onuman:


It's only a DOG who would spend billions of Naira to make Electoral Act of 2022, and spent billions of Naira to establish a system for electronic transmission of vote results, to make elections more transparent, and vowed before the public that no other method except electronic transmission of vote results would be used for the general elections; but later goes back to the manual collation of votes he set out to jettison, all in the bid to SELECT the octogenarian Tinubu who forged certificate of birth, to become president of Nigeria.

That's why the law is often likened to an 🫏. It is what it is. Law is unsentimental and can offend the mind - it can even be unjust but until it is changed it is the law.

drlateef:




INEC does not need to hide. With the evidence tendered by INEC, Atiku is a dead man walking by now. I read somewhere, but not reported here that Dr Boyede also presented evidence of the glitch including error printouts etc to the Tribunal. They will use the same evidence to kill Obi’s petition today.

BreconHills:


Hahaha as a lawyer of many many years standing I can tell you that their defence is simple. The electoral act does not consider irev as part of the voting chain simple. They don't need to start putting up ten witnesses that will confuse each other. Their argument is simple. Irev was botched but us not part of the voting process laid out in the Act. LP is trying to insinuate a process from statements made by inec officials. Inec is holding on to the electoral act process. Which is what the court will rule on. Slam dunk case.

It's simple for inec. No sweat. No drama.

alizma:

There is no reason for hiding in the first place, you can see his explanation is simple and clear. Besides every candidate is expected to have agent at each polling unit and each agent has a copy.

duro4chang:
Can't you see that Atiku's case is dead the same way obi's case will be killed?

DMerciful:
You stand no chance of being a local govt chairman

I do

tinsel:

What do you mean? With one day they killed all Atiku laboured to build in one month. Tinubu's lawyers will do the rest.

Based on what? They have nothing to show Tinubu won election

igwebuike01:

INEC lawyers are clueless. Nobody is talking about electronic collation. Real time transmission of photographed or scanned results sheet into irev is for cross checking the manually collated results and no final announcement is to be made until they tally, that was what delayed announcement in Abia and Enugu guber Elections

What delayed Abia n Enugu is the discrepancy between number of BVAS accredited votes and number of casted votes, and that's note the case here.

seanfer:


You’re wrong. What happened in Enugu and Abia states is one party trying to inflate the figures to gain advantage over the others.
Even our Electoral Act and the constitution explain how results must be collated.

Don't mind him. I hate it when someone comes online to say what he doesn't know boldly.

BreconHills:


That's why the law is often likened to an 🫏. It is what it is. Law is unsentimental and can offend the mind - it can even be unjust but until it is changed it is the law.

Even a fool knows that Form EC8As could be easily doctored, or illegal
vote numbers entirely written on them, on transit from the polling units to INEC offices. That's what the new Electoral Act of 2022 was made to offset.
The old law on manual collation of votes by INEC was set aside by the Electoral Act of 2022 which stipulated system for electronic transmission of vote results.

RETROGRESSIVE.
You can stick to your retrogression but don't expect everyone to continue to share one country of retrogressive people with you, since you want to set aside the Electoral Act of 2022 in order to make Tinubu succeed Buhari as president of Nigeria.

ratiani6:
Go on and implicate yourselves

If u still buy fuel same price with others in Nigeria,u must be the highest fool.

You can never be even a local govt chairman,
how much more gov. Yeye dey smell

duro4chang:
I do

BreconHills:


Hahaha as a lawyer of many many years standing I can tell you that their defence is simple. The electoral act does not consider irev as part of the voting chain simple. They don't need to start putting up ten witnesses that will confuse each other. Their argument is simple. Irev was botched but us not part of the voting process laid out in the Act. LP is trying to insinuate a process from statements made by inec officials. Inec is holding on to the electoral act process. Which is what the court will rule on. Slam dunk case.

It's simple for inec. No sweat. No drama.

I hope you listened to Pa Adebanjo explanation yesterday on live TV.
The Afanifere chieftain.
Telling you that the process Tinubu used to Aso Rock is fraudulent.

Gbogbowa:
Inec failed again ,all we are talking about is electronic transmission of Pu results for all to see before announcement,if that was done it will be difficult to announced another person a winner because everyone would have seen the results from each state.

Online transmission of results is not a rigid rule. It lies within the jurisdiction of INEC to use it or not. Know your law so that you won't hope on nothing.

WATCHOVER:

Comon! The result INEC published in their server and the one they called did not corelate, so that alone is enough for INEC to loose in court, there is what we call integrity. My verdict is INEC lost this First Case

Why for the issue of INEC changing the guidelines before the election after investigation my Verdict is INEC actually announce the change of guidelines so INEC won this second case.
But still on still the result may be recounted

How many PUs transmitted their results on the day of the election?? Why there won be different? The major means of results coalition is manual. You read your constitution.

OkCornel:


Who polled the highest votes in Rivers state presidential election and who did INEC declare winner there?

Just post am

Online Judge has given his verdict.. go and sit down

duro4chang:
Can't you see that Atiku's case is dead the same way obi's case will be killed?

igwebuike01:

INEC lawyers are clueless. Nobody is talking about electronic collation. Real time transmission of photographed or scanned results sheet into irev is for cross checking the manually collated results and no final announcement is to be made until they tally, that was what delayed announcement in Abia and Enugu guber Elections

Where did u read ur own law

Igwe9:

You two are saying the same thing, that of those places were resisted but INEC chairman preferred to announce his by midnight and asked the parties involved to go to court .

He announced an already prepared results hence they are struggling with the uploaded results on irev.

Big man, it's not the same thing.

MatrixCircle:


What happened in Rivers and Benue alone that has been unraveled, what is that called
Even APC Chieftains acknowledged it was clear rigging in those areas and trying to dissociate themselves from those areas. Evidences are already there accepted as exhibit.

Credible rigging ??

Can you post the Rivers and Benue results that is different from what INEC declared?

matrixme:
The biggest mistake Atiku/Obi made is to rush to court and then allow INEC/Tinubu get on the defensive lastly. I know Atiku isn't really serious about his court case, but Obi assuming he had a case to really prove shouldn't have rushed in to present first. But then again, that would be an impossible procedure in court. When Tinubu starts his defense this week, he's just going to look for 1000 different loopholes in the "evidences" presented and knock out all their cases before lunch break.
Obi allowed emotions and the energy of his headless mob push him into political irrelevance. He had a great support and goodwill from well meaning Nigerians in the onset till it took a dark turn by his followers. I heard someone presented the EU report released recently as evidence. Such a huge joke! [b]Where was EU report when Trump Supporters were hijacking the US Capitol the other day? France is burning today right under their nose, but they can't write a report too. [/b]Clowns.

I personally find it very irritating seeing this fools commenting on Nigerian internal matter as if we're their appendage.

onuman:


If INEC ever issued a notice before the election that it would not use electronic transmission of vote results during the general elections, why then did it use electronic transmission of vote results in all the elections, except for the presidential election, but gave excuse of GLITCH for not using electronic transmission of vote results for presidential election?

INEC OFFICIALS ARE LIKE LIARS WHO NOW HAVE NO OTHER METHOD TO COVER THEIR LIES.

We all know that there have never been a free and fair election in Nigeria but we're trying to educate people based on the standing of the law, not emotions that PDP has no case here. Electronic transmission of results as I said before is not a rigid rule.

Pjoe238:
Online Judge has given his verdict.. go and sit down

Did you say online judge?

tinsel:

https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/top-news/607812-inec-closes-its-case-in-atikus-petition-challenging-tinubus-election.html

With only a witness INEC finiished and buried all outcries of PDP and LP in their appeals, submissions, and African Magic video displays in the court room!
More to come!

MatrixCircle:


I hope you listened to Pa Adebanjo explanation yesterday on live TV.
The Afanifere chieftain.
Telling you that the process Tinubu used to Aso Rock is fraudulent.

Tbh it doesn't matter what people think or say. The only thing that matters is what the law says.

onuman:


If INEC ever issued a notice before the election that it would not use electronic transmission of vote results during the general elections, why then did it use electronic transmission of vote results in all the elections, except for the presidential election, but gave excuse of GLITCH for not using electronic transmission of vote results for presidential election?

INEC OFFICIALS ARE LIKE LIARS WHO NOW HAVE NO OTHER METHOD TO COVER THEIR LIES.

Actually there was no electronic transmission of Results in that election...Snapping of polling unit results & upload of same on IREV is not the same as electronic transmission of result.

WATCHOVER:

Comon! The result INEC published in their server and the one they called did not corelate, so that alone is enough for INEC to loose in court, there is what we call integrity. My verdict is INEC lost this First Case

Why for the issue of INEC changing the guidelines before the election after investigation my Verdict is INEC actually announce the change of guidelines so INEC won this second case.
But still on still the result may be recounted

Oga loose what? This has been settled in Adeleke Vs Oyetola.

onuman:


Even a fool knows that Form EC8As could be easily doctored, or illegal
vote numbers entirely written on them, on transit from the polling units to INEC offices. That's what the new Electoral Act of 2022 was made to offset.
The old law on manual collation of votes by INEC was set aside by the Electoral Act of 2022 which stipulated system for electronic transmission of vote results.

RETROGRESSIVE.
You can stick to your retrogression but don't expect everyone to continue to share one country of retrogressive people with you, since you want to set aside the Electoral Act of 2022 in order to make Tinubu succeed Buhari as president of Nigeria.

Yes it can be doctored but irev is not an answer to that. The camera on bvas is rubbish, it has no back-light- some elections finished at dusk with bad light. How can you rely on that. Meanwhile you have all party agents at the polling station. Even voters can wait until counting is over. There is no check and balance in an upload, Anything could be uploaded or even substituted after uploaded - after all its not like the server is attached to a blockchain registry.

As a judge one can only adjudicate on the law before you. No matter what evidence you bring it does not change the law.

I can tell you for free that some parties held several national trainings for their party agents. Some parties on the other hand didn't even have representation at the polling stations. This doesn't change the law. Its tough cheese.

This is why INEC defence was so short

zinaunreal:


Based on what? They have nothing to show Tinubu won election

Ah! Nothing to show ke! The result declared by INEC is still valid as of today. So what else do you want them to show when the petitioners did not counter the results in their proceedings

onuman:


Even a fool knows that Form EC8As could be easily doctored, or illegal
vote numbers entirely written on them, on transit from the polling units to INEC offices. That's what the new Electoral Act of 2022 was made to offset.
The old law on manual collation of votes by INEC was set aside by the Electoral Act of 2022 which stipulated system for electronic transmission of vote results.

RETROGRESSIVE.
You can stick to your retrogression but don't expect everyone to continue to share one country of retrogressive people with you, since you want to set aside the Electoral Act of 2022 in order to make Tinubu succeed Buhari as president of Nigeria.

What do you mean electronic transmission of voting results? The election was not electronic, it was counted manually, collated manually, attested by party agents manually and read out in person. A-Z that election was manual. The upload is a post election event for purposes of transparency not credibility or accuracy. The two overlap but they are not the same thing.

I have read that law over several times and no where in it does it say that INEC are mandated to transfer election results electronically no does it say that unless this is done, the election is invalid.

Wishing something were so does not make it so.

Enice:
Ah! Nothing to show ke! The result declared by INEC is still valid as of today. So what else do you want them to show when the petitioners did not counter the results in their proceedings

Bros it's still valid that's why they are in court. What proof does inec have that the election was contacted without manipulation and was it entered to the courts? Nooo

seunmsg:


Can you post the Rivers and Benue results that is different from what INEC declared?

The evidence are in court and has been accepted as exhibit.