Supreme Court Judgement will be delivered on/before November 6th 2023 according to the electoral act.

Section 285(5) to (7) provide that: “An election petition shall be filed within 21 days after the date of the declaration of result of the elections;


“An election tribunal shall deliver its judgment in writing within 180 days from the date of the filing of the petition;

“An appeal from a decision of an election tribunal or Court of Appeal in an election matter shall be heard and disposed of within 60 days from the date of the delivery of the judgment of the tribunal or Court of Appeal.”

https://placng.org/i/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Electoral-Act-2022.pdf

Monday Ubani, former Chairman of the Section of Public Interest and Development Law (SPIDEL), Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), says it will be difficult for the Supreme Court to admit fresh evidence in the appeal of the judgment of the presidential election petition tribunal.

Ubani said this on Channels Television’s Sunrise Daily on Thursday.

Ubani was reacting to the case initiated in the United States by the People’s Democratic Party’s (PDP) presidential candidate in the 2023 election, Atiku Abubakar, where he requested for the release of President Bola Tinubu’s certificate from the Chicago State University with the suspicion that the certificate the President submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) may not be authentic.

He noted that admitting fresh evidence was rare and could only be taken in special circumstances.

“Looking at the facts surrounding it, the admissibility of fresh evidence by the appellate court is very rare, especially if that evidence was available to you while you were initiating the process.

https://businessday.ng/news/article/768700-supreme-court/

Will the court accept new evidence from Atiku team or not.
Will Tinubu win or will he be disqualified.
Will they be rerun if Tinubu is disqualified or will they declared Atiku our new president.

They must accept! The constitution does not allow someone that forged his certificate to be president. Its unconstitutional!

Spiritmask:
Will the court accept new evidence from Atiku team or not.
Will Tinubu win or will he be disqualified.
Will they be rerun if Tinubu is disqualified or will they declared Atiku our new president.

Finally foolish people can rest

30 days left

29 days left

Supreme Court should please accept anything Atiku brings to save us from too much wailing by poke nosers.

Judgement on the presidential election petition will not exceed 6th of November, 2023.

Finally criminal can be sent away from Aso Rock.

MS2471:
Finally foolish people can rest

In conclusion, new/fresh evidence will be accepted, for sure.

Spiritmask:
Monday Ubani, former Chairman of the Section of Public Interest and Development Law (SPIDEL), Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), says it will be difficult for the Supreme Court to admit fresh evidence in the appeal of the judgment of the presidential election petition tribunal.

Ubani said this on Channels Television’s Sunrise Daily on Thursday.

Ubani was reacting to the case initiated in the United States by the People’s Democratic Party’s (PDP) presidential candidate in the 2023 election, Atiku Abubakar, where he requested for the release of President Bola Tinubu’s certificate from the Chicago State University with the suspicion that the certificate the President submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) may not be authentic.

He noted that admitting fresh evidence was rare and could only be taken in special circumstances.

“Looking at the facts surrounding it, the admissibility of fresh evidence by the appellate court is very rare, especially if that evidence was available to you while you were initiating the process.

https://businessday.ng/news/article/768700-supreme-court/

2BabaNairaland:
In conclusion, new/fresh evidence will be accepted, for sure.

Let's wait till the judgement day

DMerciful:
They must accept! The constitution does not allow someone that forged his certificate to be president. Its unconstitutional!

Nothing suggests the certificate was forged. The photocopy submitted to INEC had part of the logo cut- off and copy was presented to the registrar during disposition which he denied its knowledge. The fact that the school agreed the certificate looks exactly like that of other people issued in 1997 attests to the the fact the document isn't forged

kunle4toyeyaho:
Nothing suggests the certificate was forged. The photocopy submitted to INEC had part of the logo cut- off and copy was presented to the registrar during disposition which he denied its knowledge. The fact that the school agreed the certificate looks exactly like that of other people issued in 1997 attests to the this fact

the school disowned it, that means it did not come from them, it was forged

oyichi:
the school disowned it, that means it did not come from them, it was forged

The copy disowned by the registrar is the one held by Atiku's U.S lawyer,that copy is not totally the same as the copy obtained by Tinubu. It is a 'photocopy of photocopy' and as such had some features cut-off.

You know its forged but just defending criminality

kunle4toyeyaho:
Nothing suggests the certificate was forged. The photocopy submitted to INEC had part of the logo cut- off and copy was presented to the registrar during disposition which he denied its knowledge. The fact that the school agreed the certificate looks exactly like that of other people issued in 1997 attests to the this fact

DMerciful:
You know its forged but just defending criminality

By the time DSS invites you to substantiate this reckless statement,you will be shouting victimisation. Your Mr. Siddiq couldn't even prove it after spending millions of dollars. How can one forge something he earned already

It is forged! You know it

kunle4toyeyaho:
By the time DSS invites you to substantiate this reckless statement,you will be shouting victimisation. Your Mr. Siddiq couldn't even prove it after spending millions of dollars. How can one forge something he earned already

DMerciful:
It is forged! You know it

Then,take your evidence to the court of law.#Wounded obidient

Tinubu criminality will catch up with him soonest

kunle4toyeyaho:
Then,take your evidence to the court of law.#Wounded obidient

The day for judgement is getting closer.

Hearing of petition start today.

Fingers crossed.

Supreme court final judgement on 2023 presidential election petition will hopefully be next week.

kunle4toyeyaho:
Nothing suggests the certificate was forged. The photocopy submitted to INEC had part of the logo cut- off and copy was presented to the registrar during disposition which he denied its knowledge. The fact that the school agreed the certificate looks exactly like that of other people issued in 1997 attests to the the fact the document isn't forged

This is typical of an agbadorian whom Tinubu converted into internet wildebeest devoid of any meaningful sentience, reason, and rationality as described by David Hundeyin

Tomorrow is the day for judgement.

Today is the D day for judgement