SamboAnguissa:


Ibos always think they're smarter than others, not knowing they can't fool anyone. They already stationed their braindead hackers ready to hack INEC and manipulate the results in favour of their fraud. INEC fooled them and didn't upload results. This got them mad. Reason why they're crying all over public space. Later they went on twitter collating results by polling units and pasting it, screaming and jumping that Obi was leading. By the time they got to 3/4 of collated results and found out it was leaning towards the result INEC declared, they abandoned the project. Very weird lot.

Everyday I must meet a daft on nairaland. When they hack numbers, will they hack paper? You are just a little man

garfield1:


Obi did not sweep anything.the results were a fair reflection.before the polls,you could see that almost all se supported obi while many in ss were against him.he only won the xtian areas of nc.even if we give him nc and taraba,he still lose.investigation shows that he was only cheated in rivers

While many in the SS were against him?
Can you name the states in the SS that were against Obi?
Investigations show he was only cheated in Rivers?
Because Rivers is the only state in the SS, where investigations were conducted so far?
If investigations were not conducted there,you would have also lumped it among the SS states that never supported him..

wirinet:


That's the problem with Nigerians and the Nigerians system, we tend to justify dishonesty and crime using meaningless terms and technicalities. What is substantial compliance and who determines substantial compliance. Yaradua was elected on ballot papers without serial numbers as specified in the electoral law, the supreme court ruled that there was substantial compliance. Now, an election was conducted with lots of evidence of fraud, voter intimidation, manipulation of figures and violence, you shout the same substantial compliance.
How do you expect a presidential candidate to prove substantial compliance? You want him to prove fraud, voter intimidation, manipulation of figures and violence in all 176,974 polling units in Nigeria?
You and I should demand credible elections. That alone will make us proud as a people, not the charade we have been having (and it's gets worse with each election cycle) since 1960. Bad elections alway bring bad consequences and set us backward. Remember, it was rigged elections in the South West was the excuse for the first military coup which led to the civil war.

You have answered the questions.if 2003 and 2007 polls which were the most rigged were not cancelled,none will.tbh,this election is the best since 1999.the media is just over blowing things in a fraction of places

Ireportlive:


17% of the results where not uploaded
5% uploaded were blurry

If you generously dash Peter Obi all of Tinubu's Rivers vote 200k Tinubu still leads Atiku with over 1.6m votes

Dash Peter Obi all of Tinubu's 572k Lagos vote plus 200k Rivers vote and let's assume Tinubu had zero votes in Rivers and Lagos.. Tinubu still leads with over 1m votes

North plays a major role in who governs Nigeria


.

And you believe there's no rigging in core northern states ?

Go to court & explain this nonsense to them.

garfield1:


Yes except it is widespread

So,who defines widespread?
The results of highly populated states like Rivers and Lagos were manipulated,among others and that is not widespread enough for you?

They have not checked out the real mystery in the South East results, dey play.

Popeonah:

If he won clearly why did he now rig it

In order not to leave any stone unturned

Angelfrost:


So, what was the point in manipulating Rivers state results?!!

And if Rivers was clearly manipulated, isn't that sufficient to cast doubts on the rest even from the North?!!

Isn't that enough basis to void the election and conduct a fresh one?!!

You must bring proof of manipulation elsewhere

donbenie:
So?
It should be accepted as the norm?

There are no elections elsewhere that is blatantly rigged like Nigeria. The imperfections of elections elsewhere are minor infrastractions by voters themselves and not a deliberate manipulation by the electoral body and one of the political parties.

donbenie:
So,who defines widespread?
The results of highly populated states like Rivers and Lagos were manipulated,among others and that is not widespread enough for you?

The supreme court has defined substantial noncompliance to be that it is enough to upturn the results.we have seen evidence of manipulation in rivers.where are the ones of Lagos? What of other states?

Creeper:


Cite one credible election in the history of Nigeria.

The most credible 'erection' in Nigeria, still remains the 'do_or_die erection', conducted by
the 'Great-grandfather of African democracy,
OBJ of Africa, with the collaboration of one of the world's globally acclaimed political scientist,
Prof. Maurice Ewu

donbenie:
While many in the SS were against him?
Can you name the states in the SS that were against Obi?
Investigations show he was only cheated in Rivers?
Because Rivers is the only state in the SS, where investigations were conducted so far?
If investigations were not conducted there,you would have also lumped it among the SS states that never supported him..

Even if you give him rivers,tinubu still got 25% in rivers and 4 other states.it made no difference

garfield1:


The supreme court has defined substantial noncompliance to be that it is enough to upturn the results.we have seen evidence of manipulation in rivers.where are the ones of Lagos? What of other states?

Where are the ones of Lagos?
Does Voter intimidation and disenfranchisement not equate to election manipulation?
Or where you not in Nigeria,when video evidences of such in Lagos was being paraded?

OGHENAOGIE:
only one state...u think judges are emotional like u...get used to tinubu presidency till 2027

Just imagine!

Rigging took place only in one state?

garfield1:


Even if you give him rivers,tinubu still got 25% in rivers and 4 other states.it made no difference

Lol..
We will give him Rivers,because BBC bothered to conduct an investigation?
What of the other States,BBC have not conducted an investigation?
That automatically meant Tinubu won them legitimately?

Agadinaagwuofe:


In as much as this is not to counter your submission. In all, court judgement should not supercede the will of the people. The electoral process should be made in such a way the court can only cancel and prosecute offenders but have no authority to "assign" winner no matter the claim. The court should only adjudicate on the fairness and credibility and if found the process doubtful only possess the right for outright cancellation and call for full or partial re-voting than awarding claimants votes and declare him winner against the choice of the populace. This is just my opinion.

Again if the Uzodimma case took advantage of weakness in electoral process it means PO or any of the candidates can also "take advantage" especially for PO who has a genuine claim of suppression of votes to ride on that precedence.

Yes, obi can take advantage but not against master crook like tinubu.he would only face further humiliation...
The law is blind.if the process that brought the will of the people is faulty, it intervenes.the will of the people was also thwarted in bayelsa and zamfara.imo to an extend shows hope is the will of the people because noone was disq and he got the highest votes after court collation.again,if ihedioha was the will of the people,he would have made the spread

optimusprime2:

I marvel at the ... is it ignorance or negligence or tribal stereotypes some people display, because its really mind boggling especially in 2023.

I will easily break it down:
1- INEC released the list of registered Voters

2- The age long myth of highest voters from the North was busted based on the released registered voter-data by INEC.

3- The 3 K's had the highest registered voter-Data up North, while down South; Lagos, Rivers, Oyo, and Delta State had the highest registered voter-Data with Lagos topping the whole National list. Please refer to the registered voter-Data.

Now the breakdown;
1- Peter Obi won Lagos, & Delta.
2- BAT didn't win any of the 3 K's (that had the highest Voters)
3-BAT won Northern states with regular registered voter-Data that matched with the States Peter Obi and Atiku won.

Which is why Rivers State manipulations was very critical to BAT'S results...

As I type to you now Stears has two presidential results for the elections which are;
1- Declared by INEC of which Peter Obi is third
&
2- Provisional results on IREV of which Peter Obi is 2nd and the results are still incomplete due to computations currently ongoing- an important point to note is that BAT'S votes have dropped by over 3 million.

The question remains how did BAT and INEC work the sort of miracles we witnessed?

Go ahead and keep being oblivious to the matter but those of us who know that 1+1 = 2 are simply asking how did 1+1= 94 in the previous Elections INEC conducted.

Lagos have always had the highest voters since 1999 followed by nw.winning Lagos,rivers,delta isn't important but winning massively.tinubu destroyed obi in the KKK states and tinubu votes in nw swallowed obi votes in se ss

IgOga:
The PEPT will be interesting.

Whoever truly wins should be declared. First real evidence coming from BBC. Over to Mr Yakubu and INEC to tell us what happened. Las las dem go cancel Rivers votes

Oga,rivers evidence of obi winning has been out since february

Agadinaagwuofe:



You really don't have to reply the foolish APC stooge. That nonsense that happened in Rivers is more than enough to rubbish the credibility of the whole exercise. It amounts to stupidity to try white wash people by saying "even if you dash all the votes". That is high level of thoughtlessness but again with APC there is no deeper level of foolishness they cannot get to . How can the country spent billions of naira only to be making these kind of juvenile mistakes (that is if they want to claim it is a mistake). Since the government claimed they are popular and North decides they should have allowed free and fair election.

The eyes is on the Judiciary to do the correct thing, foisting an unpopular candidates to the masses is already a sure way for the government to fail cos there is always going to be sabotage. The truth is peradventure the election is allowed to stand most of the actors that helped INEC achieve the heist will one way or the other try hold the country hostage because they will keep demanding and try abusing powers since they knew the mandates wasn't from masses. In all the populace is the one to bear the brunts

Tinubu truly won.obi has to prove other states

unclejb2:
This rigging happened all across the country and it can't stand.

It's even a shame that INEC gave us such an election after collecting N400b.

Even yourself should be heading to your suicide gallows at the moment.

Show us that the rigging happened in other places

onuman:

In Jigawa state for example, votes for LP from Imo state were posted to APC on INEC portal. It's like that in many other states. They did that to favour Tinubu. Let the vote recount in the courts begin.

Nigeria's voters never renewed the tenure of APC which made Nigeria become the poverty capital of the world and one of the most terrorised countries on earth.

Tinubu didn't even meet up with the 25% of votes in Abuja requirement by the Constitution. Tinubu lost Lagos, lost Kano, lost Kaduna states, lost Rivers, lost Katsina States, lost all the Eastern States, lost Edo and Delta.
The 12 Sharia states and 4 SW states couldn't have given Tinubu the 8 million+ votes.

How many did obi score in the 12 Shari a states

Agadinaagwuofe:


In as much as this is not to counter your submission. In all, court judgement should not supercede the will of the people. The electoral process should be made in such a way the court can only cancel and prosecute offenders but have no authority to "assign" winner no matter the claim. The court should only adjudicate on the fairness and credibility and if found the process doubtful only possess the right for outright cancellation and call for full or partial re-voting than awarding claimants votes and declare him winner against the choice of the populace. This is just my opinion.

Again if the Uzodimma case took advantage of weakness in electoral process it means PO or any of the candidates can also "take advantage" especially for PO who has a genuine claim of suppression of votes to ride on that precedence.

Nigeria Nigerian courts will rule an election rigged or manipulated, which is a serious crime by itself, and assign a winner but will not prosecute and punish anyone for the crime. You would think the election was rigged by spirits.

OGHENAOGIE:
u pple ll only wail even in America not everyone support Biden... Didn't u see some persons wanting UK throne scrap... Sha keep ur madness online otherwise u ll be experiment for law enforcement guys... If PDP didn't divided themselves into Atiku obi kwankwanso they Atiku would have been sworn in May 29... LP other's can't win presidency elections ok... only APC PDP can achieve that

Was there brazen rigging and wasn't their results transmitted live...stop comparing nonsense

Ireportlive:


17% of the results where not uploaded
5% uploaded were blurry

If you generously dash Peter Obi all of Tinubu's Rivers vote 200k Tinubu still leads Atiku with over 1.6m votes

Dash Peter Obi all of Tinubu's 572k Lagos vote plus 200k Rivers vote and let's assume Tinubu had zero votes in Rivers and Lagos.. Tinubu still leads with over 1m votes

North plays a major role in who governs Nigeria


.

What about Plateau and Benue??
Nasarawa

donbenie:
Lol..
We will give him Rivers,because BBC bothered to conduct an investigation?
What of the other States,BBC have not conducted an investigation?
That automatically meant Tinubu won them legitimately?

Oga,obidients have calculated all the states and rivers is off.BBC calculation is even late.it is in the place of obi to prove that he won other states.again,in court irev result is secondary.primary results are form ec8a

Bringbackmandat:
that was just one state that it was discovered, do you know the amount of rigging that took place in the remaining 35 states?

Can you prove it? Court deals with facts not assumptions

dmz1:


I previously thought that PO will not be victorious at the tribunal as per Nigerian system, but I am becoming strongly convinced that PO will be sworn in as the next president. If even only Rivers is rightfully given to PO, he wins 13 states and fct. Tinubu goes to 11 states which is below the minimum threshold needed for victory. At worst the will be a run off.
Mahmood would go to jail

Winning elections does not have anything to do with amount of states you win but number of votes and spread

Bringbackmandat:
stop fooling yourself. Whatever happened in Rivers state must have happened 3 times in other states.
This election should be null and void.

Nothing like that.you will prove it that it happened elsewhere

dmz1:


By then BAT with only 11states will be constitutionally unqualified to be president

It doesnt matter how many states you win.obidients dont know nada

Bringbackmandat:
tinubu cannot get the per centage he got in the north. The whole north was for Atiku.
This election must be nullified if we really want peace.

You lie.the whole north was never for atiku,they dont like atiku.the north was divided

InvertedHammer:


/
Your ilk like to justify bullshit.
If Obi gets 200k from Rivers and still lose the election, the honorable thing to do is to give him that 200k and let the result speaks for itself.

It doesn't matter if Tinubu won the election by 1000 votes but let the real results show that.

/

Is this too much to ask for in a democracy?

The same people who support this injustice will be crying if anyone takes what they wanted