papa giddy: now,OBAMA is voted out. he has lost the election already. u just watch!

papa giddy: now,OBAMA is voted out. he has lost the election already. u just watch!

omo~fat:
Obama is not your pastor ooooo.

Obama is president of the US, sworn to uphold something called the constitution.

The country is not a theocracy ooo.

dayokanu: I am with Obama on this

Even if I dont support their practices, I cant deny their rights

And some ppl yelling today. That was the same way anyone who supported women right, civil rights etc years back was viewed

pelezico: Separation of Church and state is misunderstood by almost everybody except Christians. It was never the intention of Thomas Jefferson (the 3rd President of the US who first coined this term ) to exclude religious convictions from Politics but to stop interference of Government in Church affairs.

His letter to the Danbury Baptist association in the state of Connecticut by Thomas Jefferson explains this very clearly. Those in favour of not allowing men with natural basic Godly convictions (think conscience) of which all people possess to one degree of another is literally enslavement.

Here in the UK the State (well we do follow after Marxs manifesto) are doing the same trying to redefine marriage thereby aboloshing marriage since a redefining of it destroys its meaning completely.

Matthew 19
But he answered and said to them, “Have you not read that he who made from the beginning, made them male and female?” 5And he said, “Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and shall cleave to his wife and the two of them shall be one flesh.” 6“Therefore they were not two, but one flesh. The things therefore that God has united let not a man separate.”

big_sean:
Its official u have interpreted the whole church and state thing upside down, i cant laugh at u enough.
youtube JFK's church and state speech, then cover your head in shame for trying to mislead people.
and u do know JFK fought for civil rights, one of the reasons he got killed!

dayokanu: I am with Obama on this

Even if I dont support their practices, I cant deny their rights

And some ppl yelling today. That was the same way anyone who supported women right, civil rights etc years back was viewed

asscend: When Civil Partenships was granted, they told us they will not in anyway tamper with Marriage as we all know it to be, now they want to go a step further and endorse it. Anyway i hope the Senate chucks it out when it comes to them.

Kay 17:

Exactly, the substance being protected is the rights. Not whether u enjoy the acts.

big_sean:
pls tell them there is separation of church and state over here.
Some people will find it hard to get used to that.
but that is how the US government was built to work

Kay 17:

The Nigerian constitution guarantees it too.

Delafruita: av noticed that when gay topics arise,some hypocritical buffoons start quoting and misquoting.i agree the Bible condemns it but doesnt the bible condemn adultery,polygamy and many other things that are prevalent in our society?why will i deny another person his own sin(no matter how ludicrous) when i also commit mine?

GAR3TH: But just for the record, like I said before on this thread and others, WHAT DO GAY PEOPLE 3000 MILES AWAY CONCERN YOU. DOES THE NIGERIAN ECONOMY CRASH BECAUSE OF GAY PEOPLE OR DOES THE PRICE OF OIL TRIPLE OR IS CORRUPTION CAUSED BY GAY PEOPLE? WETIN CONCERN YOU ABOUT THE LIVES OF SOMEONE ELSE 3000 MILES AWAY OR EVEN YOUR NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR. NOTHING!!! people are just sticking their noises into arguments that wont even affect them nor the country. Thats just being an instigator and a bigot. If gay marriage is past or not or if obama approves of it or not who cares, life still goes on as usually and nothing will change. Hence why I and many others find it !funny that many people are so sentimental about this issue even though it does not involve them. this hole gay marriage thing is blown out of proportion by people who have nothing better to do.

pelezico: Separation of Church and state is misunderstood by almost everybody except Christians. It was never the intention of Thomas Jefferson (the 3rd President of the US who first coined this term ) to exclude religious convictions from Politics but to stop interference of Government in Church affairs.

His letter to the Danbury Baptist association in the state of Connecticut by Thomas Jefferson explains this very clearly. Those in favour of not allowing men with natural basic Godly convictions (think conscience) of which all people possess to one degree of another is literally enslavement.

Here in the UK the State (well we do follow after Marxs manifesto) are doing the same trying to redefine marriage thereby aboloshing marriage since a redefining of it destroys its meaning completely.

Matthew 19
But he answered and said to them, “Have you not read that he who made from the beginning, made them male and female?” 5And he said, “Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and shall cleave to his wife and the two of them shall be one flesh.” 6“Therefore they were not two, but one flesh. The things therefore that God has united let not a man separate.”

Chrisbenogor: They have a right to practice what they want and if they want the full rights of a married couple they should go ahead and have it.

Delafruita:
you guys are pathetic.the man is expressing his opinion which coincidentally is shared by numerous people.am sure soon the 'religious" group will appear with their words:abominable,shameful,soddom&gomorrah etc

asscend: Sodom and Gomorah was given to us as an example so we don't repeat same mistake, unfortunately people see it as mere fiction, another time They also laughed at Noah until the floods came...

The wise ones will only warn against such and will not take part, in a very short while the consequences of such decisions will be clear for all to see.

elliottibanga:

Please review the following at your own convenience. And remember this, Google is your friend!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals

dayokanu: I am with Obama on this

Even if I dont support their practices, I cant deny their rights

And some ppl yelling today. That was the same way anyone who supported women right, civil rights etc years back was viewed

Nebeuwa: President Obama will not lose silly Nairalanders, because of same-sex marriage.

Even if President Obama does not win the popular vote, he will most likely have the Electoral College vote and that is what matters.

I will be voting for President Obama regardless, because I cannot see myself voting against the first black president. And that is the honest truth.

Sagamite:

Please note that Homosexual behaviours does not imply Homosexuals. There are no records of Homosexual animals.

And remember, God gave you your brain for reasoning. Use it for that!

Sagamite:

Please note that Homosexual behaviours does not imply Homosexuals. There are no records of Homosexual animals.

And remember, God gave you your brain for reasoning. Use it for that!

In 1998 two male Griffon vultures named Dashik and Yehuda, at the Jerusalem Biblical Zoo, engaged in "open and energetic sex" and built a nest. The keepers provided the couple with an artificial egg, which the two parents took turns incubating; and 45 days later, the zoo replaced the egg with a baby vulture. The two male vultures raised the chick together.[47] A few years later, however, Yehuda became interested in a female vulture that was brought into the aviary. Dashik became depressed, and was eventually moved to the zoological research garden at Tel Aviv University where he too set up a nest with a female vulture.

Sagamite:

If I was in America, I would vote against him straight up. I vote for people based on principles and visions I agree with.

manny4life:
So in other words, straight behaviors does not imply heterosexual, right? I mean that explains a lot on this thread.

According to that link, here is an excerpt from the first paragraph

Homosexual behavior in animals refers to the documented evidence of homosexual and bisexual behavior in various (non-human) species. Such behaviors include sex, courtship, affection, pair bonding, and parenting among same sex animals.

So are you trying to convince us in the bold that these behaviors doesn't constitute homosexual?

Sagamite:

What a stewpid question?

If someone exihibits heterosexual behaviour and is heterosexual, does that not make him heterosexual?

Tough question?

Yeah, I knew you will struggle with it. Let me make it clearer.

If someone exhibits homosexual behaviour and is heterosexual, does that not make him homosexual?

Are prisoners that bone each others arse automatically homosexuals?

Show me a gay animal!!!

There are reasons why heterosexual animals can exhibit homosexual behaviours that does not mean they are homosexual animals.

Start using your brain to dissect what you are fed so you are not led to have rubbish opinions. Even the authors of the reports you point ensured they did not claim to have seen gay animals. They claim to have seen gay BEHAVIOUR!