Now, if people have issues, or need clear judgement, they approach the judiciary, right ?

Now, what if the judiciary is being unjust especially when it is clear for all to see, who would they submit to for checks and balances ?

It'll be a very destructive thing to humanity that somehow, the judiciary is the ultimate to give judgement and has no entity or body of which too they submit to, to make sure things are the way they must be.

It makes no sense then going to court if even if it goes wrong, it can't be held responsible in someway.

I want your views.

Nigeria judiciary and legislatures are owned by the executive.

victorclean:
Nigeria judiciary and legislatures are owned by the executive.

This isn't about Nigeria but the world at large.

RushManni:


This isn't about Nigeria but the world at large.

Not exactly. In Nigeria, executive owns electoral commission, judiciary, and legislatures. Other countries have more respectable separation of powers in government.

RushManni:


This isn't about Nigeria but the world at large.

Judiciary is working in other part of the word except Nigeria Judiciary.

victorclean:



Not exactly. In Nigeria, executive owns electoral commission, judiciary, and legislatures. Other countries have more respectable separation of powers in government.

So in those other countries, who do their judiciary report to for checks and balances

Jostoman:
Judiciary is working in other part of the word except Nigeria Judiciary.

That isn't exactly the aim of the thread. Who do judiciaries report to for checks and balances. Cos without this, I don't see how then there should be the justification to have/make use of judiciary