Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,161,448 members, 7,846,867 topics. Date: Saturday, 01 June 2024 at 04:49 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / If Size Of Land Was Important, Lagos Would Not Be Important (675 Views)
Nigeria Gets UN Approval For New Maritime Territory ‘5 Times The Size Of Lagos’ (2) (3) (4)
Re: If Size Of Land Was Important, Lagos Would Not Be Important by BentizilL0: 2:54pm On May 15 |
gidgiddy:Lagos as it's known today was not the capital of Nigeria, only a small portion less than 10% was Nigeria capital.. I hate when people like you try to attribute Lagos development to being Nigeria capital.. Lagos was left to die but it's still thriving.. If you don't know anything, it's better you keep shut instead of writing nonsense online.. 3 Likes 1 Share |
Re: If Size Of Land Was Important, Lagos Would Not Be Important by T9ksy(m): 3:00pm On May 15 |
BentizilL0: Abeg, cut the miserable Op some slack, ojare He is one of those "biafrans" who are clinically obsessed with lagos and the yorubas. 2 Likes |
Re: If Size Of Land Was Important, Lagos Would Not Be Important by babasolution: 3:38pm On May 15 |
BentizilL0: This argument is totally flawed,wrong and should be stopped, unless you didn't grow up in Lagos that's why you making such a flawed argument. LAGOS was more or less FCT ,with seat of government on the island just as we have FCT and Abuja today. Development was spurred by the fact that Lagos was essentially FCT. 2 Likes |
Re: If Size Of Land Was Important, Lagos Would Not Be Important by Bendeco2020: 3:47pm On May 15 |
BentizilL0:This is just like saying only FCT is the capital of Nigeria alone not the whole Abuja. You're not including other parts of lagos because they were not among the main city then but they're still lagos territory. Your yoruba version of brain can't let you know that even those rural/reserved area in Abj will develop in short time with the influence of the main town/city whether the Capital is relocated to another state or not. You guys eh! There's a regional disease that made you guys to reason upside down. 3 Likes 1 Share |
Re: If Size Of Land Was Important, Lagos Would Not Be Important by Bendeco2020: 3:53pm On May 15 |
babasolution: Those guys are naturally like that. They always lie and twist everything to make themselves feel good. Ask them, they will tell you that tinubu made lagos. 3 Likes 1 Share |
Re: If Size Of Land Was Important, Lagos Would Not Be Important by Uchek(m): 5:04pm On May 15 |
Because Lagos is a PARASITE feeding on the resources of other part Nigeria. Restructure Nigeria today and Lagos will lose its allure on Nigerians helinues: 1 Like |
Re: If Size Of Land Was Important, Lagos Would Not Be Important by gidgiddy: 6:02pm On May 15 |
BentizilL0: It doesn't matter if it was one street that was designated capital, the surrounding area will benefit from it Where in you area did you develop with it being near any capital? No where It all goes to show that you that without government intervention, some people cannot develop anywhere 2 Likes |
Re: If Size Of Land Was Important, Lagos Would Not Be Important by gidgiddy: 6:49am On May 17 |
T9ksy: But the Biafran is one who does not want to be with Yorubas in one country? 1 Like |
Re: If Size Of Land Was Important, Lagos Would Not Be Important by T9ksy(m): 9:27am On May 17 |
gidgiddy: Of course, that's the illogical narrative they are propagating, however the same biafrans are all over yorubaland like bees gather around a honeycomb. 1 Like |
Re: If Size Of Land Was Important, Lagos Would Not Be Important by gidgiddy: 9:47am On May 17 |
T9ksy: Same as Nigerians are all over USA, Britain and Germany like bees gather around a honeycomb 1 Like |
Re: If Size Of Land Was Important, Lagos Would Not Be Important by Cooletempa: 9:55am On May 17 |
gidgiddy: Common sense has never been your strength. Are you Nigerians in those places shouting free Nigeria and insulting their hosts? 1 Like |
Re: If Size Of Land Was Important, Lagos Would Not Be Important by gidgiddy: 9:58am On May 17 |
Cooletempa: In Nigeria there are no "hosts", you can't host a person in their own country. If you want to be host , go get Oduduwa Republic first 2 Likes |
Re: If Size Of Land Was Important, Lagos Would Not Be Important by MEEVEET: 10:04am On May 17 |
helinues:Calabar was never a capital didn't you go to school? It was an assumed capital was never Desgniated as capital 2 Likes |
Re: If Size Of Land Was Important, Lagos Would Not Be Important by Cooletempa: 2:24pm On May 17 |
gidgiddy: Is okay….be deceiving yourself. Don’t worry….igbo will be governor of lagos… 1 Like |
Re: If Size Of Land Was Important, Lagos Would Not Be Important by T9ksy(m): 2:28pm On May 17 |
gidgiddy: You're right as those Nigerians went to the places you mentioned, in search of greener pastures. Same way biafrans flocks to yorubaland. However, you don't hear Nigerians in Europe or similar places wailing everyday that, they do not want to live with the locals. |
Politics Explained / Where is our own News network? / Ogun Set To Return Schools To Original Owners
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 28 |