Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,152,704 members, 7,816,888 topics. Date: Friday, 03 May 2024 at 07:28 PM

Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue - Politics - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue (6526 Views)

Do Abia, Imo And Other Igbo States Among Oil States / Why Are Governors From No-drop-of-oil States Obsessed With Oil? / N5,000 For The Poor: Katsina Women Storm Bank To Demand For APC Social Security (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (Reply) (Go Down)

Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by chino11(m): 1:53pm On Feb 26, 2012
Anger dripped from the reply of governors and stakeholders in the oil-producing states on Saturday to the 19 Northern governors’ demand for a review of the revenue formula to give more funds to them.

The South-South governors said such a call smacked of insensitivity to the plight of the zone, evident in its over 50 years of marginalisation and environmental degradation and advised Northern governors to develop their revenue base as each state had a resource to develop.

Similarly, Niger Delta activists said states in the North should find ways of generating revenues to run their states as the region once did through groundnut pyramids, rather than seeking for more allocation from oil.

The Chairman of the Northern Governors’ Forum and governor of Niger State, Dr. Babangida Aliyu, had last Thursday, on behalf of his colleagues, asked for a review of the revenue formula that “reflects current realities.”

Aliyu had stated this during the inauguration of Ahmadu Bello’s Memorial Foundation Advisory Council in Abuja.

A recent poverty index released by the Federal Bureau of Statistics had shown more states in the North in grave situation than their counterparts in the Southern part of the country, a scenario that Aliyu might have had in mind when he mentioned “current realities.”

He had bemoaned how his state got between N4.2bn and N4.5bn as monthly allocation whereas some other states received 20 times the amount.

He had said, “The revenue allocation formula should be looked at. We are hoping that within 2012, there would be discussions and review of the allocation formula.

“It will not serve everybody well if certain parts of the country are not doing well while some parts are doing exceptionally well. So, the pressure will continue until we are able to find a solution.”

But irked by Aliyu’s clamour, the Rivers State government said his comment was unfair and lacked appreciation of the fact that the oil-producing states were, the “goose that lay the golden egg.”

It added that every state had resources it could develop and generate revenue and that “nobody should be worried when some concessions are given to oil-bearing states.”

The state Commissioner for Information and Communication, Mrs. Ibim Semenitari, stated her government’s stance.

She said, “It is unfortunate that this is coming from a governor I respect. Knowing the environmental degradation in the Niger Delta, the thought of getting equal allocation of funds is unnecessary.

“Every state has its own resources. We also have states that are doing well in agriculture but the proceeds from such resources are not shared among states.

“The funds that are shared among the states of the federation come from the oil bearing states. The level of magnanimity from the Niger Delta should be saluted and not the call for sharing the proceeds from the oil-bearing states equally.”

In Akwa-Ibom State, the Commissioner for Information and Communication, Mr. Aniekan Umanah, said, “The demand by the northern governors is improper. When they were receiving 50 per cent for groundnut, they did not share it with anybody.

“Now that 13 per cent oil derivation is paid to the South-South and other oil producing states in the country, they want the money to be shared with them.”

On Aliyu’s claim that oil wells that were over 200 kilometres off shore were supposed to be oil wells for the whole country, Umannah reminded him that people inhabited the coastline.

He noted that oil producing states did not share their 50 years of environmental degradation with the North.

Umannah said, “Don’t they know about environmental degradation? Don’t they think that people live along the coastline and that they are affected by oil spills and other environmental degradation through the activities of oil companies?

“What have they suffered to justify their demand that they equally get 13 per cent of oil revenue? It is uncalled for.”

The Chief Press Secretary to Governor Theodore Orji of Abia State, Mr. Ugochukwu Emezue, also told SUNDAY PUNCH that Aliyu’s demand was uncalled for.

He said, “I don’t think it is fair for anybody to complain about what Niger Delta states get as monthly allocation because these are the states that suffer environmental degradation.

“What we are getting in Abia as a Niger Delta state is not enough and we are calling for an upward review of our monthly allocation.

“Abia is serious about developing the state and as an oil-bearing state; we need more funds to achieve all these.

“But it will not be fair for anybody to say that the funds from crude oil should be shared equally between the oil-producing and non-oil producing states.”

Similarly in Ondo State, the Commissioner for Information, Mr. Kayode Akinmade, noted that the oil producing states currently enjoying the 13 per cent derivation funds had the statutory rights to enjoy it.

He said, “We should not forget the fact that states that are currently enjoying the derivation fund had experienced serious environmental degradation and untold neglect by successive governments in the past despite the fact that they were ‘laying the golden eggs.’

“The bulk of the money being used to develop the country is coming from the natural resources being derived from the oil producing states but they remain the least developed in terms of provision of infrastructural facilities.

“The condition of most residents of the oil producing communities is appalling. Many of them do not have access to drinkable water, decent accommodation, good roads, functional public schools and qualitative health care, among others.”

Opinion leaders in the South-South geopolitical zone also lacerated the northern governors stressing that Aliyu’s position negated true federalism.

Niger Delta activist, Annkio Briggs, said, “If the Niger State Governor said that, I want to tell him that what he said was unfair because his state is not bringing anything to the table.

“The people from the Niger Delta region are bringing the oil that God has given to them. The oil is in our land and it belongs to us.

“I want him to know that it is unfair that there are 36 states in Nigeria and only nine states are actually contributing something; and people who are not contributing anything at all are now talking about injustice.”

Also, the former President of the Ijaw National Congress, Prof. Kimse Okoko, described the position of Aliyu as ‘insensitive.’

He said Aliyu’s position had further reinforced the call for a Sovereign National Conference and the urgent need to amend the 1999 Constitution in favour of true federalism in the country.

He explained, “They are trying to make a case on the basis of their own interest. We have our own interest and we will protect it.

“They don’t experience the kind of severe pollution that the people of our states experience in this country.

“It is not fair that we should bear the environmental destruction caused by oil spills in the litoral states and at the same time share with those people who have absolutely not been affected by any oil pollution. We will just ignore those kinds of statements.”

Similarly, the National Secretary of the Ijaw National Congress, Mr. Robinson Esitei, condemned the demand by the northern governors and advised them to be creative and look for alternative sources of revenue to run their respective states.

He said, “What the northern governors are saying is totally wrong. Our people are saying that they should be in control of the resources found in our communities so that they could pay tax to the centre.

“If you look at the IGR of the states of the North, you find out that it is lower than that of their counterparts in the South because they are relying on allocation from oil proceeds from the Federal Government.

“This cannot be the position of Nigeria now, if the country is to move forward. In fact, we are proposing in the present constitutional amendment that Nigeria should revert back to the regional arrangement where each region would control its resources and pay tax to the centre.

“We are in essence saying that the present formula is disadvantageous to the Niger Delta people who are suffering degradation and other hazards that go with oil exploitation.”

The Governor of Central Bank of Nigeria, Mallam Lamido Sanusi, had in an interview with The Financial Times of London last month, decried what he termed the low allocation to Northern states from the Federation Account.

Sanusi had linked violence in the North, particularly the activities of the Islamic fundamentalist sect, Boko Haram, to the uneven distribution of the country’s wealth.

Currently, the revenue allocation formula is 52.68 for the Federal Government; 26.72 per cent for states; and 20.6 per cent for council areas, while 13 per cent is given to the oil-producing states as derivation.

The 13 per cent derivation was introduced in 1999 as part of measures aimed at redressing the long time grievances of oil-producing states.

Official figures from the government show that Rivers State received N1.053tn between 1999 and 2008 from the federal allocation.

However, two states in the North-East – Yobe and Borno – received N388bn within the same period.


http://www.punchng.com/news/oil-states-reject-norths-demand-for-more-revenue/
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by chino11(m): 1:55pm On Feb 26, 2012
All these abokis should look elsewhere, shameless pigs. They need more money to finance boko haram just like Sanusi is doing in CBN
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by hakanai(m): 1:59pm On Feb 26, 2012
chino11:

All these abokis should look elsewhere, shameless pigs. They need more money to finance boko haram just like Sanusi is doing in CBN
Your comments are actually demeaning.That aside good thing ND governors!!!!!
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by udezue(m): 2:02pm On Feb 26, 2012
Lazy unintelligent unrepentant low-life parasites. They don't even deserve a single allocation talk-less of an increase in what they are already stealing. Throwing money at them is a waste coz most likely they will destroy their region in the name of religious violence or sponsor more terrorism with it.
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by chino11(m): 2:04pm On Feb 26, 2012
What is demeaning about my comment? Isn't boko haram what the North is about? In other words the North is synonymous with Boko Haram, that the simple analysis.
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by chino11(m): 2:07pm On Feb 26, 2012
udezue:

Lazy unintelligent unrepentant low-life parasites. They don't even deserve a single allocation talk-less of an increase in what they are already stealing. Throwing money at them is a waste coz most likely they will destroy their region in the name of religious violence or sponsor more terrorism with it.




You have summerized it all in few lines. The north does not deserve any more money because as you have said their 'leaders' will just channel it towards promoting islamic violent nature.
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by Nobody: 2:39pm On Feb 26, 2012
oil producing states did not share their 50 years of environmental degradation with the North. “Don’t they know about environmental degradation? Don’t they think that people live along the coastline and that they are affected by oil spills and other environmental degradation through the activities of oil companies?
“What have they suffered to justify their demand that they equally get 13 per cent of oil revenue? It is uncalled for.” NO BE D BOKO HARAM GOVERNOR FAULT. If we ve bin practicing true federalism ab initio, parasites like gov aliyu wldnt v hard d balls to ask for more revenue. OLIVER TWIST
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by Nobody: 3:29pm On Feb 26, 2012
Useless northern governors,their allocation will reduce to zero very soon.boko haram sponsors.the useless people keep name droping 19 northern governos while another useless group of middle belt govs-plateau,benue,taraba do not disown their stvpid arewa collegues.
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by PROUDIGBO(m): 4:54pm On Feb 26, 2012
To be fair, they could do with a bit more money, but they should look at the federal gov'ts share as I don't see why they receive as much as they do.
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by Yeske2(m): 12:06am On Feb 27, 2012
Why bother replying? Bunch of ingrates
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by ak47mann(m): 2:22am On Feb 27, 2012
northern nigeria dont like us only our oil is what they want undecided i wonder how u keep giving money to your enemies in the first place?
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by T8ksy(m): 2:46am On Feb 27, 2012
ak47mann:

northern nigeria dont like us only our oil is what they want undecided i wonder how u keep giving money to your enemies in the first place?

Oh so its now that you lot realise that northern nigeria hates the sight of you lot?

Did they not slaughtered you ibos in 1945 in jos? and in 1953? Yet you ibos begged them to join the union.

Na your long throat go kill all of una. Dem neva kill u finish.
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by musiwa43: 5:39am On Feb 27, 2012
I think the 13% should be reviewed. 13% derivation is injustice to some, because nigeria govt earn money from other source which does not have 13%. And oil state should support a new change.
that law should be modified. If not you are callng for war with many state. And since there is bias way in which the derivation is been shared. it must be review.
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by Dainfamous: 5:44am On Feb 27, 2012
musiwa,,.:

I think the 13% should be reviewed. 13% derivation is injustice to some, because nigeria govt earn money from other source which does not have 13%. And oil state should support a new change.
that law should be modified. If not you are callng for war with many state. And since there is bias way in which the derivation is been shared. it must be review.



True because even in SE oil state are not getting what they suppose to get it angry angry
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by musiwa43: 5:53am On Feb 27, 2012
they dont have oil in some state in igboland.   i am supporting the removal of 13% derivation  and also the removal of vat from the law and replacement with 13% state taxes. that way all state can collect 13%. it does not affect ordinary nigerian. it mean 13% of goods sold or transaction , a state must directly collect it.
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by Nobody: 6:11am On Feb 27, 2012
^^why confusing yourself, did the guy said all?

True fiscal fedralism is emerging everyday cheesy

let every family manage her belonging tongue
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by chino11(m): 7:28am On Feb 27, 2012
I hope this monstrous parasites does not come anywhere close to Anambra Orient Pet. Refinery and our oil/gas. cool
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by Nobody: 8:39am On Feb 27, 2012
Only parasites talks abt revenue sharing rather than calling 4d practice of true federalism. Hw can some states be playing d almajiri's card (BEGGERS) for so many yrs nw?
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by Beaf: 9:13am On Feb 27, 2012
I de laf o! The true face of Nigeria shows more clearly everyday.

How is it normal for a governor who is supposed to develop his state to begin calling louder for awuf from other states? How is it normal that the citizens of his state have not risen up to call for his head for embarrassing them so patently when they are not invalids?

What is the use of a governor who is so phucking unimaginative and bereaft of ideas as to make beggarly calls for oil money, while those from whose land it act as the slaves and donkeys for all? It boggles the mind that thousands would actually have queued up, exposed to the vagaries of the elements, uncertain about the violence thugs or govt forces could unleash at any crazed moment. . . to vote for a man whose most creative thought is an ever expanding beggars bowl.

What a country!
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by INFO70: 10:06am On Feb 27, 2012
The NGs should develop their resources to finance whatever they need to fund including BOKO HARAM. They should keep their eyes away from oil money.
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by NaMe4: 10:09am On Feb 27, 2012
See these govs whose states are becoming increasingly unhabitable talking rubbish. More allocation for what?
They haven't tackled security issues chasing investors away.

With the previous allocations they've been receiving, nothing meaningful has been done.
They should increase allocation as other Nigerians are running to the South. Rubbish!
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by Catchfire1: 10:12am On Feb 27, 2012
Seems some of these northern lunatics need money to upgrade from the normal explosives to some nuclear shyte undecided angry
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by gonon: 10:25am On Feb 27, 2012
after using coup to rule and award oil wells to yourselves and your cronies, you still want more money so you can marry more wives and sponsor terrorism, useless mofos. even zamfara state has minerals, if not y should they be complaining of lead poisoning? nasarawa state is called home of solid minerals yet i have not heard of them mining it. what happened to agriculture and destroying all the factories in the north?
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by Samar1: 10:30am On Feb 27, 2012
Constitutionally the oil wealth is belong to d FG,what are ur governors doing with 13 %deriuation, therefore blame ursef
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by Ournaija: 10:32am On Feb 27, 2012
Beaf:

I de laf o! The true face of Nigeria shows more clearly everyday.

How is it normal for a governor who is supposed to develop his state to begin calling louder for awuf from other states? How is it normal that the citizens of his state have not risen up to call for his head for embarrassing them so patently when they are not invalids?

What is the use of a governor who is so phucking unimaginative and bereaft of ideas as to make beggarly calls for oil money, while those from whose land it act as the slaves and donkeys for all? It boggles the mind that thousands would actually have queued up, exposed to the vagaries of the elements, uncertain about the violence thugs or govt forces could unleash at any crazed moment. . . to vote for a man whose most creative thought is an ever expanding beggars bowl.

What a country!

Hey take it easy on Aliyu. Here is a man voted to oversee beggars.  He is only doing his job. After all Awolowo and Azikiwe told us that we are brothers.
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by Nobody: 10:40am On Feb 27, 2012
Samar1:

Constitutionally the oil wealth is belong to d FG,what are ur governors doing with 13 %deriuation, therefore blame ursef
another reason why SNC is urgently needed. this useless land use act and exclusive list jargons is really deceiving some mofos
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by ocelot2006(m): 10:48am On Feb 27, 2012
The current clamour for a review of states' allocations clearly shows a lack of initiatives by northern governors. If the allocations are small, why don't they look inwards and develop the resources they have e.g agriculture, solid minerals, tourism, etc?
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by jpphilips(m): 10:48am On Feb 27, 2012
chei aboki wan chop oil money lool,
dey don tire for nama?
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by bulksms247(m): 10:50am On Feb 27, 2012
Idiots, instead of developing what you have in your lands to make revenue you are busy crying foul waiting for revenues gotten from other peoples land be given to you. Aboki must be an aboki no matter what. Increase their revenue you bring in more boko haram. They have spent all their state money in sponsoring boko haram now they want more funds to be added to the ones they are already getting.
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by PointB: 10:52am On Feb 27, 2012
Northern elites as represented by the likes of El Rufia and Sanusi Lamido Sanusi will never fail to blame their failure to provide leadership and vision to the people on others.

Why is there no free and compulsory primary education in the North? Why are pupils not given free foods, cloths, books, bursary, quarans etc just to get them to go to school? Why are the likes of Sanusi, El Rufia, and even Ribadu not championing western education in the North? Why does an average Northerner think that individual southerners are better off due to 13% Derivative and oil money, rather than imitating their tendency for above average formal education?

It all point to leadership! Frankly speaking the Northern leaders have failed their people. By reaching out only for political power, without paying attention to mental education development, they have sold their people's tomorrow for their today!


El Rufia and co should eat the humble pie, admit they have failed in their responsibility of elevating their people from ignorance and poverty, and then go back to the drawing board. Free and compulsory formal western education should be the starting point in their new thinking, political power is pyrrhic victory, if they ever learn anything from their history!

Even if they get 50% of oil revenue but scorn western education necessary for 21st century world, South will still be ahead in every positive index for years to come.
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by Frankiegul: 11:00am On Feb 27, 2012
Northerners with their Governors should go to blazes, for all i care.
Infact, the one that is given to them should be withdrawn sef.
They should go and eat their groundnuts, murderers,
Re: Oil States Reject North’s Demand For More Revenue by MAYOWAAK: 11:43am On Feb 27, 2012
We cannot say that we exist in a Federal Republic and then some people still think that the way to address their revenue shortfall is to eye the revenues of others. That is not Federalism. You only do that to a conquered people. You only do that to a vassal state. So Nigeria should decide do we really want to be a Federal Republic of Nigeria where we have viable states that pull their own weight o, r do we want to pretend by calling ourselves a Federal Republic while the reality is that there is nothing Federal about the Republic and we are really a Unitary Republic of Nigeria where states depend on one unitary commodity (oil) and abandon other resources (such as agriculture, solid minerals and manufacturing)

(1) (2) (Reply)

Watch & Download Video Abubakar Shekau, Vows To Attack Emir Sanusi Of Kano / Why Is Buhari Absent From The Debate? / Ambode At The Closing Ceremony Of National Women’s Conference

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 61
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.