Oyetola and his advisers must be very mischievous. That APC lost Osun totally has been confirmed by both the National and State Assembly elections where Tinubu could not even win his own state of birth. Lost to Atiku. APC should forget Osun for now, you cannot win Osun State after 12 years of dysmal performance

The Appeal Court did not place Voters Register above the BVAS, the Court only said it is essential. As long the accreditation process follows both and they are both in our different laws, it is only okay that both go through same process.



It is not just the Court of Appeal saying, it is in our laws in the Evidence Act 2011.



In law, the Primary evidence is of supreme value (it is the best evidence).

1st report - server report given to Oyetola in July (unsynchronised)

2nd report - server report given to Adeleke (unsynchronised)

3rd report - BVAS Machines physically tendered before the Court with all the data in it (PRIMARY DATA)

4th report - Final Synchronisation gotten from (3) above.

The SC will not say otherwise, like I said in the morning as long as server reports are subject to human and network issue, it's a problem... See SC in Wike v Peterside .

Again, on what premise did the tribunal ignore the other three reports.

Primary Data.

The BVAS machines were physically tendered before the tribunal and reports accurately submitted by INEC (i.e. 4th report). Oyetola's lawyers didn't challenge it in their final written address.

Whatever data is on the BVAS machine is the primary data, anything that comes out of it, backend server or so is secondary.

There ordinarily shouldn't be, this is what the EC8A (Statement), Voters Register & BVAs is expected to fish out.

Hear Oyetola's expert witness:

Isiaka Olanrewaju testified that he is an expert, who had operated several electronic devices, including BVAS, before, and was aware that an electoral officer might fail to submit the data imputed into the machine or that if the network was bad, the data submitted would not be successful.

Has he not supported the INEC staff's position? Did this witness bolster Oyetola's case?

An expert should be able to furnish the court with scientific analysis that will allow the Court to form its independent judgement otherwise it is valueless and worthless. (SC in Ogiale v. SPDC, 1997)

The Court of Appeal restored the supremacy of the BVAS that's why it based its judgement on a completed and synchronised Report.

SC in Okereke v Umahi (2016) by Justice Chima C Nweze JSC

[u]Furthermore, PW8 an official of INEC who testified on subpoena on the application of the appellant admitted that Exhibit GP45 (the Card Reader Report) was an incomplete document, as data from some polling units had not been uploaded to the INEC data base as at the time the report was made. The document was therefore unreliable and lacking in any evidential value. Again the Tribunal rightly rejected the report and the Court below was right to have affirmed the rejection. On these findings alone, the petition was bound to fail.



It was for these and the more elaborate reasons well marshalled in the lead judgment that I dismissed this appeal and affirmed the decision of the Court below. (This was in 2016)



In this case, the INEC still testified that it was an incomplete document that was handed over to Oyetola, any difference?

The same Justice Nweze will be on the panel, so do you think it will make any difference?



It is improper for a court of law to enter judgment for a party on incomplete and inconclusive facts or evidence. A party ought to place all relevant facts before the court to assist it to arrive at a fair and reasonable conclusion (Justice Okoro in Adim v NBC).

Barrister fergie001 ✍️ ✍️✍️✍️

JasonScoolari:
“If to say Goat know say Salad dey, E for nor dey chop Grass.”



Oyetola and his gang of Efulefu's in the APC should first of all pay the N500,000 the Appeal Court asked them to pay....

We wan use am do small Owambé for Osogbo tomorrow evening.


In the words of Tinubu miscreants; “Go To Court”

alhaji aguero, when is obi coming? Despite pdps poor performance in detail you still voted PDP again? Are you guys zombies?

Yeah... He should!

Supreme court did it for Hope Uzodinma!

They can do it for Oyetola!

Osun people do not want you again go and rest and if your brother tinubu gives you high job good n if not go and rest in peace

Abeg rest. Osun people wants Adeleke. You win some you lose some..

PDP must now be jittery in Osun state.

Tinubu's supporters boasted that Tinubu influenced the appointments of many of the Supreme Court judges of today.
The Supreme Court recently awarded primary election victory to APC senate aspirants who did not even contest the primary election.

You know their game. Just like Lagos was deliberately left for them in the Feb election.

INTEGRITYA1:
Even if Oyetola go to Supreme Court, Adeleke will still win. (PDP)
At the end Tinubu will also win all legal tussles against him. (APC)

If oppositions begin to say our Judicial system has been bought by the time Tinubu win at court, then the response will be; when PDP win at Osun State, the judicial system wasn't bought then.

Las Las Oyetola will be pacify with Federal Appointment.

Bookmark this post for reference purposes.

And after supreme na to go heaven for Oyetoro to report the case to baba God

You shall reclaim your mandate insha Allah

The guy no dey hear word.

Supreme Court judges must no longer allow themselves to become sources of calamity in Nigeria.

Nearly all of Imo state, except the state capital, is set back to 19th century status with scores of lives lost since the Supreme Court judges awarded victory to a man who hardly contested the election and came fourth in the polls.
President Buhari has visited Imo state more than any other state, and the governor has visited Buhari in Aso Rock more than any governor ever did.

Because igbos are always in the opposite of normal and sensible things in Nigeria , if others are going forward , they are going backward , no wonder they can't boast of any development in their region other than erosion....No single bus terminal in the east

JASONjnr:
Igbos are in full support for the Adeleke's win.... Why aren't they calling Adeleke an Igbo man?

Zico5:
Oyetola is just wasting his time. Osun people have rejected him totally. They have spoken through the just concluded election. He shouldn't waste his time but gear up for another for another election. That guy mumu too much

Is this coming from a APC and Thiefnúbu loyalist? Wonders shall never end😂

press9jatv:
The Appeal Court did not place Voters Register above the BVAS, the Court only said it is essential. As long the accreditation process follows both and they are both in our different laws, it is only okay that both go through same process.



It is not just the Court of Appeal saying, it is in our laws in the Evidence Act 2011.



In law, the Primary evidence is of supreme value (it is the best evidence).

1st report - server report given to Oyetola in July (unsynchronised)

2nd report - server report given to Adeleke (unsynchronised)

3rd report - BVAS Machines physically tendered before the Court with all the data in it (PRIMARY DATA)

4th report - Final Synchronisation gotten from (3) above.

The SC will not say otherwise, like I said in the morning as long as server reports are subject to human and network issue, it's a problem... See SC in Wike v Peterside .

Again, on what premise did the tribunal ignore the other three reports.

Primary Data.

The BVAS machines were physically tendered before the tribunal and reports accurately submitted by INEC (i.e. 4th report). Oyetola's lawyers didn't challenge it in their final written address.

Whatever data is on the BVAS machine is the primary data, anything that comes out of it, backend server or so is secondary.

There ordinarily shouldn't be, this is what the EC8A (Statement), Voters Register & BVAs is expected to fish out.

Hear Oyetola's expert witness:

Isiaka Olanrewaju testified that he is an expert, who had operated several electronic devices, including BVAS, before, and was aware that an electoral officer might fail to submit the data imputed into the machine or that if the network was bad, the data submitted would not be successful.

Has he not supported the INEC staff's position? Did this witness bolster Oyetola's case?

An expert should be able to furnish the court with scientific analysis that will allow the Court to form its independent judgement otherwise it is valueless and worthless. (SC in Ogiale v. SPDC, 1997)

The Court of Appeal restored the supremacy of the BVAS that's why it based its judgement on a completed and synchronised Report.

SC in Okereke v Umahi (2016) by Justice Chima C Nweze JSC

[u]Furthermore, PW8 an official of INEC who testified on subpoena on the application of the appellant admitted that Exhibit GP45 (the Card Reader Report) was an incomplete document, as data from some polling units had not been uploaded to the INEC data base as at the time the report was made. The document was therefore unreliable and lacking in any evidential value. Again the Tribunal rightly rejected the report and the Court below was right to have affirmed the rejection. On these findings alone, the petition was bound to fail.



It was for these and the more elaborate reasons well marshalled in the lead judgment that I dismissed this appeal and affirmed the decision of the Court below. (This was in 2016)



In this case, the INEC still testified that it was an incomplete document that was handed over to Oyetola, any difference?

The same Justice Nweze will be on the panel, so do you think it will make any difference?



It is improper for a court of law to enter judgment for a party on incomplete and inconclusive facts or evidence. A party ought to place all relevant facts before the court to assist it to arrive at a fair and reasonable conclusion (Justice Okoro in Adim v NBC).

Barrister fergie001 ✍️ ✍️✍️✍️

Na good talk you talk.

Oletola that should be consoled by his fellow unserious party members is assuring his supporters and members of another failure ahead..

So, he only recognised the duos but not the entire indegens or the state residents.. ofulefu

That's what we expected,go to court.

ijustdey:


https://saharareporters.com/2023/03/24/apc-oyetola-vow-approach-supreme-court-over-osun-governorship-election

You better go and sit down, tinubu tout!!!!

Oyetola will still lose he has never won any election in his life even as a governor he came in through the backdoor.

...now TO EVERYBODY.. And in the great violence and intimidations PDP and Adeleke posed to APC supporters in Osun state in cahoots with others - official and details - during the elections. Wait till the other day...

As earlier said after Oyetola lost at the election, Tinubu should not invest energy in Osun State. He should leave Osun State alone. He should allow Adeleke to continue his dancing.

From my earlier analysis beginning from the defeat of Aregbesola during the Senatorial election to replace Isiaka Adeleke and the defeat at 2018 gubernatorial election which INEC tactically declared inconclusive to pave way to do or die bye election where APC won. Finally, APC lost again last year. APC (ACN) came to Osun through a 3 years Court case. In 2014, it was Isiaka Adeleke and Oyinlola that brought victory to Aregbesola, otherwise, he would have been removed.

Within 100 days in office Adeleke a dancer delivered Osun to Atiku instead of Tinubu during the last Presidential election. Within 100 days in office, he won 98% of House of Assembly election. Appeal Court judgement is based on the facts on ground. The recent elections revealed so much about Osun people. ACN has never won a clean election at Osun apart from Adeleke / Oyinlola assisted victory of 2014.

Aregbesola is a nobody as far as Osun is concerned. He cannot win a Local government election at Osun. Oyetola is also a nobody in Osun. Both Aregbesola and Oyetola are riding on Tinubu's name. This is unlike late Isiaka Adeleke and Oyinlola.

Tinubu should forget Aregbesola, Oyetola and Osun for now. He should concentrate on his presidency.

Does Adeleke Truly Married an Igbo Woman ? then he must be an IPOB , He must be an IGBO Man Someone should please tell me his Igbo Name .

Abi Na Lie ..Just like Gbadebo GRV for Lagos ..

Maybe Osun People need to Starts educating themselves on this .

Nigerian Politics with Tribalism

I hail ooo

Oyetola is power drunk. Adeleke is the winner of the election, stop wasting your money on court processes...

NaijaRoyalty:
Tinubu supporters are the most foolish animals on earth , don't take them serious

And you're the most smartest animal on Earth!

God1000:
Supreme court again

I swear I fear this supreme Court

Mayhem1:
Is this coming from a APC and Thiefnúbu loyalist? Wonders shall never end😂

I don't lick the ass of a politician because of gain. We value good governance in South west and that's why we don't follow politicians like mumu. You perform, we retain u. You Bleep up, we reject u. I supported Tinubu because of the way you guys play politics. How can u call a man created by God a demented and dead person because of politics.

For where you see Igbo support adeleke? Una go just dey yarn rubbish with una anus...

JASONjnr:
Igbos are in full support for the Adeleke's win.... Why aren't they calling Adeleke an Igbo man?

Oyetola please Go and sit down allow us to breathe