face front
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by Mylove55(f): 12:22pm On Mar 11, 2023
bentenny:

This is not a matter of insults or emotions!
Read the guidelines and regulations which is an extension of the amended electoral acts!
If inec gave a contrary training to their presiding officers,then the commission has defaulted in their own laws of which there are grave consequences for such actions which may include an outright cancellations of the presidential election assuming you are right in your assertions!
Peruse before commenting!
inec follow the electoral act,
at least 83% of the results were uploaded from the poling unit,
that means, presiding officers follow inec instructions that any area without network can transfer manually
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by bentenny(m): 1:54pm On Mar 11, 2023
Mylove55:
inec follow the electoral act,

The guidelines and regulations is an extension of the amended electoral acts!
Its also carries the same weight as the electoral laws itself!

Mylove55:

at least 83% of the results were uploaded from the poling unit,

Do you have facts that 83% of results were uploaded in the irev after voting was concluded on February 25th?
Even the same irev wasn't even functioning on the election day as inec admitted they encountered issues with the inec server...

Mylove55:

that means, presiding officers follow inec instructions that any area without network can transfer manually
Once again,your assertion if correct further puts inec in trouble and concludes the independent body disobeyed their own laws!
The guidelines and regulations which is as mandatory as the electoral laws indicates that its imperative for results to be transmitted electronically from the polling unit!
Once the primary transmission of results fail,the election is cancelled as the process has been flawed!
Manual transmission implies that the results will be done at the collation centre which compromises the integrity of the results as we have seen so far in some states!
Finally, if inec knew that the e-transmission of results was not possible or attainable,they should have told the public and outrightly postpone the election until they comply with their own laws!
The disobedience of their own laws has just rendered the election null and void!
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by Mylove55(f): 2:19pm On Mar 11, 2023
bentenny:


The guidelines and regulations is an extension of the amended electoral acts!
Its also carries the same weight as the electoral laws itself!



Do you have facts that 83% of results were uploaded in the irev after voting was concluded on February 25th?
Even the same irev wasn't even functioning on the election day as inec admitted they encountered issues with the inec server...


Once again,your assertion if correct further puts inec in trouble and concludes the independent body disobeyed their own laws!
The guidelines and regulations which is as mandatory as the electoral laws indicates that its imperative for results to be transmitted electronically from the polling unit!
Once the primary transmission of results fail,the election is cancelled as the process has been flawed!
Manual transmission implies that the results will be done at the collation centre which compromises the integrity of the results as we have seen so far in some states!
Finally, if inec knew that the e-transmission of results was not possible or attainable,they should have told the public and outrightly postpone the election until they comply with their own laws!
The disobedience of their own laws has just rendered the election null and void!
if inec had postpone the election, you people will be the first to shout foul play,
Meanwhile, the court said inec can decide any method, and inec use both method to transmit result
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by bentenny(m): 2:57pm On Mar 11, 2023
Mylove55:
if inec had postpone the election, you people will be the first to shout foul play,

Its not about what people will say...its about doing what is stated in the electoral law in constitution!
Things must be done in the right manner without sentiments!

Mylove55:

Meanwhile, the court said inec can decide any method, and inec use both method to transmit result
Yes the court said inec can decide which method of transmission to use...that was why inec brought out their guidelines and regulations to make the electorates and parties aware of the method of transmission they have and will be adopting in the election which is the electronic means!
This is contained in the guidelines and regulations of inec that carries as much weight as the electoral laws!
Infact,the guidelines and regulations are an extension of the electoral laws!
If inec believes they were not prepared for the method of transmission they have adopted,they would have simply postponed the election!
Its that simple!
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by Mylove55(f): 3:29pm On Mar 11, 2023
bentenny:


Its not about what people will say...its about doing what is stated in the electoral law in constitution!
Things must be done in the right manner without sentiments!


Yes the court said inec can decide which method of transmission to use...that was why inec brought out their guidelines and regulations to make the electorates and parties aware of the method of transmission they have and will be adopting in the election which is the electronic means!
This is contained in the guidelines and regulations of inec that carries as much weight as the electoral laws!
Infact,the guidelines and regulations are an extension of the electoral laws!
If inec believes they were not prepared for the method of transmission they have adopted,they would have simply postponed the election!
Its that simple!
there is no way to have 100% electronic transmission of results, because network do fails in nigeria,
Even your banking system guarantee 100% cashless,
For inec to get 83% electronic transmission is not a small fit,
Some area can not transmit electronically,
Meanwhile, the 12 state won by apc came in less than 24hrs,
Follow by where atiku won,
But where obi won came after 48hrs, even Abuja result came last,
Obi.diot are simply ashamed to concede defeat,
Is not really easy to concede defeat after all the insult and boasting to defeat tinubu.
Just admit that this election is the most freest and fairest election since 1960
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by wildkat: 4:19pm On Mar 11, 2023
YorubaRonuuu:
asshole face front

Just calm down and stop foaming from your stinky mouth
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by bentenny(m): 4:32pm On Mar 11, 2023
Mylove55:
there is no way to have 100% electronic transmission of results, because network do fails in nigeria,
Even your banking system guarantee 100% cashless,
Sorry dear but if humongous funds gotten from taxpayers were channelled towards getting the BIVAS and ensuring electronic transmission,the least expected from INEC was a near flawless election!
The reason behind the electronic transmission of results from polling units was to ensure that the integrity of the election and independence of the commission was preserved!
If INEC were unable to perform what was contained in their guidelines and regulations,it simply meant they conducted a disappointing and disgraceful election which should never have stood had the commission had an ounce of credibility left in them!

Mylove55:

For inec to get 83% electronic transmission is not a small fit,
You are still yet to provide me with proof that there was 83% electronic transmission of results on february 25!
There were various degrees of problems aside INEC's inability to electronically transmit results!
Most polling units had no INEC official hence no voting was done or When there was presence of INEC officials,the BIVAS was either not working or the voting materials were not enough for the particular PUs!
Most INEC officials showed up at their respective centres with no material for the election and went back to the collation centre only to hear that results from that PU had been manufactured from nowhere and the results announced!
In most PUs INEC officials came very late to their centres and in two hours they wanted to leave!
All these are on INEC and they were provided with enough funds in order not to blame anyone!
Overall,the election was a sham and the primary reason for many electorates who came out to vote which is believing their votes will count using an electronic means was truncated by INEC's inability to conduct a free and fair election!

Mylove55:

Some area can not transmit electronically,

You still dont get it!
Whose fault is it? The electorates or INEC that kept ponificating about how ready they were to deliver a free and fair election!
INEC boasted about their preparedness and assured everyone that results will be transmitted electronically from all PUs in the country!
If there were network failures or hitches,the guidelines and regulations stated explicitly that such PUs will either be cancelled and a new election held 24 hours later!
So thats no excuse dear!

Mylove55:

Meanwhile, the 12 state won by apc came in less than 24hrs,
Follow by where atiku won,
But where obi won came after 48hrs, even Abuja result came last,
Obi.diot are simply ashamed to concede defeat,
Is not really easy to concede defeat after all the insult and boasting to defeat tinubu.
Just admit that this election is the most freest and fairest election since 1960

Obviously you are speaking from a partisan inclination!
However,the reason behind conducting a free and fair election is for all parties to realize that they were not in any way cheated!
This was the reason for the BIVAS and the electronic transmission of results in order to give the election the needed credibility!
Another reason why the BIVAS was introduced is to ensure transparency and a future reduction of court processes!
Unfortunately,this was not possible because the election outcome was horrendously conducted and left room for election malpractices!
If you claim the 2023 presidential election was the freest and fairest election since 1960,then i guess i am living in a totally different country from yours!

Finally one point to note is that you have deviated from the main conversation and trying fruitlessly to hold brief for INEC....Have you finally admitted that INEC failed to uphold their own end of the bargain by disobeying their own laws that was stipulated in their own guidelines and regulations which is also as mandatory as the electoral laws? Yes or No?
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by Mylove55(f): 4:53pm On Mar 11, 2023
bentenny:

Sorry dear but if humongous funds gotten from taxpayers were channelled towards getting the BIVAS and ensuring electronic transmission,the least expected from INEC was a near flawless election!
The reason behind the electronic transmission of results from polling units was to ensure that the integrity of the election and independence of the commission was preserved!
If INEC were unable to perform what was contained in their guidelines and regulations,it simply meant they conducted a disgraceful election which should not have stood had the commission had an ounce of credibility left in them!

Yes, inec did a good job, pdp already employed the service of Russians to hack the server as they did in 2019,
The pdp actually attacked the server 166 times,
You need to commend Inec for a job well done

You are still yet to provide me with proof that there was 83% electronic transmission of results on february 25!
There were various degrees of problems aside INEC's inability to electronically transmit results!
Most polling units had no INEC official hence no voting was done or When there was presence of INEC officials,the BIVAS was either not working or the voting materials were not enough for the particular PUs!
Most INEC officials showed up at their respective centres with no material for the election and went back to the collation centre only to hear that results from that PU had been manufactured from nowhere and the results announced!
In most PUs INEC officials came very late to their centres and in two hours they wanted to leave!
All these are on INEC and they were provided with enough funds in order not to blame anyone!
Overall,the election was a sham and the primary reason for many electorates who came out to vote which is believing their votes will count using an electronic means was truncated by INEC's inability to conduct a free and fair election!



You still dont get it!
Whose fault is it?
INEC boasted about their preparedness and assured everyone that results will be transmitted electronically from all PUs in the country!
If there was network failure or hitch,the guidelines and regulations stated explicitly that for such PUs will either be cancelled and a free election held 24 hours later!
So thats no excuse dear!



Obviously you are speaking from a partisan inclination!
However,the reason behind conducting a free and fair election is for all parties to realize that they were not in any way cheated!
This was the reason for the BIVAS and the electronic transmission of results in order to give the election the needed credibility!
Another reason why the BIVAS was introduced is to ensure transparency and a future reduction of court processes!
Unfortunately,this was not possible because the election outcome was horrendously conducted and left room for election malpractices!
If you claim the 2023 presidential election was the freest and fairest election since 1960,then i guess i am living in a totally different country from yours!

Finally one point to note is that you have deviated from the main conversation and trying fruitlessly to hold brief for INEC....Have you finally admitted that INEC failed to uphold their own end of the bargain by disobeying their own laws that was stipulated in their own guidelines and regulations which is also as mandatory as the electoral laws? Yes or No?
Yes, inec did a good job, pdp already employed the service of Russians to hack the server as they did in 2019,
The pdp actually attacked the server 166 times,
You need to commend Inec for a job well done


Meanwhile, the election should only be conducted in south east,
You said inec came late and without material and result were already in collation center,
That means those results awarded to obi in south east of 95% were all fake,
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by feedthenation(m): 5:08pm On Mar 11, 2023
Mylove55:
if inec had postpone the election, you people will be the first to shout foul play,
Meanwhile, the court said inec can decide any method, and inec use both method to transmit result

---Maybe INEC decided to stop electronic transmission of results due to videos like the link below---

https://twitter.com/Sir_Muby49/status/1633856211564089345?s=20
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by Mylove55(f): 5:20pm On Mar 11, 2023
feedthenation:


---Maybe INEC decided to stop electronic transmission of results due to videos like the link below---

https://twitter.com/Sir_Muby49/status/1633856211564089345?s=20
yes naYes, inec did a good job, pdp already employed the service of Russians to hack the server as they did in 2019,
The pdp actually attacked the server 166 times,
You need to commend Inec for a job well done
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by Mylove55(f): 5:23pm On Mar 11, 2023
bentenny:

Sorry dear but if humongous funds gotten from taxpayers were channelled towards getting the BIVAS and ensuring electronic transmission,the least expected from INEC was a near flawless election!
The reason behind the electronic transmission of results from polling units was to ensure that the integrity of the election and independence of the commission was preserved!
If INEC were unable to perform what was contained in their guidelines and regulations,it simply meant they conducted a disappointing and disgraceful election which should never have stood had the commission had an ounce of credibility left in them!


You are still yet to provide me with proof that there was 83% electronic transmission of results on february 25!
There were various degrees of problems aside INEC's inability to electronically transmit results!
Most polling units had no INEC official hence no voting was done or When there was presence of INEC officials,the BIVAS was either not working or the voting materials were not enough for the particular PUs!
Most INEC officials showed up at their respective centres with no material for the election and went back to the collation centre only to hear that results from that PU had been manufactured from nowhere and the results announced!
In most PUs INEC officials came very late to their centres and in two hours they wanted to leave!
All these are on INEC and they were provided with enough funds in order not to blame anyone!
Overall,the election was a sham and the primary reason for many electorates who came out to vote which is believing their votes will count using an electronic means was truncated by INEC's inability to conduct a free and fair election!



You still dont get it!
Whose fault is it? The electorates or INEC that kept ponificating about how ready they were to deliver a free and fair election!
INEC boasted about their preparedness and assured everyone that results will be transmitted electronically from all PUs in the country!
If there were network failures or hitches,the guidelines and regulations stated explicitly that such PUs will either be cancelled and a new election held 24 hours later!
So thats no excuse dear!



Obviously you are speaking from a partisan inclination!
However,the reason behind conducting a free and fair election is for all parties to realize that they were not in any way cheated!
This was the reason for the BIVAS and the electronic transmission of results in order to give the election the needed credibility!
Another reason why the BIVAS was introduced is to ensure transparency and a future reduction of court processes!
Unfortunately,this was not possible because the election outcome was horrendously conducted and left room for election malpractices!
If you claim the 2023 presidential election was the freest and fairest election since 1960,then i guess i am living in a totally different country from yours!

Finally one point to note is that you have deviated from the main conversation and trying fruitlessly to hold brief for INEC....Have you finally admitted that INEC failed to uphold their own end of the bargain by disobeying their own laws that was stipulated in their own guidelines and regulations which is also as mandatory as the electoral laws? Yes or No?
feedthenation:


---Maybe INEC decided to stop electronic transmission of results due to videos like the link below---

https://twitter.com/Sir_Muby49/status/1633856211564089345?s=20
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by bentenny(m): 5:33pm On Mar 11, 2023
Mylove55:
Yes, inec did a good job, pdp already employed the service of Russians to hack the server as they did in 2019,
The pdp actually attacked the server 166 times,
You need to commend Inec for a job well done

Did a good job?
Are you sure you know what you are saying?
They failed in making provisions for their officers in terms of logistics hence the officials arrived at their PU centres very late!
They failed to adequately transmit results from PUs as the officials had challenges with uploading results thereby compromising the entire electoral process!
They failed to provide enough materials for many PUs across the country thereby disenfranchising many electorates!
Even INEC admitted though indirectly in their earlier press briefing that they didn't fulfill they purpose for which they promised Nigerians!
Most INEC officials were seem compromising the results by manipulating results due to the apparent absence of e-transmission of results!
If that is what you refer to as good then i would need to check the meaning again to know if it has recently been changed to something else!

Mylove55:

Meanwhile, the election should only be conducted in south east,
You said inec came late and without material and result were already in collation center,
That means those results awarded to obi in south east of 95% were all fake,
Whether in the SE,or SS or NW or NE or SW or any other region in nigeria,the entire process was compromised the moment INEC failed to ensure the e-transmission of results from the polling units and the entire process should have been cancelled!

Once again,you are deviating from the main purpose of discus....do you finally agree that e-transmission of results was mandatory as contained in the guidelines and regulation of INEC which is an extension of the electoral laws? Yes or No?
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by bentenny(m): 5:38pm On Mar 11, 2023
Mylove55:

.
Inec stopping the e-transmission of results and using manual transmission for any reason whatsoever goes contrary to their guidelines and regulations....The only option available to them was to cancel the entire process and declare that the election had been compromised while seeking a new date for another election instead of continuing with manual transmission of results without informing the public!
If this is Inec's argument,the election will definitely be cancelled by any court of law!
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by Mylove55(f): 5:44pm On Mar 11, 2023
bentenny:


Did a good job?
Are you sure you know what you are saying?
They failed in making provisions for their officers in terms of logistics hence the officials arrived at their PU centres very late!
They failed to adequately transmit results from PUs as the officials had challenges with uploading results thereby compromising the entire electoral process!
They failed to provide enough materials for many PUs across the country thereby disenfranchising many electorates!
Even INEC admitted though indirectly in their earlier press briefing that they didn't fulfill they purpose for which they promised Nigerians!
Most INEC officials were seem compromising the results by manipulating results due to the apparent absence of e-transmission of results!
If that is what you refer to as good then i would need to check the meaning again to know if it has recently been changed to something else!


Whether in the SE,or SS or NW or NE or SW or any other region in nigeria,the entire process was compromised the moment INEC failed to ensure the e-transmission of results from the polling units and the entire process should have been cancelled!

Once again,you are deviating from the main purpose of discus....do you finally agree that e-transmission of results was mandatory as contained in the guidelines and regulation of INEC which is an extension of the electoral laws? Yes or No?
inec actually received results from poling unit to their server,
But not to irev, because obi and atiku plan to infuse their result to irev,
As you can see from the video I sent you, and dino agree he try to enter irev 166 times,
Inec knows their plan, that was the reason inec stop the irev and only received the result in inec server from poling unit,
Inec compare the results in server with the manual collation before announcing the result,
Inec really did a good job,
If not, nigeria would have be no more by now
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by Mylove55(f): 5:47pm On Mar 11, 2023
bentenny:

Inec stopping the e-transmission of results and using manual transmission for any reason whatsoever goes contrary to their guidelines and regulations....The only option available to them was to cancel the entire process and declare that the election had been compromised while seeking a new date for another election instead of continuing with manual transmission of results without informing the public!
If this is Inec's argument,the election will definitely be cancelled by any court of law!
the aggrieved candidates are already comparing the result from inec server with what inec announced.
There is no difference
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by bentenny(m): 5:57pm On Mar 11, 2023
Mylove55:
inec actually received results from poling unit to their server,
But not to irev, because obi and atiku plan to infuse their result to irev,
Interesting!
Firstly,what is IreV?
What to you is a server?

Mylove55:

As you can see from the video I sent you, and dino agree he try to enter irev 166 times,
Inec knows their plan, that was the reason inec stop the irev and only received the result in inec server from poling unit,
Inec compare the results in server with the manual collation before announcing the result,
Inec really did a good job,
If not, nigeria would have be no more by now
lol
It would seem as if you misunderstand a party situation room,IreV and Server!
In one hand,you are saying INEC ditched the usage of e-transmission and in another hand you are also saying INEC transmitted results to the inec server!
Obviously,it seems you do not know the relationship between the INEC server and IreV!
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by bentenny(m): 6:05pm On Mar 11, 2023
Mylove55:
the aggrieved candidates are already comparing the result from inec server with what inec announced.
There is no difference
It would help you greatly if you would stick to your first argument instead of prevaricating!
Like i said before,most results were not transmitted electronically and INEC should have done the needful by stopping or cancelling the election if there was any alleged hacking or breach that may compromise the results instead of resorting to manual transmission of results!!
Secondly,most of the results that were manipulated are still there!
Some PU results from another state is being shown in another state!
As for insinuating that the results from the opposition parties and that found on the server are not different,lets wait and see what evidence they will present!
No need jumping the gun!
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by Mylove55(f): 6:42pm On Mar 11, 2023
bentenny:

Interesting!
Firstly,what is IreV?
What to you is a server?


lol
It would seem as if you misunderstand a party situation room,IreV and Server!
In one hand,you are saying INEC ditched the usage of e-transmission and in another hand you are also saying INEC transmitted results to the inec server!
Obviously,it seems you do not know the relationship between the INEC server and IreV!
that is the reason court will stroke out the issue of electronic transmitted result,
Because inec will tell court that she actually received the result from poling unit,
Pdp or Lp disagreement is the issue of irev,
And irev is not mandatory in electoral act or inec guidelines,
For example, if NTA promise to show live match, and at last unable to show the live match, will you give court paper to NTA for not keeping to her promise, will not showing the match change the result of the match,
Inec received the live result from poling unit and could not transmit the received result from server to viewing portal, does that affect the received result in the inec server?

According to obi online inec ( mark essien) he could not see the difference between inec received result in the server and what inec actually announced
Re: Court Ruled In January That INEC Can Use Any Method For Results Transmission by bentenny(m): 7:40pm On Mar 11, 2023
Mylove55:
that is the reason court will stroke out the issue of electronic transmitted result,
Because inec will tell court that she actually received the result from poling unit,
The court never struck out the issue of electronic transmission of results!
LP went to court to compel INEC into using e-transmission and the judge quoted the section of the electoral law that gives INEC the choice or discretion to determine which mode of transmission they will adopt!
INEC later made the decision of which mode of transmission to adhere to through their guidelines and regulation where INEC stated emphatically that the commission will adopt electronic transmission of results from the polling unit!
Once INEC had adopted a mode of transmission,they cannot ditch it for any reason whatsoever by using another mode or form of transmission!
That will be like disobedience to their own laid down laws which is binding on them and the entire staffs of INEC!

Mylove55:

Pdp or Lp disagreement is the issue of irev,
You are yet to define what Irev means hence the confusion!
When there is a transmission of a property or material or information,there must be a start point and destination point!
In the case of INEC,the PU is the start point and the destination point is the INEC server where the results are stored and people can view the contents of the results through a portal called INEC Result Viewer(IReV)
The opposition parties case is that INEC did not upload the results directly from the PUs hence the integrity of the results were compromised!

Mylove55:

And irev is not mandatory in electoral act or inec guidelines,
IREV is not mandatory to you because you do not know its meaning or its importance to the electronic transmission of results process!
IreV is a portal where people view the uploaded results that come from the various PUs
Like i explained before,transmission is the movement of a source or information from one point to another...in other words,there must be a start and destination point!
Since its electronic transmission of results,it means the electronic movement from the PU through the BIVAS devices to the INEC server where all the PU results are stored and a portal called IreV is made available for an individual to access a PU result!
The IreV displays what is stored in the server!
Hence saying IreV is not important or mandatory implies you do not know how an electronic system works!

Mylove55:

For example, if NTA promise to show live match, and at last unable to show the live match, will you give court paper to NTA for not keeping to her promise, will not showing the match change the result of the match,
This example you are giving is off point!
NTA is at liberty to change a sponsored programme at will and show any other programme since they are a government owned property!
However,if NTA were a private company with TV rights to show such match and they reneged,there will pay a hefty fine and their rights will be taken from them!

Mylove55:

Inec received the live result from poling unit and could not transmit the received result from server to viewing portal, does that affect the received result in the inec server?
lol
Once again you still do not understand what a server is or what an IREV means!
Try to get the meaning so that you do not confuse both!

Mylove55:

According to obi online inec ( mark essien) he could not see the difference between inec received result in the server and what inec actually announced
That's not my bone of contention!
My argument is that the integrity of the election has been truncated because allegedly,INEC were unable to upload results from the PUs to the server in order for people to use the portal to view the uploaded results!

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (Reply)

See Peoples Gazette Today's News Headlines (Photo) / Tinubu Vs DAAR Communications: Parties Failed To Settle Case Out Of Court (Pics) / 3 South-East Governors To Join APC

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 151
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.