Why is it that in every discourse or issue that regards to the 2023 presidential election, the APC and INEC always tilt towards the same direction? Why do they always support the same cause and oppose the same way? Is it a sign that something is fishing between the two?

inec must provide peter obi 100% electoral documents he needs to prove his case else the 60days given is trash.
you cannot ask him to go to court and be dragging feet like an unserious camel

Hadeylex:
Why is it that in every discourse or issue that regards to the 2023 presidential election, the APC and INEC always tilt towards the same direction? Why do they always support the same cause and oppose the same way? Is it a sign that something is fishing between the two?

Did INEC not tilt towards same direction with PDP and Adeleke against APC in d Osun elections court case? Some of u Obidients seems to have really poor educational background. When u challenge an election, u join INEC as a direct party or respondent in d case, in other words d petitioner is challenging INEC that INEC broke the law in announcing d other person as d winner. INEC as a direct defender must now defend itself against u that u are wrong and they were right in declaring d said winner. If u don't want INEC to be in same page with d winner, then sue only d winner without joining INEC in your suit. How can u accuse INEC of being a law breaker and rigger and u don't want them to defend themselves?

Hadeylex:
Why is it that in every discourse or issue that regards to the 2023 presidential election, the APC and INEC always tilt towards the same direction? Why do they always support the same cause and oppose the same way? Is it a sign that something is fishing between the two?

INEC defend Adeleke/PDP, Obaseki/PDP’s mandate in Osunand Edo states and nobody call INEC any names because from the beginning of democracy the body always defend its actions. Now because your tiny god is at the losing end you people start calling INEC names.

Odibembem:


Did INEC not tilt towards same direction with PDP and Adeleke against APC in d Osun elections court case? Some of u Obidients seems to have really poor educational background. When u challenge an election, u join INEC as a direct party or respondent in d case, in other words d petitioner is challenging INEC that INEC broke the law in announcing d other person as d winner. INEC as a direct defender must now defend itself against u that u are wrong and they were right in declaring d said winner. If u don't want INEC to be in same page with d winner, then sue only d winner without joining INEC in your suit. How can u accuse INEC of being a law breaker and rigger and u don't want them to defend themselves?

Most of them are just ignorant of court procedures and lawless. You can see their leader saying his party chairman is someone a court ask not to parade himself as chairman.

It's only normal for INEC with REC and commissioners from all State and tribe to tilt with the truth

Scripted

Hadeylex:
Why is it that in every discourse or issue that regards to the 2023 presidential election, the APC and INEC always tilt towards the same direction? Why do they always support the same cause and oppose the same way? Is it a sign that something is fishing between the two?

Once INEC has declared the winners ,the winner has automatically become the candidate of the INEC. INEC can never come out to deny their stressful and successful hand work. They need to back their result unless court prove otherwise. Telling Inect not to support the winners means the Result is not valid it has negate its own result and no one can do that even if not INEC. The explanation should be understood if you are not among the wailing lost manhood Team .

Why is INEC opposing televised proceedings like APC? Whats in it for INEC to oppose?


Even Adeleke's appeal, INEC was practically forced to appeal unless you're not aware

Odibembem:


Did INEC not tilt towards same direction with PDP and Adeleke against APC in d Osun elections court case? Some of u Obidients seems to have really poor educational background. When u challenge an election, u join INEC as a direct party or respondent in d case, in other words d petitioner is challenging INEC that INEC broke the law in announcing d other person as d winner. INEC as a direct defender must now defend itself against u that u are wrong and they were right in declaring d said winner. If u don't want INEC to be in same page with d winner, then sue only d winner without joining INEC in your suit. How can u accuse INEC of being a law breaker and rigger and u don't want them to defend themselves?

seanfer:


Most of them are just ignorant of court procedures and lawless. You can see their leader saying his party chairman is someone a court ask not to parade himself as chairman.

Not just court procedures; they are ignorant of anything beyond trading in a 2 by 2 shop.

Hadeylex:
Why is it that in every discourse or issue that regards to the 2023 presidential election, the APC and INEC always tilt towards the same direction? Why do they always support the same cause and oppose the same way? Is it a sign that something is fishing between the two?

Because they are both respondent in the case. Peter Obi and Labour Party sued APC, Tinubu and INEC together. They will jointly defend the allegations raised against them by Peter Obi. That is how election petition works.