Godx:

It's very reasonable to compare them. La Liga is still deemed uncompetitive and an easy league despite most of their teams dominating Europe in recent times. La liga team performance in Europe have not stopped epl fan boys from ridiculing the league. So epl team performance in Europe this past 2 seasons has not reflect the actual quality of the league.

Suggesting La Liga as an uncompetitive and easy league would be fairly accurate considering the resource gap between the haves and have nots.
This is not applicable to EPL

Do you agree EPL was also weak the season Pep won by 19 points or your bias is only applicable to Klopp and Liverpool?

Performance in Europe reflects quality in and of the League. There is a reason we have coefficients mate

Godx:

Liverpool would not have won 25matches and drawn 1 if the rest teams were up to the task. It's as simple as that. They will be no need to keep up when Liverpool are losing and drawing matches against the other teams.

Based on what evidence? They only lost 1 the previous season. What you are witnessing is a team at its peak. Simple!! I don't know why you are stretching yourself beyond biological boundaries to discredit them

airmark:


I thought i edited it.

They lost once in 2009/2010 in 38 laliga matches and it was an away match. But lost twice in Ucl, one at home to fvcking Rubin Kazan.

Can we say laliga was weak that season?

BARCELONA drew 6 and lost 1. That shows in 7 contests they met their match
compare that to Liverpool that has drawn just 1

For Liverpool to meet that Barcelona season, out of the last 12 games they will have to lose 1 and draw 5

A40:
Iyen o kan aye. Liverpool didn't know what they were doing last season too else they would have won back to back

The entire league didn't know what they were doing when pap fraudiola Laumdeuter won epl twice.

raumdeuter:


That shows the rivals standards dropped

What of in Europe? Where they are dominating the rest of the competition

A40:
Suggesting La Liga as an uncompetitive and easy league would be fairly accurate considering the resource gap between the haves and have nots.
This is not applicable to EPL

Do you agree EPL was also weak the season Pep won by 19 points or your bias is only applicable to Klopp and Liverpool?

Performance in Europe reflects quality in and of the League. There is a reason we have coefficients mate

You have been basing the EPL strenght on performance on the field, why not use that metrics for La Liga when Madrid was winning the treble and Sevilla was dominating the lesser cup

A40:
What of in Europe? Where they are dominating the rest of the competition

In Europe this season out of 6 games they dropped points in 2. IUnlike EPL where they are 25-1-0

lordfalcao:
I don’t know why am seeing tears all over this place about bad officiating..

Una don forget karma is a bitch, when una dy laugh Man U and man city when officials go against them nko.

Now is our turn to feel the pain, abeg mk una no disturb us about officiating here

One of those olorigbeskeres that wanted Lampard and Chelsea to slump, because we didn't accept he succeeded earlier with their Sarri's framework.

raumdeuter:


They simply failed to make that feat because they had quality opposition which Liverpool is lacking

This same Liverpool that lost 1 in 64 games has lost 2 times in 13 CL games in the same time

The quality of opposition is not verifiable or juxtaposable (apologies Donjazet) so this argument is neither here nor there

Losing in CL games but it did not hurt their overall objective did it?

lordfalcao:
liverpool knew what they were doing. Another team that knows what they where doing overtook them by a marginal gap

You can't know what you are doing and lose a 7 point advantage I'm sorry

A40:
Suggesting La Liga as an uncompetitive and easy league would be fairly accurate considering the resource gap between the haves and have nots.
This is not applicable to EPL

Do you agree EPL was also weak the season Pep won by 19 points or your bias is only applicable to Klopp and Liverpool?

Performance in Europe reflects quality in and of the League. There is a reason we have coefficients mate

The resource gap between the have and have not in England is still big despite the TV revenue and no it doesn't. A team could finish 7th in league and yet still go on to win the champions league. Liverpool have lost a game in the champions league in just 6matches yet are unbeaten in 25 league matches. That should tell you something

raumdeuter:


Wenger did not go 25-1-0 Infact no one in Europe has done it before

Exactly. So give credit where it's due

A40:
The quality of opposition is not verifiable or juxtaposable (apologies Donjazet) so this argument is neither here nor there

Losing in CL games but it did not hurt their overall objective did it?

Last season and this

In Europe Liverpool played 19 games lost to PSG, Red Star,Napoli(twice) that is 4 loses in 19 games in Europe

In the league 64 games Liverpool lost 1 time

4/19 vs 1/64

A40:
Exactly. So give credit where it's due

Credit is given with a bit of context. You are just against any type of context and looking at the raw figures.

Godx:

Using point tally argument doesn't work. Because I reached 90points in 2017 doesn't mean I will achieve the same thing in 2003. Technically speaking you are correct their point tally was the 2nd highest but saying they would have won the league apart from 2 seasons is you hyping them as usual.

How can it not work?

If for nothing else that will at least help you appreciate the difficulty of opposition and what it took for them to not win the league.

You literally cannot prove that they don't win the league any other year but those two years. I can theoretically say they can but you have absolutely no shot at proving they can't

raumdeuter:


BARCELONA drew 6 and lost 1. That shows in 7 contests they met their match
compare that to Liverpool that has drawn just 1

For Liverpool to meet that Barcelona season, out of the last 12 games they will have to lose 1 and draw 5

That means nobody was strong enough to defeat Barcelona at home like Rubin Kazan. The drawn matches might even be when their key players were rested, so you can't just scratch it on the surface.

A40:
Exactly. So give credit where it's due

The credit will be befitting if they are coasting in Europe the same way they are doing locally

If you are 4 losses in 19 in Europe but 1 loss in 64 in the league should tell us the competition locally is not comparable to what they are facing in Europe

airmark:


One of those olorigbeskeres that wanted Lampard and Chelsea to slump, because we didn't accept he succeeded earlier with their Sarri's framework.

mumu that’s why you are now watching with a relaxed mind.

diggz:


The entire league didn't know what they were doing when pap fraudiola Laumdeuter won epl twice.

I tire. The league was not weak when Pep won with 19pts

airmark:


That means nobody was strong enough to defeat Barcelona at home like Rubin Kazan. The drawn matches might even be when their key players were rested, so you can't just scratch it on the surface.

WHy dont you stick to what you know?
What we know is Brcelona dropped points in 7 matches that season, compare that to Liverpool this season

A40:
Based on what evidence? They only lost 1 the previous season. What you are witnessing is a team at its peak. Simple!! I don't know why you are stretching yourself beyond biological boundaries to discredit them

You keep combining both seasons in order to make them what they are not. Last season is gone and they finished as the best losers. When they meet a team capable of matching them in accumulating wins upon wins the ended up as losers. Now that there is no competition they are running away with it. This should tell you something now imagine if the rest top teams were up for a title challenge.

raumdeuter:


You have been basing the EPL strenght on performance on the field, why not use that metrics for La Liga when Madrid was winning the treble and Sevilla was dominating the lesser cup

When did Madrid win treble?

So when Barcelona was dominating with superior financial power than the rest of their league everybody crowned them the best team in club history.

So if Liverpool somehow win CL again this year what is the coherent argument that can be made that they don't deserve to be in the conversation

A40:
I tire. The league was not weak when Pep won with 19pts

Anything to make the baldiola pap fraudiola Laumdeuter look like a great coach.

raumdeuter:


In Europe this season out of 6 games they dropped points in 2. IUnlike EPL where they are 25-1-0

Europe is tougher than EPL. Open secret.

A40:
You can't know what you are doing and lose a 7 point advantage I'm sorry

are you not the same person who said man city won 18 straight games?? Liverpool were evening doing well if not for that type of massive win which saw man city gap them.

A40:
I tire. The league was not weak when Pep won with 19pts

very soon you people will deviate to pep vs guardiola argument

Godx:

The resource gap between the have and have not in England is still big despite the TV revenue and no it doesn't. A team could finish 7th in league and yet still go on to win the champions league. Liverpool have lost a game in the champions league in just 6matches yet are unbeaten in 25 league matches. That should tell you something

That tells me there are better teams in Europe than in England but still does not diminish the fact that they are the best team in Europe.

So if they are good enough for Europe and still dominate the league. Why then are you making excuses instead of giving due credit

A40:
How can it not work?

If for nothing else that will at least help you appreciate the difficulty of opposition and what it took for them to not win the league.

You literally cannot prove that they don't win the league any other year but those two years. I can theoretically say they can but you have absolutely no shot at proving they can't

You can only match your nearest competitor. If I am in a title race and my nearest opponent can only attain 80 to 90 points that will also be my objective. One can say Liverpool only reached 95points because that's what it will take to catch City. If the previous past winners were up against a team guaranteed to reach 96points then that will also be their objective.

raumdeuter:


WHy dont you stick to what you know?
What we know is Brcelona dropped points in 7 matches that season, compare that to Liverpool this season

What i know is what you first posted, number of losses in local league and ucl. You should stick to it.

Barca lost once and away in laliga but got sodomised at home by fvcking Rubin Kazan. While your useless Mourinhoe completed the banging in Ucl.

Laliga was too weak that year for that to happen bro.

raumdeuter:


Last season and this

In Europe Liverpool played 19 games lost to PSG, Red Star,Napoli(twice) that is 4 loses in 19 games in Europe

In the league 64 games Liverpool lost 1 time

4/19 vs 1/64

And they are reigning Champions of Europe. No?

This league argument would be valid if they are not winning the CL or reaching the Finals in the last two years

Godx:

Credit is given with a bit of context. You are just against any type of context and looking at the raw figures.

You are not giving any credit at all.

That's why you are still drumming on this weak league line for a team that is quite clearly the best in Europe

airmark:


What i know is what you first posted, number of losses in local league and ucl. You should stick to it.

Barca lost once and away in laliga but got sodomised at home by fvcking Rubin Kazan. While your useless Mourinhoe completed the banging in Ucl.

Laliga was too weak that year for that to happen bro.

What I posted is Barcelona dropped points in 7 games, Liverpool has dropped points in just 1 game

Now draw your correlation