₦airaland Forum

OBY EKWESILLY don chop BONE wey 🪝 her neck .

Commentor ,face front biko

on my way to Obaofaba, Onionbandit, helinues, yarimo, Flangelo12, shortigboman, zero8zero, LegendHero house .Make una prepare onugbu, nsala,Egusisoup plus akpu ready

asfrank:
The write up is really on point, Oby should just take a back seat, or better still provide account statement from January to date, proving no funds was transferred to her. Some things are simple to discredit if there's no truth in them.

Exactly my point, to discredit her, provide account statements of all banks and Viola! She will keep shut.

But ignoring the allegation and writing support letters just proves there is substance to the allegation.

Nonsense

Fiscus105:
Time for Duru to catch out from oga gigolo. Keep it up. You too must shop from national cake.

Thank God that you guys cannot use her tribe against her in this case so it is this kind cheap blackmail of "dem don pay ham", "na 30k stipends mak ham talk like that", "na to chop national cake" etc yet same people reason with emotions, likes anything that destroys people reputation more than the need for proof.

Una go dey alright las las Sha that I have seen but for now.... Continue

Simeonee111:
REBUTTAL TO Oby Ezekwesili’S EMOTIVE PROPAGANDA MASQUERADING AS A MEMO


https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1A1rBoNsLT/?mibextid=WC7FNe

we all know Ezekwezili is the head of the women wing of IPOB,senseless woman forming due process

Going by your logic, I have to believe there is someone sponsoring your posts here.. Since anyone who comes out with any view that swings one way than the other is considered to being bankrolled by the benefactor of that view.

Akpabio paid Duru handsomely same for Natasha she paid Ezekwezili... etc to air her views...

So who is paying you... Since it looks like this business is booming now...

You may want to say it's the same person who pays me... But note that I am not thinking as you are... Forgetting that these people are okay and have their self will to support or oppose any view or opinion without the attraction inducement of money or influence...

Thank you..

EponObi:
Lmaoooo... Seasonal film. Natasha def didn't expect things to turn out this way. She thought she's the commander-in-chief of serial blackmailers but didn't know that where her madness ended is where someone else's started.

Game on! Akpabio has got himself a super striker. Five goals scored in less than a week since transfer was completed

Jokes aside, if Oby Ezekwesili knows what's best for her, she should refund Natasha ASAP and back down if she doesn't want mud slinging whatever is left of her reputation.

The thing is people like Sandra Duru don't abide by any rule. Like I said in the full version of the post below, Sandra has nothing to lose, especially if Akpabio is sponsoring her (I lean 90% she's working for Akpabio). She has no reputation to protect, no political career, neither is she a senator like Natasha. There's no limit to what she can say or allegation she can throw or evidences she can throw into the public. As you saw, she threw private chats and call recordings straight into the public the moment "she was subbed on " Don't underestimate someone like that. It's like fighting a mad man. The mad man is not bound by any rule or law; him fit kai you self and nothing go happen.

What I can clearly see as the game plan of coach Akpabio is:

1. Putting Sandra on a high offensive against Natasha, to choke and put her in state of confusion
2. Switch Sandra to the wing to squeeze Natasha and force her to produce "her evidence" and also overload her side backs (Ezekwesili and co.) into deeper defensive block.
3. Akpabio's defensive midfielders (Regina Askia and Oby Ndukwe) are to offer support to Sandra's high offensive moves, so Natasha doesn't have the space to flip into attack mode.
4. The media and social media influencers will serve as his 10, to keep the attacking tempo alive and to control the narrative.

The objective is simple, make the public see Natasha as the serial blackmailer she is and pressurize her to "produce evidence" - the evidence is the main deal . When she does, I'm sure there's a Kelvin De Bryune somewhere waiting to drive in a curling, long-range shot from outside the penalty box with clinical precision to finish off Natasha in the courts of public opinion and the law. As the maestro Mourinho once said, "The best form of defense is attack".

Natasha goofed trying to contract Sandra Duru for her organ harvesting blackmail plan. She was also at no point strategic with her plays - typical of personalities like her who think they can have total control at all times and do whatever with the belief that everyone will/have to bend in their direction.

Btw, she hasn't produced any evidence still - not against Yahyah Bello, Akpabio, or Sandra Duru. Lmaooo.

I as EponObi will continue observing from inside the black trouser of their proprietress

This issue is becoming the joke of the day .. what's the need for this back and forth, if none of them can come forward with verifiable evidence to this their madness ....
Everybody just trying to be relevant..
The social media space is just giving attention to clowns who are cashing out on their attention seeking mandate...

TempleHouse:
The Same Professor who mistakenly showed Akpabio s chat on her phone online is now diverting attention.

I wonder how much Akpabio paid for these change of narrative.

Nigeria is indeed a Zoo !!

What happened between Natasha and Reno Omokri?

Akpabio a corrupt polithievian...
Natasha almost destroyed Reno Omokri...
Reno Omokri get hin own for body...

Supporting any one of them is like the devil and deep blue sea...

Both as a man who have witnessed many men destroyed by false accusations (harassment and r*pe)...

I lean 5% support for Akpabio until evidence(s) proof otherwise

Simeonee111:
REBUTTAL TO Oby Ezekwesili’S EMOTIVE PROPAGANDA MASQUERADING AS A MEMO


https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1A1rBoNsLT/?mibextid=WC7FNe

Well done Dr Sandra. This is my line of thought and should be the line of thought of all believers in truth and justice. Even most of those that accused Donald Trump of sexual harassment and even rape provided evidence both in court and in public. Some could not provide anything just like Natasha.

Though unfortunately even with evidence a lot of us supported Donald Trump. Many even said he is innocent that the women should go to hell even with some incontrovertible evidence graphically and in recordings.

Why is Akpabio's different, even without ANY evidence. I cannot understand this.

EponObi:
Lmaoooo... Seasonal film. Natasha def didn't expect things to turn out this way. She thought she's the commander-in-chief of serial blackmailers but didn't know that where her madness ended is where someone else's started.

Game on! Akpabio has got himself a super striker. Five goals scored in less than a week since transfer was completed

Jokes aside, if Oby Ezekwesili knows what's best for her, she should refund Natasha ASAP and back down if she doesn't want mud slinging whatever is left of her reputation.

The thing is people like Sandra Duru don't abide by any rule. Like I said in the full version of the post below, Sandra has nothing to lose, especially if Akpabio is sponsoring her (I lean 90% she's working for Akpabio). She has no reputation to protect, no political career, neither is she a senator like Natasha. There's no limit to what she can say or allegation she can throw or evidences she can throw into the public. As you saw, she threw private chats and call recordings straight into the public the moment "she was subbed on " Don't underestimate someone like that. It's like fighting a mad man. The mad man is not bound by any rule or law; him fit kai you self and nothing go happen.

What I can clearly see as the game plan of coach Akpabio is:

1. Putting Sandra on a high offensive against Natasha, to choke and put her in state of confusion
2. Switch Sandra to the wing to squeeze Natasha and force her to produce "her evidence" and also overload her side backs (Ezekwesili and co.) into deeper defensive block.
3. Akpabio's defensive midfielders (Regina Askia and Oby Ndukwe) are to offer support to Sandra's high offensive moves, so Natasha doesn't have the space to flip into attack mode.
4. The media and social media influencers will serve as his 10, to keep the attacking tempo alive and to control the narrative.

The objective is simple, make the public see Natasha as the serial blackmailer she is and pressurize her to "produce evidence" - the evidence is the main deal . When she does, I'm sure there's a Kelvin De Bryune somewhere waiting to drive in a curling, long-range shot from outside the penalty box with clinical precision to finish off Natasha in the courts of public opinion and the law. As the maestro Mourinho once said, "The best form of defense is attack".

Natasha goofed trying to contract Sandra Duru for her organ harvesting blackmail plan. She was also at no point strategic with her plays - typical of personalities like her who think they can have total control at all times and do whatever with the belief that everyone will/have to bend in their direction.

Btw, she hasn't produced any evidence still - not against Yahyah Bello, Akpabio, or Sandra Duru. Lmaooo.

I as EponObi will continue observing from inside the black trouser of their proprietress

I cannot take someone who lied she doesn't know who akpabio or yahaya bello is on camera seriously.

Sandra has been known as a blackmailer since 2020 and even since rochas was in power.

She was hired and is now chasing clout.

DesChyko:
Dr Duru, as a way of lending credence to the fact that you are not out for blackmail or on a payroll, you insinuated you did not know the Senate President or have any affiliations with the politicians. Fair enough.

How then is it that on your video, while trying to display the messages you allegedly received from Senator Natasha without your request, it clearly shows that you just missed a call from the Senate President, and you are a member of a Pro-Akpabio Whatsapp group?

Just the way the woman who spearheaded that sham of a recall has faded into oblivion, you would as well follow the same route and allow tax paying citizens to hold the government to account.

You said it all

Oby, you see your life.

[quote author=EponObi post=135231524]Lmaoooo... Seasonal film. Natasha def didn't expect things to turn out this way. She thought she's the commander-in-chief of serial blackmailers but didn't know that where her madness ended is where someone else's started.

Game on! Akpabio has got himself a super striker. Five goals scored in less than a week since transfer was completed

Jokes aside, if Oby Ezekwesili knows what's best for her, she should refund Natasha ASAP and back down if she doesn't want mud slinging whatever is left of her reputation.

The thing is people like Sandra Duru don't abide by any rule. Like I said in the full version of the post below, Sandra has nothing to lose, especially if Akpabio is sponsoring her (I lean 90% she's working for Akpabio). She has no reputation to protect, no political career, neither is she a senator like Natasha. There's no limit to what she can say or allegation she can throw or evidences she can throw into the public. As you saw, she threw private chats and call recordings straight into the public the moment "she was subbed on " Don't underestimate someone like that. It's like fighting a mad man. The mad man is not bound by any rule or law; him fit kai you self and nothing go happen.

What I can clearly see as the game plan of coach Akpabio is:

1. Putting Sandra on a high offensive against Natasha, to choke and put her in state of confusion
2. Switch Sandra to the wing to squeeze Natasha and force her to produce "her evidence" and also overload her side backs (Ezekwesili and co.) into deeper defensive block.
3. Akpabio's defensive midfielders (Regina Askia and Oby Ndukwe) are to offer support to Sandra's high offensive moves, so Natasha doesn't have the space to flip into attack mode.
4. The media and social media influencers will serve as his 10, to keep the attacking tempo alive and to control the narrative.

The objective is simple, make the public see Natasha as the serial blackmailer she is and pressurize her to "produce evidence" - the evidence is the main deal . When she does, I'm sure there's a Kelvin De Bryune somewhere waiting to drive in a curling, long-range shot from outside the penalty box with clinical precision to finish off Natasha in the courts of public opinion and the law. As the maestro Mourinho once said, "The best form of defense is attack".

Natasha goofed trying to contract Sandra Duru for her organ harvesting blackmail plan. She was also at no point strategic with her plays - typical of personalities like her who think they can have total control at all times and do whatever with the belief that everyone will/have to bend in their direction.

Btw, she hasn't produced any evidence still - not against Yahyah Bello, Akpabio, or Sandra Duru. Lmaooo.

I as EponObi will continue observing from inside the black trouser of their proprietress ; This EponObi is reviewing like Reno Omokri. My guess may be right. Extremely intelligent man

DenreleDave:
U av spoken like a headless mob all bcoz of Ur hatred from Akpabio and ignored the truth that Natasha needs to provide evidence of sexual stuff

, aren't evidence supposed to be produced in court? Akpabio 's wife had already sued Natasha over this same case why does the SP' supporters wants evidence of a case already in court filed by AKPABIO 's family?

jaxxy:
I cannot take someone who lied she doesn't know who akpabio or yahaya bello is on camera seriously.

Sandra has been known as a blackmailer since 2020 and even since rochas was in power.

She was hired and is now chasing clout.

Ohhh 😮
So you know Sandra as a blackmailer...but you did not know Natasha as a blackmailer

Hmn...are you one of the u.seful I.diots

Common sense to me in this brouhaha is that ,there is no way you will address your friend wife which you attend her wedding and be saying we are not in nightclub...no matter what..even if not in same party..if there wasn't some under current between you guys ,you will atleast for your friends sake accord her lil respect and slack ,even because of your friend she will enjoy some privilege from you..but opposite is the case here.. unfortunately the woman too is with alot of baggages..when you see women like Nathasha..pls run for your dear life... anyway am on the fence here .. whatever they want to do with each other is allowed but they should allow us focus on much more mundane issues in the country..the issue is in the court..they can continue their arguments there.

creativejagaban:
Ohhh 😮
So you know Sandra as a blackmailer...but you did not know Natasha as a blackmailer

Hmn...are you one of the u.seful I.diots

https://www.nairaland.com/5915550/sandra-duru-con-artist-work

I didn't call Sandra a blackmailer but her story don tey.

jaxxy:
I cannot take someone who lied she doesn't know who akpabio or yahaya bello is on camera seriously.

Sandra has been known as a blackmailer since 2020 and even since rochas was in power.

She was hired and is now chasing clout.

But you can believe someone who said she doesn't know Dr Sandra. But when faced with stark evidence somersaulted and agreed she knows her and that she will give a response later to the numerous allegations. Haba!

Dr Vocabulary earned her meal for today.

NwokoloOwa:
Well done Dr Sandra. This is my line of thought and should be the line of thought of all believers in truth and justice. Even most of those that accused Donald Trump of sexual harassment and even rape provided evidence both in court and in public. Some could not provide anything just like Natasha.

Though unfortunately even with evidence a lot of us supported Donald Trump. Many even said he is innocent that the women should go to hell even with some incontrovertible evidence graphically and in recordings.

Why is Akpabios different, even without evidence. I cannot understand this.

Most people who hate akpabio are the igbos..they hate him bcus they akpabio is not Igbo and he is in APC..

Dapson73:
Obi Ezkwesili.... An obidient patron, see your life outside.
Your reputation both locally and international is now on red alert because of your shaddy deal just for survival.

I'm long throat to see your response and see how the accuser will expose you, before she came out to accuse you and Natasha, she has enough evidence to nail you.

I'm also waiting for Pandora comment on the matter and blame Tinubu and APC.

Shame on hypocrites.

Senator Godswill Akpabio is a duly qualified lawyer with extensive legal practice prior to his political tenure, possesses comprehensive knowledge of the judicial mechanisms requisite for addressing defamation or false allegations.

It is imperative that he forgo orchestrated social media campaigns and pursue redress exclusively through the courts. Should Senator Akpabio assert a genuine grievance, he is obligated to meticulously compile all relevant evidence and supporter testimonies for submission to a court of competent jurisdiction.

The purported social media maneuvers, evidently supported by his allies, represent a futile endeavor to solicit public sympathy and evade established legal protocols.

The prolonged inaction in commencing legal proceedings against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, particularly when contrasted with the prompt litigation initiated by the Falanas in a comparable matter, demands scrutiny.

Senator Akpabio must unequivocally undertake decisive legal action, renouncing reliance on social media tactics, to resolve this matter within the judicial framework.

emkz:
Let's look at the additional layers.

1. Neither Natasha, Oby, nor Abiola has concretely denied the claims of being offered money to disrupt the senate hearing into her sexual allegations.

2. In her rebuttal, Natasha danced around the bush and ended up trying to cast aspersions on Professor Mgbeke and promised to respond soon.

3. The additional denial from Natasha's camp is that Mgbeke claimed not to have known Akpabio but that there was a record of Akpabio's name on her call log. Didn't Natasha also deny knowing Mgbeke until Mgbeke provided proof that Natasha squealed like a parrot on colos during recorded phone conversations about how she planned with Oby to disrupt senate hearing into her accusations?

What are the substantive issues to be addressed?

1. Mgbeke needs to supply evidence of how much Oby and Abiola were paid. We need bank details. I am sure Natasha may have sent such a receipt to Mgbeke considering how she spoke recklessly in that phone conversation.

2. Akpabio needs to supply CCTV of everything that happened in his house on that night December 8th, 2023. Onyekachi Nwaebonyi said Natasha was not with them when Akpabio gave a tour of his mansion. We need other witnesses to corroborate Natasha's claim of being with Akpabio alone.

3. Natasha has taken everyone on a circus by going to Arise News, Channels, Sky News, BBC and DW television. Anytime she is asked for proof, she gets riled up. Anytime she is reminded of the exact misconduct that led to her suspension, she tries to diminish it and redirect the conversation to her sexual allegations. It seems she is more interested in the circus than closure.

4. Arise News needs to come out and let us know if they sold an award to Natasha, and how much was received.

5. Mgbeke said she'd have an exclusive interview with CNN. We are aware that these interviews are paid for and do not come cheap. Can Mgbeke inform us on who would pay for her appearance?

How is this connected to other issues?

Folks, there is a pattern here.

During presidential election petitions, those who could not prove how they won elections they lost started throwing dirt; like double nomination of someone, phantom drug dealing by the person who defeated them, and so on. When the case was dying, around 27th August 2023, one of those who lost came up with a rant on Twitter than the person who won could not have attended Chicago State University and did not graduate from high school.

Then began a voyage to obtain a deposition from Chicago State University which ended up nullifying their claims. They still brought it, thinking they had a smoking gun, and filed it wrongly without properly authenticating it with the District Court of Illinois. Justice Emmanuel Agim JSC told them that. The other justices told them they couldn't introduce evidence on appeal. This indicated they were clearly unaware of judicial processes. Is this not familiar with someone who wrongly filed sexual harassment petition in the senate?

The judges at the tribunal asked petitioners if they expected the judges to manufacture evidence for them. They never told the judges how many votes they won the election. They hurled dirt, hoping something would stick. Natasha, we cannot manufacture evidence for your case. If you cannot supply evidence, it means you lied. It means you are more interested in the drama of soiling the senate president and the senate to get what you want than proving your claims. Your election versus erection letter proved it.

Since the same pattern of headless fighting was deployed in the presidential elections campaigns and the tribunal, including those who prosecuted their petitions on social media and traditional media instead of the courts; could it be that some people wish to reap political capital from this mess?

What I think transpired between you and Mgbeke

You probably reached out to Mgbeke to use her to do part of your dirty job. She started by bashing Akpabio on your behalf. She then asked you for a contractual agreement but you declined in order not to implicate yourself. From the chats you deleted, it could have been implicating materials you do not want seen. What did you delete?

What I suspect happened is that Mgbeke earned your trust by bashing Akpabio initially. I suspect you paid her. After earning your trust, you started talking carelessly, and she recorded you incase she needed to have something on you. She probably asked for more money and you refused. So others may have reached out to her or she may have reached out to them to say she had information to bury you. This may have led to her live video.

What I see here is that Mgbeke is a smart businesswoman, PR consultant, and probably a smarter blackmailer. She clearly outwitted you because you have not controverted her evidence intelligently.

You had your field day on Arise, Sky News, BBC and DW News. Other foreign outlets like ABC News also reported your case. Some influencers also used their platforms to fight for you. All the while, without supplying evidence.

If Akpabio recruited Mgbeke, I cannot fault him or his team. You started this media fight, end it by supplying evidence or face a more intelligent Mgbeke who is flogging you at your game.

Senator Godswill Akpabio is a duly qualified lawyer with extensive legal practice prior to his political tenure, possesses comprehensive knowledge of the judicial mechanisms requisite for addressing defamation or false allegations.

It is imperative that he forgo orchestrated social media campaigns and pursue redress exclusively through the courts. Should Senator Akpabio assert a genuine grievance, he is obligated to meticulously compile all relevant evidence and supporter testimonies for submission to a court of competent jurisdiction.

The purported social media maneuvers, evidently supported by his allies, represent a futile endeavor to solicit public sympathy and evade established legal protocols.

The prolonged inaction in commencing legal proceedings against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, particularly when contrasted with the prompt litigation initiated by the Falanas in a comparable matter, demands scrutiny.

Senator Akpabio must unequivocally undertake decisive legal action, renouncing reliance on social media tactics, to resolve this matter within the judicial framework.

LibertyRep:
Seems like many episodes will unfold.

The issue is simple and straightforward, na people just dey use English and emotions confuse themselves.

Natasha has the key to resolving all these; provide evidence of sexual harassment and see how 'sensible' people will descend on Akpabio.

Imagine if people had descended on Reno back then and it turned out to be a false alarm once bitten...

Enough of gender manipulation

Senator Godswill Akpabio is a qualified and practicing lawyer prior to his political career, is well-versed in the legal mechanisms available for addressing defamation or false allegations.

Rather than engaging in orchestrated social media campaigns, he should pursue redress through the judicial system. If Senator Akpabio genuinely believes he has been defamed, he is obliged to assemble pertinent evidence and supporter testimonies for adjudication in a court of competent jurisdiction.

The ongoing social media efforts, purportedly supported by his associates, constitute an inadequate attempt to garner public sympathy and circumvent due process.

The delay in initiating legal proceedings against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, contrasted with the expeditious response of the Falanas in a similar case, raises pertinent questions.

Senator Akpabio must undertake resolute legal action, eschewing social media strategies, to resolve this matter appropriately within the judiciary.

What kind of doctor is her dr. I have checked online and kind find anything.

Akpabio's paid imagemaker is doing all to launder unlaunderable image.

Fiscus105:
Time for Duru to catch out from oga gigolo. Keep it up. You too must shop from national cake.

Like Dr Oby is cashing out from Natasha. This matter for no drag, just tell Natasha to show evidence, simple