Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,151,339 members, 7,811,985 topics. Date: Monday, 29 April 2024 at 04:40 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Science/Technology / Evidence Of The Bing B4ng Theory (1057 Views)
NASA Confirms Evidence That Liquid Water Flows On Today’s Mars / NASA Mars Rover Finds Evidence Of Life-friendly Ancient Lake / What Exactly Happened To The Lost Apollo 18 Astronauts! Act Of God Or Man Theory (2) (3) (4)
Evidence Of The Bing B4ng Theory by ghostofsparta(m): 9:50am On Jul 13, 2012 |
I created this topic on this sub-forum since it pertains to science and not religion, as a response to all religious apologists such as davidylan and DeepDaftedSight We are all here to learn so any comment shouldn't contain insult or abuse. No beefing please. The B4ng Theory - Evidence for the Theory What are the major evidences which support the Big B4ng theory? First of all, we are reasonably certain that the universe had a beginning. Second, galaxies appear to be moving away from us at speeds proportional to their distance. This is called "Hubble's Law," named after Edwin Hubble (1889-1953) who discovered this phenomenon in 1929. This observation supports the expansion of the universe and suggests that the universe was once compacted. Third, if the universe was initially very, very hot as the Big B4ng suggests, we should be able to find some remnant of this heat. In 1965, Radioastronomers Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson discovered a 2.725 degree Kelvin (-454.765 degree Fahrenheit, -270.425 degree Celsius) Cosmic Microwave Background radiation (CMB) which pervades the observable universe. This is thought to be the remnant which scientists were looking for. Penzias and Wilson shared in the 1978 Nobel Prize for Physics for their discovery. Finally, the abundance of the "light elements" Hydrogen and Helium found in the observable universe are thought to support the Big Bang model of origins. |
Re: Evidence Of The Bing B4ng Theory by Nobody: 5:47pm On Jul 13, 2012 |
ghostofsparta: I created this topic on this sub-forum since it pertains to science and not religion, as a response to all religious apologists such as davidylan and DeepDaftedSight Please obviously this is not your own work since you dont know anything. It might be helpful if you add a reference for this copy-paste job. |
Re: Evidence Of The Bing B4ng Theory by ghostofsparta(m): 9:42am On Jul 14, 2012 |
davidylan: ofcourse not my write-up. I never said it is. Davidylan why are you always antagonistic towards me. My bad for not inserting the link to the source. I forgot to do that while editing ba•ng to b4ng because its annoying when the bots replaces it with slam. |
Re: Evidence Of The Bing B4ng Theory by Nobody: 2:52pm On Jul 14, 2012 |
ghostofsparta: I'm not antagonistic towards YOU persay, just that from experience i am very used to atheists coming here claiming opinions they merely copied verbatim from websites. I put it to you that if google didnt exist many of you would be completely unable to justify your atheist stand. I also notice that you STILL have refused to include your reference. Still busy? |
(1) (Reply)
Large Hadron Collider: 6 Implications Of Finding A Higgs Boson Particle / $1 Trillion Trove Of Rare Minerals Revealed Under Afghanistan / I Cant Find My Beer Inside The Bottle Even When The TOP Is Still Intact
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 17 |