i find it necessary for physics to be regarded as the study of ways to exist that can be studied. in other words,there is a limit to what YOU can give names,define or/and give examples of.there is a limit to what you can calculate/check/measure. there is a limit to what you can specifically do.it never means there isn't more to existence. you must have limits SINCE you are a specific entity,dead or alive or anything else.existence is not just about you,so why say there must be a totality of existence,just becuz of you? Yeah,at the end of ur argument,u mean it just becuz u CANT do more than yours. U may proceed to say there is no difference in existence(oneness concept). Well,what u call evidence or knowledge or understanding is not amazing to me. Why not infinity of existence? Why even conclude that 1+2=3 also proves the universe? 1+2=3 is a statement of they that write or say 1+2=3. Plants,within a garden, can be counted but plants do not write or say 1+2=3. It is u that has to calculate with numbers. Your operation is yours but that never means ur conclusion(the universe) is meant to follow.

Make use of paragraphs. How can one read this?

7thgeneration:
Make use of paragraphs. How can one read this?

i no get android 4 that. na badluck i get.