Some argue IT exists, some say IT don't.

The proof is in Orgasm.

...and so the argument went, is orgasm real or not?

It involves three guys:

Mr Norgasma, Mr Orgasma and Dr Dolittle

Their bios

1: Mr Norgasma:
Doesn't think Orgasm is real
Sexual Status: Virgin

2: Mr. Orgasma : Read about it in books and had conducted several research and publishes books on Orgasm. 100% believer in orgasm.

Sexual Status: Virgin


3: Dr Dolittle: Read about orgasm, has sex with spouse, Experienced orgasm and wrote this experience the best he can in a book.

Mr Norgasm challenges Orgasma to a debate on the nonexistence of orgasm, stating there was no way it was real.

Orgsma having been raised to believe it fought back with counter arguments in the reality of it. He gave Norgasm citations from his research of Dr Dolittles work and also his mental thoughts about it.

Dolittle had had orgasm while in the Middle East and wrote in his journal.

Dolittle met the duo taking themselves out to the point of fisticuffs.

After setting a little calm to the situation, he got curious to hear Orgasma's points on Orgasms.

To his amazement, Orgasma was very knowledgeable on it despite stating being a virgin. The only thing was that they white didn't describe orgasm as it was.

He noted how even he who had that experience lack the right words to pull it off.

There was no word to present the sensations and feelings involved in orgasm. He simply used the word "sweet".

"Sweet" however did no justice to it.

He now thought of a way to settle the matter.
He suggested they both get laid so they could experience rather than believe or not believe the reality of orgasm.

Mr Orgasma believes he knows it already and turned the request down.

Norgasma decided he will give it a try.

This ends the thread.

Bonus:


"The taste of the pudding is in the eating"



(Not in the reading about the taste.)



(Not in believing about taste from what others say or wrote ).

Get laid today, experience is the true teacher.

Cheerios!

That's it.

There are several things on this earthly plane that can only be experienced subjectively. Orgasm and Spirituality are some of them.

The fact that you as a person has never experienced orgasm does not mean that orgasm does not exist. The more you call the people who have experienced it fools, the more foolish and idiotic you sound.

This same analogy applies to spirituality. When someone says God whom I have personally experienced and still experiencing does not exist, I see them as fools. They're playing with fire. Serious fire for that matter!

I really love how you put it. Only a true encounter makes the difference

Bubblylady:
I really love how you put it. Only a true encounter makes the difference

Sure dear. Thank you

chieveboy:
This ends the thread.

Bonus:


"The taste of the pudding is in the eating"



(Not in the reading about the taste.)



(Not in believing about taste from what others say or wrote ).

Get laid today, experience is the true teacher.

Cheerios!

What If he doesn't have sex organ, how will he experience it?

Maynman:

What If he doesn't have sex organ, how will he experience it?

Every one does have it.

chieveboy:


Every one does have it.

Some are not born with it, and some are not working, how will they experience orgasm?

And also what do you mean by existence of orgasm. "orgasm" does not exist, it's just a name of a feeling during sex. It is not an OBJECT THAT EXIST.
Orgasm is the excitement when you cum.

What do you mean by existence and non Existence of "orgasm"?

FxMasterz:
That's it.

There are several things on this earthly plane that can only be experienced subjectively. Orgasm and Spirituality are some of them.

The fact that you as a person has never experienced orgasm does not mean that orgasm does not exist. The more you call the people who have experienced it fools, the more foolish and idiotic you sound.

This same analogy applies to spirituality. When someone says God whom I have personally experienced and still experiencing does not exist, I see them as fools. They're playing with fire. Serious fire for that matter!

Well said, but its a two-way traffic.

Those who have had orgasm can NEVER be able to use human language to explain or teach it to anyone just as it really is. No one can. Not via text, not via speech.

It's like the word "happy". No one has the right word for it and never will.

This then leaves a condition where any objective presentation if it is not actually correct, because it is something you can't fully express without distorting it's originality and truth.

If you must distort the reality of orgasm during the presentation owing to inefficiency of language and communication media, then whatever you're saying is not really true in the sense of reaching the totality of the experience.

So you arguing with, killing or fighting those who don't agree are really in same lane.


The point is, no one should really be explaining or preaching orgasm to anyone. The best one can do is to live, demonstrate or embody it practically. That still doesn't impart the knowledge to third parties, but it at least gives them an idea towards the pursuit of their own experience.

Maynman:

Some are not born with it, and some are not working, how will they experience orgasm?

Orgasm is not entirely in the biological level. It's an astral (emotional) phenomena. It's like sight, people without eyes do see when they dream. Dreaming and vision are not physical phenomena.

And also what do you mean by existence of orgasm. "orgasm" does not exist, it's just a name of a feeling during sex. It is not an OBJECT THAT EXIST.
Orgasm is the excitement when you cum.

Take not of the bolded. That right there (is) gives existence to anything. It can't be used with no Thing.

What do you mean by existence and non Existence of "orgasm"?

"Existence": The reality of an encounter or experience with anything...basically.

chieveboy:


Orgasm is not entirely in the biological level. It's an astral (emotional) phenomena. It's like sight, people without eyes do see when they dream. Dreaming and vision are not physical phenomena.



Take not of the bolded. That right there (is) gives existence to anything. It can't be used with no Thing.



"Existence": The reality of an encounter or experience with anything...basically.

Orgasm is only in a biological level.
If a blind person has never heard anyone had an eye, he will never dream of having eyes.


You putting "is" to something doesn't mean it exist.
Is "ljhv" existing?

Wonders are forevermore...

chieveboy:



"Existence": The reality of an encounter or experience with anything...basically.

This reality was not existing till you encountered or experience it?

Maynman:

This reality was not existing till you encountered or experience it?

Basically yes, in a sense. You have never encountered the food I cooked this afternoon. You can say it doesn't exist.

chieveboy:


Basically yes, in a sense. You have never encountered the food I cooked this afternoon. You can say it doesn't exist.

Chai 😂😂

chieveboy:


Basically yes, in a sense. You have never encountered the food I cooked this afternoon. You can say it doesn't exist.

Hope you sha know enckanka abi wetin una dey call am is from Sant Mat, basically Hinduism.

Aum is shabd, it represents nothingness.

Maynman:

Orgasm is only in a biological level.
If a blind person has never heard anyone had an eye, he will never dream of having eyes.

A blind person dreams and they see in dreams. This is the world of the internet please, use it.

Orgasm is a feeling. Feeling is "emotion" which I mentioned earlier...

You putting "is" to something doesn't mean it exist.
Is "ljhv" existing?

You need just broaden you mind...perhaps someone else can help you out on this one because the answer is staring at you.

chieveboy:


A blind person dreams and they see in dreams. This is the world of the internet please, use it.

Orgasm is a feeling. Feeling is "emotion" which I mentioned earlier...




You need just broaden you mind...perhaps someone else can help you out on this one because the answer is staring at you.

A blind person does not see in dreams, it's more complicated than that.
Are they seeing themselves seeing ?

Orgasm is a feeling of excitement when cumming.
Look up the definition of the word.

chieveboy:



You need just broaden you mind...perhaps someone else can help you out on this one because the answer is staring at you.

Where is the mind that I should broaden?
It does not exist.

You don't understand what you read or is y what they taught you, go back.

You putting "is" to something doesn't mean it exist.
Is "ljhv" existing?

chieveboy:


Well said, but its a two-way traffic.

Those who have had orgasm can NEVER be able to use human language to explain or teach it to anyone just as it really is. No one can. Not via text, not via speech.

It's like the word "happy". No one has the right word for it and never will.

This then leaves a condition where any objective presentation if it is not actually correct, because it is something you can't fully express without distorting it's originality and truth.

If you must distort the reality of orgasm during the presentation owing to inefficiency of language and communication media, then whatever you're saying is not really true in the sense of reaching the totality of the experience.

So you arguing with, killing or fighting those who don't agree are really in same lane.


The point is, no one should really be explaining or preaching orgasm to anyone. The best one can do is to live, demonstrate or embody it practically. That still doesn't impart the knowledge to third parties, but it at least gives them an idea towards the pursuit of their own experience.

This mirrors spiritual experiences. There's no word to fully express or accurately describe the experience, so all discriptions fail to do Justice to the matter. However, the failings of many who claim genuine spirituality while living obnoxious lives contrary to spiritual expectations do much damage to the subject. There is a very limited few who walk the talk but the masses errorneously base their judgements on the many professed spiritual men whose lives are nothing to write home about.

Maynman:

A blind person does not see in dreams, it's more complicated than that.
Are they seeing themselves seeing ?

Orgasm is a feeling of excitement when cumming.
Look up the definition of the word.

I had earlier suggested you use the internet, this was because you seem to often put the horse of information behind the cart of ignorance.

Here is a link to a research on blind people being able to see. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8340899/

chieveboy:


I had earlier suggested you use the internet, this was because you seem to often put the horse of information behind the cart of ignorance.

Here is a link to a research on blind people being able to see. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8340899/

Have you read the link yourself?
Please quote where they said blind people see in dreams?

Did you read the conclusion?