~Bluetooth:


Ok. . . .Ramirez and drogba then cuz it seems you like them black.

BlueMurder: where that Alvez wey just dey run in mouth anyhow?

e dey go house

mama-gee:
Where are those that dissed ronaldo yesterday as being a big game flop?

Is it fair to call messi a big game flop too?

Funny enough ronaldo got an assist while messi scored 0 goals and 0 assists.

I see people eating their own words now.

ddippset: what are you talking about? we visited london and had our hosts camped in their 18 yard box almost throughout, limiting them to a 30% ball possession and a few passes. ronaldo and co visited munich and were totally outplayed outplayed. did you not see messi penetrating the chelsea defence like great big pu**y? is it about assist? just that final assist from messi to pedro was better than everything ronaldo did in 90 mins. just that one among many.

Funkymallam:

Stories!

bright007: That ŵăš not å goal!

sweetcocoa: You ain't serious dude,what will then happen if chelsea wins?

ddippset: what are you talking about? we visited london and had our hosts camped in their 18 yard box almost throughout, limiting them to a 30% ball possession and a few passes. ronaldo and co visited munich and were totally outplayed outplayed. did you not see messi penetrating the chelsea defence like great big pu**y? is it about assist? [size=18pt]just that final assist from messi to pedro was better than everything ronaldo did in 90 mins.[/size] just that one among many.

Quit grasping at straws!
So messi chasing shadows throughout the match is better than a performance that actually ended up giving madrid hope for the second leg, that's the only thing that matters in a crucial match like this one not failed attempts or misses.

Comparing messi's par performance that led to 0 goals after more than 50 passes made to him for the whole 90+ mins is quite funny considering the fact that ronaldo got less of the ball because of mourinho's tactics of equalizing and then defending the rest of match instead of attacking but he still assisted mesut ozil to tie the match before they conceded a late goal.

Assist? since when did a failed attempt to pass the ball turn into an assist? Did pedro score?

So you're comparing an assist that led to a goal after 54mins to a full 90mins of misses and shadow chasing.

Funny enough, you're the only one that thinks messi performed well today because most if not all of the football sites voted him as the flop of the match so continue telling yourself that messi's 0 assists and 0 goals in 90+ mins is better than 1 assist after 54mins that later turned into a defensive battlefield instead of a real football match.

And by the way ronaldo got a far higher rating for his performance than messi.

eyoniggar: ^^^ You have been a client from day 1 mama-gee. Who cares if ur in da Antarctic Zone. What I know is your points/contributions as regards football are always irrelevant, so its better you make up your time sleeping/hibernating,jst make sure you dont shut down.

Sure sir, will do as you said, your bed is calling.

1forall: Again tonight, clearly, Chelsea's weakest link = John Mikel Obi

1forall: Again tonight, clearly, Chelsea's weakest link = John Mikel Obi

mama-gee:
Looks like eyoniggar has finally gone to bed as expected.

Back to topic: I have a feeling madrid will thrash munich in the second leg and barcelona will make it to the final.

ddippset: what are you talking about? we visited london and had our hosts camped in their 18 yard box almost throughout, limiting them to a 30% ball possession and a few passes. ronaldo and co visited munich and were totally outplayed outplayed. did you not see messi penetrating the chelsea defence like great big pu**y? is it about assist? just that final assist from messi to pedro was better than everything ronaldo did in 90 mins. just that one among many.

Kingsleyinfo: Why are people so biased, have u ever watched a match where barca has beaten Chelsea by more than 1 goal, because as for me I can't remember. Make una remind me o...... Na wetin dey the bou camp sef? We have had more draws there....

Even barca knows its not childs play to meet with Chelsea.
and since when did it become a crime to defend, if that's our strategy, then its working for us.
We change strategy as situation demands.
Please if una nor fit analyse match as e be make una go sleep. Barcelona were attacking and they did it 90%
Chelsea were defending and they did it 100%
So in ür own logic, who was the better side.
Technically we were better, barca has their style,
chelsea has theirs? Ours have prevailed that's what matters.
for barca to score Chelsea 2 unreplied goals will be a feat for them. So even if they win 2-1 Chelsea will still go through on away goals rule.
have u ever seen Chelsea putting pressure on a team, pls go and watch our matches, and u will understand why barca will have a hard time beating Chelsea.

Barca was good, but Chelsea were better.
The more technical side one, simples......

Sijo01:

i get reason o.
If i buy bottle n fight come start for NL viewing center, watin go happen is beta imagin o

4ward: UP CHELSEA.MAN U,REAL M,INTER,MANCITY ALL TRY 2 STOP THE SO CALL UNSTOPPABLE BARCA.BLUES DON DO AM OOOO.DROGBA U 2 BADDDDDDDDDD.GGGGGGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL.

EVEN IF U TRY WIN OR DRAW 2ND LEG WE DON WE DIS SHA .

EBI LIKE SAY MR INESTA,MESSI TIGER &FABREGAS DEY BENCH.OOOOOO SORRY DEN DEY FEILD .OK NOW

1forall: Again tonight, clearly, Chelsea's weakest link = John Mikel Obi